Abstract
Slovenia has one of the most extensive Natura 2000 networks in Europe with 259 SAC’s covering 31.4% of the country. To determine how well does the current network cover the areas of high butterfly diversity and/or aggregation of the butterfly species of conservation concern, the data from the recent survey for a distribution atlas were used. Altogether 99,423 records of 173 species collated after 1979 were used. The data distribution is slightly biased towards SAC’s, with 44.8% of localities within them, most likely due to sparsely sampled urban areas and intensive farmland areas which are found only outside SAC’s. The diversity and distribution of red listed species was evaluated at a 5 × 5 km grid square level. Additionally the importance of the size of the SAC’s was compared to their butterfly species diversity. In general the high diversity areas also hold the largest aggregation of red listed species with core areas concentrated in SW Slovenia. The SAC’s cover majority of areas with high diversity and the distribution of all but one threatened butterfly species. That species is Colias myrmidone, which is now considered extinct in Slovenia with no records after 1993. The most prominent areas with high conservation value in Slovenia not included in the SAC’s network are the Koroška region, Goriška Brda region, lower Sava River valley and Slovenske Gorice region. The butterfly diversity in small SAC’s is relatively high with increases in size only gradually increasing the species numbers, thus emphasizing the importance and conservation value of small SAC’s for sustaining high butterfly diversity in Slovenia.
References
Asher J, Warren M, Fox R, Harding P, Jeffcoate G, Jeffcoate S (2001) The millenium atlas of butterflies in Britain and Ireland. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Balmford A et al (2005) The convention on biological diversity’s 2010 target. Science 307:212–213
Bos F, Bosveld M, Groenendijk D, van Swaay C, Wynhoff I (2006) De dagvlinders van Nederland: verspreiding en bescherming (Lepidoptera: Hesperoidea, Papilionoidea). Nationaal Natuurhistorisch Museum Naturalis, Leiden, KNNV Uitgeverij, Urecht, European Invertebrate Survey—Nederland, Leiden
Carnelutti J (1992) Red list of Lepidoptera (Macrolepidoptera) in Slovenia (in Slovene). Varstvo narave 17:61–104
Chiarucci A, Bacaro G, Rocchini D (2008) Quantifying plant species diversity in a Natura 2000 network: old ideas and new proposals. Biol Conserv 141:2608–2618
European Commission (EU) (2000) Managing Natura 2000 sites. The provisions of article 6 of the ‘Habitats’ Directive 92/43/CEE. EU, Luxembourg
Dimitrakipoulos PG, Memtsas S, Troumbis AY (2004) Questioning the effectiveness of the Natura 2000 special areas of conservation strategy: the case of Crete. Global Ecol Biogeogr 13:199–207
Early R, Thomas CD (2007) Multispecies conservation planning: identifying landscapes for the conservation of viable populations using local and continental species priorities. J Appl Ecol 44:253–262
European Commission (EU) (2009) Natura 2000 barometer. EU, Luxembourg [http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/natura2000/barometer/index.en.htm]. Accessed Jan 2010
Fleishman E, Thomson JR, Mac Nally R, Murphy DD, Fay JP (2005) Using indicator species to predict species richness of multiple taxonomic groups. Conserv Biol 19:1125–1137
Franco AMA, Hill JK, Kitschke C, Collingham YC, Roy DB, Fox R, Huntley B, Thomas CD (2006) Impacts of climate warming and habitat loss on extinctions at species’ low-latitude range boundaries. Glob Change Biol 12:1545–1553
Heltshe J, Forrester NE (1983) Estimating species richness using the jackknife procedure. Biometrics 39:1–11
Maes D, Van Dyck H (2001) Butterfly diversity loss in Flanders (north Belgium): Europe’s worst case scenario? Biol Conserv 99:263–276
Maiorano L, Falcucci A, Garton EO, Boitani L (2007) Contribution of the Natura 2000 network to biodiversity conservation in Italy. Conserv Biol 21:1433–1444
Predovnik Ž, Verovnik R (2004) New records of rare pierids (Lepidoptera: Pieridae) in Slovenia. Nat Slov 6(2):39–47
Roy DB, Rothery P, Moss D, Pollard E, Thomas JA (2001) Butterfly numbers and weather: predicting historical trends in abundance and the future effects of climate change. J Anim Ecol 70:201–217
Thomas JA (2005) Monitoring change in the abundance and distribution of insects using butterflies and other indicator groups. Philos Trans Roy Soc B Biol Sci 360:339–357
Thomas JA, Clarke RT (2004) Extinction rates and butterflies—response. Science 305:1563–1564
Uradni list RS (2002) Regulations on the classification of endangered plant and animal species in the Red list (in Slovene). Ur L Rep Slov 82:8893–8975
van Swaay C, Warren M, Lois G (2006) Biotope use and trends of European butterflies. J Insect Conserv 10:189–209
van Swaay C, Cuttelod A, Collins S, Maes D, Munguira ML, Šašić M, Settele J, Verovnik R, Verstrael T, Warren M, Wiemers M, Wynhoff I (2010) European red list of butterflies. EU, Luxembourg
Zagmajster M (2005) Overview of the final decisions of the Biogeographical seminars—Alpine region (in Slovene). Kranjska Gora (version 7.6.2005)
Zagmajster M, Skaberne B (2006) Overview of the final decisions of the Biogeographical seminars—continental region (in Slovene). Darova (CZ) (version 28.5.2006)
Acknowledgments
The authors would wish to thank all the volunteers for their attentive field work and data provided from their private collections. We are especially grateful to Chris van Swaay on the comments and improvements of the early version of the manuscript. The Centre for Cartography of Fauna and Flora provided all necessary resources for digitalization and maintenance of the records database.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Verovnik, R., Govedič, M. & Šalamun, A. Is the Natura 2000 network sufficient for conservation of butterfly diversity? A case study in Slovenia. J Insect Conserv 15, 345–350 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-010-9308-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-010-9308-0