Advertisement

Journal of Insect Conservation

, Volume 18, Issue 2, pp 225–231 | Cite as

Spectral composition of light sources and insect phototaxis, with an evaluation of existing spectral response models

  • Roy H. A. van Grunsven
  • M. Donners
  • K. Boekee
  • I. Tichelaar
  • K. G. van Geffen
  • D. Groenendijk
  • F. Berendse
  • E. M. Veenendaal
ORIGINAL PAPER

Abstract

Artificial illumination attracts insects, but to what extent light attracts insects, depends on the spectral composition of the light. Response models have been developed to predict the attractiveness of artificial light sources. In this study we compared attraction of insects by existing light sources used for streetlights as well as newly developed environment friendly alternatives, and used this data to test the predictive ability of the existing response models. Light sources differed in overall attractiveness to insects and relative attractiveness was dependent on insect order. The attraction patterns predicted by the two models correlated weakly with the number of insects attracted when the only light source rich in UV, a mercury vapour light, was included in the tested spectra. When the mercury vapour light, which is going to be banned in Europe, was not included in the test no correlation was found between predicted and observed attraction patterns. We conclude that currently existing attraction response models are insufficiently sensitive to evaluate new light sources.

Keywords

Artificial light pollution Attraction Lepidoptera Mercury vapour Night Trapping 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank G. Biewenga and J. Zonderland of Nij Bosma Zathe for their assistance. Dr. R. Kats and Drs. E. Drent are acknowledged for their helpful support. This project is funded by NWO-STW Grant 11110, Philips Lighting and the Dutch Oil Company (Nederlandse Aardolie Maatschappij).

Supplementary material

10841_2014_9633_MOESM1_ESM.docx (72 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 72 kb)
10841_2014_9633_MOESM2_ESM.docx (135 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 134 kb)
10841_2014_9633_MOESM3_ESM.docx (1.5 mb)
Supplementary material 3 (DOCX 1564 kb)

References

  1. Baker RR, Sadovy Y (1978) The distance and nature of the light-trap response of moths. Nature 276(5690):818–821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barghini A, De Medeiros BAS (2012) UV radiation as an attractor for insects. LEUKOS J Illum Eng Soc 9(1):47–56. doi: 10.1582/leukos.2012.09.01.003 Google Scholar
  3. Briscoe AD, Chittka L (2003) The evolution of color vision in insects. Annu Rev Entomol 46:471–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cinzano P, Falchi F, Elvidge CD (2001) The first world atlas of the artificial night sky brightness. Mon Not R Astron Soc 328(3):689–707. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04882.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cleve K (1964) Der Anflug der Schmetterlinge an künstliche lichtquellen. Mitt Dt Ent Ges 23:66–76Google Scholar
  6. Conrad KF, Warren MS, Fox R, Parsons MS, Woiwod IP (2006) Rapid declines of common, widespread British moths provide evidence of an insect biodiversity crisis. Biol Conserv 132(3):279–291. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2006.04.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dos Santos TG, De Mello Gaia MC, Peçanha Brazil R (2003) Attraction of sand flies (Diptera: Psychodidae) to light traps in rural areas of Minas Gerais State, Brazil. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 19(1):74–78PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Eisenbeis G (2006) Artificial night lighting and insects: attraction of insects to streetlamps in a rural setting in Germany. Ecological consequences of artificial night lighting. Island press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  9. Eisenbeis G, Eick K (2010) Attraction of nocturnal insects to street lights with special regard to LEDs. In: Abstracts of the Society for Conservation Biology, 24th Annual Meeting, Edmonton, AlbertaGoogle Scholar
  10. Eisenbeis G, Hassel F (2000) Zur Anziehung nachtaktiver Insekten durch Straßenlaternen—eine Studie kommunaler Beleuchtungseinrichtungen in der Agrarlandschaft Rheinhessens. Natur und Landschaft 75(4):145–156Google Scholar
  11. EU (2009a) Commission Regulation (EC) No 244/2009 of 18 March 2009 implementing Directive 2005/32/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to ecodesign requirements for non-directional household lamps. Off J Eur Union 76:3–16Google Scholar
  12. EU (2009b) Commission Regulation (EC) No 244/2009: implementing Directive 2005/32/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to ecodesign requirements for fluorescent lamps without integrated ballast, for high intensity discharge lamps, and for ballasts and luminaires able to operate such lamps, and repealing Directive 2000/55/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council. Off J Eur Union 76:17–44Google Scholar
  13. EU (2010) Commission Regulation (EU) No 347/2010: amending Commision Regulation (EC) No 245/2009 as regards the ecodesign requirements for flourescent lamps without integrated ballast, for high intensity discharge lamps, and for ballasts and luminaries able to operate such lamps. Off J Eur Union 104:20–28Google Scholar
  14. Fox R (2013) The decline of moths in Great Britain: a review of possible causes. Insect Conserv Divers 6(1):5–19. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-4598.2012.00186.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fox R, Randle Z, Hill L, Anders S, Wiffen L, Parsons MS (2011) Moths count: recording moths for conservation in the UK. J Insect Conserv 15(1):55–68. doi: 10.1007/s10841-010-9309-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Garstang RH (2004) Mount Wilson observatory: the sad story of light pollution. Observatory 124(1178):14–21Google Scholar
  17. Gaston KJ, Davies TW, Bennie J, Hopkins J (2012) Reducing the ecological consequences of night-time light pollution: options and developments. J Appl Ecol 49(6):1256–1266. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2012.02212.x PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Goretti E, Coletti A, Di Veroli A, Di Giulio AM, Gaino E (2011) Artificial light device for attracting pestiferous chironomids (Diptera): a case study at Lake Trasimeno (Central Italy). Ital J Zool 78(3):336–342. doi: 10.1080/11250003.2010.534115 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Groenendijk D, Ellis WN (2011) The state of the Dutch larger moth fauna. J Insect Conserv 15(1):95–101. doi: 10.1007/s10841-010-9326-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hölker F, Wolter C, Perkin EK, Tockner K (2010) Light pollution as a biodiversity threat. Trends Ecol Evol 25(12):681–682. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2010.09.007 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hu KG, Stark WS (1977) Specific receptor input into spectral preference in Drosophila. J Comp Physiol A 121(2):241–252. doi: 10.1007/bf00609614 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hu KG, Stark WS (1980) The roles of Drosophila ocelli and compound eyes in phototaxis. J Comp Physiol A 135(1):85–95. doi: 10.1007/bf00660183 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ingpen A (1839) Instructions for collecting and preserving British and foreign insects: also for collecting and preserving Crustacea and Shells, 2nd edn. William Smith, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ishiwata K, Sasaki G, Ogawa J, Miyata T, Su ZH (2011) Phylogenetic relationships among insect orders based on three nuclear protein-coding gene sequences. Mol Phylogenetic Evol 58(2):169–180. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2010.11.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Longcore T, Rich C (2004) Ecological light pollution. Front Ecol Environ 2:191–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Menzel R, Greggers U (1985) Natural phototaxis and its relationship to colour vision in honeybees. J Comp Physiol A 157:311–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Menzel R, Ventura D, Hertel H (1986) Spectral sensitivity of photoreceptors in insect compound eyes: comparison of species and methods. J Comp Physiol A 158:165–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Merckx T, Slade EM (2014) Macro-moth families differ in their attraction to light: implications for light-trap monitoring programmes. Insect Conserv Divers. doi: 10.1111/icad.12068
  29. Poot H, Ens BJ, de Vries H, Donners MAH, Wernand MR, Marquenie JM (2008) Green light for nocturnally migrating birds. Ecol Soc 13(2)Google Scholar
  30. Rea M (ed) (1993) Lighting handbook: reference & application, 8th edn. Illuminating Engineering Society of North America, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. Robinson HS, Robinson PJM (1950) Some notes on the observed behaviour of lepidoptera in the vicinity of light-sources together with a description of a light-trap designed to take entomological samples. Entomol Gaz 11:121–132Google Scholar
  32. Somers-Yeates R, Hodgson D, McGregor PK, Spalding A, Ffrench-Constant RH (2013) Shedding light on moths: shorter wavelengths attract noctuids more than geometrids. Biol Lett 9(4):20130376. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2013.0376 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Truxa C, Fiedler K (2012) Attraction to light-from how far do moths (Lepidoptera) return to weak artificial sources of light? Eur J Entomol 109(1):77–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. van Langevelde F, Ettema JA, Donners M, WallisDeVries MF, Groenendijk D (2011) Effect of spectral composition of artificial light on the attraction of moths. Biol Conserv 144(9):2274–2281. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2011.06.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Van Veen M, Zeegers T (1993) Insecten basisboek. Jeugdbondsuitgeverij, UtrechtGoogle Scholar
  36. Waring P, Townsend M (2006) Nachtvlinders veldgids met alle in Nederland en België voorkomende soorten. Tirion Uitgevers, BaarnGoogle Scholar
  37. Williams C (1936) The influence of moonlight on the activity of certain nocturnal insects, particularly of the family Noctuidae, as indicated by a light trap. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B, Biol Sci 226:357–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roy H. A. van Grunsven
    • 1
    • 2
  • M. Donners
    • 3
  • K. Boekee
    • 4
  • I. Tichelaar
    • 4
  • K. G. van Geffen
    • 1
  • D. Groenendijk
    • 5
  • F. Berendse
    • 1
  • E. M. Veenendaal
    • 1
  1. 1.Nature Conservation and Plant Ecology GroupWageningen UniversityWageningenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of Animal EcologyNetherlands Institute of EcologyWageningenThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Philips ResearchEindhovenThe Netherlands
  4. 4.Van Hall LarensteinLeeuwardenThe Netherlands
  5. 5.Dutch Butterfly ConservationWageningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations