Understanding sampling and taxonomic biases recorded by citizen scientists

Abstract

Projects involving citizen scientists have greatly increased over the last decade and understanding errors associated with such projects has been identified as an important step. NatureWatch NZ is a biodiversity recording system accessible to members of the public. The “NZ wasps, ants, bees and parasitoids (Hymenoptera) project” was initiated within NatureWatch NZ in December 2012, and comparisons were analysed between these records and the known Hymenoptera fauna of the New Zealand region. Over the course of 1 year 25 members contributed 360 records from 186 taxa, including the discovery of several introduced species new to New Zealand. There was a strong geographical bias to the records, with the majority being based around the major cities. Aculeates (stinging wasps) were significantly over-represented in the NatureWatch records. Only half (55 %) of taxa were identified to species level, with a further 28 % at genus level, and 17 % identified above genus level (family, order). Furthermore, the majority (65 %) of taxa were recorded only once, and only a few taxa were recorded >5 times (top records were “Ichneumonidae”, “Hymenoptera”, Anthidium manicatum, and Apis mellifera). It is probable that these same biases also exist for many other taxonomic groups in projects operated by citizen scientists lacking set protocols. Caution should be exercised on the subsequent use, compilation, and analysis of citizen science, especially without prior examination of records and potential biases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  1. Berry JA (2010) Order Hymenoptera: sawflies, wasps, ants, and bees. In: Gordon DP (ed) New Zealand inventory of biodiversity. Volume 2. Kingdom Animalia. Chaetognatha, Ecdysozoa, Ichnofossils. Canterbury University Press, Christchurch, pp 350–359

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cohn JP (2008) Citizen science: can volunteers do real research? Bioscience 58:192–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dennis RLH, Thomas CD (2000) Bias in butterfly distribution maps: the influence of hot spots and recorder’s home range. J Insect Conserv 4:73–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dennis RLH, Sparks TH, Hardy PB (1999) Bias in butterfly distribution maps: the effects of sampling effort. J Insect Conserv 3:33–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dennis RLH, Shreeve TG, Isaac NJB, Roy DB, Hardy PB, Fox R, Asher J (2006) The effects of visual apparency on bias in butterfly recording and monitoring. Biol Conserv 128:486–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dickinson JL, Zuckerber B, Bonter DN (2010) Citizen science as an ecological research tool: challenges and benefits. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst 41:149–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fitzpatrick M, Preisser E, Ellison A, Elkinton J (2009) Observer bias and the detection of low-density populations. Ecol Appl 19:1673–1679

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Isaac NJB, Cruickshanks KL, Weddle AM, Rowcliffe JM, Brereton TM, Dennis RLH, Shuker DM, Thomas CD (2011) Distance sampling and the challenge of monitoring butterfly populations. Methods Ecol Evol 2:585–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lester PJ, Brown SDJ, Edwards ED, Holwell GI, Pawson S, Ward DF, Watts CH (2014) Critical issues facing New Zealand entomology. N Z Entomol 37. doi:10.1080/00779962.2014.861789

  10. New TR (2009) Insect species conservation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 272

    Google Scholar 

  11. Shaw MR, Hochberg ME (2001) The neglect of parasitic Hymenoptera in insect conservation strategies: the British fauna as a prime example. J Insect Conserv 5:253–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Silvertown J (2009) A new dawn for citizen science. Trends Ecol Evol 24:67–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Thorpe S (2013a) Cheiloneurus flaccus (Walker, 1847) (Hymenoptera: Encyrtidae), new to New Zealand. Biodivers Data J 1:e958

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Thorpe S (2013b) Scutellista caerulea (Fonscolombe, 1832) (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae), new to New Zealand for the second time! Biodivers Data J 1:e959

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ward DF (2012) More than just records: analysing natural history collections for biodiversity planning. PLoS One 7:e50346. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0050346

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ward DF, Early JW, Schnitzler F-R, Hitchmough RA, Stringer IAN (2012) The conservation status of New Zealand Hymenoptera. N Z Entomol 35:116–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Thanks to all the NatureWatch NZ contributors of the Hymenoptera project. Thanks to the two anonymous reviewers for improving the manuscript. This work was supported by the MBIE through funding of the “Defining New Zealand’s Land Biota” programme. The project and its details are available to view at http://naturewatch.org.nz/projects/nz-wasps-ants-bees-and-parasitoids-hymenoptera (registration required).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Darren F. Ward.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ward, D.F. Understanding sampling and taxonomic biases recorded by citizen scientists. J Insect Conserv 18, 753–756 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-014-9676-y

Download citation

Keywords

  • Conservation
  • Public
  • Hymenoptera
  • New Zealand
  • Observation