Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Are we conserving peripheral populations? An analysis of range structure of longhorn beetles (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) in Finland

  • Original paper
  • Published:
Journal of Insect Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper characterises range structures of longhorn beetles (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) occurring in Finland and classifies species as resource (host plant), substrate (specific host plant qualities) or climate limited. This information is then used to evaluate whether the IUCN red-list classification applied in Finland is directed towards peripheral European populations. Thirty (37%) longhorn beetle species are red-listed in Finland. Limited host plant distribution is adequate in explaining the red-list status for 43% of the red-listed species. All of these species are dependent on hardwood trees. Of the red-listed species that are dependent on widespread host plants, 30% have a limited extent of occurrence as well as a small area of occupancy in Finland. As these species are widespread outside Fennoscandia, their range in Finland is most likely limited by climate. Twenty per cent of the red-listed species have a wide extent of occurrence, albeit a small area of occupancy in Finland. As these species are dependent on widespread host plant species, but require specific substrate qualities (e.g. decaying, large diameter trunks), it is likely that their range is restricted by anthropogenic activities, mainly forestry and agriculture. The present study shows that the red-list classification in Finland is directed towards peripheral European populations. This study, however, did not address the conservation value of these populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  • Ahti T, Hämet-Ahti L, Jalas J (1968) Vegetation zones and their sections in northwestern Europe. Ann Bot Fenn 5:169–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Bense U (1995) Longhorn beetles. Illustrated key to the Cerambycidae and Vesperidae of Europe. Margraf Verlag, Weikersheim

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunnell FL, Campbell RW, Squires KA (2004) Conservation priorities for peripheral species: the example of British Columbia. Can J For Res 34:2240–2247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis AJ, Jenkinson LS, Lawton JH, Shorrocks B, Wood S (1998) Making mistakes when predicting shifts in species range in response to global warming. Nature 391:783–786

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gaston KJ (1994) Rarity. Chapman Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaston KJ (2003) The structure and dynamics of geographical ranges. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaston KJ, Blackburn TM, Lawton JH (1997) Interspecific abundance-range size relationships: an appraisal of mechanisms. J Anim Ecol 66:579–601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heliövaara K, Mannerkoski I, Siitonen J (2004) Suomen sarvijäärät. Tremex Press, Helsinki

    Google Scholar 

  • IUCN (1994) IUCN Red list categories. IUCN-The World Conservation Union, Gland

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunin WE, Gaston KJ (1997) The biology of rarity. Causes and consequences of rare–common differences. Chapman Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Lahti T, Lampinen R, Kurtto A (1995) Atlas of the distribution of vascular plants in Finland. Computer Version 2.0. University of Helsinki, Finnish Museum of Natural History, Botanical Museum, Helsinki

  • Lesica P, Allendorf FW (1995) When are peripheral populations valuable for conservation? Conserv Biol 9:753–760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rassi P, Alanen A, Kanerva T, Mannerkoski I (2001) The 2000 Red List of Finnish species. Ministry of the Environment, Edita, Helsinki. [In Finnish with English summary)

  • Silfverberg H (2004) Enumeratio nova Coleopterorum Fennoscandiae, Daniae et Baltiae. Sahlbergia 9:1–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Soulé M (1973) The epistasis cycle: a theory of marginal populations. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 4:165–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson M (1996) Biological invasions. Chapman Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Esko Hyvärinen & Mats Jonsell gave useful comments on the earlier version of the manuscript. Raino Lampinen & Arto Kurtto kindly provided data on the plant distribution.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Atte Komonen.

Appendix

Appendix

Classification of Finnish red-listed longhorn beetles (n = 30) in ecological groups based on their range size, range extent and resource use. Range size in Finland is the number of 50 km × 50 km grid cells occupied (max. 170) and in Europe the number of countries occupied (max. 26, incl. Finland; see Methods for the countries included). Range extent is the diagonal distance (rounded to the nearest integer; max. 1,390 km) between latitudinal and longitudinal extent. Host plant column gives the documented main host plants in Finland, and if not known, the most likely host plants based on observations in northern Europe. Species can occasionally use other host plants than the ones listed.

Species groups

Range size

Extent Finland

IUCN status

Host plants

Finland

Europe

Hardwood

    Rhamnusium bicolor

1

18

71

CR

Ulmus laevis

    Anoplodera sexguttata

1

23

71

EN

Quercus robur

    Strangalia attenuata

1

21

71

CR

Quercus robur

    Phymatodes testaceus

2

24

180

EN

Quercus robur

    Clytus arietis

1

21

71

VU

Quercus robur

    Plagionotus arcuatus

2

23

141

CR

Quercus robur

    Chlorophorus herbstii

2

14

316

EN

Tilia cordata

    Mesosa myops

1

3

71

CR

Quercus robur, Tilia cordata

    Oplosia cinerea

4

16

283

VU

Tilia cordata

    Pogonocherus hispidus

4

24

224

VU

Tilia cordata, Ulmus laevis

    Leiopus nebulosus

4

23

180

NT

Quercus robur, Corylus avellana

    Exocentrus lusitanus

9

18

354

NT

Tilia cordata

    Stenostola dubia

10

19

292

NT

Tilia cordata, other deciduous

Temperate

    Prionus coriarius

5

25

364

NT

Pinus sylvestris

    Leptura pubescens

4

19

354

EN

Pinus sylvestris

    Leptura maculata

2

25

112

VU

Betula spp., other deciduous

    Phytoecia cylindrica

4

23

292

VU

Anthriscus sylvestris

    Stenocorus meridianus a

5

22

430

VU

Hardwoods, other deciduous

Eastern

    Tetropium aquilonium

1

2

71

NT

Picea abies

    Acmaeops smaragdula

4

6

474

VU

Coniferous

    Nivellia sanguinosa

2

9

474

EN

Deciduous

    Leptura nigripes

6

9

583

VU

Betula spp.

    Leptura thoracica

1

7

71

CR

Populus tremula

Substrate limited

    Tragosoma depsarium

9

16

763

VU

Pinus sylvestris

    Acmaeops septentrionis

17

14

962

VU

Picea abies

    Acmaeops marginata

6

16

636

VU

Pinus sylvestris

    Xylotrechus rusticus

39

22

1,141

NT

Populus tremula

    Monochamus urussovii

22

6

1,012

VU

Picea abies

    Saperda perforata

20

16

890

NT

Populus tremula

Miscellaneous

    Obrium cantharium b

27

19

763

VU

Populus tremula

  1. a The primary host plants of the species are hardwoods, but the species must be able to use other host trees in Finland as it has been documented from locations without hardwoods.
  2. Obrium cantharium is not included in the group ‘Substrate limited’ based on the information on its specific substrate requirements (e.g. branches of Populus tremula); the species may simply be difficult to find and thus artificially rare.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Komonen, A. Are we conserving peripheral populations? An analysis of range structure of longhorn beetles (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) in Finland. J Insect Conserv 11, 281–285 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-006-9043-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-006-9043-8

Keywords

Navigation