Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Slash harvesting does not undermine beetle diversity on small clear-cuts containing sufficient legacies

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Journal of Insect Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Logging residues (slash) constitute an increasingly important source of renewable energy in forested countries, but their intensive extraction can reduce biodiversity. Important research issues include the mitigation potential of reduced logging and slash extraction levels, and their feasibility in production forestry. We performed a comparative study on beetle assemblages in relation to slash extraction practices in Estonia, where silviculture retains higher deadwood amounts than in intensive forestry systems, slash extraction level is ca. 50 %, and final fellings retain at least 5 % of the standing stock. We sampled beetles using flight-interception traps on six pairs of retention cut sites (one conventional and one slash-harvested; average size ca. 2 ha; in three forest site-types). The material comprised 11,948 beetle specimens identified to species level (500 species). Species of conservation concern occurred regularly in all sites, while a total of 18 putative pest species comprised only ca. 3 % of individuals in both treatments. There were no clear influences of slash extraction on species richness, abundance or assemblage composition. The main gradients in the assemblage composition were trapping season and site type; the latter co-varying with tree-species composition and deadwood volumes. We conclude that slash harvesting that retains (depending on forest type) 5–25 m3 ha−1 of coarse deadwood and 10–35 m3 ha−1 of fine deadwood neither reduces beetle diversity (at least of highly mobile species in the short term) nor affects pest outbreaks in our study system. To sustain beetle diversity, sufficient deadwood legacies should be supplemented with live-tree retention for a continuous deadwood supply during post-harvest succession.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahnlund H, Lindhe A (1992) Endangered wood-living insects in coniferous forests—some thoughts from studies of forest-fire sites, outcrops and clearcuttings in the province of Sörmland, Sweden. Entomol Tidskr 113:13–22 (In Swedish with English summary)

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson J, Hjältén J, Dynesius M (2015) Wood-inhabiting beetles in low stumps, high stumps and logs on boreal clear-cuts: implications for dead wood management. PLoS ONE 10:e0118896. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0118896

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • ArtDatabanken (2015) Rödlistade arter i Sverige 2015. ArtDatabanken SLU, Uppsala

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergstedt J, Milberg P (2001) The impact of logging intensity on field-layer vegetation in Swedish boreal forests. Forest Ecol Manag 154:105–115. doi:10.1016/s0378-1127(00)00642-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouget C, Duelli P (2004) The effects of windthrow on forest insect communities: a literature review. Biol Conserv 118:281–299. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2003.09.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouget C, Lassauce A, Jonsell M (2012) Effects of fuelwood harvesting on biodiversity—a review focused on the situation in Europe. Can J Forest Res 42:1421–1432. doi:10.1139/x2012-078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brattli JG, Andersen J, Nilssen AC (1998) Primary attraction and host tree selection in deciduous and conifer living Coleoptera: Scolytidae, Curculionidae, Cerambycidae and Lymexylidae. J Appl Entomol 122:345–352. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0418.1998.tb01511.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlberg A, Thor G, Allmér J, Jonsell M, Jonsson M, Ranius T (2011) Modelled impact of Norway spruce logging residue extraction on biodiversity in Sweden. Can J Forest Res 41:1220–1232. doi:10.1139/x11-034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devine WD, Harrington CA (2007) Influence of harvest residues and vegetation on microsite soil and air temperatures in a young conifer plantation. Agr Forest Meteorol 145:125–138. doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2007.04.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dulaurent AM, Porté AJ, van Halder I, Vétillard F, Menassieu P, Jactel H (2011) A case of habitat complementation in forest pests: pine processionary moth pupae survive better in open areas. Forest Ecol Manag 261:1069–1076. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2010.12.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehnström B, Axelsson R (2002) Insektsgnag i bark och ved. ArtDatabanken, SLU, Uppsala

    Google Scholar 

  • Esseen PA, Ehnström B, Ericson L, Sjöberg K (1997) Boreal forests. Ecol Bull 16:16–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Estonian Red List of Threatened Species (2008) Eesti Teaduste Akadeemia Looduskaitse Komisjon, Tartu. http://elurikkus.ut.ee/prmt.php?lang=eng. Accessed 06 Nov 2015

  • Etheridge DA, MacLean DA, Wagner RG, Wilson JS (2006) Effects of intensive forest management on stand and landscape characteristics in northern New Brunswick, Canada (1945–2027). Landsc Ecol 21:509–524. doi:10.1007/s10980-005-2378-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foit J (2015) Bark- and wood-boring beetles on Scots pine logging residues from final felling: effects of felling date, deposition location and diameter of logging residues. Ann For Res 58:67–79. doi:10.15287/afr.2015.302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fossestøl KO, Sverdrup-Thygeson A (2009) Saproxylic beetles in high stumps and residual downed wood on clear-cuts and in forest edges. Scand J Forest Res 24:403–416. doi:10.1080/02827580903143871

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fritsche UR, Iriarte L, de Jong J, Agostini A, Scarlat N (2014) Extending the EU renewable energy directive sustainability criteria to solid bioenergy from forests. Nat Resour Forum 38:129–140. doi:10.1111/1477-8947.12042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller RJ (2013) Searching for biodiversity gains through woodfuel and forest management. J Appl Ecol 50:1295–1300. doi:10.1111/1365-2664.12152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunnarsson B, Nittérus K, Wirdenäs P (2004) Effects of logging residue removal on ground-active beetles in temperate forests. Forest Ecol Manag 201:229–239. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2004.06.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gustafsson L, Baker S, Bauhus J, Beese W, Brodie A, Kouki J, Lindenmayer DB, Lõhmus A, Martínez Pastur G, Messier C, Neyland M, Palik B, Sverdrup-Thygeson A, Volney J, Wayne A, Franklin JF (2012) Retention forestry to maintain multifunctional forests: a world perspective. BioScience 62:633–645. doi:10.1525/bio.2012.62.7.6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hautala H, Jalonen J, Laaka-Lindberg S, Vanha-Majamaa I (2004) Impacts of retention felling on coarse woody debris (CWD) in mature boreal spruce forests in Finland. Biodivers Conserv 13:1541–1554. doi:10.1023/b:bioc.0000021327.43783.a9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedgren PO (2007) Early arriving saproxylic beetles (Coleoptera) and parasitoids (Hymenoptera) in low and high stumps of Norway spruce. Forest Ecol Manag 241:155–161. doi:10.1023/b:bioc.0000021327.43783.a9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedin J, Isacsson G, Jonsell M, Komonen A (2008) Forest fuel piles as ecological traps for saproxylic beetles in oak. Scand J Forest Res 23:348–357. doi:10.1080/02827580802269991

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helmisaari HS, Kaarakka L, Olsson BA (2014) Increased utilization of different tree parts for energy purposes in the Nordic countries. Scand J Forest Res 29:312–322. doi:10.1080/02827581.2014.926097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huber C, Baumgarten M (2005) Early effects of forest regeneration with selective and small scale clear-cutting on ground beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) in a Norway spruce stand in Southern Bavaria (Höglwald). Biodivers Conserv 14:1989–2007. doi:10.1007/s10531-004-2528-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huusko K, Tarvainen O, Saravesi K, Pennanen T, Fritze H, Kubin E, Markkola A (2015) Short-term impacts of energy wood harvesting on ectomycorrhizal fungal communities of Norway spruce saplings. ISME J 9:581–591. doi:10.1038/ismej.2014.154

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hyvärinen E, Kouki J, Martikainen P (2009) Prescribed fires and retention trees help to conserve beetle diversity in managed boreal forests despite their transient negative effects on some beetle groups. Insect Conserv Diver 2:93–105. doi:10.1111/j.1752-4598.2009.00048.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeffries JM, Marquis RJ, Forkner RE (2006) Forest age influences oak insect herbivore community structure, richness, and density. Ecol Appl 16:901–912. doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[0901:faioih]2.0.co;2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Joensuu J, Heliövaara K, Savolainen E (2008) Risk of bark beetle (Coleoptera, Scolytidae) damage in a spruce forest restoration area in central Finland. Silva Fennica 42:233–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonsell M (2007) Effects on biodiversity of forest fuel extraction, governed by processes working on a large scale. Biomass Bioenerg 31:726–732. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2007.06.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonsell M, Schroeder M (2014) Proportions of saproxylic beetle populations that utilise clear-cut stumps in a boreal landscape—biodiversity implications for stump harvest. Forest Ecol Manag 334:313–320. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2014.08.042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaila L, Martikainen P, Punttila P (1997) Dead trees left in clear-cuts benefit saproxylic Coleoptera adapted to natural disturbances in boreal forest. Biodivers Conserv 18:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King DI, Schlossberg S (2014) Synthesis of the conservation value of the early-successional stage in forests of eastern North America. Forest Ecol Manag 324:186–195. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2013.12.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraut A, Liira J, Lõhmus A (2016) Beyond a minimum substrate supply: sustaining saproxylic beetles in semi-natural forest management. Forest Ecol Manag 360:9–19. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2015.10.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laas E, Uri V, Valgepea M (2011) Metsamajanduse alused [Principles of forest management]. Tartu Ülikooli Kirjastus, Tartu, pp 214–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Lassauce A, Lieutier F, Bouget C (2012) Woodfuel harvesting and biodiversity conservation in temperate forests: effects of logging residue characteristics on saproxylic beetle assemblages. Biol Conserv 147:204–212. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2012.01.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehnert LW, Bässler C, Brandl R, Burton PJ, Müller J (2013) Conservation value of forests attacked by bark beetles: highest number of indicator species is found in early successional stage. J Nat Conserv 21:97–104. doi:10.1016/j.jnc.2012.11.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindenmayer DB, Burton PJ, Franklin J (2008) Salvage logging and its ecological consequences. Island Press, Washington. doi:10.1086/644668

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindhe A, Jeppsson T, Ehnström B (2010) Longhorn beetles in Sweden—changes in distribution and abundance over the last two hundred years. Entomol Tidskr 131:241–510

    Google Scholar 

  • Lõhmus A, Kraut A (2010) Stand structure of hemiboreal old-growth forests: characteristic features, variation among site types, and a comparison with FSC-certified mature stands in Estonia. Forest Ecol Manag 260:155–165. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2010.04.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lõhmus A, Kohv K, Palo A, Viilma K (2004) Loss of old-growth, and the minimum need for strictly protected forests in Estonia. Ecol Bull 51:401–411

    Google Scholar 

  • Lõhmus A, Kraut A, Rosenvald R (2013) Dead wood in clearcuts of seminatural forests in Estonia: site-type variation, degradation, and the influences of tree retention and slash harvest. Eur J Forest Res 132:335–349. doi:10.1007/s10342-012-0678-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martikainen P, Kouki J (2003) Sampling the rarest: threatened beetles in boreal forest biodiversity inventories. Biodivers Conserv 12:1815–1831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martikainen P, Siitonen J, Kaila L, Punttila P, Rauh J (1999) Bark beetles (Coleoptera, Scolytidae) and associated beetle species in mature managed and old-growth boreal forests in southern Finland. Forest Ecol Manage 116:233–245. doi:10.1016/S0378-1127(98)00462-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martikainen P, Kouki J, Heikkala O, Hyvärinen E, Lappalainen H (2006) Effects of green tree retention and prescribed burning on the crown damage caused by the pine shoot beetles (Tomicus spp.) in pine-dominated timber harvest areas. J Appl Entomol 130:37–44. doi:10.1111/j.1439-0418.2005.01015.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCavour MJ, Paré D, Messier C, Thiffault N, Thiffault E (2014) The role of aggregated forest harvest residue in soil fertility, plant growth, and pollination services. Soil Sci Soc Am J 78:S196–S207. doi:10.2136/sssaj2013.08.0373nafsc

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCune B, Mefford MJ (2011) PC-ORD. Multivariate analysis of Ecological Data, Version 6.0 for Windows

  • New TR (2014) Insects, fire and conservation. Springer, New York. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-08096-3_4

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nittérus K, Åström M, Gunnarsson B (2007) Commercial harvest of logging residue in clear-cuts affects the diversity and community composition of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Scand J Forest Res 22:231–240. doi:10.1080/02827580701352955

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palo A (2010) Loodusdirektiivi metsaelupaikade inventeerimise juhend [Mapping manual of Habitat Directive forests habitats], Tartu

  • Parmain G, Dufrêne M, Brin A, Bouget C (2013) Influence of sampling effort on saproxylic beetle diversity assessment: implications for insect monitoring studies in European temperate forests. Agric For Entomol 15:135–145. doi:10.1111/afe.12008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parmain G, Bouget C, Müller J, Horak J, Gossner MM, Lachat T, Isacsson G (2015) Can rove beetles (Staphylinidae) be excluded in studies focusing on saproxylic beetles in central European beech forests? Bull Entomol Res 105:101–109. doi:10.1017/s0007485314000741

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Perera AH, Buse LJ (eds) (2014) Ecology of wildfire residuals in boreal forests. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester. doi:10.1002/9781118870488.ch6

    Google Scholar 

  • Pihlaja M, Koivula M, Niemelä J (2006) Responses of boreal carabid beetle assemblages (Coleoptera, Carabidae) to clear-cutting and top-soil preparation. Forest Ecol Manag 222:182–190. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2005.10.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitkänen A, Kouki J, Viiri H, Martikainen P (2008) Effects of controlled forest burning and intensity of timber harvesting on the occurrence of pine weevils, Hylobius spp., in regeneration areas. Forest Ecol Manag 255:522–529. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2007.09.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proe M, Griffiths J, McKay H (2001) Effect of whole-tree harvesting on microclimate during establishment of second rotation forestry. Agric For Meteorol 110:141–154. doi:10.1016/S0168-1923(01)00285-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pykälä J (2004) Immediate increase in plant species richness after clear-cutting of boreal herb-rich forests. Appl Veg Sci 7:29–34. doi:10.1111/j.1654-109X.2004.tb00592.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranius T, Caruso A, Jonsell M, Juutinen A, Thor G, Rudolphi J (2014) Dead wood creation to compensate for habitat loss from intensive forestry. Biol Conserv 169:277–284. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2013.11.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rassi P, Hyvärinen E, Juslén A, Mannerkoski I (eds) (2010) The 2010 Red List of Finnish Species. Ympäristöministeriö & Suomen ympäristökeskus, Helsinki

    Google Scholar 

  • Remm L, Lõhmus P, Leis M, Lõhmus A (2013) Long-term impacts of forest ditching on non-aquatic biodiversity: conservation perspectives for a novel ecosystem. PLoS One 8. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0063086

  • Rubene D, Wikars LO, Ranius T (2014) Importance of high quality early-successional habitats in managed forest landscapes to rare beetle species. Biodivers Conserv 23:449–466. doi:10.1007/s10531-013-0612-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubene D, Schroeder M, Ranius T (2015) Diversity patterns of wild bees and wasps in managed boreal forests: effects of spatial structure, local habitat and surrounding landscape. Biol Conserv 184:201–208. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2015.01.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rytter L, Andreassen K, Bergh J, Ekö PM, Grönholm T, Kilpeläinen A, Lazdina D, Muiste P, Nord-Larsen T (2015) Availability of biomass for energy purposes in Nordic and Baltic Countries: land areas and biomass amounts. Baltic Forestry 21:375–390

    Google Scholar 

  • Selonen VAO, Ahlroth P, Kotiaho JS (2005) Anthropogenic disturbance and diversity of species: polypores and polypore-associated beetles in forest, forest edge and clear-cut. Scand J Forest Res 20(Suppl 6):49–58. doi:10.1080/14004080510041002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siira-Pietikäinen A, Haimi J, Siitonen J (2003) Short-term responses of soil macroarthropod community to clear felling and alternative forest regeneration methods. Forest Ecol Manag 172:339–353. doi:10.1016/s0378-1127(01)00811-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siitonen J (2001) Forest management, coarse woody debris and saproxylic organisms: Fennoscandian boreal forests as an example. Ecol Bull 49:11–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Silfverberg H (2004) Enumeratio nova Coleopterorum Fennoscandiae, Daniae et Baltiae. Sahlbergia 9:1–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Six DL, Vander Meer M, DeLuca TH, Kolb P (2002) Pine engraver (Ips pini) colonization of logging residues created using alternative slash management systems in Western Montana. West J Appl For 17:96–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Spies TA, McComb BC, Kennedy RSH, McGrath MT, Olsen K, Pabst RJ (2007) Potential effects of forest policies on terrestrial biodiversity in a multi-ownership province. Ecol Appl 17:48–65. doi:10.1890/1051-0761(2007)017[0048:peofpo]2.0.co;2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spuris, Z (ed) (1998) Red Data Book of Latvia—rare and threatened species of plants and animals, vol 4. Invertebrates, Rîga: Institute of Biology, University of Latvia, 388 pp

  • Stenbacka F, Hjältén J, Hilszczański J, Dynesius M (2010) Saproxylic and non-saproxylic beetle assemblages in boreal spruce forests of different age and forestry intensity. Ecol Appl 20:2310–2321. doi:10.1890/09-0815.1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Süda I (2009) New woodland beetle species (Coleoptera) in Estonian fauna. Forestry Stud 50:98–114. doi:10.2478/v10132-011-0071-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson ME, Franklin JF, Beschta RL, Crisafulli CM, DellaSala DA, Hutto RL, Lindenmayer DB, Swanson FJ (2011) The forgotten stage of forest succession: early-successional ecosystems on forest sites. Front Ecol Environ 9:117–125. doi:10.1890/090157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson ME, Studevant NM, Campbell JL, Donato DC (2014) Biological associates of early-seral pre-forest in the Pacific Northwest. Forest Ecol Manag 324:160–171. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2014.03.046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taki H, Okochi I, Okabe K, Inoue T, Goto H, Matsumura T, Makino S (2013) Succession influences wild bees in a temperate forest landscape: the value of early successional stages in naturally regenerated and planted forests. PLoS ONE 8:e56678. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0056678

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Thorn S, Bässler C, Gottschalk T, Hothorn T, Bussler H, Raffa K, Müller J (2014) New insights into the consequences of post-windthrow salvage logging revealed by functional structure of saproxylic beetles assemblages. PLoS ONE 9:e101757. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0101757

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Toivanen T, Markkanen A, Kotiaho JS, Halme P (2012) The effect of forest fuel harvesting on the fungal diversity of clear-cuts. Biomass Bioenerg 39:84–93. doi:10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.11.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Wagner CE (1968) The line intersect method in forest field sampling. For Sci 14:20–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Voolma K, Õunap H, Süda I, Sibul I (2003) Mardikaliste (Coleoptera) liigirikkus ja arvukus intensiivselt majandatavas männimetsas ja raiestikel [The diversity and abundance of Coleoptera in intensively managed pine forests and clearings]. Metsanduslikud Uurimused 38:85–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren WG, Olsen PF (1964) A line intersect technique for assessing logging waste. For Sci 13:267–276

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Uno Roosileht and Ilmar Süda helped to identify some difficult specimens. We thank two anonymous reviewers for valuable comments on the manuscript. The study was supported by the Estonian Research Council (projects IUT34-7 and ETF7402) and the State Forest Management Centre.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Zoology, Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Vanemuise 46, 51014, Tartu, Estonia

    Valentina Zolotarjova, Ann Kraut & Asko Lõhmus

  2. Institute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Kreutzwaldi 5, 51014, Tartu, Estonia

    Valentina Zolotarjova

Authors
  1. Valentina Zolotarjova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ann Kraut
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Asko Lõhmus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ann Kraut.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (XLSX 55 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zolotarjova, V., Kraut, A. & Lõhmus, A. Slash harvesting does not undermine beetle diversity on small clear-cuts containing sufficient legacies. J Insect Conserv 20, 285–294 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-016-9865-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-016-9865-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation