Journal of Insect Conservation

, Volume 16, Issue 5, pp 677–695 | Cite as

Ants on a mountain: spatial, environmental and habitat associations along an altitudinal transect in a centre of endemism

  • T. C. Munyai
  • S. H. Foord


Mountains are biodiversity hotspots and provide spatially compressed versions of regional and continental variation. They might be the most cost effective way to measure the environmental associations of regional biotic communities and their response to global climate change. We investigated spatial variation in epigeal ant diversity along a north–south elevational transect over the Soutpansberg Mountain in South Africa, to see to what extent these patterns can be related to spatial (regional) and environmental (local) variables and how restricted taxa are to altitudinal zones and vegetation types. A total of 40,294 ants, comprising 78 species were caught. Ant richness peaked at the lowest elevation of the southern aspect but had a hump-shaped pattern along the northern slope. Species richness, abundance and assemblage structure were associated with temperature and the proportion of bare ground. Local environment and spatially structured environmental variables comprised more than two-thirds of the variation explained in species richness, abundance and assemblage structure, while space alone (regional processes) was responsible for <10%. Species on the northern aspect were more specific to particular vegetation types, whereas the southern aspect’s species were more generalist. Lower elevation species’ distributions were more restricted. The significance of temperature as an explanatory variable of ant diversity across the mountain could provide a predictive surrogate for future changes. The effect of CO2-induced bush encroachment on the southern aspect could have indirect impacts complicating prediction, but ant species on the northern aspect should move uphill at a rate proportional to their thermal tolerance and the regional increases in temperature. Two species are identified that might be at risk of local extinction.


Formicidae Transect Altitude Monitoring Indicator taxa Elevation Biosphere Reserve 



Special thanks to Colin Schoeman and Brigitte Braschler for verifying identifications. Hendrik Sithole provided access to the Kruger National Park ant collection and Norbert Hahn for his various inputs. We are also grateful to Ian and Retha Gaigher, Oldrich van Schalkwyk and the several volunteers at Lajuma Research Centre for their hospitality assistance in the field as well as Dave Dewsnap for access to and support on the farm Goro. This study was funded by the DST-NRF, Centre of Excellence for Invasion Biology and the University of Venda.


  1. Abensperg-Traun M, Steven D (1995) The effects of pitfall trap diameter on ant species richness (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and species composition of the catch in a semi-arid eucalypt woodland. J Ecol 20:282–287Google Scholar
  2. Adis J (1979) Problems of interpreting arthropod sampling with pitfall traps. Zool Anz 202:177–184Google Scholar
  3. Andersen AN (1992) Regulation of “momentary” diversity by dominant species in exceptionally rich ant communities of the Australian seasonal tropics. Am Nat 140:401–420PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andersen AN (1995) A classification of Australian ant communities, based on functional groups which parallel plant life-forms in relation to stress and disturbance. J Biogeogr 22:15–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Andersen AN, Sparling GP (1997) Ants as indicators of restoration success: relationship with soil microbial biomass in the Australian seasonal tropics. Restor Ecol 5:109–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berger K, Crafford JE, Gaigher I, Gaigher MJ, Hahn N, Macdonald I (2003) A first synthesis of the environmental, biological & cultural assets of the Soutpansberg. Leach Printers & Signs CC, Louis TrichardtGoogle Scholar
  7. Bestelmeyer BT (2000) The trade-off between thermal tolerance and behavioural dominance in a subtropical South American ant community. J Anim Ecol 69:998–1009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bestelmeyer BT, Wiens JA (1996) The effects of land use on the structure of ground-foraging ant communities in the Argentine Chaco. Ecol Appl 6:1225–1240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bolton B (1984) Identification guide to the ant genera of the world. Harvard University Press, MasschussetsGoogle Scholar
  10. Bond WJ (2008) What limits trees in C4 grasslands and savannas? Annu Rev Ecol Syst 39:641–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bond, WJ, Midgeley, GF (2000) A proposed CO2-controlled mechanism of woody plant invasion in grasslands and savannas. Glob Change Biol 6Google Scholar
  12. Boonzaaier C, McGeoch MA, Parr CL (2007) Fine-scale temporal and spatial dynamics of epigaeic ants in Fynbos: sampling implications. Afr Entomol 15:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Borcard D, Legendre P (2002) All-scale spatial analysis of ecological data by means of principal coordinates of neighbour matrices. Ecol Model 153:51–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Borcard D, Legendre P, Drapeau P (1992) Partialling out the spatial component of ecological variation. Ecology 73:1045–1055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Borcard D, Legendre P, Avois-Jacquet C, Tuomisto H (2004) Dissecting the spatial structure of ecological data at multiple scales. Ecology 85:1826–1832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Botes A, McGeoch MA, Robertson HG, Van Niekerk A, Davids HP, Chown SL (2006) Ants, altitude and change in the northern Cape Floristic Region. J Biogeogr 33:71–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Botes A, McGeoch MA, Chown SL (2007) Ground-dwelling beetle assemblages in the northern Cape Floristic Region: patterns, correlates and implications. Austral Ecol 32:210–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Brown WLJ (1973) A comparison of the Hylean and Congo-west African rain forest ant faunas. In: Tropical forest ecosystems in Africa and South America. Smithsonian Institutional Press, Washington, pp 161–185Google Scholar
  19. Brown JH, Valone T, Curtin C (1997) Reorganization of an arid ecosystem in response to recent climate change. Proc Nat Acad Sci U S A 94:9729–9733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Carvalho JC, Cardoso P, Crespo LC, Henriques S, Carvalho R, Gomes P (2011) Determinants of beta diversity of spiders in coastal dunes along a gradient of Mediterraneity. Divers Distrib 17:225–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Chown SL, Gaston KJ (2000) Areas, cradles and museums: the latitudinal gradient in species richness. Trends Ecol Evol 15:311–315PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Colwell, RK (2006) Estimate S: Statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples. Version 8. Persistent URL
  23. Colwell RK, Brehm G, Cardelus CL, Gilman AC, Longino JT (2008) Global warming, elevational range shifts, and lowland biotic attrition in the wet tropics. Science 322:258–261PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Davis, C, Archer, E, Engelbrecht, F, Landman, W, Stevens, N, Nkambule, C, Maserumule, R, Van der Merwe, M (2010) A climate change handbook for north-eastern South AfricaGoogle Scholar
  25. Dray S, Legendre P, Peres-Neto PR (2006) Spatial modelling: a comprehensive framework for principal coordinate analysis of neighbour matrices (PCNM). Ecol Model 196:483–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dufrene M, Legendre P (1997) Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecol Monogr 67:345–366Google Scholar
  27. Dunn RR, Agosti D, Andersen AN, Arnan X, Bruhl CA, Cerdá X, Ellison AM, Fisher BL, Fitzpatrick MC, Gibb H, Gotelli NJ, Gove AD, Guenard B, Janda M, Kaspari M, Laurent EJ, Lessard JP, Longino JT, Majer JD, Menke SB, McGlynn TP, Parr CL, Philpott SM, Pfeiffer M, Retana J, Suarez AV, Vasconcelos HL, Weiser MD, Sanders NJ (2009) Climatic drivers of hemispheric asymmetry in global patterns of ant species richness. Ecol Lett 12:324–333PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Foord SH, Dippenaar-Schoeman AS, Van der Merwe M (2002) A check list of the spider fauna of the Western Soutpansberg, South Africa (Arachnida: Araneae). Koedoe 45:35–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Foord SH, Mafadza M, Dippenaar-Schoeman AS, Van Rensburg BJ (2008) Micro-scale heterogeneity of spiders (Arachnida: Araneae) in the Soutpansberg, South Africa: a comparative survey and inventory in representative habitats. Afr Zool 43:156–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Greenslade PJM (1973) Sampling ants with pitfall traps: digging in effects. Insectes Soc 20:343–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Haddad CR (2009) Vendaphaea, a new dark sac spider genus apparently endemic to the Soutpansberg Mountains, South Africa (Araneae: Corinnidae). Afr Invert 50:269–278Google Scholar
  32. Haddon IG, McCarthy TS (2005) The Mesozoic-Cenoic interior sag basins of Central Africa: late cretaceous-cenozoic Kalahri and Okavango basins. J Afr Earth Sc 43:316–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hahn N (1997) Plant diversity statistics of the Soutpansberg. SABONET News 2:106–109Google Scholar
  34. Hahn N (2002) Endemic flora of the Soutpansberg. University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, p 219Google Scholar
  35. Hahn N (2006) Floristic diversity of the Soutpansberg, Limpopo Province, South Africa, In Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences. University of Pretoria, Pretoria, p 421Google Scholar
  36. Hodkinson ID (2005) Terrestrial insects along elevation gradients: species and community responses to altitude. Biol Rev 80:489–513PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1990) The ants. Harvard University Press, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  38. Hubbell SP (2001) The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  39. Huber BA (2003) Southern African pholcid spiders: revision and cladistic analysis of Quamtana gen. nov. and Spermaphora Hentz (Araneae: Pholcidae), with notes on male-female covariation. Zool J Linn Soc 139:477–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Jankowski JE, Ciecka AL, Meyer NY, Rabenold KN (2009) Beta diversity along environmental gradients: implications of habitat specialization in tropical montane landscapes. J Anim Ecol 78:315–327PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jocqué R (2008) A new candidate for a Gondwanaland distribution in Zodariidae (Araneae): Australutica in Africa. Zookeys 1:59–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kaspari M, Majer JD (2000) Using ants to monitor environmental change. Smithsonian Institution Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  43. Kaspari M, O’Donnel S, Kercher JR (2000) Energy, density and constraints to species richness: ant assemblages along a productivity gradient. Am Nat 155:280–293PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kattan GH, Franco P, Saavedra-RodrÍGuez CA, Valderrama C, Rojas V, Osorio D, MartÍNez J (2006) Spatial components of bird diversity in the Andes of Colombia: implications for designing a regional reserve system. Conserv Biol 20:1203–1211PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Legendre P, Legendre L (1998) Numerical ecology. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  46. Legendre P, Mi X, Ren H, Ma K, Yu M, Sun I-F, He F (2009) Partitioning beta diversity in a subtropical broad-leaved forest of China. Ecology 90:663–674PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lepš J, Šmilauer P (2003) Multivariate analysis of ecological data using CANOCO. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  48. Lindsey PA, Skinner JD (2001) Ant composition and activity patterns as determined by pitfall trapping and other methods in three habitats in the semi-arid Karoo. J Arid Environ 48:551–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Loarie, SR, Duffy, PB, Hamilton, H, Asner, GP, Field, CB, Ackerly, DD (2009) The velocity of climate change.(LETTERS)(Report). Nature 462: 1052(1056)Google Scholar
  50. Lomolino MV (2001) Elevation gradients of species-density: historical and prospective views. Glob Ecol Biogeog 10:3–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Longino, JT, Colwell, RK (2011) Density compensation, species composition, and richness on a neotropical elevational gradient. Ecosphere 2:3: art29Google Scholar
  52. McCullagh P, Nelder JA (1989) Generalized linear models. Chapman & Hall/CRC, LondonGoogle Scholar
  53. McGeoch MA, Price PW (2004) Spatial abundance structures in an assemblage of gall-forming sawflies. J Anim Ecol 73:506–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. McGeoch MA, Van Rensburg BJ, Botes A (2002) The verification and application of bioindicators: a case study of dung beetles in a savanna ecosystem. J Appl Ecol 39:661–672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. McKillup S (2006) Statistics explained: an introduction guide for life scientists. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  56. Mitrovich MJ, Matsuda T, Pease KH, Fisher RN (2010) Ants as a measure of effectiveness of habitat conservation planning in Southern California. Conserv Biol 24:1239–1248PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Mostert THC, Bredenkamp GJ, Klopper HL, Verwey C, Mostert RE, Hahn N (2008) Major vegetation tyes of the Soutpansberg Conservancy and the Blouberg Nature Reserve, South Africa. Koedoe 50:32–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Oksanen, J, Kindt, R, Legendre, P, O’Hara, RB (2007) Vegan: community ecology package. R package version 1.9-15. Available at: (last accessed: 1 June 2011)
  59. Parr C, Chown S (2001) Inventory and bioindicator sampling: testing pitfall and winkler methods with ants in a South African savanna. J Insect Conserv 5:27–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Parr CL, Robertson HG, Biggs HC, Chown SL (2004) Response of African savanna ants to long-term fire regimes. J Appl Ecol 41:630–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Parr CL, Sinclair BJ, Andersen AN, Gaston KJ, Chown SL (2005) Constraint and competition in assemblages: a cross-continental and modeling approach for ants. Am Nat 165:481–494PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Peres-Neto PR, Legendre P (2010) Estimating and controlling for spatial structure in the study of ecological communities. Global Ecol Biogeogr 19:174–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Pimm SL (2009) Climate disruption and biodiversity. Curr Biol 19:R595–R601PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Pryke J, Samways M (2010) Significant variables for the conservation of mountain invertebrates. J Insect Conserv 14:247–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. R Development Core Team (2011) R: a langauge and environment for statistical computing. Available at: (last accessed: 30 September 2011)
  66. Ricklefs RE (1987) Community diversity: relative roles of local and regional processes. Science 235:167–171PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Rosenberg MS, Anderson CD (2011) PASSaGE: Pattern analysis, spatial statistics and geographic exegesis. Version 2. Methods Ecol Evol 2:229–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Rosenzweig ML (1995) Species diversity in space and time. Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Rotenberry JT, Wiens JA (1980) Habitat structure, patchiness, and avian communities in North American steppe vegetation: a multivariate analysis. Ecology 61:1228–1250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Ruggiero A, Hawkins BA (2008) Why do mountains support so many species of birds? Ecography 31:306–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Samways M (1983) Community structure of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in a series of habitats associated with citrus. J Appl Ecol 20:833–847CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Samways M (1990a) Species temporal variability: epigaeic ant assemblages and management for abundance and scarcity. Oecologia 84:482–490Google Scholar
  73. Samways MJ (1990b) Land forms and winter habitat refugia in the conservation of montane grasshoppers in Southern Africa. Conserv Biol 4:375–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Samways MJ, McGeoch MA, New TR (2010) Insect conservation: a handbook of approaches and methods. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  75. Sanders NJ (2002) Elevational gradients in ant species richness: area, geometry, and Rapoport’s Rule. Ecography 25:25–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Sanders NJ, Lessard J-P, Fitzpatrick MC, Dunn RR (2007) Temperature, but not productivity or geometry, predicts elevational diversity gradients in ants across spatial grains. Glob Ecol Biol 16:640–649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Smith JL, Halvorson JJ, Bolton H Jr (2002) Soil properties and microbial activity across a 500 m elevation gradient in a semi-arid environment. Soil Biol Biochem 34:1749–1757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Stevens GC (1992) The elevational gradient in altitudinal range: an extension of Rapoport’s latitudinal rule to altitude. Am Nat 140:893–911PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Swart JM, Richardson PRK, Ferguson JWH (1999) Ecological factors affecting the feeding behaviour of pangolins (Manis temminckii). J Zool 247:281–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Taylor B (2010) The ants of (sub-Saharan) Africa (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)Google Scholar
  81. Team, RDC (2009) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Available at: (last accessed: 30 September 2011)
  82. Ter Braak CJF, Šmilauer P (2008) CANOCO reference manual and canodraw for windows user’s guide: software for canonical community ordination (version 4.5). Microcomputer Power, IthacaGoogle Scholar
  83. Van Rensburg BJ, Chown SL, Gaston KJ (2002) Species richness, environmental correlates, and spatial scale: a test using South African birds. Am Nat 159:567–577Google Scholar
  84. Van Wyk AE, Smith GF (2001) Regions of floristic endemism in Southern Africa. Umdaus Press, PretoriaGoogle Scholar
  85. Whittaker RH (1956) Vegetation of the Great Smoky Mountains. Ecol Monogr 26:1–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Wu F, Yang XJ, Yang JX (2010) Additive diversity partitioning as a guide to regional montane reserve design in Asia: an example from Yunnan Province, China. Divers Distrib 16:1022–1033CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Invasion Biology and Department of ZoologyUniversity of VendaThohoyandouSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations