Advertisement

Journal of Insect Conservation

, Volume 19, Issue 3, pp 487–500 | Cite as

Diversity and abundance of solitary and primitively eusocial bees in an urban centre: a case study from Northampton (England)

  • Muzafar Hussain SirohiEmail author
  • Janet Jackson
  • Mike Edwards
  • Jeff Ollerton
ORIGINAL PAPER

Abstract

The apparent reduction of solitary and primitively eusocial bees populations has remained a huge concern over the past few decades and urbanisation is considered as one of the factors affecting bees at different scales depending on bee guild. As urbanisation is increasing globally it necessitates more research to understand the complex community dynamics of solitary and primitively eusocial bees in urban settings. We investigated the urban core of a British town for diversity and abundance of solitary bees using standardized methods, and compared the results with nearby meadows and nature reserves. The study recorded 48 species within the town, about 22 % of the total species and 58 % of the genera of solitary bees in the United Kingdom. Furthermore we found the urban core to be more diverse and abundant in solitary and primitively eusocial bees compared to the meadows and nature reserves. Of particular note was an urban record of the nationally rare Red Data Book species Coelioxys quadridentata and its host Anthophora quadrimaculata. This research demonstrates that urban settings can contribute significantly to the conservation of solitary and primitively eusocial bees in Britain.

Keywords

Biodiversity Solitary bees Pollinator decline Species richness Urbanisation Northampton 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to all those who supported this study at any stage, particularly land owners, All Saints Church, St. Giles Church, Church of the Holy Sepulchre, New Testament Church, The Churches Conservation Trust (for access to St. Peter’s Church), Northampton and County Club, Northampton Borough Council, The Wildlife Trust BCN (for access to Bradlaugh Fields, Barnes Meadow, and Kingsthorpe Nature Reserve) and South Court Environmental (for access to Abington Meadow, Child First Orchard and Wilson’s Orchard). We would also like to thank the reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions, and Dr. Hilary Erenler for advice about species identifications and bee biology.

References

  1. Addinsoft (2014) XLSTAT, Data analysis and statistics with MS Excel. Addinsoft, NYGoogle Scholar
  2. Baldock KCR, Goddard MA, Hicks DM, Kunin WE, Mitschunas N, Osgathorpe LM, Potts SG, Robertson KM, Scott AV, Stone GN, Vaughan IP, Memmott J (2015) Where is the UK’s pollinator biodiversity? The importance of urban areas for flower-visiting insects. Proc R Soc B. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2014.2849 PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Banaszak J, Banaszak-Cibicka W, Szefer P (2014) Guidelines on sampling intensity of bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Apiformes). J Insect Conserv 18:651–656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Banaszak-Cibicka W, Zmihorski M (2012) Wild bees along an urban gradient: winners and losers. J Insect Conserv 16:331–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Biesmeijer JC, Roberts SP, Reemer M, Ohlemüller R, Edwards M, Peeters T, Schaffers AP, Potts SG, Kleukers R, Thomas CD, Settele J, Kunin WE (2006) Parallel declines in pollinators and insect pollinated plants in Britain and the Netherlands. Science 313:351–354PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Butchart SH, Walpole M, Collen B, van Strien A, Scharlemann JP, Almond RE, Baillie JE, Bomhard B, Brown C, Bruno J, Carpenter KE, Carr GM, Chanson J, Chenery AM, Csirke J, Davidson NC, Dentener F, Foster M, Galli A, Galloway JN, Genovesi P, Gregory RD, Hockings M, Kapos V, Lamarque JF, Leverington F, Loh J, McGeoch MA, McRae L, Minasyan A, Hernández Morcillo M, Oldfield TE, Pauly D, Quader S, Revenga C, Sauer JR, Skolnik B, Spear D, Stanwell-Smith D, Stuart SN, Symes A, Tierney M, Tyrrell TD, Vié JC, Watson R (2010) Global biodiversity: indicators of decline. Science 328:1164–1168PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. BWARS (2013a) List of British and Irish aculeate Hymenoptera (January 2012), bees, wasp and ants recording society. http://www.bwars.com/index.php?q=content/checklist-british-and-irish-aculeate-hymenoptera-0. Accessed 15 Sept 2013
  8. BWARS (2013b) Melecta albifrons (Forster, 1771), bees, wasp and ants recording society. http://www.bwars.com/index.php?q=bee/apidae/melecta-albifrons. Accessed 10 Sept 2013
  9. BWARS (2013c) Nomada signata (Jurine, 1807), bees, wasp and ants recording society. http://www.bwars.com/index.php?q=bee/apidae/nomada-signata. Accessed 10 Sept 2013
  10. Cane JH, Minckley R, Kervin L (2000) Sampling bees (Hymenoptera: Apiformes) for pollinator community studies: pitfalls of pan-trapping. J Kans Entomol Soc 73:225–231Google Scholar
  11. Cane JH, Minckley RL, Kervin LJ, Williams NM, Roulston TH (2006) Complex responses within a desert bee guild (Hymenoptera: Apiformes) to urban habitat fragmentation. Ecol Appl 16:632–644PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Colwell RK (2013) EstimateS: statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. Version 9. User’s guide and application. http://purl.oclc.org/estimates. Accessed 15 Sept 2013
  13. Colwell RK, Mao CX, Chang J (2004) Interpolating, extrapolating and comparing incidence-based species accumulation curves. Ecology 85:2717–2727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Colwell RK, Chao A, Gotelli NJ, Lin SY, Mao CX, Chazdon RL, Longino JL (2012) Models and estimators linking individual-based and sample-based rarefaction, extrapolation, and comparison of assemblages. J Plant Ecol 5:3–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Czech B, Krausman PR, Devers PK (2000) Economic associations among causes of species endangerment in the United States. Bioscience 50:593–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Defra (2013) The State of Natural Capital: towards a framework for measurement and valuation. A report from the Natural Capital Committee. http://www.defra.gov.uk/naturalcapitalcommittee/files/State-of-Natural-Capital-Report-2013.pdf. Accessed 10 Sept 2013
  17. Dormann CF, Schweiger O, Arens P, Augenstein I, Aviron S, Bailey D, Baudry J, Billeter R, Bugter R, Bukácek R, Burel F, Cerny M, Cock RD, De Blust G, DeFilippi R, Diekötter T, Dirksen J, Durka W, Edwards PJ, Frenzel M, Hamersky R, Hendrickx F, Herzog F, Klotz S, Koolstra B, Lausch A, Le Coeur D, Liira J, Maelfait JP, Opdam P, Roubalova M, Schermann-Legionnet A, Schermann N, Schmidt T, Smulders MJ, Speelmans M, Simova P, Verboom J, van Wingerden W, Zobel M (2008) Prediction uncertainty of environmental change effects on temperate European biodiversity. Ecol Lett 11:235–244PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. EFSA (2014) Towards an integrated environmental risk assessment of multiple stressors on bees: review of research projects in Europe, knowledge gaps and recommendations. EFSA J 12:3594. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2014.3594 Google Scholar
  19. Elmqvist J, Fragkias M, Goodness J, Güneralp B, Marcotullio PJ, McDonald RI, Parnell S, Schewenius M, Sendstad M, Seto KC, Wilkinson K (2013) Urbanization, biodiversity and ecosystem services: challenges and opportunities. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Everaars J, Strohbach MW, Gruber B, Dormann CF (2011) Microsite conditions dominate habitat selection of the red mason bee (Osmia bicornis, Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) in an urban environment: a case study from Leipzig, Germany. Landsc Urban Plan 103:15–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Falk S (1991) A review of the scarce and threatened bees, wasps and ants of Great Britain. Research and Survey in Nature Conservation No. 35. Nature Conservancy Council for England, PeterboroughGoogle Scholar
  22. Fetridge ED, Ascher JS, Langellotto GA (2008) The bee fauna of residential gardens in a suburb of New York City (Hymenoptera: Apoidea). Ann Entomol Soc Am 101:1067–1077CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fitter AH, Peat HJ (1994) The ecological flora data base. J Ecol 82:415–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fowler L, Cohen L, Jarvis P (1998) Practical statistics for field biology, 2nd edn. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  25. Frankie GW, Ehler LE (1978) Ecology of insects in urban environments. Ann Rev Entomol 23:367–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Frankie GW, Rizzardi M, Vinson SB, Griswold TL (2009) Decline in bee diversity and abundance from 1972 to 2004 on a flowering leguminous tree, Andira inermis in Costa Rica at the interface of disturbed dry forest and the urban environment. J Kans Entomol Soc 82:1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. French K, Major R, Hely K (2005) Use of native and exotic garden plants by suburban nectarivorous birds. Biol Cons 121:545–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gaston K, Smith R, Thompson K, Warren P (2005) Urban domestic gardens (II): experimental tests of methods for increasing biodiversity. Biodivers Conserv 14:395–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gilbert OL (1989) The ecology of urban habitats. Chapman and Hall, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Goddard MA, Dougill AJ, Benton TG (2010) Scaling up from gardens: biodiversity conservation in urban environments. Trends Ecol Evol 25:90–98PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Goulson D, Lye GC, Darvill B (2008) Decline and conservation of bumble bees. Ann Rev Entomol 53:191–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Grixti CJ, Wong LT, Cameron SA, Favret C (2009) Decline of bumble bees (Bombus) in the North American Midwest. Biol Conserv 142:75–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Grundel R, Fronhnapple KJ, Jean RP, Pavlovic NB (2011) Effectiveness of bowl trapping and netting for inventory of a bee community. Environ Entomol 40:274–380Google Scholar
  34. Harrison C, Davies G (2002) Conserving biodiversity that matters: practitioners’ perspectives on brownfield development and urban nature conservation in London. J Environ Manag 65:95–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hennig EI, Ghazoul J (2012) Pollinating animals in the urban environment. Urban Ecosyst 15:149–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hernandez JL, Frankie GW, Thorp RW (2009) Ecology of urban bees: a review of current knowledge and directions for future study. Cities Environ 2: article 3. http://escholarship.bc.edu/cate/vol2/iss1/3
  37. Hinners SJ, Kearns CA, Wessman CA (2012) Role of scale, matrix and native habitat in supporting a diverse suburban pollinator assemblage. Ecol Appl 22:923–1935CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Johnson EA, Klemens MW (2005) Nature in fragments: the legacy of sprawl. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  39. Jørgensen P (1921) Bier.Danmarks Fauna25.G.E.C.Gads, KøbenhavnGoogle Scholar
  40. Joshua W, Campbell J, Hanula L (2007) Efficiency of Malaise traps and colored pan traps for collecting flower visiting insects from three forested ecosystems. J Insect Conserv 11:399–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kearns CA, Oliveras DM (2009) Environmental factors affecting bee diversity in urban and remote grassland plots in Boulder, Colorado. J Insect Conserv 13:655–665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kevan PG, Greco CF, Belaoussoff S (1997) Log-normality of biodiversity and abundance in diagnosis and measuring of ecosystemic health: pesticide stress on pollinators on blueberry heaths. J Appl Ecol 34:1122–1136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Klein AM, Vaissière BE, Cane JH, Steffan-Dewenter I, Cunningham S, Kremen C, Tscharntke T (2007) Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops. Proc R Soc B 274:303–313PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Larson JL, Kesheimer AJ, Potter DA (2014) Pollinator assemblage on dandelion and white clover in urban and suburban lawns. J Insect Conserv 18:863–873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Leonhardt SD, Gallai N, Garibaldi LA, Kuhlmann M, Klein A (2013) Economic gain, stability of pollination and bee diversity decrease from southern to northern Europe. Basic Appl Ecol 14:461–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Liow LH, Sodhi NS, Elmquist T (2001) Bee diversity along a disturbance gradient in tropical lowland forests of south-east Asia. J Appl Ecol 38:180–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Loram A, Tratalos J, Warren P, Gaston K (2007) Urban domestic gardens (X): the extent and structure of the resource in five major cities. Landsc Ecol 22:601–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lowenstein DM, Matteson KC, Xiao I, Silva AM, Minor ES (2014) Humans, bees, and pollination services in the city: the case of Chicago, IL (USA). Biodivers Conserv 23:2857–2874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Maclvor JS, Ruttan A, Salehi B (2014) Exotic on exotics: pollen analysis of urban bees visiting Sedum on a green roof. Urban Ecosyst. doi: 10.1007/s11252-014-0408-6 Google Scholar
  50. Magurran AE (2004) Measuring biological diversity. Blackwell, MaldenGoogle Scholar
  51. Magurran AE, McGill BJ (2011) Biological diversity, frontiers in measurement and assessment. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  52. Matteson KC, Ascher JS, Langellotto GA (2008) Bee richness and abundance in New York City urban gardens. Ann Entomol Soc Am 101:140–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Matteson KC, Grace JB, Minor ES (2013) Direct and indirect effect of land use on floral resources and flower-visiting insects across an urban landscape. Oikos 122:682–694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. McKinney ML (2008) Effects of urbanization on species richness: a review of plants and animals. Urban Ecosyst 11:161–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Michael A (2009) The solitary wasps and bees (Hymenoptera: Aculeata) of the ‘GREEN SPACES’ of urban Sheffield. Entomol Mon Mag 145:11–25Google Scholar
  56. Michener CD (2007) Bees of the world, 2nd edn. The Johns Hopkins University Press, MarylandGoogle Scholar
  57. Moldenke AR (1976) California pollination ecology and vegetation types. Phytologia 34:305–361Google Scholar
  58. Natural England (2013) Habitats and species of principal importance in England, Natural England. http://www.naturalengland.org.uk/ourwork/conservation/biodiversity/protectandmanage/habsandspeciesimportance.aspx. Accessed 12 Sept 2013
  59. Ollerton J, Tarrant S, Winfree R (2011) How many flowering plants are pollinated by animals? Oikos 120:321–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Ollerton J, Erenler H, Edwards M, Crockett R (2014) Extinctions of aculeate pollinators in Britain and the role of large-scale agricultural changes. Science 346:1360–1362PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Owen J (2010) Wildlife of a garden: a thirty-year study. Royal Horticultural Society, PeterboroughGoogle Scholar
  62. Perkins RCL (1919) The British species of Andrena and Nomada. Trans Entomol Soc Lond 1919:218–319Google Scholar
  63. Potts SG, Biesmeijer JC, Kremen C, Neumann P, Schweiger O (2010) Global pollinator declines: trends, impacts and drivers. Trends Ecol Evol 25:345–353PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Rortais A, Arnold G, HalmM T-BF (2005) Modes of honeybees exposure to systemic insecticides: estimated amounts of contaminated pollen and nectar consumed by different categories of bees. Apidologie 36:71–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Roulston TH, Smith SA, Brewstera AL (2007) Comparison of pan trap and intensive net sampling techniques for documenting a bee (Hymenoptera: Apiformes) fauna. J Kans Entomol Soc 80:179–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Rowson R, Pavett M (2008) A visual guide for the identification of British Coelioxys bees. Privately published, CardiffGoogle Scholar
  67. Sarah L, Jeremy T (2012) Ecosystem services provided by urban spontaneous vegetation. Urban Ecosyst 15:545–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Simpson BB (1977) Breeding systems of a dominant perennial plants of two disjunct warm desert ecosystems. Oecologia 27:203–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Smith RM, Gaston KJ, Warren PH, Thompson K (2006) Urban domestic gardens (VIII): environmental correlates of invertebrate abundance. Biodivers Conserv 15:2515–2545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Stout J, Morales CL (2009) Ecological impacts of invasive alien species on bees. Apidologie 40:388–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Tarrant S, Ollerton J, Rahman L, Griffin J, McCollin D (2013) Grassland restoration on landfill sites in the East Midlands, UK: an evaluation of floral resources and pollinating insects. Restor Ecol 21:560–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Thomson DM (2006) Detecting the effects of introduced species: a case study of competition between Apis and Bombus. Oikos 114:407–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Toler TR, Evans EW, Tepedino VJ (2005) Pan-trapping for bees (Hymenoptera:Apiformes) in Utah’s West Desert: the importance of colour diversity. Pan-Pac Entomol 81:103–113Google Scholar
  74. Tommasi D, Miro A, Higo HA, Winston ML (2004) Bee diversity and abundance in an urban setting. Can Entomol 136:851–869CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. UN (2011) World urbanization prospectus, the 2011 revision.Department of Economic and Social Affairs (Population division) United Nations report. United Nations, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  76. Verboven HAF, Uyttenbroeck R, Brys R, Hermy M (2014) Different responses of bees and hoverflies to land use in an urban–rural gradient show the importance of the nature of the rural land use. Landsc Urban Plan 126:31–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Wilson EO (1999) The diversity of life. W.W. Norton and Company Inc., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  78. Winfree R, Griswold T, Kremen C (2007) Effect of human disturbance on bee communities in a forested ecosystem. Conserv Biol 21:213–223PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Winfree R, Aguilar R, Vázquez DP, LeBuhn G, Aizen MA (2009) A meta-analysis of bees’ responses to anthropogenic disturbance. Ecology 90:2068–2076PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Winfree R, Bartomeus I, Cariveau DP (2011) Native pollinators in anthropogenic habitats. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst 42:1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Wojcik V (2011) Resource abundance and distribution drive bee visitation within developing tropical urban landscapes. J Poll Ecol 4:48–56Google Scholar
  82. Wolda H, Roubik DW (1986) Nocturnal bee abundance and seasonal bee activity in a Panamanian forest. Ecology 62:426–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Muzafar Hussain Sirohi
    • 1
    • 3
    Email author
  • Janet Jackson
    • 1
  • Mike Edwards
    • 2
  • Jeff Ollerton
    • 1
  1. 1.University of NorthamptonNorthamptonUK
  2. 2.MidhurstUK
  3. 3.Shah Abdul Latif UniversityKhairpurPakistan

Personalised recommendations