Journal of Insect Conservation

, Volume 18, Issue 2, pp 245–256 | Cite as

Comparison of butterfly communities and abundances between marginal grasslands and conservation lands in the eastern Great Plains

  • Yasmine A. Farhat
  • William M. Janousek
  • John P. McCarty
  • Nichollette Rider
  • L. LaReesa Wolfenbarger
ORIGINAL PAPER

Abstract

The alteration and fragmentation of native tallgrass prairie in the Midwestern United States has created a need to identify other land types with the ability to support grassland butterfly species. This study examines butterfly usage of marginal grasslands, which consist of semi-natural grasslands existing within in a larger agricultural matrix, compared to grasslands managed for conservation of prairie species. Using generalized linear mixed models we analyzed how land purpose (marginal vs. conservation grasslands) affected butterfly abundance. We found grassland butterfly species to be significantly more common on conservation grasslands, whereas generalist species were significantly more common on marginal grasslands. Results of ordination analyses indicated that while many species used both types of habitats, butterfly species assemblages were distinct between habitat types and that edge to interior ratio and the floristic quality index of sites were important habitat characteristics driving this distinction. Within conservation grasslands we examined the relationship between butterfly abundance and the planting diversity used in restoring each site. We found higher diversity restorations hosted more individuals of butterflies considered habitat generalists, as well as species considered to be of conservation concern.

Keywords

Butterfly Lepidoptera Agroecosystem Grassland Conservation Floristic quality index 

References

  1. Arenz CL, Joern A (1996) Prairie legacies: invertebrates. In: Sampson FB, Knopf FL (eds) Prairie conservation: preserving North America’s most endangered ecosystem. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 91–109Google Scholar
  2. Balmer O, Erhardt A (2000) Consequences of succession on extensively grazed grasslands for Central European butterfly communities: rethinking conservation practices. Conserv Biol 14:746–757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B (2012) lme4: linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 0.999999-0. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4 Accessed 11 June 2013
  4. Blake RJ, Woodcock BA, Westbury DB, Sutton P, Potts SG (2011) New tools to boost butterfly habitat quality in existing grass buffer strips. J Insect Conserv 15:221–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Clark WR, Reeder KF (2007) Agricultural buffers and wildlife conservation: a summary about linear practices. In: Haufler JB (ed) Fish and wildlife response to farmland conservation practices. Technical Review 07-1. The Wildlife Society, Bethesda, MD, pp 45–55Google Scholar
  6. Clarke KR (1993) Non-parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure. Aust J Ecol 18:117–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Collinge SK (2000) Effects of grassland fragmentation on insect species loss, colonization, and movement patterns. Ecology 81:2211–2226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Collinge SK, Prudic KL, Oliver JC (2003) Effects of local habitat characteristics and landscape context on grassland butterfly diversity. Conserv Biol 17:178–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Davis JD, Debinski DM, Danielson BJ (2007) Local and landscape effects on the butterfly community in fragmented Midwest USA prairie habitats. Landsc Ecol 22:1341–1354. doi:10.1007/s10980-007-9111-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Davros NM, Debinski DM, Reeder KF, Hohoman WL (2006) Butterflies and continuous conservation reserve program filter strips: landscape considerations. Wildl Soc Bull 34:936–943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Debinski DM, Babbit AM (1997) Butterfly species in native prairie and restored prairie. Prairie Nat 29:219–228Google Scholar
  12. Diboll N (1997) Designing seed mixes. In: Packard S, Mutel CF (eds) The tallgrass restoration handbook: for prairies, savannas, and woodlands. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 135–149Google Scholar
  13. Dollar JG, Riffell SK, Burger LW Jr (2013) Effects of managing semi-natural grassland buffers on butterflies. J Insect Conserv 17:577–590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dover J, Settele J (2009) The influences of landscape structure on butterfly distribution and movement: a review. J Insect Conserv 13:3–27. doi:10.1007/s10841-008-9135-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Evans AV (2008) Field guide to insects and spiders of North America. Sterling, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Fleishman E, Austin GT, Brussard PF, Murphy DD (1999) A comparison of butterfly communities in native and agricultural riparian habitats in the Great Basin, USA. Biol Conserv 89:209–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Forister ML, Nice CC, Fordyce JA, Gompert Z (2009) Host range evolution is not driven by the optimization of larval performance: the case of Lycaeides melissa (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) and the colonization of alfalfa. Oecologia 160:551–561PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gilbert LE, Singer MC (1975) Butterfly ecology. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 6:365–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Haaland C, Naisbit RE, Bersier LF (2011) Sown wildflower strips for insect conservation: a review. Insect Conserv Divers 4:60–80. doi:10.1111/j.1752-4598.2010.00098.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Haddad NM (1999a) Corridor use predicted from behaviors at habitat boundaries. Am Nat 153:215–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Haddad NM (1999b) Corridor and distance effects on interpatch movements: a landscape experiment with butterflies. Ecol Appl 9:612–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Haughton AJ, Bell JR, Boatman ND, Wilcox A (2001) The effect of the herbicide glyphosate on non-target spiders: part II. Indirect effects on Lepthyphantes tenuis in field margins. Pest Manag Sci 57:1037–1042PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hawkins BA, Porter EE (2003) Does herbivore diversity depend on plant diversity? The case of California butterflies. Am Nat 161:40–49PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Holl KD (1995) Nectar resources and their influence on butterfly communities on reclaimed coal surface mines. Restor Ecol 3:76–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hopwood JL (2008) The contribution of roadside grassland restorations to native bee conservation. Biol Conserv 141:2632–2640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Iowa Department of Natural Resources (2012) The Iowa wildlife action plan. Securing a future for fish and wildlife: a conservation legacy for Iowans. http://www.iowadnr.gov/Environment/WildlifeStewardship/IowaWildlifeActionPlan.aspx. Accessed 10 April 2013
  27. Joern A, Laws AN (2013) Ecological mechanisms underlying arthropod species diversity in grasslands. Ann Rev Entomol 58:19–36. doi:10.1146/annurev-ento-120811-153540 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kiviniemi K, Eriksson O (2002) Size-related deterioration of semi-natural grassland fragments in Sweden. Divers Distrib 8:21–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kleijn D, Snoeijing GIJ (1997) Field boundary vegetation and the effects of agrochemical drift: botanical change caused by low levels of herbicide and fertilizer. J Appl Ecol 34:1413–1425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Klug P, Wolfenbarger LL, McCarty JP (2009) The nest predator community of grassland birds responds to agroecosystem habitat at multiple scales. Ecography 32:973–982. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0587.2009.05857.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kremen C (1992) Assessing the indicator properties of species assemblages for natural area monitoring. Ecol Appl 2:203–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Legendre P, Legendre L (1998) Numerical ecology, 2nd edn. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  33. Marshall EJP (2004) Agricultural landscapes: field margin habitats and their interaction with crop production. J Crop Improv 12:365–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Marshall EJP, Moonen AC (2002) Field margins in northern Europe: their functions and interactions with agriculture. Agric Ecosyst Environ 89:5–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McCune B, Grace JB (2002) Analysis of ecological communities. MjM Software Design, Gleneden Beach, ORGoogle Scholar
  36. Moranz RA, Debinski DM, McGranahan DA, Engle DM, Miller JR (2012) Untangling the effects of fire, grazing, and land-use legacies on grassland butterfly communities. Biodiver Conserv 21:2719–2746. doi:10.1007/s10531-012-0330-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Myers MC, Hoksch BJ, Mason JT (2012) Butterfly response to floral resources during early establishment at a heterogeneous prairie biomass production site in Iowa, USA. J Insect Conserv 16:457–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. New TR (1991) Butterfly conservation. Oxford University Press, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  39. Northern Great Plains Floristic Quality Assessment Panel (2001) Coefficients of conservatism for the vascular flora of the Dakotas and adjacent grasslands. U.S. Geological Survey, Biological Resources Division, Information and Technology Report, USGS/BRD/ITR-2001-0001Google Scholar
  40. Noss RF, LaRoe ET III, Michael Scott JM (1995) Endangered ecosystems of the United States: a preliminary assessment of loss and degradation. Department of the Interior, National Biological Service, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  41. Öckinger E, Smith HG (2007) Semi-natural grasslands as population sources for pollinating insects in agricultural landscapes. J Appl Ecol 44:50–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Öckinger E, Schweiger O, Crist TO, Debinski DM, Krauss J, Kuussaari M et al (2010) Life-history traits predict species responses to habitat area and isolation: a cross-continental synthesis. Ecol Lett 13:969–979. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01487.x PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Oksanen J, Guillaume Blanchet F, Roeland Kindt K, Legendre P, Minchin PR, O’Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Henry M, Stevens H, Wagner H (2013) Vegan: community ecology package. R package version 2.0-7. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan. Accessed 11 June 2013
  44. Ouin A, Burel F (2002) Influences of herbaceous elements on butterfly diversity in hedgerow agricultural landscapes. Agric Ecosyst Environ 93:45–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Panzer R, Stillwaugh D, Gnaedinger R, Derkovitz G (1995) Prevalence of remnant dependence among the prairie- and savanna-inhabiting insects of the Chicago region. Nat Areas J 15:101–116Google Scholar
  46. Piper JK, Schmidt ES, Janzen AJ (2007) Effects of species richness on resident and target species components in a prairie restoration. Restor Ecol 15:189–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pleasants JM, Oberhauser KS (2013) Milkweed loss in agricultural fields because of herbicide use: effect on the monarch butterfly population. Insect Conserv Divers 6:135–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pollard E, Yates TJ (1993) Monitoring butterflies for ecology and conservation. Chapman & Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  49. Rands MRW, Sotherton NW (1986) Pesticide use on cereal crops and changes in the abundance of butterflies on arable farmland in England. Biol Conserv 36:71–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. R Core Development Team (2013) R: a language and environment for Sstatistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org. Accessed 21 February 2013
  51. Reeder KF, Debinski DM, Danielson BJ (2005) Factors affecting butterfly use of filterstrips in the Midwestern USA. Agric Ecosyst Environ 109:40–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Richard J, Heitzman JE (1996) Butterflies and moths of Missouri. Missouri Department of Conservation, Jefferson City, MOGoogle Scholar
  53. Ries L, Debinski DM (2001) Butterfly responses to habitat edges in the highly fragmented prairies of Central Iowa. J Anim Ecol 70:840–852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Ries L, Debinski DM, Wieland ML (2001) Conservation value of roadside prairie restoration to butterfly communities. Conserv Biol 15:401–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Rowe HI (2010) Tricks of the trade: techniques and opinions from 38 experts in tallgrass prairie restoration. Restor Ecol 18:253–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Roy DB, Bohan DA, Haughton AJ, Hill MO, Osborne JL, Clark SJ et al (2003) Invertebrates and vegetation of field margins adjacent to crops subject to contrasting herbicide regimes in the farm scale evaluations of genetically modified herbicide–tolerant crops. Philos Trans R Soc B 358:1879–1898CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Russell C, Schultz CB (2009) Effects of grass-specific herbicides on butterflies: an experimental investigation to advance conservation efforts. J Insect Conserv 14:53–63. doi:10.1007/s10841-009-9224-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Saarinen K (2002) A comparison of butterfly communities along field margins under traditional and intensive management in SE Finland. Agric Ecosyst Environ 90:59–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Samson F, Knopf F (1994) Prairie conservation in North America. Bioscience 44:418–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Samson FB, Knopf FL, Ostlie WR (2004) Great Plains ecosystems: past, present, and future. Wildl Soc Bull 32:6–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Schneider R, Stoner KJ, Steinauer G, Panella M, Humpert M (2011) The Nebraska natural legacy project: state wildlife action plan, 2nd edn. The Nebraska Game and Parks Commission, Lincoln, NEGoogle Scholar
  62. Sharp MA, Parks DR, Ehrlich PR (1974) Plant resources and butterfly habitat selection. Ecology 55:870–875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Shepherd S, Debinski DM (2005) Evaluation of isolated and integrated prairie reconstructions as habitat for prairie butterflies. Biol Conserv 126:51–61. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2005.04.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Smith J, Potts SG, Woodcock BA, Eggleton P (2008) Can arable field margins be managed to enhance their biodiversity, conservation and functional value for soil macrofauna? J Appl Ecol 45:269–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Stoner KJL, Joern A (2004) Landscape versus local habitat scale influences to insect communities from tallgrass prairie remnants. Ecol Appl 14:1306–1320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Swengel SR, Schlicht D, Olsen F, Swengel AB (2011) Declines of prairie butterflies in the midwestern USA. J Insect Conserv 15:327–339. doi:10.1007/s10841-010-9323-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Taft JB, Hauser C, Robertson KR (2006) Estimating floristic integrity in tallgrass prairie. Biol Conserv 131:42–51. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2006.02.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Tscharntke T, Steffan-Dewenter I, Kruess A, Thies C (2002) Contribution of small habitat fragments to conservation of insect communities of grassland–cropland landscapes. Ecol Appl 12:354–363Google Scholar
  69. Vogel JA, Debinski DM, Koford RR, Miller JR (2007) Butterfly responses to prairie restoration through fire and grazing. Biol Conserv 140:78–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Vogel JA, Koford RR, Debinski DM (2010) Direct and indirect responses of tallgrass prairie butterflies to prescribed burning. J Insect Conserv 14:663–677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Waltz AE, Covington WW (2004) Ecological restoration treatments increase butterfly richness and abundance: mechanisms of response. Restor Ecol 12:85–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Weibull AC, Östman Ö, Granqvist Å (2003) Species richness in agroecosystems: the effect of landscape, habitat and farm management. Biodiver Conserv 12:1335–1355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Whittingham MJ (2007) Will agri-environmental schemes deliver substantial biodiversity gain, and if not why not? J Appl Ecol 44:1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Woodcock BA, Potts SG, Tscheulin T, Pilgrim E, Ramsey AJ, Harrison-Cripps J, Tallowin JR (2009) Responses of invertebrate trophic level, feeding guild and body size to the management of improved grassland field margins. J Appl Ecol 46:920–929CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Xerces Society (2013) The red list of butterflies and moths. http://www.xerces.org/red-list-of-butterflies-and-moths/. Accessed 20 Aug 2013
  76. Zimmerman GM, Goetz H, Mielke PW Jr (1985) Use of an improved statistical method for group comparisons to study effects of prairie fire. Ecology 66:606–611CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yasmine A. Farhat
    • 1
  • William M. Janousek
    • 1
  • John P. McCarty
    • 1
  • Nichollette Rider
    • 1
  • L. LaReesa Wolfenbarger
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiologyUniversity of NebraskaOmahaUSA

Personalised recommendations