Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The larval ecology of the butterfly Euphydryas desfontainii (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) in SW-Portugal: food plant quantity and quality as main predictors of habitat quality

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Journal of Insect Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Corresponding to theory, the persistence of metapopulations in fragmented landscapes depends on the area of suitable habitat patches and their degree of isolation, mediating the individual exchange between habitats. More recently, habitat quality has been highlighted as being equally important. We therefore assess the role of habitat area, isolation and quality for the occupancy of larval stages of the regionally threatened butterfly Euphydryas desfontainii occurring in grassland habitats comprising the host plant Dipsascus comosus. We put a special focus on habitat quality which was determined on two spatial scales: the landscape (among patches) and the within-patch level. On the landscape level, occupancy of caterpillars was determined by a presence-absence analysis at 28 host plant patches. On the within-patch level, oviposition site selection was studied by comparing 159 host plants with egg clutches to a random sample of 253 unoccupied host plants within six habitat patches. The occupancy of caterpillars and presence of egg clutches on host plants was then related to several predictors such as patch size and isolation on the landscape level and host plant characteristics and immediate surroundings on the within patch level. On the landscape level, only host plant abundance was related to the presence of caterpillars, while size and isolation did not differ between occupied and unoccupied patches. However, the weak discrimination of larval stages among patches changed on the within-patch level: here, several microclimatic predictors such as sunshine hours and topography, host plant morphology and phenology as well as further potential host plants in the immediate surroundings of the plant chosen for oviposition strongly determined the presence of egg clutches. We strongly suggest promoting the presence of the host plant in topographically and structurally rich habitat patches to offer potential for microclimatic compensation for a species considered threatened by climate change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anthes N, Fartmann T, Hermann G, Kaule G (2003) Combining larval habitat quality and metapopulation structure—the key for successful management of pre-alpine Euphydryas aurinia colonies. J Insect Conserv 7:175–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anthes N, Fartmann T, Hermann G (2008) The Duke of Burgundy butterfly and its dukedom: larval niche variation in Hamearis lucina across Central Europe. J Insect Conserv 12:3–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Betzholtz PE, Ehrig A, Lindeborg M, Dinnetz P (2007) Food plant density, patch isolation and vegetation height determine occurrence in a Swedish metapopulation of the marsh fritillary Euphydryas aurinia (Rottemburg 1775) (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae). J Insect Conserv 11:343–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Botham M, Ash D, Aspey N, Bourn N, Bulman C, Roy D, Swain J, Zannese A, Pywell R (2011) The effects of habitat fragmentation on niche requirements of the marsh fritillary, Euphydryas aurinia, (Rottemburg 1775) on calcareous grasslands in southern UK. J Insect Conserv 15:269–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowler DE, Benton TG (2005) Causes and consequences of animal dispersal strategies: relating individual behaviour to spatial dynamics. Biol Rev 80:205–225

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke K, Gorley R (2006) PRIMER v6: user manual/tutorial. PRIMER-E, Plymouth

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis RLH, Sparks TH (2006) When is a habitat not a habitat? Dramatic resource use changes under differing weather conditions for the butterfly Plebejus argus. Biol Conserv 129:291–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennis RLH, Shreeve TG, Van Dyck H (2003) Towards a functional resource-based concept for habitat: a butterfly biology viewpoint. Oikos 102:417–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennis RLH, Shreeve TG, Van Dyck H (2006) Habitats and resources: the need for a resource-based definition to conserve butterflies. Biodivers Conserv 15:1943–1966

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dover J, Settele J (2009) The influences of landscape structure on butterfly distribution and movement: a review. J Insect Conserv 13:3–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich PR (1992) Population biology of checkerspot butterflies and the preservation of global biodiversity. Oikos 63:6–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich PR, Hanski I (eds) (2004) On the wings of checkerspots: a model system for population biology. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich PR, Murphy DD (1987) Conservation lessons from long-term studies of checkerspot butterflies. Conserv Biol 1:122–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichel S, Fartmann T (2008) Management of calcareous grasslands for Nickerl’s fritillary (Melitaea aurelia) has to consider habitat requirements of the immature stages, isolation, and patch area. J Insect Conserv 12:677–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahrig L (2003) Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annu Rev Ecol Evol S 34:487–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fartmann T, Hermann G (eds) (2006) Larvalökologie von Tagfaltern und Widderchen in Mitteleuropa. Westfälisches Museum für Naturkunde, Münster

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowles AP, Smith RG (2006) Mapping the habitat quality of patch networks for the marsh fritillary Euphydryas aurinia (Rottemburg 1775) (Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae) in wales. J Insect Conserv 10:161–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García-Barros E, Fartmann T (2009) Butterfly oviposition: sites, behaviour and modes. In: Settele J, Shreeve TG, Konvicka M, Van Dyck H (eds) Ecology of butterflies in Europe. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 29–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanski I (1998) Metapopulation dynamics. Nature 396:41–49

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hanski I, Gaggiotti OE (2004) Ecology, genetics, and evolution of metapopulations. Academic Press, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison S, Murphy DD, Ehrlich PR (1988) Distribution of the bay checkerspot butterfly, Euphydryas editha bayensis: evidence for a metapopulation model. Am Nat 132:360–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hellmann JJ (2002) The effect of an environmental change on mobile butterfly larvae and the nutritional quality of their hosts. J Anim Ecol 71:925–936

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson JA, Thomas CD, Wintle BA, Moilanen A (2009) Climate change, connectivity and conservation decision making: back to basics. J Appl Ecol 46:964–969

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson JB, Omland KS (2004) Model selection in ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 19:101–108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Konvicka M, Hula V, Fric Z (2003) Habitat of pre-hibernating larvae of the endangered butterfly Euphydryas aurinia (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae): what can be learned from vegetation composition and architecture? Eur J Entomol 100:313–322

    Google Scholar 

  • Kudrna O (ed) (2002) Aspects of the conservation of butterflies in Europe. Aula, Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuussaari M, van Nouhuys S, Hellmann J, Singer M (2004) Larval biology of checker spots. In: Ehrlich PR, Hanski I (eds) On the wings of checkerspots. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 138–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu W, Wang Y, Xu R (2006) Habitat utilization by ovipositing females and larvae of the Marsh fritillary (Euphydryas aurinia) in a mosaic of meadows and croplands. J Insect Conserv 10:351–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mabberley DJ, Placito PJ (1993) Algarve plants and landscapes: passing tradition and ecological change. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Maravalhas E (2003) The butterflies of Portugal. Apollo Books, Stenstrup

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortelliti A, Amori G, Boitani L (2010) The role of habitat quality in fragmented landscapes: a conceptual overview and prospectus for future research. Oecologia 163:535–547

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy DD, Weiss SB (1988) Ecological studies and the conservation of the bay checkerspot butterfly, Euphydryas editha bayensis. Biol Conserv 46:183–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • New TR, Pyle RM, Thomas JA, Thomas CD, Hammond PC (1995) Butterfly conservation management. Annu Rev Entomol 40:57–83

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Novoa Pérez J, García-Villanueva M (1996) Biología y distribución geográfica de Euphydryas desfontainii (Godart 1819) en el suroeste de la Península Ibérica (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Shilap Rev Lepidopt 94:213–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabasa SG, Gutiérrez D, Escudero A (2005) Egg laying by a butterfly on a fragmented host plant: a multi-level approach. Ecography 28:629–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renwick JAA, Chew FS (1994) Oviposition behavior in Lepidoptera. Annu Rev Entomol 39:377–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sala OE, Stuart Chapin F III, Armesto JJ, Berlow E, Bloomfield J, Dirzo R, Huber-Sanwald E, Huenneke LF, Jackson RB, Kinzig A, Leemans R, Lodge DM, Mooney HA, Oesterheld M, Poff NL, Sykes MT, Walker BH, Walker M, Wall DH (2000) Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science 287:1770–1774

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Settele J, Kudrna O, Harpke A, Kühn I, Van Swaay C, Verovnik R, Warren MS, Wiemers M, Hanspach J, Hickler T et al (2008) Climatic risk atlas of European butterflies. Pensoft Moscow, Sofia, Bulgaria

  • Smee M, Smyth W, Tunmore M, ffrench-Constant R, Hodgson D (2011) Butterflies on the brink: habitat requirements for declining populations of the marsh fritillary (Euphydryas aurinia) in SW England. J Insect Conserv 15:153–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas J (2005) Monitoring change in the abundance and distribution of insects using butterflies and other indicator groups. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 360:339–357

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas JA, Bourn NAD, Clarke RT, Stewart KE, Simcox DJ, Pearman GS, Curtis R, Goodger B (2001) The quality and isolation of habitat patches both determine where butterflies persist in fragmented landscapes. P Roy Soc Lond B Bio 268:1791–1796

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas JA, Simcox DJ, Hovestadt T (2010) Evidence based conservation of butterflies. J Insect Conserv 15:241–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tolman T, Lewington R (1998) Die Tagfalter Europas und Nordwestafrikas. Franckh-Kosmos Verlag, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Tonne F (1954) Besser Bauen mit Besonnungs- und Tageslicht- Planung. Hofmann, Stuttgart

  • Tscharntke T, Brandl R (2003) Plant-insect interactions in fragmented landscapes. Annu Rev Entomol 49:405–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turlure C, Choutt J, Baguette M, Van Dyck H (2010) Microclimatic buffering and resource-based habitat in a glacial relict butterfly: significance for conservation under climate change. Glob Change Biol 16:1883–1893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Swaay C, Warren M (1999) Red data book of European butterflies (Rhopalocera). Council of Europe Publishing, Strasbourg

    Google Scholar 

  • van Swaay C, Maes D, Collins S, Munguira ML, Šašić M, Settele J, Verovnik R, Warren M, Wiemers M, Wynhoff I (2011) Applying IUCN criteria to invertebrates: how red is the red list of European butterflies? Biol Conserv 144:470–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wahlberg N (2001) The phylogenetics and biochemistry of host-plant specialization in Melitaeine butterflies (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Evolution 55:522–537

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wahlberg N, Klemetti T, Hanski I (2002) Dynamic populations in a dynamic landscape: the metapopulation structure of the marsh fritillary butterfly. Ecography 25:224–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren MS (1987) The ecology and conservation of the Heath Fritillary butterfly, Mellicta athalia. I. Host selection and phenology. J Appl Ecol 24:467–482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss SB, Murphy DD, White RR (1988) Sun, slope, and butterflies: topographic determinants of habitat quality for Euphydryas editha. Ecology 69:1486–1496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiklund C (1984) Egg-laying patterns in butterflies in relation to their phenology and the visual apparency and abundance of their host plants. Oecologia 63:23–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The study was legally approved by the Instituto da Conservação da Natureza, Lisbon. F. Pennekamp was partly funded by a grant from the lifelong learning program of the EU Commission, sponsored by Leonardo Kontakt Rheinland-Pfalz. We thank Patricia Garcia-Pereira and TAGIS – Centro de Conservação das Borboletas de Portugal for logistical help and information on the distribution of E. desfontainii in Portugal. Comments by V. Radchuck and C. Turlure improved an earlier draft of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Frank Pennekamp.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pennekamp, F., Monteiro, E. & Schmitt, T. The larval ecology of the butterfly Euphydryas desfontainii (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) in SW-Portugal: food plant quantity and quality as main predictors of habitat quality. J Insect Conserv 17, 195–206 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-012-9497-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-012-9497-9

Keywords

Navigation