Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Standardized capture rates of the endangered American burying beetle, Nicrophorus americanus Olivier (Coleoptera: Silphidae) using different trap protocols

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Journal of Insect Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has adopted two different pitfall trap protocols to survey the endangered American burying beetle, Nicrophorus americanus. One protocol uses a transect of eight pitfall traps that prohibit bait contact over the course of three trap nights. The other protocol uses buckets that allow for bait contact over a five night trapping period. A trap night is defined as one trap open for one night, and the transect protocol has historically been calculated as eight trap nights per calendar night while; the bucket protocol has been calculated as one trap night per calendar night. This study examined the effectiveness of each protocol based on the number of beetles (Nicrophorus spp.) captured per trap night (BTN) in field and laboratory trials. When each transect was considered as a single trap instead of eight separate traps, no significant difference in BTN was detected between the protocols in any year. Laboratory trials were conducted using Nicrophorus marginatus to determine differences in capture efficiency based on protocol, time after release, and feeding status. The proportion of beetles captured after 5 days was greater when compared to 3 days for either protocol. Our results indicate that cup transects used to sample the American burying beetle should be considered as a single trap when calculating trap night and that the use of five trap nights rather than three would increase the likelihood of capturing beetles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adis J (1979) Problems of interpreting arthropod sampling with pitfall traps. Zool Anz 202:177–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Backlund DC, Marrone GM (1997) New records of the endangered American burying beetle, Nicrophorus americanus Olivier, (Coleoptera: Silphidae) in South Dakota. Coleopt Bull 51:53–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Backlund DC, Marrone GM, Williams CK,Tilmon K (2008) Population estimate of the endangered American burying beetle, Nicrophorus americanus Olivier (Coleoptera: Silphidae) in South Dakota. Coleopt Bull 62:9–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Bedick JC (1997) Distribution and ecology of the American burying beetle (Nicrophorus americanus, Olivier) in south-central Nebraska. MA thesis, University of Nebraska at Lincoln, Lincoln, NE

  • Bedick JC, Ratcliffe BC, Hoback WW, Higley LG (1999) Distribution, ecology, and population dynamics of the American burying beetle [Nicrophorus americanus Olivier (Coleoptera, Silphidae)] in south-central Nebraska, USA. J Insect Conserv 3:171–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bedick JC, Ratcliffe BC, Higley LG (2004) A new sampling protocol for the endangered American burying beetle, Nicrophorus americanus Olivier (Coleoptera: Silphidae). Coleopt Bull 58:57–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlton CE, Rothwein F (1998) The endangered American burying beetle, Nicrophorus americanus Olivier, at the edge of its range in Arkansas (Coleoptera: Silphidae). Coleopt Bull 52:179–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Creighton JC, Schnell GD (1998) Short-term movement patterns of the endangered American burying beetle Nicrophorus americanus. Biol Conserv 86:187–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creighton JC, Vaughn CC, Chapman BR (1993) Habitat preference of the endangered American burying beetle (Nicrophorus americanus) in Oklahoma. Southwest Nat 38:275–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creighton JC, Bastarache R, Lomolino MV, Belk MC (2007) Effect of forest removal on the abundance of the endangered American burying beetle, Nicrophorus americanus (Coleoptera: Silphidae). J Insect Conserv 13:37–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Digweed SC, Curries CR, Carcamo HA, Spence JR (1995) Digging out the “digging-in effect” of pitfall traps: Influences of depletion and disturbance on catches of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Pedobiologia 39:561–576

    Google Scholar 

  • Fournier E, Loreau M (2002) Foraging activity of the carabid beetle Pterostichus melanarius Ill. in field margin habitats. Agr. Ecosyst Environ 89:253–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godwin WB, Minich V (2005) Status of the American burying beetles, Nicrophorus americanus Olivier, Coleoptera: Silphidae) at Camp Maxey, Lamar county, Texas. Interagency Final Report to Texas Army National Guard. Stephen F. Austin State University, Nacogdoches, Texas

  • Greenslade P, Greenslade PJM (1971) The use of baits and preservatives in pitfall traps. J Aust Entomol Soc 10:253–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guarisco H (1997) Discovery of the federally endangered American burying beetle (Nicrophorus americanus) in the Chatauqua hills of southeastern Kansas. Trans Kansas Acad Sci 100:116–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holloway AK, Schnell GD (1997) Relationship between numbers of the endangered American burying beetle Nicrophorus americanus Olivier (Coleoptera: Silphidae) and available food resources. Biol Conserv 81:145–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jurzenski J, Snethen DG, Brust M, Hoback WW (2011) New records of carrion beetles in Nebraska reveal increased presence of the American burying beetle, Nicrophorus americanus Olivier (Coleoptera: Silphidae). Great Plains Res 21:131–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozol AJ (1995) Ecology and population genetics of the endangered American burying beetle, Nicrophorus americanus. Ph.D. Dissertation, Boston University. Boston, USA

  • Kozol A, Scott MP, Traniello JFA (1988) The American burying beetle, Nicrophorus americanus: studies on the natural history of a declining species. Psyche 95:167–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leasure DR, Rupe DM, Phillips EA, Opine DR, Huxel GR (2012) Efficient new above-ground bucket traps produce comparable data to that of standard transects for the endangered American burying beetle, Nicrophorus americanus Olivier (Coleoptera: Silphidae). Coleopt Bull 66:209–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeDoux DG and Riley TJ (2002) Occurrence of the endangered American burying beetle (Nicrophorus americanus: Coleoptera:Silphidae) at Cherokee Prairie Natural Area, Franklin county, Arkansas. Proceedings of the 18th North American Prairie Conference pp 231

  • Lomolino MV, Creighton JC (1996) Habitat selection, breeding success and conservation of the endangered American burying beetle Nicrophorus americanus. Biol Conserv 77:235–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lomolino MV, Creighton JC, Schnell GD, Certain DL (1995) Ecology and conservation of the endangered American burying beetle (Nicrophorus americanus). Conserv Biol 9:605–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClelland WT, Hain FP, DeMars CJ, Fargo WS, Coulson RN, Nebeker TE (1978) Sampling bark beetle emergence: a review of methodologies, a proposal for standardization, and a new trap design. Bull Entomol Soc Am 24:137–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Peyton M (2003) Range and population size of the American burying beetle (Coleoptera: Silphidae) in the dissected hills of south-central Nebraska. Great Plains Res 13:127–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Raithel CJ, Ginsberg HS, Prospero ML (2006) Population trends and flight behavior of the American burying beetle, Nicrophorus americanus (Coleoptera: Silphidae), on Block Island, RI. J Insect Conserv 10:317–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith ADF (2009) American burying beetle survey, Camp Gruber training site, Oklahoma. Unpublished report to the department of the Army ARNG training site, Camp Gruber, Oklahoma Army National Guard

  • Smith ADF and Clifford C (2005) American burying beetle survey, Camp Gruber training Site, Oklahoma. Unpublished report to the department of the Army ARNG training site, Camp Gruber, Oklahoma Army National Guard

  • Smith ADF and Clifford C (2006) American burying beetle survey, Camp Gruber training site, Oklahoma. Unpublished report to the department of the Army ARNG training site, Camp Gruber, Oklahoma Army National Guard

  • Smith ADF and Clifford C (2007) American burying beetle survey, Camp Gruber training site, Oklahoma. Unpublished report to the department of the Army ARNG training site, Camp Gruber, Oklahoma Army National Guard

  • Smith ADF and Clifford C (2008) American burying beetle survey, Camp Gruber training site, Oklahoma. Unpublished report to the department of the Army ARNG training site, Camp Gruber, Oklahoma Army National Guard

  • Szalanksi AL, Sikes DS, Bischof R, Fritz M (2000) Population genetics and phylogenetics of the endangered American burying beetle, Nicrophorus americanus (Coleoptera: Silphidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 93:589–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szyszko J, Gryuntal S, Schwerk A (2004) Differences in locomotory activity between male and female Carabus hortensis (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in a pine forest and a beech forest in relation to feeding state. Environ Entomol 33:1442–1446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USFWS (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service) (1991) American burying beetle (Nicrophorus americanus) recovery plan. Newton Corner, Massachusetts 80 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • USFWS (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service) (2008a) American burying beetle (Nicrophorus americanus) 5-year review: summary and evaluation. New England Field Office, Concord

    Google Scholar 

  • USFWS (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service) (2008b) Nebraska survey protocol, project report. Grand Island, Nebraska

  • USFWS (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service) (2009) American burying beetle Nicrophorus americanus survey guidance for Oklahoma. Tulsa, Oklahoma

  • USFWS (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service) (2011) American burying beetle Nicrophorus americanus survey guidance for Oklahoma. Tulsa, Oklahoma

  • Walker TL, Hoback WW (2007) Effects of invasive eastern redcedar on capture rates of Nicrophorus americanus and other Silphidae. Environ Entomol 36:297–307

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wallin H (1991) Movement patterns and foraging tactics of a caterpillar hunter inhabiting alfalfa fields. Funct Ecol 5:740–749

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Funding for this study was provided by the Nebraska Department of Roads, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and Nebraska Game and Parks Commission. We wish to thank M. Parenti, A. Koehler, R. Butler and T. L. Duncan for field assistance. The views and opinions of the authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the U.S. Department of Transportation. American burying beetle trapping was conducted under U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Permit #TE045150-0.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W. Wyatt Hoback.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Butler, S.R., Harms, R., Farnsworth-Hoback, K. et al. Standardized capture rates of the endangered American burying beetle, Nicrophorus americanus Olivier (Coleoptera: Silphidae) using different trap protocols. J Insect Conserv 17, 607–613 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-012-9545-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-012-9545-5

Keywords

Navigation