Advertisement

Journal of Insect Conservation

, Volume 16, Issue 5, pp 791–800 | Cite as

Climate-based model of spatial pattern of the species richness of ants in Georgia

  • Giorgi Chaladze
ORIGINAL PAPER

Abstract

For optimal planning of conservation and monitoring measures, it is important to know the spatial pattern of species richness and especially areas with high species richness. A spatial pattern of the species richness of ants in Georgia (Caucasus) was modeled, areas with the highest number of ant’s species were inferred, and climatic factors that influence the pattern of ant diversity were identified. A database was created by accumulating occurrences for 63 ant species, including 256 localities and 2,018 species/occurrences. Species richness was positively correlated with variables associated with temperature and negatively correlated with variables associated with precipitation. Species richness reaches a maximum at the elevations 800–1,200 m a.s.l. and declines at both lower and higher altitudes. The role of climatic variables and geography of the study area in determining the observed pattern of species richness is discussed.

Keywords

Biodiversity Climatic variables Formicidae Spatial pattern Altitudinal gradient Ground moisture 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I thank Lexo Gavashelishvili and David Tarkhnishvili for providing valuable suggestions during the statistical analysis and for their comments on manuscript. I also express my gratitude to two anonymous reviewers whose comments significantly improved manuscript.

References

  1. Agosti D, Majer JD, Alonso LE, Schultz TR (2000) Ants: standard methods for measuring and monitoring biological diversity. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersen AN, Majer JD (2004) Ants show the way down-under: invertebrates as bioindicators in land management. Front Ecol Environ 2:218–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bestelmeyer BT, Wiens JA (2001) Ant biodiversity in semi-arid landscape mosaics: the consequences of grazing vs. natural heterogeneity. Ecol Appl 11:1123–1140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brühl CA, Mohamed M, Linsenmair KE (1999) Altitudinal distribution of leaf litter ants along a transect in primary forests on Mount Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia. J Trop Ecol 15:265–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ceballos G, Brown JH (1995) Global patterns of mammalian diversity, endemism, and endangerment. Conserv Biol 9:559–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dunn RR, Sanders NJ, Fitzpatrick MC, Laurent E, Lessard J-P, Agosti D, Andersen AN, Bruhl C, Cerda X, Ellison AM, Fisher BL, Gibb H, Gotelli NJ, Gove A, Guenard B, Janda M, Kaspari M, Longino JT, Majer J, Mcglynn TP, Menke SB, Parr CL, Philpott SM, Pfeiffer M, Retana J, Suarez AV, Vasconcelos HL (2007) Global ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) biodiversity and biogeography—a new database and its possibilities. Myrmecological News 10:77–83Google Scholar
  7. Dunn RR, Sanders NJ, Menke SB, Weiser MD, Fitzpatrick MC, Laurent E, Lessard J-P, Agosti D, Andersen A, Bruhl C, Cerda X, Ellison A, Fisher B, Gibb H, Gotelli H, Gove A, Guénard B, Janda M, Kaspari M, Longino JT, Majer J, McGlynn TP, Menke SB, Parr C, Philpott S, Pfeiffer M, Retana J, Suarez A, Vasconcelos H (2009) Climatic drivers of hemispheric asymmetry in global patterns of ant species richness. Ecol Lett 12:324–333PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eliava I, Cholokava A, Kvavadze E, Bakhtadze G, Bukhnikashvili A (2007) New data on animal biodiversity of Georgia. Bulletin of the Georgian National Academy of Sciences 175(2):115–119Google Scholar
  9. Fisher BL (1999) Ant diversity patterns along an elevational gradient in the resreve Naturalle Integraled’Andohalela, Madagascar. Fieldiana Zool 94:129–147Google Scholar
  10. Fitzpatrick MC, Weltzin JF, Sanders NJ, Dunn RR (2007) The biogeography of prediction error: why does the introduced range of the fire ant over-predict its native range? Glob Ecol Biogeogr 16(1):24Google Scholar
  11. Frouz J (2000) The effect of nest moisture on daily temperature regime in the nest of Formica polyctena wood ants. Insect Soc 47:229–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Frouz J, Finer L (2007) Diurnal and seasonal flucatuations in wood ant (Formica polyctena) nest temperature in two geographically distant populations along a south - north gradient. Insect Soci 54:251–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Frouz J, Jilkova V (2008) The effect of ants on soil properties and processes (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecol News 11:191–199Google Scholar
  14. Garcia A (2006) Using ecological niche modelling to identify diversity hotspots for the herpetofauna of Pacific lowlands and adjacent interior valleys of Mexico. Biol Conserv 130:25–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gratiashvili N, Barjadze Sh (2008) Checklist of the ants (FORMICIDAE LATREILLE, 1809) of Georgia. Proc Instit Zool 23:130–146Google Scholar
  16. Green WP, Pettry DE, Switzer RE (1999) Structure and hydrology of mounds of the imported fire ants in the south-eastern United States. Geoderma 93:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL, Jones PG, Jarvis A (2005) Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int J Climogy 25:1965–1978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Iverson LR, Prasad MA (2001) Potential changes in tree species richness and forest community types following climate change. Ecosystems 4:186–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Janzen DH (1973) Sweep samples of tropical foliage insects: effects of seasons, vegetation types, elevation, time of day, and insularity. Ecology 54:687-708Google Scholar
  20. Kaspari M, Majer JD (2000) Using ants to monitor environmental change. In: Agosti D, Majer JD, Alonso LE, Schultz TR (eds) Ants: standard methods for measuring and monitoring biodiversity. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, pp 89–98Google Scholar
  21. Kass G (1980) An exploratory technique for investigating large quantities of categorical data. Appl Stat 29:119–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kerr JT (2001) Butterfly species richness patterns in Canada: energy, heterogeneity, and the potential consequences of climate change. Conserv Ecol 5(1):10. [Online] URL: http://www.consecol.org/vol5/iss1/art10/ Google Scholar
  23. Kienasta F, Wildia O, Brzezieckib B (1998) Potential impacts of climate change on species richness in mountain forests—an ecological risk assessment. Bioll Conserv 83:291–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Krebs CJ (2001) Ecology: the experimental analysis of distribution and abundance. Benjamin Cummings, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  25. Lawton JH, Bifnell DE, Bolton B, Blowmers GF, Eggleton P, Hammond PM, Hodda M, Holt RD, Larsen TB, Mawdsley NA, Stork NE, Srivastava DS, Watt AD (1998) Biodiversity inventories, indicator taxa and effects of habitat modification in tropical forest. Nature 391:72–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McCahon TJ, Lockwood JA (1990) Nest architecture and pedoturbation of Formica obscuripes FOREL (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Pan-Pac Entomol 66:147–156Google Scholar
  27. Muñoz MES, Giovanni R, Siqueira MF, Sutton T, Brewer P, Pereira RS, Canhos DAL, Canhos VP (2009) openModeller: a generic approach to species’ potential distribution modelling. GeoInformatica 15:111–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Myers N, Mittermier RA, Mittermier CG, da Fonseca GAB, Kent J (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853–858PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Newbold T, Gilbert F, Zalat S, El-Gabbas A, Reader T (2009) Climate-based models of spatial patterns of species richness in Egypt’s butterfly and mammal fauna. J Biogeog 36:2085–2095CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Oliver I, Beattie AJ, York A (1998) Spatial fidelity of plants, vertebrate and invertebrate assemblages in multiple-use forest in Eastern Australia. Conserv Biol 12:822–835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Olson DM (1994) The distribution of leaf litter invertebrates along a neotropical altitudinal gradient. J Trop Ecol 10:129–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ortega-Huerta MA, Peterson AT (2008) Modeling ecological niches and predicting geographic distributions - a test of six presence-only methods. Rev Mex Biodivers 79:205–216Google Scholar
  33. Sabu TK, Vineesh PJ, Vinod KV (2008) Diversity of forest litter-inhabiting ants along elevations in the Wayanad region of the Western Ghats. J Insect Sci 8:69. Available online: insectscience.org/8.69Google Scholar
  34. Samson DA, Rickart EA, Gonzales PC (1997) Ant diversity and abundance along an elevational gradient in the Philippines. Biotropica 29(3):349–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sanders NJ, Moss J, Wagner D (2003) Patterns of ant species richness along elevational gradients in an arid ecosystem. Global Ecol Biogeog 12:93–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sauberer N, Zulka KP, Abensperg-Traun M, Berg HM, Bieringer G, Milasowszy N, Moser D, Storch C, Trostl R, Zechmeister H, Grabherr G (2004) Surrogate taxa for biodiversity in agricultural landscapes of eastern Austria. Biol Conser 117:181–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Siemann E (1998) Experimental tests of effects of plant productivity and diversity on grassland Arthropod diversity. Ecology 79:2057-2070Google Scholar
  38. Soberon J, Peterson AT (2005) Interpretation of models of fundamental ecological niches and species’ distributional areas. Biodivers Inform 2:1–10Google Scholar
  39. Srivastava DS, Lawton JH (1998) Why more productive sites have more species: an experimental test of theory using tree-hole communities. Am Nat 152:510–529Google Scholar
  40. Stockwell DRB (1999) Genetic algorithms II. In: Fielding AH (ed) Machine learning methods for ecological applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, pp 123–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Stockwell DRB, Peters DP (1999) The GARP modeling system: problems and solutions to automated spatial prediction. Int J Geogr Infn Syst 13:143–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Swets JA (1986) Indexes of discrimination or diagnostic accuracy—their ROCs and implied models. Psychol Bull 99:100–117PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tarkhnishvili D, Chaladze G, Gavashelishvili L, Javakhishvili Z, Mumladze L (2010) Georgian biodiversity database. Internet: http://www.biodiversity-georgia.net/. Accessed 12 Feb 2011
  44. Thornthwaite CW (1948) An approach toward a rational classification of climate. Geogr Rev 38:55–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Thornthwaite CW, Mather JR (1957) Instructions and tables for computing potential evapotranspiration and the water balance. Publ Climatol 10:311Google Scholar
  46. Toranza C, Arim M (2010) Cross-taxon congruence and environmental conditions. Ecology 10:18PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Van Diepen MV, Franses HP (2006) Evaluating Chi-squared automatic interaction detection. Inf Syst 31:814–831CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Van Hamburg H, Andersen AN, Meyer WJ, Robertson HG (2004) Ant commun ity development on rehabilitated ash dams in South African Highveld. Restor Ecol 12:552–558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wielgoss A, Tscharntke T, Buchori D, Fiala B, Clough Y (2010) Temperature and a dominant dolichoderine ant species affect ant diversity in Indonesian cacao plantations. Agr Ecosyst Environ 135:253–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of EcologyIlia State UniversityTbilisiGeorgia

Personalised recommendations