Advertisement

Journal of Insect Conservation

, Volume 15, Issue 1–2, pp 23–35 | Cite as

Leptidea sinapis (Wood White butterfly) egg-laying habitat and adult dispersal studies in Herefordshire

  • S. A. Clarke
  • D. G. Green
  • J. Joy
  • K. Wollen
  • I. Butler
Original Paper

Abstract

The Wood White butterfly Leptidea sinapis, a UK BAP Priority species, is present in a number of Forestry Commission woodlands in the West Midlands and these constitute an important part of the national resource of this butterfly. A joint SITA Trust funded project between the Forestry Commission and Butterfly Conservation (linking with the National Wood White Conservation Project) is researching the use of habitat by Leptidea sinapis within these sites with regard to targeting conservation management. Two aspects of this research are presented: the results of a mark-recapture study and an analysis of egg-laying habitat. Mark-recapture results show considerable movement between areas of concentrations of adults and between egg-laying areas, with males moving further and faster than females. Movements do occur across potential habitat barriers. Egg locations were found by following females and by searching for eggs. The habitat used for egg-laying is extremely variable even within a site. A number of foodplants species are used and habitat ranges from low height foodplants within bare ground to a foodplant height of over 1 m within thick vegetation and scrub. These results are being integrated into an ongoing project to restore Leptidea sinapis habitat within managed Forestry Commission woodlands.

Keywords

Conservation management Mark-recapture Forestry Habitat associations 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was commissioned by the Forestry Commission under the SITA Trust funded project “Herefordshire’s Wood White Butterflies” with advice from Butterfly Conservation. The Forestry Commission nominated officer was Kate Wollen and the nominated officer for Butterfly Conservation was Jenny Joy (West Midland Senior Regional Officer, Butterfly Conservation).

The authors would like to thank Robin Hemming for his help and advice on Haugh Wood and Stephen Jeffcoate for his most useful comments and discussions on our results. Many thanks are due to John Hemmings for help with the mark-recapture data analyses.

References

  1. Baguette M, Vansteenwegen C, Convi I, Nève G (1998) Sex-biased density-dependent migration in a metapopulation of the butterfly Proclossiana eunomia. Acta Oecol 19:17–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Biodiversity Reporting & Information Group (2007) Report on the Species and Habitat Review. Report to the UK Biodiversity PartnershipGoogle Scholar
  3. Clarke SA, Green DG (2008) A preliminary investigation into Wood White Leptidea sinapis (Linnaeus, 1758) habitat on Shropshire sites 2007. Butterfly Conservation Report No. S08-15Google Scholar
  4. Clarke SA, Green DG, Butler I (2010) Wood White Leptidea sinapis (Linnaeus, 1758) habitat in Herefordshire Forestry Commission woodlands 2008 and 2009. Forestry Commission reportGoogle Scholar
  5. Fox R, Asher J, Brereton T, Roy D, Warren MS (2006) The state of butterflies in Britain and Ireland. Book. Pisces Publications, NewburyGoogle Scholar
  6. Friberg M (2009) The evolutionary ecology of niche separation. Studies on the sympatric butterflies Leptidea sinapis and Leptidea reali. PhD thesis, Stockholm UniversityGoogle Scholar
  7. Friberg M, Olofsson M, Berger D, Karlsson B, Wiklund C (2008a) Habitat choice precedes host plant choice—niche separation in a species pair of a generalist and a specialist butterfly. Oikos 117:1337–1344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Friberg M, Vongvanich N, Borg-Karlson A-K, Kemp DJ, Merilaita S, Wiklund C (2008b) Female mate choice determines reproductive isolation between sympatric butterflies. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62:873–886CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gall LF (1984) The effects of capture and marking on subsequent activity in Boloria acrocnema (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae), with a comparison of different numerical models that estimate population size. Biol Conserv 28:139–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jeffcoate S (2005) The Wood White butterfly in Surrey in 2004. A report to Forest EnterpriseGoogle Scholar
  11. Jeffcoate S (2006) Seasonal variation in the use of vegetation resources by Leptidea sinapis (Linnaeus, 1758) (Lepidoptera: Pieridae), a multivoltine species in southern Britain: implications for its conservation at the edge of its range and in the context of climate change. Ent Gaz 57:69–82Google Scholar
  12. Joy J (2000) The status of the Wood White butterfly (Leptidea sinapis) in South Shropshire during 2000. Butterfly Conservation reportGoogle Scholar
  13. Joy J (2006) Shropshire biodiversity action plan. Wood White (Leptidea sinapis). Update. Shropshire Biodiversity Steering Group. Report to Shropshire County CouncilGoogle Scholar
  14. Joy J, Williams M (2008) Butterfly conservation regional action plan for the West Midlands. Butterfly Conservation report S08-19Google Scholar
  15. Mallet J, Longino JT, Murawski D, Murawski A, Simpson de Gamboa A (1987) Handling effects in Heliconius: where do all the butterflies go? J Anim Ecol 56:377–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. McCracken M, Warren M (2007) Wood White Leptidea sinapis factsheet. Butterfly Conservation, WarehamGoogle Scholar
  17. Morton AC (1982) The effect of marking and capture on recapture frequencies of butterflies. Oecologia 53:105–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Parker GA (1978) Evolution of competitive mate searching. Annu Rev Entomol 23:173–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Schwarz CJ, Arnason AN (1996) A general methodology for the analysis of capture-recapture experiments in open populations. Biometrics 52:860–873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Singer MC, Wedlake P (1981) Capture does affect probability of recapture in a butterfly species. Ecol Entomol 6:215–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Warren MS (1981) The ecology of the Wood White butterfly Leptidea sinapis (L.) (Lepidoptera: Pieridae). PhD thesis, University of CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  22. Warren MS (1984) The biology and status of the Wood White butterfly Leptidea sinapis (L.) (Lepidoptera: Pieridae), in the British Isles. Ent Gaz 35:207–223Google Scholar
  23. Warren MS (1985) The influence of shade on butterfly numbers in woodland rides, with special reference to the Wood White Leptidea sinapis. Biol Conserv 33:147–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Warren MS (1986) Annual and long-term changes in a population of the Wood White butterfly Leptidea sinapis. J Anim Ecol 55:707–719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Watt WB, Chew FS, Snyder LRG, Watt AG, Rothchild DE (1977) Population structure of Pierid butterflies. I Numbers and movements of some Montane Colias species. Oecologia 27:1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. White GC, Burnham KP (1999) Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked animals. Bird Study 46 Supplement:120–138Google Scholar
  27. Wiklund C (1977) Courtship behaviour in relation to female monogamy in Leptidea sinapis (Lepidoptera). Oikos 29:275–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wiklund C, Forsberg J (1991) Sexual size dimorphism in relation to female polygamy and protandry in butterflies: a comparative study of Swedish Pieridae and Satyridae. Oikos 60:373–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wiklund C, Karlsson B, Leimar O (2001) Sexual conflict and cooperation in butterfly reproduction: a comparative study of polyandry and female fitness. Proc R Soc Lond B 268:1661–1667CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. A. Clarke
    • 1
  • D. G. Green
    • 1
  • J. Joy
    • 2
  • K. Wollen
    • 3
  • I. Butler
    • 4
  1. 1.Wessex Environmental AssociatesHampshireUK
  2. 2.West Midlands Butterfly ConservationWarehamUK
  3. 3.Forestry CommissionForest of Dean DistrictColefordUK
  4. 4.Ian Butler PhotographyMalvernUK

Personalised recommendations