Skip to main content
Log in

Factors affecting overwinter survival of the American burying beetle, Nicrophorus americanus (Coleoptera: Silphidae)

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Insect Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The endangered American burying beetle (Nicrophorus americanus) is relatively abundant at Fort Chaffee Maneuver Training Center in northwestern Arkansas. There is a paucity of basic life-history information available, particularly with respect to factors affecting overwintering success. In a field experiment we: (1) captured beetles at Fort Chaffee; (2) bred them in captivity; (3) in the fall on Fort Chaffee placed offspring individually in well-ventilated, lidded 21.1-l buckets containing original soil plugs in grassland or woodland, either provisioned or not with a rat carcass as potential food; (4) overwintered the beetles; (5) checked in the spring to determine survival; and (6) released surviving beetles. Overall, 59.6% of 104 beetles survived the winter, with 77.1% and 44.6% survival in provisioned and nonprovisioned buckets, respectively. No differences were evident between habitats. Beetle age was an important survival predictor, with older beetles having a higher survival probability, but only if nonprovisioned. Gender and body size were not predictive of survival. Many surviving beetles were at or near the surface; depth averaged 6.0 cm, with some as deep as 20 cm. Our findings suggest that American burying beetles will have a higher probability of overwinter survival if carcasses are readily available as winter approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson RS (1982) On the decreasing abundance of Nicrophorus americanus Olivier (Coleoptera: Silphidae) in eastern North America. Coleopt Bull 36:362–365

    Google Scholar 

  • Bedick JC, Ratcliffe BC, Hoback WW, Higley LG (1999) Distribution, ecology, and population dynamics of the American burying beetle [Nicrophorus americanus Olivier (Coleoptera, Silphidae)] in south-central Nebraska, USA. J Insect Conserv 3:171–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bedick JC, Hoback WW, Albrecht MC (2006) High water-loss rates and rapid dehydration in the burying beetle, Nicrophorus marginatus. Physiol Entomol 31:23–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett DM, Hoffmann AA (1998) Effects of size and fluctuating asymmetry on field fitness of the parasitoid Trichogramma carverae (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae). J Anim Ecol 67:580–591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brower JE, Zar JH, von Ende CN (1998) Field and laboratory methods for general ecology, 4th edn. WCB McGraw Hill, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Creighton JC, Schnell GD (1998) Short-term movement patterns of the endangered American burying beetle Nicrophorus americanus. Biol Conserv 86:281–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creighton JC, Lomolino MV, Schnell GD (1993a) Survey methods for the American burying beetle (Nicrophorus americanus) in Oklahoma and Arkansas. Oklahoma Biological Survey, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK

  • Creighton JC, Vaughn CC, Chapman BR (1993b) Habitat preference of the endangered American burying beetle (Nicrophorus americanus) in Oklahoma. Southwest Nat 38:275–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eggert A-K, Müller JK (1997) Biparental care and social evolution in burying beetles: lessons from the larder. In: Choe JC, Crespi BJ (eds) The evolution of social behavior in insects and arachnids. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 216–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellers J, van Alphen JJM, Sevenster JG (1998) A field study of size–fitness relationships in the parasitoid Asobara tabida. J Anim Ecol 67:318–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foth HD (1970) A study of soil science. LaMotte Company, Chestertown, MD

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S (2000) Applied logistic regression, 2nd edn. John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Holloway AK, Schnell GD (1997) Relationship between numbers of the endangered American burying beetle and available food resources. Biol Conserv 81:145–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanski I, Cambefort Y (1991) Ecology of dung beetles. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Irwin JT, Lee RE Jr (2000) Mild winter temperatures reduce survival and potential fecundity of the goldenrod gall fly, Eurosta solidaginis (Diptera: Tephritidae). J Insect Physiol 46:655–661

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kozol AJ, Scott MP, Traniello JFA (1988) The American burying beetle, Nicrophorus americanus: studies on the natural history of a declining species. Psyche 95:167–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Küchler AW (1964) Potential natural vegetation of the conterminous United States (map and manual). Am Geographical Soc Spec Publ No. 36

  • Lomolino MV, Creighton JC (1996) Habitat selection, breeding success, and conservation of the endangered American burying beetle (Nicrophorus americanus). Biol Conserv 77:235–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lomolino MV, Creighton JC, Schnell GD, Certain DL (1995) Ecology and conservation of the endangered American burying beetle (Nicrophorus americanus). Conserv Biol 9:605–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pogue DW, Schnell GD (1994) Habitat characterization of secondary cavity-nesting birds in Oklahoma. Wilson Bull 106:203–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Pampel FC (2000) Logistic regression: a primer. Sage University Papers Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences No. 07–132. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA

  • Ratcliffe BC (1996) The carrion beetles (Coleoptera: Silphidae) of Nebraska. Bull Univ Nebraska State Mus 13:1–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliffe BC, Jameson ML (1992) New Nebraska occurrences of the endangered American burying beetle (Coleoptera: Silphidae). Coleopt Bull 46:421–425

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohlf FJ, Slice DE (1999) BIOMstat for Windows. Exeter Software, Setauket, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnell GD, Hiott AE (2005) 2005 American burying beetle survey at Fort Chaffee, Arkansas. Unpublished report to Chaffee Maneuver Training Center, Fort Smith, AR, from Sam Noble Oklahoma Museum of Natural History, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK

  • Sikes DS, Raithel CJ (2002) A review of hypotheses of decline of the endangered American burying beetle (Silphidae: Nicrophorus americanus Olivier). J Insect Conserv 6:103–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair BJ, Vernon P, Klok CJ, Chown SL (2003) Insects at low temperatures: an ecological perspective. Trends Ecol Evol 18:257–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith RJ (2002) Effect of larval body size on overwinter survival and emerging adult size in the burying beetle, Nicrophorus investigator. Can J Zool 80:1588–1593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research, 3rd edn. WH Freeman and Company, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg D, Colla P (2004) Logistic regression. In: Systat Software. Systat 11: statistics II. Systat Software, Richmond, CA, pp 207–278

  • Systat Software (2004) Systat 11: statistics II. Systat Software, Richmond, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Tazik DJ, Warren SD, Diersing VE, Shaw RB, Brozka RJ, Bagley CF, Whitworth WR (1992) U.S. Land Condition-Trend Analysis (LCTA) plot inventory field methods. USACERL Technical Report-92/03. Construction Engineering Research Laboratory, Champaign, IL

  • Trumbo ST (1992) Monogamy to communal breeding: exploitation of a broad resource base by burying beetles (Nicrophorus). Ecol Entomol 17:289–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (1991) American burying beetle recovery plan. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Newton Corner, MA

  • Visser ME (1994) The influence of competition between foragers on clutch size decisions in an insect parasitoid with scramble larval competition. Behav Ecol 7:109–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voituron Y, Mouquet N, de Mazancourt C, Clobert J (2002) To freeze or not to freeze? An evolutionary perspective on the cold-hardiness strategies of overwintering ectotherms. Am Nat 160:255–270

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Walker TL Jr, Hoback WW (2007) Effects of invasive eastern redcedar on capture rates of Nicrophorus americanus and other Silphidae. Environ Entomol 36:297–307

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • West SA, Flanagan KE, Godfray HCJ (1996) The relationship between parasitoid size and fitness in the field, a study of Achrysocharoides zwoelferi (Hymenoptera: Eulophidae). J Anim Ecol 65:631–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Sabrina M. Kirkpatrick, Elizabeth A. Phillips, and Daniel T. Farrer for assistance and oversight of the project, as well as for comments on the manuscript. Mary Clegert of URS Corporation provided funding coordination. The project was supported by the Military Department of Arkansas through URS Corporation. Appropriate permits were obtained from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. We thank Michael Amaral and an anonymous reviewer for helpful suggestions concerning the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gary D. Schnell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schnell, G.D., Hiott, A.E., Creighton, J.C. et al. Factors affecting overwinter survival of the American burying beetle, Nicrophorus americanus (Coleoptera: Silphidae). J Insect Conserv 12, 483–492 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-007-9086-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-007-9086-5

Keywords

Navigation