Journal of Insect Conservation

, Volume 18, Issue 3, pp 353–363 | Cite as

Conservation in Hine’s sight: the conservation genetics of the federally endangered Hine’s emerald dragonfly, Somatochlora hineana

  • Emy M. Monroe
  • Hugh B. Britten


Hine’s emerald dragonfly (Somatochlora hineana) is distributed in discrete fen and wet meadow habitats over its range from Ontario, Canada, to Missouri, USA. Habitat destruction in the vicinity of Chicago, IL, and other areas lead to its designation as an US federal endangered species in 1995. Our main goal was to delineate the population genetic structure of the species within the northern recovery unit centered on the Door Peninsula in Wisconsin and the southern recovery unit in the Des Plaines River Valley near Chicago, IL. Sites on the Door Peninsula, WI, are in a matrix of agricultural development and second-growth forest and were used as a best available approximation of a pristine system for the dragonfly. We nondestructively sampled 557 adults and larvae from 16 sites in Illinois, Michigan, and Wisconsin from 2008 through 2011 and used ten microsatellite markers to estimate levels of genetic variability, and genetic structure. Mean allelic richness across all sites and years was 5.03 (±0.64) and expected heterozygosity was 0.52 (±0.032). Northern and southern recovery units as designated in the original recovery plan were genetically distinct. We delineated two genetic populations in the northern unit and three within the southern including two disjunct sites.


Microsatellite Odonata Population structure Population genetics 



We thank the many Soluk lab summer research technicians, L. Brotkowski, A. Monroe, and M. Koster for help obtaining field specimens. Funding was provided by the Illinois State Toll Highway Authority and we thank A. La Porte for assistance as our point of contact with that agency. Additional funding was provided by the Illinois Department of Natural Resources and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. None of our funding sources had any role in study design, execution of the work or writing of the manuscript. In-kind support was provided by The Nature Conservancy Wisconsin Chapter, the DuPage County Forest Preserve District, and the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Field Station. Funding for the genetic analyzer was provided by the National Science Foundation grant #MRI-0923419. We thank L. Riley and J. Filler for assistance in the lab, J. Brown for creating the map, and two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on earlier versions of this manuscript. All specimens were obtained under permits #TE805269-11 and #TE805269-13 issued by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service as well as all required state and local permits.


  1. Bailey RG (1995) Description of the ecoregions of the United States. 2nd revised and expanded 1st edition 1980. Miscellaneous publication no. 1391(rev), Washington DC: USDA Forest Service pp 108 with separate map at 1:1 500 00Google Scholar
  2. Carlsson J (2008) Effects of microsatellite null alleles on assignment testing. J Hered 99:616–623PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cashatt ED (1991) A vulnerable species: the Ohio emerald dragonfly. Living Mus 53:29–30Google Scholar
  4. Chapuis MP, Estoup A (2007) Microsatellite null alleles and estimation of population differentiation. Mol Biol Evol 24:621–631PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J (2005) Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol Ecol 14:2611–2620PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Excoffier L, Lischer HE (2010) Arlequin suite ver 3.5: a new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Mol Ecol Res 10:564–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Excoffier L, Smouse PE, Quattro JM (1992) Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics 131:479–491PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Foster SE, Soluk DA (2006) Protecting more than the wetland: the importance of biased sex ratios and habitat segregation for conservation of the Hine’s emerald dragonfly, Somatochlora hineana Williamson. Biol Conserv 127:159–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Francois O, Durand E (2010) Spatially explicit Bayesian clustering models in population genetics. Mol Ecol Res 10:773–784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Goudet J (1995) Fstat (version 1.2): a computer program to calculate F-statistics. J Hered 86:485–486Google Scholar
  11. Guo SW, Thompson EA (1992) Performing the exact test of Hardy-Weinberg proportion for multiple alleles. Biometrics 48:361–372PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hedrick PW (2000) Genetics of populations, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  13. Latter BDH (1972) Selection in finite populations with multiple alleles. III. Genetic divergence with centripetal selection and mutation. Genetics 70:475–490PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Monroe EM, Lynch C, Soluk DA, Britten HB (2010) Non-lethal tissue sampling techniques and microsatellite markers used for first report of genetic diversity in two populations of the endangered Somatochlora hineana (Odonata:Corduliidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 103:1012–1017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Nei M (1972) Genetic distance between populations. Am. Nat. 106:283–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Nei M, Tajima F, Tateno Y (1983) Accuracy of estimated phylogenetic trees from molecular data. J Mol Evol 19:153–170PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Peakall R, Smouse PE (2006) GenAlEx 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes 6:288–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Petit RJ, Mousadik EL, Pons O (1998) Identifying populations for conservation on the basis of genetic markers. Conserv Biol 12:844–855CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pintor LM, Soluk DA (2006) Evaluating the non-consumptive, positive effects of a predator in the persistence of an endangered species. Biol Conserv 130:584–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945–959PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Purdue JR, Cashatt CD, Vogt TE (1996) Variability of the mitochondrial DNA in populations of the Hine’s emerald dragonfly, Somatochlora hineana. Report to Material Service Corporation. Illinois State Museum, Springfield, IllinoisGoogle Scholar
  22. Rice WR (1989) Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43:223–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4:406–425PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Satyshur CD, DeMots R, Soluk DA (2009) Development of captive rearing and long term handling protocols for larvae of the endangered Hine’s emerald dragonfly (Somatochlora hineana). Final report submitted to The Corporation for Openlands and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife ServiceGoogle Scholar
  25. Soluk DS, Swisher BJ, Zercher DS, Miller JD, Hults AB (1998) The ecology of the Hine’s emerald dragonfly (Somatochlora hineana): monitoring populations and determining patterns of habitat use. Illinois Natural History Survey, Center for Aquatic Ecology Technical Report 98/3Google Scholar
  26. Soluk DS, Zercher DS, Pintor LM, Herbert ME, Hults AB, Gittinger EJ, Stalzer SA (2000) Evaluation of habitat and ecology of the larvae of Hine’s emerald dragonfly (Somatochlora hineana) in Wisconsin and Illinois. Illinois Natural History Survey, Center for Aquatic Ecology Technical Report 00/1Google Scholar
  27. Takezaki N, Nei M, Tamura K (2010) POPTREE2: software for constructing population trees from allele frequency data and computing other population statistics with Windows interface. Mol Biol Evol 27:747–752PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. US Fish and Wildlife Service (2001) Hine’s emerald dragonfly (Somatochlora hineana) Recovery Plan, Fort Snelling, MN, US Fish and Wildlife ServiceGoogle Scholar
  29. van Oosterhout C, Weetman D, Hutchinson WF (2006) Estimation and adjustment of microsatellite null alleles in nonequilibrium populations. Mol Ecol Notes 6:255–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BiologyUniversity of South DakotaVermillionUSA
  2. 2.Whitney Genetics LabUS Fish and Wildlife ServiceOnalaskaUSA

Personalised recommendations