Journal of Insect Conservation

, Volume 18, Issue 4, pp 745–751 | Cite as

The role of a mound-building ecosystem engineer for a grassland butterfly

  • Merle StreitbergerEmail author
  • Stefan Rose
  • Gabriel Hermann
  • Thomas Fartmann


Both land use intensification and abandonment within grasslands lead to a homogenisation of vegetation structure. Therefore, specially structured microsites such as vegetation gaps with bare ground play an important role for species conservation within grasslands. Vegetation gaps are crucial for the establishment of low-competitive plant species and offer special microclimatic conditions essential for the development of the immature stages of many invertebrate species. The influence of small-scale soil disturbance in the form of mounds created by ecosystem engineers such as ants or moles on biodiversity is therefore of special scientific concern. The effects of mound-building species on plant species diversity have been extensively studied. However, knowledge on the significance of these species for the conservation of other animals is rare. In this study we analyse the importance of mounds created by the European mole (Talpa europaea) as an oviposition habitat for the small copper (Lycaena phlaeas) within Central European mesotrophic grasslands. Our study showed that host plants occurring at molehills were preferred for oviposition. Oviposition sites were characterised by an open vegetation structure with a high proportion of bare ground (with a mean coverage of about 50 %), a low cover of herbs and low-growing vegetation (mean height: 4.5 cm). Our study clearly illustrates the importance of small-scale soil disturbance for immature stages of L. phlaeas and the conservation of this species within mesotrophic grasslands. Mound-building ecosystem engineers, such as T. europaea, act as important substitutes for missing dynamics within mesotrophic grasslands by diversifying vegetation structure and creating small patches of bare soil.


Bare ground Conservation Disturbance Microclimate Molehill Oviposition 


  1. Anthes N, Fartmann T, Hermann G, Kaule G (2003) Combining larval habitat quality and meta-population structure—the key for successful management of pre-Alpine Euphydryas aurinia colonies. J Insect Conserv 7:175–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker, S (2014) lme4: linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. The Comprehensive R Archive Network. Accessed 18 February 2014
  3. Bergman K-O, Kindvall O (2004) Population viability analysis of the butterfly Lopinga achine in a changing landscape in Sweden. Ecography 27:49–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bullock JM, Hill BC, Dale MP, Silvertown J (1994) An experimental study of the effects of sheep grazing on vegetation change in a species-poor grassland and the role of seedlings recruitment into gaps. J Appl Ecol 31:493–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bullock JM, Franklin J, Stevenson MJ, Silvertown J, Coulson SJ, Gregory SJ, Tofts R (2001) A plant trait analysis of responses to grazing in a long-term experiment. J Appl Ecol 38:253–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cousins S (2009) Landscape history and soil properties affect grassland decline and plant species richness in rural landscapes. Biol Conserv 142:2752–2758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dennis RLH (2004) Landform resources for territorial nettle-feeding Nymphalid butterflies: biases at different spatial scales. Anim Biodivers Conserv 27:37–45Google Scholar
  8. Dennis RLH, Sparks TH (2005) Landscape resources for the territorial Nymphalid butterfly Inachis io: microsite landform selection and behavioral responses to environmental conditions. J Insect Behav 18:725–742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Drobnik J, Römermann C, Bernhardt-Römermann M, Poschlod P (2011) Adaptation of plant functional group composition to management changes in calcareous grassland. Agric Ecosyst Environ 145:29–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Duprè C, Stevens CJ, Ranke T, Bleekers A, Peppler-Lisbach C, Gowing DJG, Dise NB, Dorland E, Bobbink R, Diekmann M (2010) Changes in species richness and composition in European acidic grasslands over the past 70 years: the contribution of cumulative atmospheric nitrogen deposition. Glob Chang Biol 16:344–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ebert G, Rennwald E (1991) Die Schmetterlinge Baden-Württembergs. Bd. 2: Tagfalter II. Eugen Ulmer, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  12. Edwards GR, Crawley MJ, Heard MS (1999) Factors influencing molehill distribution in grassland: implication for controlling the damage caused by moles. J Appl Ecol 36:434–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eichel S, Fartmann T (2008) Management of calcareous grasslands for Nickerl’s fritillary (Melitaea aurelia) has to consider habitat requirements of the immature stages, isolation, and patch area. J Insect Conserv 12:677–688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ellenberg H, Leuschner C (2010) Vegetation Mitteleuropas mit den Alpen, 6th edn. Eugen Ulmer, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  15. European Environment Agency (EEA) (2013) The European grassland butterfly indicator: 1990–2011. Publications Office of the European Union, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  16. Fartmann T, Hermann G (2006) Larvalökologie von Tagfaltern und Widderchen in Mitteleuropa—von den Anfängen bis heute. Abh Westf Mus Naturk 68:11–57Google Scholar
  17. Fleischer K, Streitberger M, Fartmann T (2010) Zur Ökologie der Wiesen-Glockenblume (Campanula patula) und des Echten Tausendgüldenkrauts (Centaurium erythraea) im Magergrünland Nordwestdeutschlands. Tuexenia 30:209–229Google Scholar
  18. Fleischer K, Streitberger M, Fartmann T (2013) The importance of disturbance for the conservation of a low-competitive herb in mesotrophic grasslands. Biologia 68:398–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. García-Barros E, Fartmann T (2009) Butterfly oviposition: sites, behaviour and modes. In: Settele J, Shreeve TG, Konvicka M, van Dyck H (eds) Ecology of butterflies in Europe. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 29–42Google Scholar
  20. Grime JP, Hodgson JG, Hunt R (2007) Comparative plant ecology, 2nd edn. Castlepoint Press, DalbeattieGoogle Scholar
  21. Gröning J, Krause S, Hochkirsch A (2007) Habitat preferences of an endangered insect species, Cepero’s groundhopper (Tetrix ceperoi). Ecol Res 22:767–773CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hooftman DAP, Bullock JM (2012) Mapping to inform conservation: a case study of changes in semi-natural habitats and their connectivity over 70 years. Biol Conserv 145:30–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jones CG, Lawton JH, Shachak M (1994) Organisms as ecosystem engineers. Oikos 69:373–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. King TJ (1977) The plant ecology of ant-hills in calcareous grasslands. I. Patterns of species in relation to ant-hills in southern England. J Ecol 65:235–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Krämer B, Kämpf I, Enderle J, Poniatowski D, Fartmann T (2012) Microhabitat selection in a grassland butterfly: a trade-off between microclimate and food availability. J Insect Conserv 16:857–865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Krauss J, Bommarco R, Guardiola M, Heikkinen RK, Helm A, Kuussaari M, Lindborg R, Öckinger E, Pärtel M, Pino J, Pöyry J, Raatikainen KM, Sang A, Stefanescu C, Teder T, Zobel M, Steffan-Dewenter I (2010) Habitat fragmentation causes immediate and time-delayed biodiversity loss at different trophic levels. Ecol Lett 13:597–605PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kudrna O, Harpke A, Lux K, Pennerstorfer J, Schweiger O, Settele J, Wiemers M (2011) The distribution atlas of European butterflies. Gesellschaft für Schmetterlingsschutz, HalleGoogle Scholar
  28. Küer A, Fartmann T (2005) Prominent shoots are preferred: microhabitat preferences of Maculinea alcon ([Denis & Schiffermüller], 1775) in Northern Germany. Nota Lepid 27:309–319Google Scholar
  29. Lenoir L (2009) Effects of ants on plant diversity in semi-natural grasslands. Arth-Plant Inter 3:163–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Léon-Cortés JL, Cowley MJR, Thomas CD (2000) The distribution and decline of a widespread butterfly Lycaena phlaeas in a pastoral landscape. Ecol Entomol 25:285–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mariotte P, Buttler A, Kohler F, Gilgen AK, Spiegelberger T (2013) How do subordinate and dominant species in semi-natural mountain grasslands relate to productivity and land-use change? Bas Appl Ecol 14:217–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McIntyre S, Lavorel S, Tremont R (1995) Plant life-history attributes: their relationship to disturbance response in herbaceous vegetation. J Ecol 83: l–44Google Scholar
  33. Möllenbeck V, Hermann G, Fartmann T (2009) Does prescribed burning mean a threat to the rare satyrine butterfly Hipparchia fagi? Larval-habitat preferences give the answer. J Insect Conserv 13:77–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Munguira M, García-Barros E, Cano JM (2009) Butterfly herbivory and larval ecology. In: Settele J, Shreeve TG, Konvicka M, van Dyck H (eds) Ecology of butterflies in Europe. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 43–54Google Scholar
  35. Ödman AM, Schnoor TK, Ripa J, Olsson PA (2012) Soil disturbance as a restoration measure in dry sandy grasslands. Biodivers Conserv 21:1921–1935CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Parmesan C (2006) Ecological and evolutionary responses to recent climate change. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst 37:637–669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Porter K (1992) Eggs and egg-laying. In: Dennis RLH (ed) The ecology of butterflies in Britain. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 46–72Google Scholar
  38. R Development Core Team (2014) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. The R project for statistical computing. Accessed 18 February 2014
  39. Roy DB, Thomas JA (2003) Seasonal variation in the niche, habitat availability and population fluctuations of a bivoltine thermophilous insect near its range margin. Oecologia 134:439–444PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Sala OE, Chapin FS, Armesto JJ, Berlow E, Bloomfield J, Dirzo R, Huber-Sanwald E, Huenneke LF, Jackson RB, Kinzig A, Leemans R, Lodge DM, Mooney HA, Oesterheld M, Poff NL, Sykes MT, Walker BH, Walker M, Wall DH (2000) Biodiversity—global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science 287:1770–1774PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schiffers K, Tielbörger K, Jeltsch F (2010) Changing importance of environmental factors driving secondary succession on molehills. J Veg Sci 21:500–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Seifan M, Tielbörger K, Schloz-Murer D, Seifan T (2010) Contribution of molehill disturbances to grassland community composition along a productivity gradient. Acta Oecol 36:569–577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Stoutjesdijk P, Barkman JJ (1992) Microclimate vegetation and fauna. Opulus Press, UppsalaGoogle Scholar
  44. Streitberger M, Fartmann T (2013) Molehills as important habitats for the grizzled skipper, Pyrgus malvae (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae), in calacareous grasslands. Eur J Entomol 110:643–648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Streitberger M, Hermann G, Kraus W, Fartmann T (2012) Modern forest management and the decline of the Woodland Brown (Lopinga achine) in Central Europe. For Ecol Manage 269:239–248Google Scholar
  46. Thomas JA (2005) Monitoring change in the abundance and distribution of insects using butterflies and other indicator groups. Phil Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 360:339–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Thomas JA, Clarke RT (2004) Extinction rates and butterflies. Science 305:1563–1564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Thomas JA, Bourn NAD, Clarke RT, Stewart KE, Simcox DJ, Pearman GS, Curtis R, Goodger B (2001) The quality and isolation of habitat patches both determine where butterflies persist in fragmented landscapes. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B 268:1791–1796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tschöpe O, Tielbörger K (2010) The role of successional stage and small-scale disturbance for establishment of pioneer grass Corynephorus canescens. Appl Veg Sci 13:326–335Google Scholar
  50. Veen P, Jefferson R, de Smidt J, van der Straaten J (eds) (2009) Grasslands in Europe of high nature value. KNNV Publishing, ZeistGoogle Scholar
  51. Vickery JA, Tallowin JR, Feber RE, Asteraki EJ, Atkinson PW, Fuller RJ, Brwon VK (2001) The management of lowland neutral grasslands in Britain: effects of agricultural practices on birds and their food resources. J Appl Ecol 38:647–664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Warren SD, Büttner R (2008) Active military training areas as refugia for disturbance-dependent endangered insects. J Insect Conserv 12:671–676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Watt AS (1974) Senescence and rejuvenation in ungrazed chalk grasslands (grassland B) in Breckland: the significance of litter and of moles. J Appl Ecol 11:1157–1171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Weiss SB, Murphy DD, White RR (1988) Sun, slope, and butterflies: topographic determinants of habitat quality for Euphydryas editha. Ecology 69:1486–1496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wenzel M, Schmitt T, Weitzel M, Seitz A (2006) The severe decline of butterflies on western German calcareous grasslands during the last 30 years: a conservation problem. Biol Conserv 128:542–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wiklund C (1984) Egg-laying patterns in butterflies in relation to their phenology and the visual apparency and abundance of their host plants. Oecologia 63:23–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wünsch Y, Schirmel J, Fartmann T (2012) Conservation management of coastal dunes for Orthoptera has to consider oviposition and nymphal preferences. J Insect Conserv 16:501–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Merle Streitberger
    • 1
    Email author
  • Stefan Rose
    • 1
  • Gabriel Hermann
    • 2
  • Thomas Fartmann
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Community Ecology, Institute of Landscape EcologyUniversity of MünsterMünsterGermany
  2. 2.Working Group for Animal Ecology and PlanningFilderstadtGermany
  3. 3.Ecology, Department of Biology/ChemistryUniversity of OsnabrückOsnabrückGermany

Personalised recommendations