Habitat utilization by ovipositing females and larvae of the Marsh fritillary (Euphydryas aurinia) in a mosaic of meadows and croplands
- 192 Downloads
The butterfly Euphydryas aurinia occurs as a classical metapopulation in Yanjiaping village, Heibei province, China. In the patch network under study there were 38 habitat patches. Most patches were uncultivated, consisting of meadows and fallows, while others had been cultivated, i.e., used as small croplands. In the cultivated patches, the habitat for the butterfly can be classified into two types: meadow type (MTH) and cropland type (CTH). In contrast, the uncultivated habitat patches consists only of MTH. We examined the habitat utilization of ovipositing females and larvae of E. aurinia to assess the effect of mixed land use on the butterfly’s occurrence. More egg clusters and pre-hibernating larval groups were distributed throughout CTH than MTH. This dependence on CTH may be due to the preference of egg-laying females for large-sized host plants, which were mainly concentrated in CTH. Compared to the MTH, the mortality rate in CTH was lower. Therefore, for both eggs and pre-hibernating larvae, the quality of CTH was higher than that of MTH. The conditions in MTH, on the other hand, were important for the development of post-hibernation larvae. A combination of extensive farming and animal husbandry has created a mosaic of meadows and croplands in the habitats studied here, which is typical of rural areas in some developing countries. This study implies that patchy land use typical of traditional agriculture facilitates the long-term persistence of E. aurinia.
KeywordsConservation Cultivated patches Euphydryas aurinia Habitat types Habitat utilization
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
We are grateful for helpful corrections and comments on the manuscript from I. Hanski and M. R. Shaw. We also thank Guofa Zhou, Weiping Zeng and P. Gongal for helpful comments and language corrections. This research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 30270241).
- Daily GC (1997) Countryside biogeography and the pro-vision of ecosystem services. In: Raven P (eds) Nature and human society: the quest for a sustainable world. National Research Council National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., pp. 104–113Google Scholar
- Dover JW (1991) The conservation of insects on arable farmland. In: Collins NM, Thomas JA (eds) The conservation of insects and their habitat 980. Academic Press, London, pp 293–318Google Scholar
- Ehrilch PR, Hanski I (2004) On the wings of checkerspots, a model system for population biology. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Hanski I, Gaggiotti OE (2004) Ecology, genetics, and evolution of metapopulations. Elsevier, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
- Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S (1989) Applied logistic regression. John Wiley and Sons, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Konvicka M, Hula V, Fric Z (2003) Habitat of pre-hibernating larvae of the endangered butterfly Euphydryas aurinia (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae): what can be learned from vegetation composition and architecture? Eur J Entomol 100:313–322Google Scholar
- Porter K (1982) Basking behavior in larvae of the butterfly Euphydryas aurinia. Oikos 38:308–312Google Scholar
- Tews J, Brose U, Grimm V, Tielborger K, Wichmann MC, Schwager M, Jeltsch F (2004) Animal species diversity driven by habitat heterogeneity/diversity: the importance of keystone structures. J Biogeogr 31:79–92Google Scholar
- Thomas CD (1994) The ecology and conservation of butterfly metapopulations in the fragmented British landscape. In: Pullin AS (eds) Ecology and conservation of butterflies. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 46–63Google Scholar
- Thomas CD, Hanski I (1997) Butterfly metapopulations. In: Hanski I, Gilpin ME (eds) Metapopulation biology: ecology genetics, and evolution. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 359–386Google Scholar
- Thomas CD, Hanski I (2004) Metapopulation dynamics in changing environments: butterfly responses to habitat and climate change. In: Hanski I, Gaggiotti O (eds) Ecology, genetics, and evolution of metapopulations. Academic Press, London, pp 489–514Google Scholar
- Thomas JA, Bourn NAD, Clarke RT, Stewart KE, Simcox DJ, Pearman GS, Curtis R, Goodger B (2001) The quality and isolation of habitat patches both determine where butterflies persist in fragmented landscapes. Proc Roy Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 268:1792–1796Google Scholar
- van Swaay C, Warren M (1999) Red Data Book of European Butterflies (Rhopalocera). Nature and Environment, No. 99, Council of Europe, Strasbourg, FranceGoogle Scholar
- Wahlberg N, Kullberg J, Hanski I (2001) Nature history of some Siberian melitaeine butterfly species (Nymphalidae: Melitaeini) and their parasitoids. Entomol Finn 12:72–77Google Scholar
- Wang YF (2004) Difference in metapopulation structure and dynamics of two species of coexistent melitaeine butterflies. PhD thesis, Beijing Normal University, ChinaGoogle Scholar