Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Wild bee pollination networks in northern New England

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Journal of Insect Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Conserving and maintaining a diverse assemblage of wild bees is essential for a healthy and functioning ecosystem, as species are uniquely evolved to deliver specific plant–pollination requirements. Understanding the biology and ecology of bees in poorly studied regions is the first step towards conservation. Detailed surveys in New Hampshire reveal a broad diversity of 118 species of wild bees in different guilds and habitats including 17 bee species representing new state records. Network analyses reveal a complex community structure and relatively poorly connected plant–pollinator associations, thus species may be susceptible to disturbance. Phenological analyses document that at least one representative of five native bee families was present throughout the foraging season and both abundance and diversity were highest in June and July. This study provides important baseline information on bee abundance, diversity, phenology, and host plant associations necessary for future conservation efforts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ascher JS, Kornbluth S, Goelet RG (2014) Bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Anthophila) of Gardiners Island, Suffolk County, New York. Northeast Nat 21:47–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailes EJ, Ollerton J, Pattrick JG, Glover BJ (2015) How can understanding of plant–pollinator interactions contribute to global food security? Curr Opin Plant 26:72–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartomeus I, Ascher JS, Gibbs J, Danforth BN, Wagner DL, Hedtke SM, Winfree R (2013) Historical changes in northeastern US bee pollinators related to shared ecological traits. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:4656–4660

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bommarco R, Kleijn D, Potts SG (2013) Ecological intensification: harnessing ecosystem services for food security. Trends Ecol Evol 28:230–238

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burkle LA, Marlin JC, Knight TM (2013) Plant–pollinator interactions over 120 years: loss of species, co-occurrence and function. Science 339:1611–1615

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burnham KP, Overton WS (1978) Estimation of the size of a closed population when capture probabilities vary among animals. Biometrika 65:625–633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnham KP, Overton WS (1979) Robust estimation of population size when capture probabilities vary among animals. Ecology 60:927–936

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bushmann SL, Drummond FA (2015) Abundance and diversity of wild bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) found in lowbush blueberry growing regions of downeast Maine. Environ Entomol 44:975–989. doi:10.1093/ee/nvv082

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron SA, Lozier JD, Strange JP, Koch JB, Cordes N, Solter LF, Griswold TL (2011) Patterns of widespread decline in North American bumble bees. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:662–667

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cardinale BJ, Duffy JE, Gonzalez A, Hooper DU, Perrings C, Venail P, Narwani A, Mace GM, Tilman D, Wardle DA, Kinzig AP, Daily GC, Loreau M, Grace JB, Larigauderie A, Srivastava DS, Naeem S (2012) Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature 486:59–67

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chandler DS, Peck SB (1992) Diversity and seasonality of Leiodid Beetles (Coleoptera: Leiodidae) in an old-growth and a 40-year-old forest in New Hampshire. Environ Entomol 21:1283–1293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chao A (1984) Nonparametric estimation of the number of classes in a population. Scand J Stat 11:265–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Chao A (1987) Estimating the population size for capture-recapture data with unequal catchability. Biometrics 43:783–791

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chao A, Lee S-M (1992) Estimating the number of classes via sample coverage. J Am Stat Assoc 87:210–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colla SR, Packer L (2008) Evidence for decline in eastern North American bumblebees (Hymenoptera: Apidae), with special focus on Bombus affinis Cresson. Biodivers Conserv 17:1379–1391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colla SR, Gadallah F, Richardson L, Wagner D, Gall L (2012) Assessing declines of North American bumble bees (Bombus spp.) using museum specimens. Biodivers Conserv 21:3585–3595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colwell RK, Coddington JA (1994) Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation. Philos Trans R Soc B 345:101–118

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dormann CF, Gruber B, Fruend J (2008) Introducing the bipartite package: analysing ecological networks. R news 8:8–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Dormann CF, Fruend J, Bluethgen N, Gruber B (2009) Indices, graphs and null models: analyzing bipartite ecological networks. Open Ecol J 2:7–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Droege S (2015) The very handy manual: how to catch and identify bees and manage a collection. USGS Native Bee Inventory and Monitoring Lab

  • Dunne JA, Williams RJ, Martinez ND (2002) Food-web structure and network theory: the role of connectance and size. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:12917–12922

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Galeano J, Pastor JM, Iriondo JM (2009) Weighted-interaction nestedness estimator (WINE): a new estimator to calculate over frequency matrices. Environ Model Softw 24:1342–1346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallai N, Salles J-M, Settele J, Vaissiere BE (2009) Economic valuation of the vulnerability of world agriculture. Ecol Econ 68:810–821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garibaldi LA, Steffan-Dewenter I, Winfree R, Aizen MA, Bommarco R, Cunningham SA, Kremen C, Carvalheiro LG, Harder LD, Afik O, Bartomeus I, Benjamin F, Boreux V, Cariveau D, Chacoff NP, Dudenhoffer JH, Freitas BM, Ghazoul J, Greenleaf S, Hipolito J, Holzschuh A, Howlett B, Isaacs R, Javorek SK, Kennedy CM, Krewenka KM, Krishnan S, Mandelik Y, Mayfield MM, Motzke I, Munyuli T, Nault BA, Otieno M, Petersen J, Pisanty G, Potts SG, Rader R, Rickets TH, Rundlof M, Seymour CL, Schuepp C, Szentgyorgyi H, Taki H, Tscharntke T, Vergara CH, Viana BF, Wanger TC, Westphal C, Williams N, Klein AM (2013) Wild pollinators enhance fruit set of crops regardless of honey bee abundance. Science 339:1608–1611

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Garibaldi LA, Bartomeus I, Bommarco R, Klein AM, Cunningham SA, Aizen MA, Boreux V, Garratt MPD, Carvalheiro LG, Kremen C, Morales CL, Schuepp C, Chacoff NP, Freitas BM, Gagic V, Holzschuh A, Klatt BK, Krewenka KM, Krishnan S, Mayfield MM, Motzke I, Otieno M, Petersen J, Potts SG, Ricketts TH, Rundlof M, Sciligo A, Sinu PA, Steffan-Dewenter I, Taki H, Tscharntke T, Vergara CH, Viana BF, Woyciechowski M (2015) Trait matching of flower visitors and crops predicts fruit set better than trait diversity. J Appl Ecol 52:1436–1444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs J (2011) Revision of the metallic Lasioglossum (Dialictus) of eastern North America (Hymenoptera: Halictidae: Halictini). Zootaxa 3073:1–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill RJ, Baldock KCR, Brown MJF, Cresswell JE, Dicks LV, Fountain MT, Garratt MPD, Gough LA, Heard MS, Holland JM, Ollerton J, Stone GN, Tang CQ, Vanbergen AJ, Vogler AP, Woodward G, Arce AN, Boatman ND, Brand-Hardy R, Breeze TD, Green M, Hartfield CM, O’Connor RS, Osborne JL, Phillips J, Sutton PB, Potts SG (2016) Protecting an ecosystem service: approaches to understanding and mitigating threats to wild insect pollinators. Adv Ecol Res 54:135–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein PZ, Ascher JS (2016) Taxonomic and behavioral composition of an island fauna: a survey of bees (Hymenopter: Apoidea: Anthophila) on Martha’s Vineyard, Massachusetts. Proc Entomol Soc Wash 118:37–92. doi:10.4289/0013-8797.118.1.37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grixti JC, Packer L (2006) Changes in the bee fauna (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) of an old field site in southern Ontario, revisited after 34 years. Can Entomol 138:147–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Julier HE, Roulston TH (2009) Wild bee abundance and pollination service in cultivated pumpkins: farm management, nesting behavior and landscape effects. J Econ Entomol 102:563–573

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr JT, Pindar A, Galpern P, Packer L, Potts SG, Roberts SM, Rasmont P, Schweiger O, Colla SR, Richardson LL, Wagner DL, Gall LF, Sikes DS, Pantoja A (2015) Climate change impacts on bumblebees converge across continents. Science 349:177–180

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klein A-M, Vaissiere BE, Cane JH, Steffan-Dewenter I, Cunningham SA, Kremen C, Tscharntke T (2007) Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops. Proc R Soc B 274:303–312

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Koh I, Lonsdorf EV, Williams NM, Brittain C, Isaacs R, Gibbs J, Ricketts TH (2016) Modeling the status, trends, and impacts of wild bee abundance in the United States. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113:140–145

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kremen C, Williams NM, Aizen MA, Gemmill-Herren B, LeBuhn G, Minckley R, Packer L, Potts SG, Roulston T, Steffan-Dewenter I, Vazquez P, Winfree R, Adams L, Crone EE, Greenleaf SS, Keitt TH, Klein M, Regetz J, Ricketts TH (2007) Pollination and other ecosystem services produced by mobile organisms: a conceptual framework for the effects of land-use change. Ecol Lett 10:299–314

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Matteson KC, Ascher JS, Langellotto GA (2008) Bee richness and abundance in New York City urban gardens. Ann Entomol Soc Am 101:140–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Memmott J (1999) The structure of a plant–pollinator food web. Ecol Lett 2:276–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michener CD, McGinley RJ, Danforth BN (1994) The bee genera of North and Central America. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Minckley RL, Cane JH, Kervin L, Roulston TH (1999) Spatial predictability and resource specialization of bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) at a superabundant, widespread resource. Biol J Linn Soc 67:119–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell TB (1960) Bees of the eastern United States, vol 1. Technical Bulletin No 141, North Carolina Agricultural Experiment Station. Raleigh, North Carolina

  • Mitchell TB (1962) Bees of the eastern United States, vol 2. Technical Bulletin No 152, North Carolina Agricultural Experiment Station. Raleigh, North Carolina

  • Ollerton J, Winfree R, Tarrant S (2011) How many flowering plants are pollinated by animals? Oikos 120:321–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potts SG, Biesmeijer JC, Kremen C, Neumann P, Schweiger O, Kunin WE (2010) Global pollinator declines: trends, impacts and drivers. Trends Ecol Evol 25:345–353

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rehan SM, Sheffield CS (2011) Morphological and molecular delineation of a new species in the Ceratina dupla species-group (Hymenoptera: Apidae) of eastern North America. Zootaxa 2873:35–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards MH, Rutgers-Kelly A, Gibbs J, Vickruck JL, Rehan SM, Sheffield CS (2011) Bee diversity in naturalizing patches of Carolinian grasslands in southern Ontario, Canada. Can Entomol 143:279–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russo L, DeBarros N, Yang S, Shea K, Mortensen D (2013) Supporting crop pollinators with floral resources: network-based phonological matching. Ecol Evol 3:3125–3140

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Senapathi D, Carvalheiro LG, Biesmeijer JC, Dodson C-A, Evans RL, McKerchar M, Morton RD, Moss ED, Roberts SPM, Kunin WE, Potts SG (2015) The impact of over 80 years of land cover changes on bee and wasp pollinator communities in England. Proc R Soc B 282:20150294

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Stine A, Vaughan M, Adamson N, Gill K, Mader E, Shrader C, Barbour PJ, Henry H (2015) Using 2014 farm bill programs for pollinator conservation, 2nd ed USDA, Biological technical note no 78

  • Tripodi AD, Szalanski AL (2015) The bumble bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Bombus) of Arkansas, 50 years later. J Melittology 50:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan M, Hopwood J, Lee-Mader E, Shepherd M, Kremen C, Stine A, Black SH (2015) Farming for bees: guidelines for providing native bee habitat on farms. The Xerces Society for invertebrate conservation

  • Wagner DL, Ascher JS, Bricker NK (2014) A transmission right-of-way as habitat for wild bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Anthphila) in Connecticut. Ann Entomol Soc Am 107:110–1120. doi:10.1603/AN14001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J-P (2011) SPECIES: an R package for species richness estimation. J Stat Softw 40:1–15. URL http://www.jstatsoft.org/v40/i09/

  • Weiner CN, Werner M, Linsenmair KE, Bluthgen N (2014) Land-use impacts on plant–pollinator networks: interaction strength and specialization predict declines. Ecology 95:466–474

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wickham H (2009) ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Williams PH, Thorp RW, Richardson LL, Colla SR (2014) Bumble bees of North America: an identification guide. Princeton University Press, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright KW, Vanderbilt KL, Inouye DW, Bertelsen CD, Crimmins TM (2015) Turnover and reliability of flower communities in extreme environments: insights from long-term phenology data sets. J Arid Environ 115:27–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Dusty Durant, Elizabeth Haas, Robert Hafford and Wyatt Shell for their help with field collections and specimen processing. We also thank Sam Droege and Joan Milam for providing reference material provided support for this research. This work is supported by the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Hatch project 1004515, the New Hampshire Agricultural Experiment Station and the Tuttle Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biological Sciences, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, USA

    Erika M. Tucker & Sandra M. Rehan

Authors
  1. Erika M. Tucker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sandra M. Rehan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sandra M. Rehan.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 25763 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tucker, E.M., Rehan, S.M. Wild bee pollination networks in northern New England. J Insect Conserv 20, 325–337 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-016-9870-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-016-9870-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation