Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Habitat associations of the Small Red Damselfly (Ceriagrion tenellum) (De Villiers) in heathland in southern England (Zygoptera: Coenagrionidae)

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Insect Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Small Red Damselfly (Ceriagrion tenellum) (De Villiers) (Odonata: Coenagrionidae: Ceriagrion) is classed as vulnerable (Shirt, British Red Data Book, Nature Conservancy Council, Peterborough, UK, 1987) throughout the UK, and is included in certain Local Biodiversity Action Plans (LBAPs) in the south. A large proportion of any Biodiversity Action Plan is concerned with the requirement of conservation and management programmes. In order to guide them, information about the habitat preferences of the species concerned is vital. Detailed habitat information was collected to include a variety of physical parameters particularly vegetation, both in-channel and bankside. The species was found to be primarily associated with in-channel emergent broad-leaved plants, bankside grasses and rushes, and shallow, narrow channels with dark organic substrate. The consequences of these findings are discussed in relation to the conservation and management of C. tenellum.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Note that at the time of the study Harvest Slade, Picket Bottom and Ridley Bottom were not winterbournes but have since become so

References

  • Askew RR (1988) The dragonflies of Europe. Harley Books, Colchester, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchwald R (1992) Vegetation and dragonfly fauna-characteristics and examples of biocenological field studies. Vegetatio 101:99–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchwald R (1994) Experimental studies of habitat selection and biotope preference in Ceriagrion tenellum, De Villiers, 1789 (Coenagrionidae, Odonata). Zool Jb Syst 121:71–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchwald R (1995) Structure and floristic composition of vegetation: what is their significance for the occurrence of dragonfly species. In: Corbet PS (ed) 1999. Dragonflies, behaviour and ecology of Odonata. Harley Books, Colchester, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Convey P (1988) Competition for perches between larval damselflies: the influence of perch use on feeding efficiency, growth rate and predator avoidance. Fresh Biol 19:15–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowley PH, Johnson DM (1982) Habitat and seasonality as niche axes in an Odonate community. Ecology 63:1064–1072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbet PS (1999) Dragonflies, behaviour and ecology of Odonata. Harley Books, Colchester, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbet PS, Longfield C, Moore NW (1960) Dragonflies. Collins, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Delgado C (2002) Spatial and temporal distribution patterns of Odonata larvae in the streams of a Terra Firma Forest of the Central Amazon, Brazil. J Fresh Ecol 17:555–561

    Google Scholar 

  • Dionne M, Butler M, Folt C (1990) Plant-specific expression of antipredator behaviour by larval damselflies. Oecologica 83:371–377

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster GN (1991) Conserving insects of aquatic and wetland habitats, with special reference to beetles. In: Collins NM, Thomas JA (eds) The conservation of insects and their habitats. Academic Press, London, pp 237–261

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox ADC (1994) Status, habitat use and conservation of the scarce blue-tailed damselfly Ischnura pumilio (Charpentier) (Odonata: Coenagrionidae) in Britain and Ireland. Biol Conserv 68:115–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner AE (1954) A key to the larvae of the British Odonata. Entomol Gaz 5(157–171):193–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Hambler C, Speight MR (1996) Extinction rate in British non-marine invertebrates since 1900. Conserv Biol 10:892–896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson DM (1991) Behavioural ecology of larval dragonflies and damselflies. TREE 6:8–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson RE, Crowley PH (1980) Odonate “Hide and Seek”: habitat-specific rules? In: Kerfoot WC (ed) Evolution and ecology of zooplankton communities. Hanover, NH, University Press, New England, pp 569–579

    Google Scholar 

  • Martens A (1993) Influence of conspecifics and plant structures on oviposition site selection in Pyrrhosoma nymphula (Sulzer) (Zygoptera: Coenagrionidae). Odonatologica 22:487–494

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller PL (1987) Dragonflies. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Minitab (2006) Minitab Ltd. Brandon Court, Coventry, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • NCC (1984) River corridor survey: draft methodology. Nature Conservancy Council, Peterborough, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Pisces Conservation Ltd (2000) Environmental Community Analysis, Version 1.32. www.pisces-conservation.com

  • Pyle R, Bentzien M, Opler P (1981) Insect conservation. Annu Rev Entomol 26:233–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodwell JS (1991) British plant communities 2: mires and heaths. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt E (1987) Notes on a peculiar reproductive behaviour and on habitat recognition in Sympetrum internum Montgomery (Anisoptera: Libellulidae). Notul Odonatol 2:144–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Schridde P, Suhling F (1994) Larval dragonfly communities in different habitats of a Mediterranean running water system. Adv Odonatol 6:89–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schutte C, Schrimpf I (2002) Explaining species distribution in running water systems; larval respiration and growth of two Calopteryx species. (Odonata: Zygoptera). Arch Hydrobiol 153:217–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Shirt DB (1987) British Red Data Book 2: Insects. Nature Conservancy Council, Peterborough, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Suhling F (2001) Intraguild predation activity patterns, growth and longitudinal distribution in running water Odonate larvae. Arch Hydrobiol 151:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas JA (1991) Rare species conservation: case studies of European butterflies. In: Spellerberg IF, Goldsmith FB, Morris MG (eds) The scientific management of temperate communities for conservation 31st symposium of the British ecological society. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, pp 149–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas JA, Morris MG (1995) Rates and patterns of extinction among British invertebrates. In: Lawton JH, May RM (eds) Extinction rates, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 111–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson DJ (1987) Regulation of damselfly populations: the effects of weed density on larval mortality due to predation. Fresh Biol 17:367–371

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Noordwijk M (1980) Dragonfly behaviour over shining surfaces. Notul Odonatol 1:105

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Tol J, Verdonk MJ (1988) The protection of dragonflies (Odonata) and their biotopes. Nature and Environment Series No 38. Council of Europe, Strasbourg

  • Ward JV, Stanford JA (1982) Thermal responses in the evolutionary ecology of aquatic insects. Annu Rev Entomol 27:97–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wildermuth H, Spinner W (1991) Visual cues in oviposition site selection by Somatochlora arctica (Zetterstedt) (Anisoptera: Corduliidae). Odonatologica 20:357–367

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildermuth H (1992) Visual and tactile stimuli in choice of oviposition substrates by the dragonfly Perithemis mooma (Kirby) (Anisoptera: Libellulidae). Odonatologica 21:309–321

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildermuth H (1993) Habitat selection and oviposition site recognition by the dragonfly Aeshna juncea (L.): an experimental approach in natural habitats (Anisoptera: Aeshnidae). Odonatologica 22:27–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildermuth H (1994) Dragonflies and nature conservation: an analysis of the current situation in Europe. Adv Odonatol 6:199–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Forestry Commission for giving us permission us to carry out this study in the New Forest. We also thank two anonymous referees for their valuable comments. Coenagrion mercuriale is protected under Schedule 5 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act (1981), all work carried out that required handling of this damselfly larvae was done under licence from English Nature.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alison M. Strange.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Strange, A.M., Griffiths, G.H., Hine, S. et al. Habitat associations of the Small Red Damselfly (Ceriagrion tenellum) (De Villiers) in heathland in southern England (Zygoptera: Coenagrionidae). J Insect Conserv 11, 241–249 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-006-9041-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-006-9041-x

Keywords

Navigation