Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Habitat selection by the highly endangered long-horned beetle Rosalia alpina in Southern Europe: a multiple spatial scale assessment

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Journal of Insect Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite the popularity of the saproxylic cerambycid Rosalia alpina as a flagship species, its ecology is still poorly know, especially in the southern part of its range. Detailed information on its habitat preferences is needed to plan appropriate management. We set our multiple spatial scale assessment of habitat preferences in a beech forest of central Italy whose landscape, featuring both unmanaged forest and two types of grazed open forest, allowed us to look at the influence of different land uses. Preferred trees occurred in open sites, and those close to tall undergrowth were avoided. A range of moribund or dead trees were used: those preferred had a lower percentage canopy closure, significantly thicker bark, and were more sun-exposed, than the average. Logistic regression showed that the most important variables for selection were distance from nearest occupied tree, bark thickness, undergrowth height and irradiation. Occurrence likelihood augmented as the distance from nearest other occupied tree increased. Despite being mostly unmanaged, forest was avoided, whereas open forest (with trees pruned by ‘shredding’) was used more than expected. Although intensive forestry limits the availability of dead wood, closed forest may be unsuitable when shadowing useful substrate. The disappearance of traditional forms of forest management as shredding and moderate cattle grazing may lead to woody vegetation expansion and habitat closure eventually threatening the persistence of R. alpina. The return to traditional habitat management would be beneficial to R. alpina, an issue that conservation plans should carefully take it into account.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aulén G (1988) Ecology and distribution of white-backed woodpecker Dendrocopos leucotos in Sweden. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Wildlife Ecology, Report No. 14

  • Berg A, Ehnstrom B, Gustafsson L, Hallingback T, Jonsell M, Weslien J (1994) Threatened plant, animal, and fungus species in Swedish forests: distribution and habitat associations. Conserv Biol 8:718–731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buse J, Schröder B, Assmann T (2007) Modelling habitat and spatial distribution of an endangered longhorn beetle—a case study for saproxylic insect conservation. Biol Conserv 137:372–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Čížek L, Schlaghamerský J, Bořucký J, Hauck D (2009) Range expansion of an endangered beetle: alpine longhorn Rosalia alpina (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) spreads to the lowlands of Central Europe. Entomol Fenn 20:200–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Döhring E (1955) Zur Biologie des Großen Eichenbockkäfers (Cerambyx cerdo L) unter besondererb Berücksichtigung der opulationsbewegungen im Areal. Zeitsch Angew Zool 42:251–373

    Google Scholar 

  • Dudley N, Equilibrium, Vallauri D, France WWF (2004) Dead wood—living forests. The importance of veteran trees and dead wood for biodiversity. WWF Report, World Wildlife Fund for Nature, Gland, Switzerland

  • Duelli P, Wermelinger B (2005) Der Alpenbock (Rosalia alpina). Ein seltener Bockkäfer als Flaggschiff Art. Merkblatt für die Praxis 39:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Gatter W (1997) Förderungsmöglichkeiten für den Alpenbock. Allg Forst Z Waldwirtsch Umweltvorsorge 213:1305–1306

    Google Scholar 

  • Groombridge B (1992) Global biodiversity: status of the earth’s living resources. Chapman and Hall, London

  • IUCN (2009) IUCN red list of threatened species. Version 2009.2. <www.iucnredlist.org>. Accessed 11 Nov 2009

  • Jendek B, Jendek E (2006) Analýza druhovej ochrany coleoptera na slovensku na základe modelovej skupiny fuzáče (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae). Folia Faun Slov 11:15–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonsson BG, Kruys N, Ranius T (2005) Ecology of species living on dead wood–lessons for dead wood management. Silva Fenn 39:289–309

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonsson M, Ranius T, Ekvall H, Bostedt G, Dahlberg A, Ehnström B, Nordén B, Stokland JN (2006) Cost-effectiveness of silvicultural measures to increase substrate availability for redlisted wood-living organisms in Norway spruce forests. Biol Conserv 127:443–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jurc M, Ogris N, Pavlin R, Borkovic D (2008) Forest as a habitat of saproxylic beetles on Natura 2000 sites in Slovenia. Rev écol (Terre Vie) 63:53–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaila L, Martikainen P, Punttila P (1997) Dead trees left in clear-cuts benefit saproxylic Coleoptera adapted to natural disturbances in boreal forest. Biodivers Conserv 6:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leather SR, Basset Y, Hawkins BA (2008) Insect conservation: finding the way forward. Insect Conserv Diver 1:67–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindhe A, Lindelöw Ǻ, Ǻsenblad N (2005) Saproxylic beetles in standing dead wood density in relation to substrate sun-exposure and diameter. Biodivers Conserv 14:3033–3053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luce J-M (1996) Rosalia alpina (Linnaeus, 1758). In: van Helsdingen PJ, Willemse L, Speight MCD (eds) Background information on invertebrates of the habitats directive and the bern convention. Part I—Crustacea, Coleoptera and Lepidoptera. Nat Environ 79:70–73

  • Luigioni P (1931) Terzo contributo alla conoscenza della fauna entomologica del Parco Nazionale d’Abruzzo. Coleotteri. Atti Pont Acc Scienze (Nuovi Lincei) 84(1930–1931):120–180

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie DI, Nichols JD, Lachman GB, Droege S, Royle JA, Langtimm CA (2002) Estimating site occupancy rates when detection probabilities are less than one. Ecology 83:2248–2255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mairhuber C (2005) Der Alpenbockkäfer im Nationalpark Gesäuse. Folgeprojekt 2005—Verbreitung, Erhaltungszustand und weiterführende Maßnahmen. Oekoteam–Graz. 33 S

  • McGeoch MA (1998) The selection, testing and application of terrestrial insects as bioindicators. Biol Rev 73:181–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milner-Gulland EJ, Rowcliffe JM (2007) Conservation and sustainable use. A handbook of techniques. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Neu CW, Byers CR, Peek JM (1974) A technique for analysis of utilization-availability data. J Wildl Manage 38:541–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • New TR (1997) Are Lepidoptera an effective ‘umbrella group’ for biodiversity conservation? J Insect Conserv 1:5–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranius T, Jansson N (2000) The influence of forest regrowth, original canopy cover and tree size on saproxylic beetles associated with old oaks. Biol Conserv 95:85–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray AM, Millar JC, McElfresh S, Swift IP, Barbour JD, Hanks LM (2009) Male-produced aggregation pheromone of the cerambycid beetle Rosalia funebris. J Chem Ecol 35:96–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberge J-M, Mikusiński G, Svensson S (2008) The white-backed woodpecker: umbrella species for forest conservation planning? Biodiv Conserv 17:2479–2494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russo D, Cistrone L, Jones G, Mazzoleni S (2004) Roost selection by barbastelle bats (Barbastella barbastellus, Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae) in beech woodlands of central Italy: consequences for conservation. Biol Conserv 117:73–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Speight MCD (1989) Saproxylic invertebrates and their conservation. Council of Europe, Strasbourg

  • Vié J-C, Hilton-Taylor C, Stuart SN (eds) (2009) Wildlife in a changing world—an analysis of the 2008 IUCN red list of threatened species. IUCN, Gland

    Google Scholar 

  • Vodka S, Konvicka M, Čížek L (2009) Habitat preferences of oak-feeding xylophagous beetles in a temperate woodland: implications for forest history and management. J Insect Conserv 13:553–562

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge funding received from the Abruzzo, Lazio and Molise National Park, and also thank its scientific staff (Cinzia Sulli and Roberta Latini), Alessandro Biscaccianti, Lorenzo Vacca and the other park rangers, who provided useful information on the occurrence of Rosalia alpina. Nancy Jennings and Mark Weir made useful comments and kindly improved the language of a previous ms draft.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Danilo Russo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Russo, D., Cistrone, L. & Garonna, A.P. Habitat selection by the highly endangered long-horned beetle Rosalia alpina in Southern Europe: a multiple spatial scale assessment. J Insect Conserv 15, 685–693 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-010-9366-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-010-9366-3

Keywords

Navigation