Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Abiotic variables dictate the best monitoring times for the endangered Table Mountain stag beetle (Colophon westwoodi Gray 1832, Coleoptera: Lucanidae)

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Journal of Insect Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is often a lack of basic ecological data needed to implement effective conservation management programmes for endangered arthropods. This is particularly true for the highly localized and rare Colophon, a genus of beetles of which all members are narrow range endemics of conservation concern. The genus is confined to the highest mountain peaks in the Cape Floristic Region of South Africa and each of the 17 known species is endemic to a particular mountain or range. We investigated the influence of selected abiotic variables on adult Colophon westwoodi activity in Table Mountain National Park, South Africa, which will aid the development of an effective monitoring programme. Weekly surveys conducted on Table Mountain showed that adult numbers peaked during early summer. Adults were active at dusk on clear days, although earlier when misty. Unexpectedly, relative humidity and air temperature had no significant effect on Colophon abundance, while illuminance was the most important predictor. Contrary to general consensus, C. westwoodi activity is not strictly crepuscular but also appears nocturnal. Thus, Colophon monitoring programmes need to be conducted in early summer after sunset and monitoring can continue later than previously assumed. Little is still known about C. westwoodi population size, area of occupancy, general behaviour and the impact tourists have on it, or indeed why the genus is restricted to mountain tops. Therefore this research is important for the design of monitoring protocols for this flagship species, while at the same time directing future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

References

  • Araya K (1993) Relationship between the decay types of dead wood and occurrence of lucanid beetles (Coleoptera: Lucanidae). Appl Entomol Zool 28:27–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnard KH (1929) A study of the genus Colophon Gray. Trans R Soc S Afr 18:163–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartolozzi L (1995) Description of a new species of Colophon from South Africa (Coleoptera, Lucanidae). Fragm Entomol Roma 26:333–340

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartolozzi L (2005) Description of two new stag beetle species from South Africa (Coleoptera: Lucanidae). Afr Entomol 13:347–352

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinck P (1956) Coleoptera: Lucanidae. S Afr Anim Life 3:304–335

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavallini P, Nel JAJ (1990) Ranging behavior of the Cape Grey mongoose Galerella pulverulenta in a coastal area. J Zool Lond 222:353–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniels SR, Picker M, Cowling RM, Hamer M (2009) Unraveling evolutionary lineages among South African velvet worms (Onychophora: Peripatopsis)—evidence for cryptic species complexes. Biol J Linn Soc 97:200–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobson A (2005) Monitoring global rates of biodiversity change: challenges that arise in meeting the convention on biological diversity (CBD) 2010 goals. Philos Tr Soc B 360:229–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Endrödy-Younga S (1988) Evidence for the low-altitude origin of the Cape Mountain Biome derived from the systematic revision of the genus Colophon Gray (Coleoptera: Lucanidae). Ann S Afr Mus 96:359–424

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth GG, van Wilgen BW (2008) The recent fire history of the Table Mountain National Park and implications for fire management. Koedoe 50:3–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geertsema H, Owen CR (2007) Notes on the habitat and adult behaviour of three red-listed Colophon spp. (Coleoptera: Lucanidae) of the Cape Floristic Region, South Africa. J Insect Conserv 11:43–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gess FW, Gess SK (1993) Irresponsible collecting for financial gain. Lett Afr Wildl 47:187

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldblatt P, Manning J (2000) Cape plants. A conspectus of the Cape flora of South Africa, Strelitzia 9. National Botanical Institute of South Africa, Pretoria

  • Henning GA, Terblanche RF, Ball JB (2009) South African red data book: butterflies. SANBI biodiversity series 13. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria

  • IUCN (2009) IUCN red list of threatened species. http://www.redlist.org

  • Lovell S, Hamer M, Slotow R, Herbert D (2010) Assessment of sampling approaches for a multi-taxa invertebrate survey in a South African savanna-mosaic ecosystem. Austral Ecol 35:357–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCulloch CE, Searle SR, Neuhaus JM (2008) Generalized, linear, and mixed models, 2nd edn. Wiley, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • McGeoch MA, Sithole H, Samways MJ, Simaika JP, Pryke JS, Picker M et al (2011a) Conservation and monitoring of invertebrates in terrestrial protected areas. Koedoe 53:137–149

    Google Scholar 

  • McGeoch MA, Dopolo M, Novellie P, Hendriks H, Freitag S, Ferreira S, Grant R, Kruger J, Bezuidenhout H, Randall RM, Vermeulen W, Kraaij T, Russell IA, Knight MH, Holness S, Oosthuizen A (2011b) A strategic framework for biodiversity monitoring in SAN parks’. Koedoe 53:48–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Melisch R, Schütz P (2000) Butterflies and beetles in Germany. Traffic Bull 18:91–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittermeier RA, Gil PR, Hoffmann M, Pilgrim J, Brooks T, Mittermeier CG, Lamoreux J, da Fonseca GAB (2004) Hotspots revisited: earth’s biologically richest and most endangered ecoregions. CEMEX, Mexico

    Google Scholar 

  • Mizukami T, Kawai S (1997) Nature of South Africa and ecological notes on the genus Colophon Gray. Gekkan-Mushi Suppl 2:1–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Mucina L, Rutherford MC (2006) The vegetation of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. SANBI, South Africa

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel JF (1956) Fog precipitation on Table Mountain. Q J R Meteor Soc 82:452–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • New TR (1995) Introduction to invertebrate conservation biology. Oxford University press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • New TR (2009) Insect species conservation. Ecology, biodiversity and conservation series. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Onore G (1994) Description of the immature stages of six species of Sphaenognathus, with comparative notes on phylogeny and natural history (Insecta: Coleoptera: Lucanidae). Ann Carnegie Mus 63:77–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters RL, Darling JDS (1985) The greenhouse effect and nature reserves. Bioscience 35:707–726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pryke JS, Samways MJ (2008) Conservation of invertebrate biodiversity on a mountain in a global biodiversity hotspot, Cape Floral Region. Biodivers Conserv 17:3027–3043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pryke JS, Samways MJ (2009) Conservation of the insect assemblages of the Cape Peninsula biodiversity hotspot. J Insect Conserv 13:627–641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pryke JS, Samways MJ (2010) Significant variables for the conservation of mountain invertebrates. J Insect Conserv 14:247–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pryke JS, Samways MJ (2012) Importance of using many taxa and having adequate controls for monitoring impacts of fire for arthropod conservation. J Insect Conserv 16:177–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rebelo TG, Freitag S, Cheney C, McGeoch MA (2011) Prioritising species of special concern for monitoring in Table Mountain National Park: the challenge of a species-rich, threatened ecosystem. Koedoe 53:164–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholtz CH, Endrödy-Younga S (1994) Systematic position of Colophon Gray (Coleoptera: Lucanidae), based on larval characters. Afr Entomol 2:13–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner C (2007) Water beetles associated with reservoirs on Table Mountain, Cape Town: implications for conservation. J Insect Conserv 11:75–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Wilgen BW, Bond WJ, Richardson DM (1992) The management of fynbos ecosystems—principles and scenarios. In: Cowling RM (ed) The ecology of fynbos: nutrients, fire and diversity. Oxford University Press, Cape Town

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the Western Cape Nature Conservation Board (Permit number 0035-AAA004-00615) and Table Mountain National Park operated by the South African National Parks for permission to work in the park. This study would not have been possible without help from numerous people that assisted with conducting surveys, often under the most trying of conditions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francois Roets.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roets, F., Pryke, J.S. & McGeoch, M.A. Abiotic variables dictate the best monitoring times for the endangered Table Mountain stag beetle (Colophon westwoodi Gray 1832, Coleoptera: Lucanidae). J Insect Conserv 17, 279–285 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-012-9507-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-012-9507-y

Keywords

Navigation