Journal of Insect Conservation

, Volume 14, Issue 4, pp 367–378 | Cite as

Use of insect rarity for biotope prioritisation: the tenebrionid beetles of the Central Apennines (Italy)

Original Paper

Abstract

Insect conservation has been traditionally based mainly on the identification of priority biotopes. One of the most commonly used criteria for biotope prioritisation is the occurrence of priority species, hence the need for measures of species vulnerability. In this paper a two-step protocol for biotope prioritisation is proposed. Firstly, insect species vulnerability is estimated from rarity measures that can be easily derived from basic data. Then, these values of vulnerability are used to rank biotopes. The method was applied here to the tenebrionid beetles of the Central Apennines, a montane area of high conservation concern for South Europe. Their use in this paper is an example of the use of data hidden in museum collections for analyses dealing with traditionally overlooked insect groups. Most of conservation decisions for Mediterranean mountains are biased towards certain vertebrates. Although current management practices in the preserves of the study area are generally consistent with the conservation of tenebrionids (especially woodland protection, which is essential for arboreal species), results provided in this study stress the importance of preserving also open biotopes, which are crucial for many taxa, including several endemic forms. Moreover, there is indication that preservation of such kind of biotopes would be important also for vertebrates. The approach for biotope prioritisation based on species rarity was here applied to a single animal taxon, but it can be easily extended to other insect groups, in order to obtain a more general view of the relative importance of different biotope types for Apennine conservation.

Keywords

Coleoptera Tenebrionidae Conservation planning Mediterranean Mountains Rarity measures 

Supplementary material

10841_2010_9266_MOESM1_ESM.xls (90 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (XLS 90 kb)
10841_2010_9266_MOESM2_ESM.doc (130 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (DOC 130 kb)

References

  1. Ales RF, Martin A, Ortega F, Ales EE (1992) Recent changes in landscape structure and function in a Mediterranean region of SW Spain (1950–1984). Landscape Ecol 7:3–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aliquò V, Leo P (1996) I coleotteri Tenebrionidi delle Madonne. Naturalista sicil 20:281–304Google Scholar
  3. Anzellotti P, Di Marzio P (2003a) Biclimate of Italy. In: Blasi C (ed) Ecological information in Italy. Ministero dell’Ambiente e della Tutela del Territorio and Società Botanica Italiana, Rome, pp 11–12Google Scholar
  4. Anzellotti P, Di Marzio P (2003b) CORINE land cover. In: Blasi C (ed) Ecological information in Italy. Ministero dell’Ambiente e della Tutela del Territorio and Società Botanica Italiana, Rome, pp 21–23Google Scholar
  5. Anzellotti P, Di Marzio P (2003c) The map of the vegetation series of Italy. In: Blasi C (ed) Ecological information in Italy. Ministero dell’Ambiente e della Tutela del Territorio and Società Botanica Italiana, Rome, pp 25–28Google Scholar
  6. Apollonio M, Mattioli L, Scandura M, Mauri L, Gazzola A, Avanzinelli E (2004) Wolves in the Casentinesi Forests: insights for wolf conservation in Italy from a protected area with a rich wild prey community. Biol Conserv 120:249–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baccetti N, Dall’Antonia P, Magagnali P, Melega L, Serra L, Soldatini C, Zenatello M (2002) Risultati dei censimenti degli uccelli acquatici svernanti in Italia: distribuzione, stima e trend delle popolazioni nel 1991–2000. Biol Conserv Fauna 111:1–240Google Scholar
  8. Balletto E, Casale A (1991) Mediterranean insect conservation. In: Collins NM, Thomas JA (eds) The conservation of insects and their habitats. Academic Press, London, pp 121–142Google Scholar
  9. Bergerot B, Lasne E, Vigneron T, Laffaille P (2008) Prioritization of fish assemblages with a view to conservation and restoration on a large scale European basin, the Loire (France). Biodiv Conserv 17:2247–2262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Blasi C (1994) Carta del fitoclima del Lazio. Regione Lazio and Università di Roma “La Sapienza”, RomeGoogle Scholar
  11. Bologna M, Carpaneto GM (2003) La diversità faunistica potenziale. 5.1. Introduzione. In: Filpa A, Romano B (eds) Pianificazione e reti ecologiche. Planeco - Planning in ecological network. Gangemi Editore, Roma, pp 67–68 Google Scholar
  12. Bruno F, Bazzichelli G (1966) Note illustrative alla carta della vegetazione del Parco Nazionale d’Abruzzo (scala 1:25.000). Progetto conservazionale geobotanico. Annali di Botanica 24:739–778Google Scholar
  13. Ciucci P, Boitani L (2008) The Apennine brown bear: a critical review of its status and conservation problems. Ursus 19(2):130–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cook JA, MacDonald SO (2001) Should endemism be a focus of conservation efforts along the North Pacific Coast of North America? Biol Conserv 97:207–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dapporto L, Dennis RLH (2008) Island size is not the only consideration. Raking priorities for the conservation of butterflies on Italian offshore islands. J Insect Conserv 12:237–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Debussche M, Lepart J, Dervieux A (1999) Mediterranean landscape changes: evidence from old postcards. Global Ecol Biogeogr 8:3–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dennis RLH, Shreeve TG, Van Dyck H (2003) Towards a functional resource-based concept for habitat: a butterfly biology viewpoint. Oikos 102:417–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Di Marzio P, Riggio L (2003) Priority habitat types in Italy. In: Blasi C (ed) Ecological information in Italy. Ministero dell’Ambiente e della Tutela del Territorio and Società Botanica Italiana, Rome, pp 47–50Google Scholar
  19. Dobson FS, Yu J (1993) Rarity in neotropical forest mammals revised. Conserv Biol 7:586–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Farina A (1991) Recent changes of the mosaic patterns in a montane landscape (North Italy) and consequences on vertebrate fauna. Option Méditerranéennes 15:121–134Google Scholar
  21. Farina A, Johnson AR, Turner SJ, Belgrano A (2003) ‘Full’ world versus ‘empty’ world paradigm at the time of globalization. Ecol Econ 45:11–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fattorini S (2000) Dispersal, vicariance and refuges in the Anatolian Pimeliinae (Coleoptera, Tenebrionidae): remarks on some biogeographical tenets. Biogeographia 21:355–398Google Scholar
  23. Fattorini S (2006a) A new method to identify important conservation areas applied to the butterflies of the Aegean Islands (Greece). Animal Conserv 9:75–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fattorini S (2006b) Biogeography and conservation of endemic tenebrionid beetles (Coleoptera Tenebrionidae) on East Mediterranean islands. Vie Milieu 56:231–241Google Scholar
  25. Fattorini S (2008a) A multidimensional characterization of rarity applied to the Aegean tenebrionid beetles (Coleoptera Tenebrionidae). J Insect Conserv 12:251–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fattorini S (2008b) Foreword. In: Fattorini S (ed) Insect ecology and conservation. Research Signpost, Trivandrum, pp 1–4Google Scholar
  27. Fattorini S (2008c) Ecology and conservation of tenebrionid beetles in Mediterranean coastal areas. In: Fattorini S (ed) Insect ecology and conservation. Research Signpost, Trivandrum, pp 165–297Google Scholar
  28. Fattorini S (2009) Assessing priority areas by imperilled species: insights from the European butterflies. Anim Conserv 12:313–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Filippi E, Luiselli L (2000) Status of the Italian snake fauna and assessment of conservation threats. Biol Conserv 93:219–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Garcia-Ruiz JM, Lasanta T, Ruiz-Flano P, Ortigosa L, White S, Gonzàles C, Martì C (1996) Land-use changes and sustainable development in mountain areas: a case study in the Spanish Pyrenees. Landscape Ecol 11:267–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Grill A, Cleary DFR (2003) Diversity patterns in butterfly communities of the Greek nature reserve Dadia. Biol Conserv 114:427–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hartley S, Kunin W (2003) Scale dependency of rarity, extinction risk, and conservation priority. Conserv Biol 17:1559–1570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hopkins GW, Thacker JI, Dixon AFG, Waring P, Telfer MG (2002) Identifying rarity in insects: the importance of host plant range. Biol Conserv 105:293–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Isaac NJB, Purvis A (2004) The species problem and testing macroevolutionary hypotheses. Divers Distrib 10:275–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. IUCN (1994) IUCN red list categories. Prepared by the IUCN species survival commission. IUCN, GlandGoogle Scholar
  36. IUCN (2001) IUCN red list categories and criteria: version 3.1. IUCN species survival commission. IUCN, GlandGoogle Scholar
  37. IUCN (2003) Guidelines for application of IUCN red list criteria at regional levels: version 3.0. IUCN species survival commission. IUCN, GlandGoogle Scholar
  38. Kati V, Dufrêne M, Legakis A, Grill A, Lebrun P (2003) Conservation management for Orthoptera in the Dadia reserve, Greece. Biol Conserv 115:33–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kattan G (1992) Rarity and vulnerability: the birds of the Cordillera Central of Colombia. Conserv Biol 6:64–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Koomen P, van Helsdingen PJ (1996) Listing of biotopes in Europe accordino to their significance for invertebrates. Nature and Environmnent, no. 77. Council of Europe Publishing, StrasbourgGoogle Scholar
  41. Leo P (2008) Osservazioni su Dichillus corsicus e descrizione di tre nuove specie del Mediterraneo Occidentale (Coleoptera, Tenebrionidae). Ann Mus civ St nat G Doria 99:603–627Google Scholar
  42. Löbl I, Smetana A (2008) Catalogue of palaearctic coleoptera. vol. 5. Tenebrionoidea. Apollo Books, StenstrupGoogle Scholar
  43. Maiorano L, Falcucci A, Boitani L (2006) Gap analysis of terrestrial vertebrates inItaly: priorities for conservation planning in a human dominated landscape. Biol Conserv 133:455–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Manne LL, Pimm SL (2001) Beyond eight forms of rarity: which species are threatened and which will be next? Anim Conserv 4:221–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ministry of the Environment and Protection of the Territory and Sea (2009) Portale Cartografico Nazionale. Available at: http://www.pcn.minambiente.it/PCN/ (last accessed 2 April 2009)
  46. Moran MD (2003) Arguments for rejecting the sequential Bonferroni in ecological studies. Oikos 100:403–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Myers AA, De Grave S (2000) Endemism: origins and implications. Vie Milieu 50:195–204Google Scholar
  48. New TR (2008) Insect species conservation. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ottaviani D, Panzacchi M, Jona Lasinio G, Genovesi P, Boitani L (2009) Modelling semi-aquatic vertebrates’ distribution at the drainage basin scale: the case of the otter Lutra lutra in Italy. Ecol model 220:111–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pignatti S, Menegoni P, Giacanelli V (2001) Liste rosse e blu della flora italiana. ANPA, RomaGoogle Scholar
  51. Piovesan G, Presutti Saba E, Biondi F, Alessandrini A, Di Filippo A, Schirone (2009) Population ecology of yew (Taxus baccata L.) in theCentral Apennines:spatial patterns and their relevance for conservation strategies. Plant Ecol. doi:10.1007/s11258-009-9596-1
  52. Pisano P, Leo P (1985) Le categorie degli Opatrinae di Sardegna (Coleoptera Tenebrionidae). Rendiconti Seminario Facoltà Scienze, Università di Cagliari 54: 231-244Google Scholar
  53. Posillico M, Meriggi A, Pagnin E, Lovari S, Russo L (2004) A habitat model for brown bear conservation and land use planning in the central Apennines. Biol Conserv 118:141–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Primack RB (2006) Essentials of conservation biology, 4th edn. Sinauer Associates, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  55. Rabinowitz DS (1981) Seven forms of rarity. In: Synge H (ed) The biological aspects of rare plant conservation. Wiley, Chichester, pp 205–217Google Scholar
  56. Rabinowitz D, Cairns S, Dillon T (1986) Seven forms of rarity and their frequency in the flora of the British Isles. In: Soulé ME (ed) Conservation biology: the science of scarcity and diversity. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, pp 182–204Google Scholar
  57. Ruffo S, Stoch F (eds) (2005) Checklist e distribuzione della fauna italiana. Memorie del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Verona, 2.serie, Sezione Scienze della Vita, 16Google Scholar
  58. Ryder OA (1986) Species conservation and systematics: the dilemma of subspecies. Trends Ecol Evol 1:9–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Samways MJ (1994) Insect conservation biology. Chapman and Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  60. Samways MJ (2005) Insect diversity conservation. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Schawaller W (1996) Tenebrionidae (Coleoptera) aus Nord-Griechenland: Habitate, Artengeselleschaft und Verbreitung. Entomologische Blätter 92:3–18Google Scholar
  62. Scozzafava S, De Sanctis A (2006) Exploring the effects of land abandonment on habitat suitability for three passerine species in a highland area of Central Italy. Landscape Urban Plan 75:23–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Smiraglia C (2002) Le forme delle montagne italiane. In: Caveri L, Da Polenza A, Salvatori F, Smiraglia C (eds) Montagne d’Italia. Istituto Geografico De Agostani, Novara, pp 26–42Google Scholar
  64. Soldati F, Coache A (2004) Résultats d’une première campagne de prospections entomologiques en Corse (Coleoptera, Tenebrionidae). Bulletin de la Société linnéenne de Bordeaux 32:1–25Google Scholar
  65. Soldati F, Coache A (2005) Faunistique des Coléoptéres Tenebrionidae de Corse. Résultats d’une deuxième campagne de prospections. Bulletin de la Société linnéenne de Bordeaux 33:78–98Google Scholar
  66. Stanisci A, Pelino G, Blasi C (2005) Vascular plant divesity and climatic change in the alpine belt of the central Apennines (Italy). Biodiv Conserv 14:1301–1318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Strayer DL (1999) Statistical power of presence-absence data to detect population declines. Conserv Biol 13:1034–1038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Tellini-Florenzano G (2004) Birds as indicators of recent environmental changes in the Apennines (Foreste Casentinesi National Park, central Italy). Ital J of Zool 71:317–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Tomaselli R, Balduzzi A, Filipello S (1973) Carta bioclimatica d’Italia. Collana Verde 33. Ministero Agricoltura e Foreste, RomaGoogle Scholar
  70. Vigna Taglianti A, De Felici S (1994) Ground beetle communities in Central Apennines beech woods. In: Desender K, Dufrene M, Loreau M, Luff ML (eds) Carabid beetles: ecology and evolution. Kluwer, the Netherlands, pp 71–78Google Scholar
  71. Vos W, Stortelder A (1992) Vanishing Tuscan land- scapes. Landscape ecology of a Submediterranean-Montane area (Solano Basin, Tuscany, Italy). Pudoc, WageningenGoogle Scholar
  72. Zapparoli M (2006) A catalogue of the centipedes (Chilopoda) of Central Apennines (Italy). Bollettino del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Verona, Botanica Zoologia 30:165–273Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biotechnology and BiosciencesUniversity of Milano BicoccaMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations