Journal of Insect Conservation

, Volume 16, Issue 4, pp 629–633 | Cite as

Small sample, substantial contribution: additions to the Honduran hawkmoth (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae) fauna based on collections from a mountainous protected area (Cusuco National Park)

  • Maarten P. M. Vanhove
  • Merlijn Jocque
  • Darren J. Mann
  • Shaun Waters
  • Thomas J. Creedy
  • Jose M. Nuñez-Miño
  • Ana C. Samayoa
  • Thierry Vaglia
  • Jeroen Casteels


With the largest part of diversity in the world absorbed by invertebrates, ignoring invertebrates in biodiversity surveys and monitoring of areas under conservation would give a strongly incomplete image. The poor knowledge of most invertebrate taxa and their enormous diversity limits most surveys to the better-studied groups. Hawkmoths (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae) are one of the more charismatic and well-known groups among the Lepidoptera and hence a valuable group commonly used in biodiversity research. In this small-scale study, 42 museum specimens of sphingids from Cusuco National Park (Cortés, Honduras) were identified and compared to recent published accounts. This yielded three new country records and, in addition, four new regional records for the park. Some of the additions to the Honduran fauna probably result from recent taxonomic changes. However, the several contributions using a small collection of this well-studied group in an area which has attracted previous research interest, demonstrate the incomplete data availability and the necessity for more rigorous surveying. Several new records concern high altitude species, indicating the data gap in mountains. As elevation is an important determinant of sphingid community structure, sampling across an altitudinal range is recommended. This study also underpins the usefulness of a reference collection-based approach in particular, as many hawkmoth species are identified using subtle diagnostic characters.


Adhemarius Biodiversity Eumorpha Manduca Meso-America Xylophanes 



The people from Buenos Aires and Santo Tomas (vicinity of CNP) are gratefully acknowledged for their kind collaboration and guidance during field work; volunteers, students and staff members of Operation Wallacea in Honduras for data collection; the Honduran government for support, research and export permits via Administracion Forestal del Estado, Corporacion Hondureña de Desarollo Forestal (State Forest Administration—Honduran Corporation of Forest Development—AFE-COHDEFOR); J. Hogan (OUMNH) for his assistance in lab work; the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) for research funding to J.M.N.-M.; J. Haxaire (Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle de Paris) for help in identification and an anonymous referee for valuable additions to the manuscript. M.P.M.V. is recipient of a PhD grant from the Research Foundation—Flanders (FWO—Vlaanderen).


  1. Amorim FW, de Ávila RS Jr, de Camargo AJA, Vieira AL, Oliveira PE (2009) A hawkmoth crossroads? Species richness, seasonality and biogeographical affinities of Sphingidae in a Brazilian Cerrado. J Biogeogr 36:662–674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson RS, Ashe JS (2000) Leaf litter inhabiting beetles as surrogates for establishing priorities for conservation of selected tropical montane cloud forests in Honduras, Central America (Coleoptera; Staphylinidae, Curculionidae). Biodivers Conserv 9(5):617–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Birkinshaw N, Thomas CD (1999) Torch-light transect surveys for moths. J Insect Conserv 3:15–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brou VA (1994) A new species of Lapara (Sphingidae) from southeastern United States. J Lepid Soc 48(1):51–57Google Scholar
  5. Cadiou J-M, Haxaire J (1997) Description of new taxa in the genera Paonias, Nyceryx and Xylophanes with a revision of associated species (Lepidoptera, Sphingidae). Lambillionea 97:569–584Google Scholar
  6. Cadiou J-M, Hodges RW (1998) Adhemarius donysa (Druce): identification and notes on closely related species (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae). Proc Entomol Soc Wash 100(2):202–208Google Scholar
  7. D’Abrera B (1986) Sphingidae Mundi—hawk moths of the world. E.W. Classey Ltd., FaringdonGoogle Scholar
  8. Darrault RO, Schlindwein C (2002) Esfingídeos (Lepidoptera, Sphingidae) no Tabuleiro Paraibano, nordeste do Brasil: abundância, riqueza e relação com plantas esfingófilas. Rev Bras Zool 19(2):429–443 [Hawkmoths (Lepidoptera, Sphingidae) in the Tabuleiro Paraibano, northeastern Brazil: abundance, richness and relations to sphingophilous plants.]Google Scholar
  9. Druce H (1881–1900) Insecta. Lepidoptera-Heterocera vol III. R.H. Porter, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. Duarte JA Jr, Schlindwein C (2008) Hawkmoth fauna of a northern Atlantic rain forest remnant (Sphingidae). J Lepid Soc 62(2):71–79Google Scholar
  11. Duarte M, Carlin LF, Marconato G (2008) Light-attracted hawkmoths (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae) of Boracéia, municipality of Salesópolis, state of São Paulo, Brazil. CheckList 4(2):123–136Google Scholar
  12. Fox R, Randle Z, Hill L, Anders S, Wiffen L, Parsons MS (2011) Moths count: recording moths for conservation in the UK. J Insect Conserv 15:55–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Haber WA, Frankie GW (1989) A tropical hawkmoth community: Costa Rican dry forest Sphingidae. Biotropica 21(2):155–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hundsdoerfer AK, Wink M (2006) Incongruence of morphology and genetic markers in Hyles tithymali (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae) from the Canary Islands. J Zool Syst Evol Res 44(4):316–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ignatov II, Janovec JP, Centeno P, Tobler MW, Grados J, Lamas G, Kitching IJ (2011) Patterns of richness, composition, and distribution of sphingid moths along an elevational gradient in the Andes-Amazon region of Southeastern Peru. Ann Entomol Soc Am 104(1):68–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kalkman VJ, Clausnitzer V, Dijkstra K-DB, Orr AG, Paulson DR, van Tol J (2008) Global diversity of dragonflies (Odonata) in freshwater. Hydrobiologia 595:351–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kitching IJ, Cadiou J-M (2000) Hawkmoths of the world—an annotated and illustrated checklist (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae). The Natural History Museum, London and Cornell University Press, Ithaca and LondonGoogle Scholar
  18. Kitching IJ, Scoble MJ, Smith CR, James S, Young R, Blagoderov V (2011) CATE sphingidae. Accessed 21 Nov 2011
  19. León-Cortés JL, Soberón-Mainero J, Llorente-Bousquets J (1998) Assessing completeness of Mexican sphinx moth inventories through species accumulation functions. Divers Distrib 4:37–44Google Scholar
  20. Lewinsohn TM, Freitas AVL, Prado PI (2005) Conservation of terrestrial invertebrates and their habitats in Brazil. Conserv Biol 19(3):640–645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lewis OT, Senior MJM (2011) Assessing conservation status and trends for the world’s butterflies: the sampled red list index approach. J Insect Conserv 15:121–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Maes JM (1998) Insectos de Nicaragua. SETAB BOSAWAS, MARZOENA, ManaguaGoogle Scholar
  23. Marinoni RC, Dutra RRC, Mielke OHH (1999) Levantamento da fauna entomológica no Estado do Paraná. IV. Sphingidae (Lepidoptera). Diversidade alfa e estrutura de comunidade. Rev Bras Zool 16(2):223–240 [Survey of the entomological fauna in Paraná State. IV. Sphingidae (Lepidoptera). Alpha diversity and community structure.]Google Scholar
  24. Martin A, Soares A, Bizarro J (2011) A guide to the hawkmoths of the Serra dos Orgaos. Regua Publications, South-eastern BrazilGoogle Scholar
  25. Mata RA, Roque F, Tidon R (2008) Drosophilids (Insecta, Diptera) of the Paranã valley: eight new records for the Cerrado biome. Biota Neotrop 8(1):55–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mata RA, McGeoch M, Tidon R (2010) Drosophilids (Insecta, Diptera) as tools for conservation biology. Nat Conserv 8(1):60–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Medeiros HF, Klaczko LB (2004) How many species of Drosophila (Diptera, Drosophilidae) remain to be described in the forests of São Paulo, Brazil? Species lists of three forest remnants. Biota Neotrop 4(1):1–12Google Scholar
  28. Moritz C (1994) Defining ‘Evolutionarily Significant Units’ for conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 9(10):373–375PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Moss AM (1920) Sphingid of Para. Brasil. Early stages, food plants, habits, etc. Novit Zool 27:333–415Google Scholar
  30. Motta CS, Aguilera-Peralta FJ, Andreazze R (1998) Aspectos da Esfingofauna (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae), em área de terra firme, no Estado do Amazonas, Brasil. Acta Amaz 28(1):75–92Google Scholar
  31. Oehlke B (2011) Sphingidae of the Americas. Accessed 3 Nov 2011
  32. Owen DF (1972) Species diversity in tropical Sphingidae and a systematic list of species collected in Sierra Leone. J Nat Hist 6(2):177–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pittaway AR (1993) The hawkmoths of the western Palaearctic. Harley Books, ColchesterGoogle Scholar
  34. Reaka-Kudla ML (1997) The global biodiversity of coral reefs: a comparison with rain forests. In: Reaka-Kudla ML, Wilson DE, Wilson EO (eds) Biodiversity II: understanding and protecting our biological resources. Joseph Henry Press, Washington, DC, pp 83–108Google Scholar
  35. Samayoa AC, Cave RD (2008) Catálogo de las especies de Sphingidae (Lepidoptera) en Honduras. Ceiba 49(1):103–117Google Scholar
  36. Schmidt BC (2009) Hemaris thetis (Boisduval, 1855) (Sphingidae) is a distinct species. J Lepid Soc 63(2):100–109Google Scholar
  37. Schuster JC, Cano EB (2006) What can Scarabaeoidea contribute to the knowledge of the biogeography of Guatemala? Coleopts Bull 60(5):57–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Seifert JL (1974) The Sphingidae of Turrialba, Costa Rica. J New York Entomol Soc 82(1):45–56Google Scholar
  39. Sinclair F (2004) Tropical forest conservation and the importance of national parks: study of the ecology of several Chrysina species (Coleoptera: Scarabidae: Rutelinae), and the species richness of the lepidopteran family Sphingidae in Cusuco National Park, Honduras. MSc thesis, University of London and Imperial College, LondonGoogle Scholar
  40. Smith JB (1888) A monograph of the Sphingidae of America north of Mexico. American Entomological Society, PhiladelphiaCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sullivan JB (2007) Intraspecific body size variation in Macrolepidoptera as related to altitude of capture site and seasonal generation. J Lepid Soc 61(2):72–77Google Scholar
  42. Tuttle J (2007) The hawk moths of North America, a natural history study of the Sphingidae of the United States and Canada. Wedge Entomological Research Foundation, Washington, D.CGoogle Scholar
  43. Vaglia T, Haxaire J (2005) Revision des Adhemarius du complexe gannascus (Stoll, 1790) (Lepidoptera Sphingidae). Lambillionea 105(1):3–39Google Scholar
  44. Vaglia T, Haxaire J, Kitching IJ, Meusnier I, Rougerie R (2008) Morphology and DNA barcoding reveal three cryptic species within the Xylophanes neoptolemus and loelia species-groups (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae). Zootaxa 1923:18–36Google Scholar
  45. van Langevelde F, Ettema JA, Donners M, WallisDeVries MF, Groenendijk D (2011) Effect of spectral composition of artificial light on the attraction of moths. Biol Conserv 144:2274–2281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Weidemeyer JW, Calverley S, Edwards WH (1903) Illustrations of North American Lepidoptera Sphingidae. American Entomological Society, PhiladelphiaCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Young AM (1972) Notes on a community ecology of adult sphinx moths in Costa Rican lowland tropical rain forest. Carib J Sci 12(3–4):151–163Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maarten P. M. Vanhove
    • 1
    • 2
  • Merlijn Jocque
    • 1
    • 3
    • 4
  • Darren J. Mann
    • 5
  • Shaun Waters
    • 5
  • Thomas J. Creedy
    • 3
    • 5
  • Jose M. Nuñez-Miño
    • 3
    • 6
  • Ana C. Samayoa
    • 7
  • Thierry Vaglia
    • 8
  • Jeroen Casteels
    • 1
    • 9
  1. 1.BINCO vzwHaachtBelgium
  2. 2.Laboratory of Biodiversity and Evolutionary GenomicsBiology DepartmentLeuvenBelgium
  3. 3.Operation WallaceaLincolnshireUK
  4. 4.Royal Belgian Institute of Natural SciencesBrusselBelgium
  5. 5.Hope Entomological CollectionsOxford University Museum of Natural HistoryOxfordUK
  6. 6.Department of ZoologyUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
  7. 7.Insect-Plant Interaction Laboratory, Department of EntomologyNational Chung Hsing UniversityTaichungTaiwan, ROC
  8. 8.Chercheur associé à l’Insectarium de MontréalLavalCanada
  9. 9.Laboratory of Aquatic Ecology, Evolution and ConservationBiology DepartmentLeuvenBelgium

Personalised recommendations