Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Population size and conservation of the last eastern remnants of the regal fritillary, Speyeria idalia (Drury) [Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae]; implications for temperate grassland restoration

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Insect Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We monitored the last remaining Pennsylvania population of the regal fritillary butterfly (Speyeria idalia) for 8 years (1997–2005) at Fort Indiantown Gap, a National Guard training facility located in south-central Pennsylvania, USA. We observed demes of this population in five grassland areas, four of which received limited protection from anthropogenic military activities (i.e., motorized vehicles were prohibited). The Pollard walk technique allowed us to make estimates of butterfly density over the consecutive 8 years period. Mark/Recapture estimates of population size were done in 2005. Of the three areas surveyed for relative abundance over the entire 8 years period, none showed significant changes in relative population density of adult butterflies, indicating that the population remained stable over the 8 years. Mark-recapture estimates of population size in 2005 indicate that this population reached a peak of 913 butterflies that year. The stability of population size occurred despite efforts to improve habitat. Dead caterpillars were found over 3 years in some fields indicating that caterpillar habitat includes both violets (caterpillar food plants) and mature warm season grasses approximately 5 years post-disturbance. These disturbances are caused by military activity such as motorized vehicle training that reduces areas to bare soil. These activities are now banned in protected butterfly areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amstrup SC, McDonald TL, Manly BFJ (2005) Handbook of capture–recapture analysis. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjorn K, Anderson E (1980) Pleistocene mammals of North America. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman D (1951) Some properties of the hypergeometric distribution with applications to zoological sample censuses. Univ Calif Publ Stat 1:131–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooch EG, White GC (2006) Program MARK. [online] A gentle introduction. 5th edn. http://www.phidot.org/software/mark/docs/book/ (18 October 2006)

  • Cushman J, Murphy D (1993) Susceptibility of Lycaenid butterflies to endangerment. Wings 17:16–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies ZG, Wilson RJ, Brereton TM, Thomas CD (2005) The re-expansion and improving status of the silver-spotted skipper butterfly (Hesperia comma) in Britain: a metapopulation success story. Biol Conserv 124:189–198. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2005.01.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debinski DM, Kelly L (1998) Decline of Iowa populations of the regal fritillary (Speyeria idalia) Drury. J Iowa Acad Sci 105:16–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Denton S (1900) Moths and butterflies of the United States east of the Rocky Mountains. Bradlie Whidden, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Derge KL, Chazal AC (2000) Conservation status assessment for the Regal Fritillary (Speyeria idalia) in Virginia, 2000. Natural Heritage Technical Report 00-20. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage. Richmond

  • Edwards W (1879) Description of predatory stages of Argynnis idalia Drury. Can Entomol 11:217–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferster B (2005) Regal Fritillaries: news from the eastern front. Am Butterflies 13:4–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferster B, Leppo BR, Swartz MT, Vulinec K, Habegger F, Mehring A (2008) Lepidoptera of Fort Indiantown Gap National Guard training center, Annville, Pennsylvania. Northeast Natur 15:141–148. doi:10.1656/1092-6194(2008)15[141:LOFIGN]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fonseca DM, Keyghobadi N, Weintraub JD (2008) The Regal Fritillary butterfly in the eastern United States: molecular genetic tools for conservation and re-introduction. Unpublished final report to The Pennsylvania Department of Military and Veterans Affairs

  • Frankham R, Ralls K (1998) Inbreeding leads to extinction. Nature 392:441–442

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haddad NM, Hudgens B, Damiani C, Gross K, Kuefler D, Pollock K (2008) Determining optimal population monitoring for rare butterflies. Conserv Biol 22:929–940. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00932.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hanski I (1999) Metapopulation ecology. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanski I, Kuussaari M, Nieminen M (1994) Metapopulation structure and migration in the butterfly Melitaea Cinxia. Ecology 75:747–762. doi:10.2307/1941732

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harker RJ, Shreeve TG (2008) How accurate are single site transect data for monitoring butterfly trends? Spatial and temporal issues identified in monitoring Lasiommata megera. J Insect Conserv 12:125–133. doi:10.1007/s10841-007-9068-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howe WH (1975) The butterflies of North America. Doubleday and Co., Garden City

    Google Scholar 

  • INCA Insect Count Analyzer (2002) A user-friendly program to analyze transect count data. The Urban Wildlands Group, Available at http://www.urbanwildlands.org/INCA/

  • Jolly GM (1965) Explicit estimates from capture–recapture data with both death and immigration–stochastic model. Biometrika 52:225–247

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Keyghobadi N, Unger KP, Weintraub JD, Fonseca DM (2006) Remnant populations of the regal fritillary (Speyeria idalia) in Pennsylvania: local genetic structure in a high gene flow species. Conserv Genet 7:309–313. doi:10.1007/s10592-006-9127-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klots A (1951) A field guide to the butterflies of North America, East of the Great Plains. Houghton Mifflin, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Kopper B, Shu S, Charlton R, Ramaswamy S (2001) Evidence for reproductive diapause in the fritillary Speyeria idalia (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 94:427–432. doi:10.1603/0013-8746(2001)094[0427:EFRDIT]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krebs CJ (1999) Ecological methodology, 2nd edn. Benjamin Cummings, Menlo Park

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuefler D, Haddad NM, Hall S, Hudgens B, Bartel B, Hoffman E (2008) Distribution, population structure and habitat use of the endangered Saint Francis Satyr butterfly, Neonympha mitchellii francisci. Am Midl Nat 159:298–320. doi:10.1674/0003-0031(2008)159[298:DPSAHU]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latham RE, Zercher D, McElhenny P, Mooreside P, Ferster B (2007) Habitat restoration and management for the eastern regal fritillary, Speyeria idalia idalia Drury (Nymphalidae) at a military installation in Pennsylvania. Ecol Restor 25:103–111. doi:10.3368/er.25.2.103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longcore T, Mattoni R, Zonneveld C, Bruggeman J (2003). INsect Count Analyzer: a tool to assess responses of butterflies to habitat restoration. Ecol Restor, vol 21, pp 60–61. See http://www.urbanwildlands.org/INCA/

  • Matern A, Drees C, Meyer H, Assmann T (2007) Population ecology of the rare carabid beetle Carabus variolosus (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in north-west Germany. J Insect Conserv 12:591–601. doi:10.1007/s10841-007-9096-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattoon S, Davis R, Spencer O (1971) Rearing techniques for species of Speyeria (Nymphalidae). J Lepid Soc 25:247–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard CJ (1886) The butterflies of New England. Bradlie Whidden, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris WF, Doak DF (2002) Quantitative conservation biology: theory and practice of population viability analysis. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland

    Google Scholar 

  • Opler P (1983) County atlas of eastern United States butterflies (1840–1982). U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Department of the Interior, Washington, DC special pub

    Google Scholar 

  • Opler P (1992) A field guide to eastern butterflies. Houghton Mifflin, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Opler P, Warren A (2002) Scientific names list for butterfly species of North America, north of Mexico, Butterflies of North America 2. Contributions of the Gillette Museum of Arthropod biodiversity. Fort Collins. Available on-line at: http://www.biology.ualberta.ca/old_site/uasm/. Accessed 14 Sept 2004

  • Panzer R (2002) Compatibility of prescribed burning with the conservation of insects in small, isolated prairie reserves. Conserv Biol 16:1296–1307. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.01077.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollard E, Yates J (1993) Monitoring butterflies for ecology and conservation. In: Goldsmith F (ed) The British butterfly monitoring scheme. Conservation biology series. Chapman and Hall, Inc, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollick S (2004) Karner blue. Toledo Magazine, Toledo, p 6

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabasa SG, Gutierrez D, Escudero A (2007) Metapopulation structure and habitat quality in modeling dispersal in the butterfly Iolana iolas. Oikos 116:793–806. doi:10.1111/j.0030-1299.2007.15788.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy DB, Sparks TH (2000) Phenology of British butterflies and climate change. Glob Change Biol 6:407–416. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2486.2000.00322.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saccheri I, Kuussaari M, Kankare M, Vikman P, Fortelius W, Hanski I (1998) Inbreeding and extinction in a butterfly metapopulation. Nature 392:491–494. doi:10.1038/33136

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schlicht D, Orwig T (1998) The status of Iowa’s lepidoptera. J Iowa Acad Sci 105:82–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz C, Crone E (1998) Burning prairie to restore butterfly habitat: a modeling approach to management tradeoffs for the Fender’s blue. Restor Ecol 6:244–252. doi:10.1046/j.1526-100X.1998.00637.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schweitzer DF (1984) The regal fritillary, Speyeria idalia on the Dickens-Lewis Preserve, Block Island. Unpublished report prepared for The Nature Conservancy

  • Schweitzer DF (1993) Regal fritillaries in the East. Am Butterflies 1:9

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweitzer DF (2000) Element stewardship abstract for Speyeria idalia. Unpublished report prepared for The Nature Conservancy

  • Scudder S (1889) Speyeria idalia—the regal fritillary. In: Scudder S (ed) Butterflies of the eastern United States and Canada with special reference to New England. Cambridge Publishers, Cambridge, pp 536–544

    Google Scholar 

  • Swengel A (1993) Regal fritillary: prairie royalty. Am Butterflies 1:4–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Swengel A (1996) Effects of fire and hay management on abundance of prairie butterflies. Biol Conserv 76:73–85. doi:10.1016/0006-3207(95)00085-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swengel A (1998) Effects of management on butterfly abundance in tallgrass prairie and pine barrens. Biol Conserv 83:77–89. doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(96)00129-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swengel A (2001) A literature review of insect responses to fire, compared to other conservation managements of open habitat. Biodivers Conserv 10:1141–1169. doi:10.1023/A:1016683807033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TNC The Nature Conservancy (2000) 1999 Flora and fauna inventory for Fort Indiantown Gap National Guard Training Center, Anneville, Pennsylvania. Unpublished report prepared for the Pennsylvania Department of Military and Veterans Affairs, Fort Indiantown Gap Environmental Section, Annville

  • TNC The Nature Conservancy (2001) Population monitoring and life history studies of the regal fritillary (Speyeria idalia) at Fort Indiantown Gap Military Reservation, Annville, Pennsylvania: activity summary and report of findings (January–December 2000). Prepared by D. Zercher. The Nature Conservancy, Ft. Indiantown Gap Office, Pennsylvania. Unpublished report to The Pennsylvania Department of Military and Veterans Affairs

  • Trager MD, Wilson GWT, Hartnett DC (2004) Concurrent effects of fire regime, grazing and bison wallowing on tallgrass prairie vegetation. Am Midl Nat 152:237–247. doi:10.1674/0003-0031(2004)152[0237:CEOFRG]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner D, Wallace M, Boettner G, Elkinton J (1997) Status update and life history studies on the regal fritillary (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). In: Vickery P, Dunwiddie P (eds) Grasslands of northeastern North America: ecology and conservation of native and agricultural landscapes. Massachusetts Audubon Society, Lincoln, pp 261–275

    Google Scholar 

  • West P (1998) Establishing long-term monitoring of the regal fritillary (Speyeria idalia Drury) in Wisconsin. RJ/KOSE Report, WIFO: regal fritillary monitoring pp 12

  • Williams BE (1999) Regal fritillaries in a tailspin: a story of east and west, DNA, and the urgent need for conservation of a flagship species. Am Butterflies 7:16–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams BE (2001a) Patterns of morphological variation in Speyeria idalia (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) with implications for taxonomy and conservation. Ann Entomol Soc Am 94:239–243. doi:10.1603/0013-8746(2001)094[0239:POMVIS]2.0.CO;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams BE (2001b) Recognition of western populations of Speyeria idalia (Nymphalidae) as a new subspecies. J Lepid Soc 55:144–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams BE, Brawn JD, Page KN (2003) Landscape scale genetic effects of habitat fragmentation on a high gene flow species: Speyeria idalia (Nymphalidae). Mol Ecol 12:11–20. doi:10.1046/j.1365-294X.2003.01700.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zar J (1999) Biostatistical analysis, 4th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Zonneveld C (1991) Estimating death rates from transect counts. Ecol Entomol 16:115–121. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2311.1991.tb00198.x-121

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Gylla MacGregor, Denise Johnson, Dave Zapotok, Lindsay Zemba, Andrew Mehring, Fred Habegger, Sarah Hamsher, Ron Evans, Angela Edmunds, Jessica Kindt, Berget Magagna, Amy Carnell, Peter Mooreside, Mark T. Swartz, and Rosemary Spreha assisted with data collection, field work, and data entry. Their contributions, ideas and enthusiasm were invaluable and greatly appreciated. We are also grateful to Ann Swengel and Scott Swengel for suggestions on analyses and to early drafts. Gregory Paulson, Walter E. Meshaka, Jr., and two anonymous reviewers provided valuable comments to drafts. Special thanks go to the Pennsylvania Army National Guard (PAARNG) for granting access to field sites and providing vehicles for field use. This project was sponsored by the PAARNG (Cooperative Agreement # DAHA36-01-2-9001). The content of the information does not necessarily reflect the position or the policy of the United States Government, and no official endorsement should be inferred. Funding for this project was also provided by the Pennsylvania Department of Military and Veterans Affairs (DMVA).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Betty Ferster.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ferster, B., Vulinec, K. Population size and conservation of the last eastern remnants of the regal fritillary, Speyeria idalia (Drury) [Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae]; implications for temperate grassland restoration. J Insect Conserv 14, 31–42 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-009-9222-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-009-9222-5

Keywords

Navigation