Journal of Insect Conservation

, Volume 12, Issue 5, pp 519–525 | Cite as

How too much care kills species: Grassland reserves, agri-environmental schemes and extinction of Colias myrmidone (Lepidoptera: Pieridae) from its former stronghold

  • Martin Konvicka
  • Jiri Benes
  • Oldrich Cizek
  • Frantisek Kopecek
  • Ondrej Konvicka
  • Lubomir Vitaz
Original Paper


We describe a rapid extirpation of a strong population of globally threatened butterfly, Colias myrmidone, from the White Carpathians, Czech Republic. The area is renowned for a high plant and insect diversity associated with savannah-like Carpathian meadows, traditionally managed by mowing once a year and subsequent autumn grazing. Although many meadows fell victim to land consolidation schemes in the 1970s and 1980s, over 2000 hectares have been preserved in a dense network of reserves. The reserve management practised since the mid-1990s has consisted of uniform machine mowing of entire areas and this was further accelerated after accession of the Czech Republic to the EU, when agri-environmental schemes (AES) required two cuts per year. This starkly conflicted with the life history of C. myrmidone, because both spring and autumn cuts interfere with larval development. Despite intensive surveys, only five and then two C. myrmidone individuals were seen in the area in 2005 and 2006, respectively, rendering the species effectively extinct. Conservation authorities failed by neglecting early warning signals issued by amateur entomologists, and by ignoring the basic tenets of conservation of insect diversity, such as the need to maintain heterogeneity of resources. Unless AES provide for this crucial aspect of habitat suitability for invertebrates, they may turn from a great hope into a massive failure.


Endangered species Habitat quality Landscape management Natura 2000 Seminatural grasslands 



The information presented here would not exist without several hundreds of recorders participating in Czech butterfly recording. Particular thanks J. Uricar for organising the detailed survey of the White Carpathians, and to J. Holomek, M. Hrouzek, A. Pavlicko, P. Snajdara, V. Tomecek and M. Zapletal for sharing their observations regarding C. myrmidone. H. Höttinger, Z. Varga and H. Kalivoda discussed with us the current situation in Austria, Hungary and Slovakia. M. Dolek invited us to a Myrmidone discussion group, through which we connected with colleagues from across Europe interested in conservation of the butterfly. Matthew Sweney corrected the English. Funding was provided by the Czech Department of the Environment (VaV/620/1/03, 620/2/03 and 620/12/03), the Czech Academy of Sciences (600070601) and the Grant Agency of the Czech Republic (206/03/H034).


  1. Anthes N, Fartmann T, Hermann G, Kaule G (2003) Combining larval habitat quality and metapopulation structure: the key for successful management of pre-alpine Euphydryas aurinia colonies. J Insect Conserv 7:175–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Balmer O, Erhardt A (2000) Consequences of succession on extensively grazed grasslands for Central European butterfly communities: Rethinking conservation practices. Conserv Biol 14:746–757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benes J, Konvicka M, Dvorak J, Fric Z, Havelda Z, Pavlicko A, Vrabec V, Weidenhoffer Z (eds) (2002) Butterflies of the Czech Republic: distribution and conservation I, II. SOM, PragueGoogle Scholar
  4. Bloch D, Werdenberg N, Erhardt A (2006) Pollination crisis in the butterfly-pollinated wild carnation Dianthus carthusianorum. New Phytologist 169:699–706PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. CHKO Bile Karpaty (1997) Plan pece o CHKO Bile Karpaty pro obdobi 1.1.1998-31.12.2007 [Management plan for LPA Bile Karpaty] Available at:
  6. Chladek F (1998) Beitrag zur Kenntniss der Geradflügler (Orthoptera s.l.) aus dem Nationalen Naturschutzgebiet Čertoryje im Gebirge Bílé Karpaty. Tetrix 8:45–49Google Scholar
  7. Dennis RLH, Shreeve TG, Van Dyck H (2003) Towards a functional resource-based concept for habitat: a butterfly biology viewpoint. Oikos 102:417–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dolek M, Freese A, Geyer A, Stetter H (2005) The decline of Colias myrmidone at the western edge of its range and notes on its habitat requirements. Biologia 60:607–610Google Scholar
  9. Erhardt A (1985) Diurnal Lepidoptera – Sensitive indicators of cultivated and abandoned grassland. J Appl Ecol 22:849–861CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fox R, Asher J, Brereton T, Roy D, Warren M (2006) The State of Butterflies in Britain and Ireland. Nature Bureau, NewburyGoogle Scholar
  11. Freese A, Dolek M, Geyer A, Stetter H (2005) Biology, distribution, and extinction of Colias myrmidone (Lepidoptera, Pieridae) in Bavaria and its situation in other European countries. J Res Lepidoptera 38:51–58Google Scholar
  12. Grieshuber J (2006) Revision of Colias myrmidone (Esper, 1771) (Lepidoptera, Pieridae). Hélios 7:84–104Google Scholar
  13. Helm A, Hanski I, Partel M (2006) Slow response of plant species richness to habitat loss and fragmentation. Ecol Lett 9:72–77PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Hlobilova I (1985) Antropické vlivy v lučních společenstvech Bílých Karpat a rozšíření vstavačovitých [Anthropogenous changes in meadows in the White Carpathians and local distribution of orchids]. Unpublished thesis, Palacky University Olomouc, Czech RepublicGoogle Scholar
  15. Johst K, Drechsler M, Thomas J, Settele J (2006) Influence of mowing on the persistence of two endangered large blue butterfly species. J Appl Ecol 43:333–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jongepierova I, Bezdecka P, Jagos B (2004) Plán péče o NPR Čertoryje na období 2005–2014 [Management plan for Certoryje National nature reserve, 2005–2014]. Technical document, CHKO Bile Karpaty. Google Scholar
  17. Jongepierova I, Jongepier JW, Klimes L (1994) Obnova druhově bohatých luk v NPR Čertoryje [Restoring species-rich grasslands in Certoryje National nature reserve]. Příroda (Praha) 1:185–189Google Scholar
  18. Kleijn D, Berendse F, Smit R, Gilissen N (2001) Agri-environment schemes do not effectively protect biodiversity in Dutch agricultural landscapes. Nature 413: 723–725PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kleijn D, Baquero RA, Clough Y, Diaz M, De Esteban J, Fernandez F, Gabriel D, Herzog F, Holzschuh A, Johl R, Knop E, Kruess A, Marshall EJP, Steffan-Dewenter I, Tscharntke T, Verhulst J, West TM, Yela JL (2006) Mixed biodiversity benefits of agri-environment schemes in five European countries. Ecol Lett 9:243–254PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Klimes L (1995) Small-scale distribution of species richness in a grassland (Bile Karpaty Mts, Czech Republic). Folia Geobot Phytotax 30:499–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Klimes L, Jongepierova I, Jongepier JW (2000) Vliv obnovení pravidelného kosení na louky v Bílých Karpatech [The effect of mowing on a previously abandoned meadow: a ten-year experiment] Priroda (Praha) 17:7–24Google Scholar
  22. Konvicka M, Benes J (2005) Stav a změny biodiverzity denních motýlů [Butterfly biodiversity and its changes]. In: Vackar D (ed) Indikátory změny biodiverizty. Academia, Prague, pp. 116–126Google Scholar
  23. Konvicka M, Benes J, Fric Z, Cizek O (2004) Natura 2000 a denní motýli [Natura 2000 and butterflies]. Ochrana prirody 59:179–183Google Scholar
  24. Kralicek M, Gottwald A (1984) Motyli jihovychodni Moravy I. [Butterflies of Southeast Moravia I.]. Museum Uhersky Brod & OV CSOP, Uherske HradisteGoogle Scholar
  25. Kudrna O (2002) The distribution atlas of European butterflies. Oedippus 20:1–343Google Scholar
  26. Kudrna O, Mayer L (1990) Grundlagen zu einem Artenhilfsprogramm fur Colias myrmidone (Esper, 1780) in Bayern. Oedippus 1:1–46Google Scholar
  27. Liu W, Wang Z, Xu R (2006) Habitat utilization by ovipositing females and larvae of the Marsh fritillary (Euphydryas aurinia) in a mosaic of meadows and croplands. J Insect Conserv 10:351–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Loertsher M, Erhardt A, Zettel J (1995) Microdistribution of butterflies in a mosaic-like habitat: the role of nectar sources. Ecography 18:15–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Maes D, Van Dyck H (2001) Butterfly diversity loss in Flanders (north Belgium): Europe’s worst case scenario? Biol Conserv 99:263–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Morris MG (2000) The effects of structure and its dynamics on the ecology and conservation of arthropods in British grasslands. Biol Conserv 95:129–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ockinger E, Smith HG (2006) Landscape composition and habitat area affects butterfly species richness in semi-natural grasslands. Oecologia 149:526–534PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ouin A, Aviron S, Dover J, Burel F (2004) Complementation/supplementation of resources for butterflies in agricultural landscapes. Agri Ecosyst Environ 103:473–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Poyry J, Luoto M, Paukkunen J, Pykala J, Raatikainen K, Kuussaari M (2006) Different responses of plants and herbivore insects to a gradient of vegetation height: an indicator of the vertebrate grazing intensity and successional age. Oikos 115:401–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Predovnik Z, Verovnik R (2004) New records of rare pierids (Lepidoptera: Pieridae) in Slovenia. Natura Sloveniae 6:39–47Google Scholar
  35. Thomas CD (2000) Dispersal and extinction in fragmented landscapes. Proc R Soc London B 267:139–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Thomas JA (1995) Why small cold-blooded insects pose different conservation problems to birds in modern landscapes. Ibis 137:S112–S119 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Thomas JA, Telfer MG, Roy DB, Preston CD, Greenwood JJD, Asher J, Fox R, Clarke RT, Lawton JH (2004) Comparative losses of British butterflies, birds, and plants and the global extinction crisis. Science 303:1879–1881PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. van Swaay CAM (2002) The importance of calcareous grasslands for butterflies in Europe. Biol Conserv 104:315–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. van Swaay CAM, Warren MS (1999) Red Data Book of European Butterflies (Rhopalocera). Nature and Environment Series No. 99. Council of Europe, StrasbourgGoogle Scholar
  40. Verhulst J (2000) Colias du Monde. Goecke & Evers, KelternGoogle Scholar
  41. Wallington TJ, Hobbs RJ, Moore SA (2005) Implications of Current Ecological Thinking for Biodiversity Conservation: a Review of the Salient Issues. Ecol Soc 10(1):15 [online] URL: Google Scholar
  42. Wallis De Vries MF, Poschold P, Willems JH (2002) Challenges for the conservation of calcareous grasslands in northwestern Europe: integrating the requirements of flora and fauna. Biol Conserv 104:265–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Waring P (2001) Grazing and cutting as conservation management tools: The need for a cautious approach, with some examples of rare moths which have been adversely affected. Entomol Rec J Var 113:193–200 Google Scholar
  44. Weidemann HJ (1995) Tagfalter beobachten, bestimmen. Naturbuch VerlagGoogle Scholar
  45. Wenzel M, Schmitt T, Weitzel M, Seitz A (2006) The severe decline of butterflies on western German calcareous grasslands during the last 30 years: A conservation problem. Biol Conserv 128:542–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Whittingham MJ (2007) Will agri-environment schemes deliver substantial biodiversity gain, and if not why not? J Appl Ecol 44:1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martin Konvicka
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jiri Benes
    • 2
  • Oldrich Cizek
    • 1
    • 2
  • Frantisek Kopecek
    • 3
  • Ondrej Konvicka
    • 4
  • Lubomir Vitaz
    • 5
  1. 1.School of Biological SciencesUniversity South BohemiaCeske BudejoviceCzech Republic
  2. 2.Institute of EntomologyCzech Academy of SciencesCeske BudejoviceCzech Republic
  3. 3.Uhersky BrodCzech Republic
  4. 4.CHKO Bile KarpatyLuhacoviceCzech Republic
  5. 5.Nove Mesto nad VahomSlovakia

Personalised recommendations