Journal of Insect Conservation

, Volume 9, Issue 1, pp 49–59 | Cite as

Saproxylic hoverflies benefit by modern forest management (Diptera: Syrphidae)

Article

Abstract

Saproxylic organisms are regarded as threatened in many European countries. Nevertheless, there have been some signals indicating a recent increase of saproxylic hoverflies in the Netherlands. This paper examines the change in occurrence of saproxylic hoverflies compared to other ecological groups of the same family. The trend analysis is based on the database of an extensive recording programme carried out in the Netherlands. The results show an increase in occupied grid cells for a majority of saproxylic species in relation to other ecological groups. This positive trend occurs among all five ecological subcategories of saproxylic hoverflies recognized in this paper. It is suggested that this increase could be attributed to the changes in the Dutch forests during the past 50 years. Important aspects of these changes are: the increase in forest area (including an increase in area of forest with large and very large trees), the increase in age of forests and the changes in forest management in favour of a more natural approach towards dead and ill trees. In the discussion the possible influence of climate change and the method of trend calculation are discussed.

Keywords

Forest management Saproxylic Syrphidae 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ball, S.G., Morris, R.K.A. 2000Provisional atlas of British Hoverflies (DipteraSyrphidae)Biological Records CentreHuntingdonGoogle Scholar
  2. Burton, J.F. 2003

    The apparent influence of climatic change on recent changes of range by European insects (Lepidoptera, Orthoptera)

    Reemer, M.Helsdingen, P.J.Kleukers, R.M.J.C. eds. Proceedings of the 13th International Colloquium of the European Invertebrate Survey, Leiden, 2–5 September 2001EIS-NederlandLeiden1321
    Google Scholar
  3. Cavalli, R., Mason, F. 2003Techniques for Re-establishment of Dead Wood for Saproxylic Fauna Conservation. LIFE Nature Project NAT/IT/99/6245 Bosco della Fontana (Mantova, Italy)Gianluigi Arcari EditoreMantovaGoogle Scholar
  4. Dirkse, G.M., Daamen, W.P., Schoonderwoerd, H., Paasman, J.M. 2003Meetnet Functievervulling bos. Het Nederlandse bos 2001–2002Expertisecentrum LNVWageningenGoogle Scholar
  5. Duuren, L. , Eggink, G.J., Kalkhoven, J., Nooteboom, J., Strien, A.J., Wortelboer, R. 2003Natuurcompendium 2003. Centraal Bureau voor StatistiekVoorburg & Milieu- & NatuurplanbureauBilthovenGoogle Scholar
  6. Fayt, P., Branquart, E., Dufrene, M., Henin, J.-M., Pontegnie, C., Versteirt, V. 2003

    Xylobios: patterns, roles and determinants of saproxylic diversity in Belgian deciduous forests

    McManus, L.Liebhold, A.M. eds. Proceedings Ecology, Survey and Management of Forest InsectsUSDA Forest ServiceDelaware128129
    Google Scholar
  7. Good, J.A., Speight, M.C.D. 1996Saproxylic Invertebrates and their Conservation throughout EuropeCouncil of EuropeStrasbourgGoogle Scholar
  8. Mason F., Nardi G. and Tisato M.(eds)2003. Proceedings of the International Symposium ‘Dead wood: a key to biodiversity’, Mantova, May 29–31st 2003. Sherwood 95 supplement2: 1–100.Google Scholar
  9. Reemer, M. 2003Zweefvliegen en veranderd bosbeheer in Nederland (Diptera, Syrphidae)European Invertebrate Survey – NederlandLeidenGoogle Scholar
  10. Reemer, M., Smit, J.T., Steenis, W. 2003

    Changes in ranges of hoverflies in the Netherlands in the 20th century Diptera: Syrphidae

    Reemer, M.Helsdingen, P.J. Kleukers, R.M.J.C. eds. Proceedings of the 13th International Colloquium of the European Invertebrate Survey, Leiden, 2–5 September 2001EIS-NederlandLeiden5360
    Google Scholar
  11. Rotheray, G.E. 1999Descriptions and a key to the larval and puparial stages of north-west European Volucella (Diptera, Syrphidae)Studia Dipterol.6103116Google Scholar
  12. Rotheray, G.E., MacGowan, I. 2000Status and breeding sites of three presumed endangered Scottish saproxylic syrphids (Diptera, Syrphidae)J. Insect Conserv.4215223Google Scholar
  13. Rotheray, G.E., Hancock, G., Hewitt, S., Horsfield, D., MacGowan, I., Robertson, D., Watt, K. 2001The biodiversity and conservation of saproxylic Diptera in ScotlandJ. Insect Conserv.57785Google Scholar
  14. SOVON2002Atlas van de Nederlandse broedvogels 1998–2000Nederlandse Fauna51585Google Scholar
  15. Speight, M.C.D. 1989Saproxylic Invertebrates and their ConservationCouncil of EuropeStrasbourgGoogle Scholar
  16. Speight, M.C.D., Castella, E. 2003a

    Traits of European Syrphidae (Diptera), 2002

    Speight, M.C.D.Castella, E.Obrdlik, P.Ball, S. eds. Syrph the Net, the database of European Syrphidae 35Syrph the Net PublicationsDublin
    Google Scholar
  17. Speight, M.C.D., Castella, E. 2003b

    Range and status data for European Syrphidae (Diptera)

    Speight, M.C.D.Castella, E.Obrdlik, P.Ball, S. eds. Syrph the Netthe Database of European Syrphidae 42Syrph the Net PublicationsDublin
    Google Scholar
  18. Speight, M.C.D., Castella, E., Obrdlik, P. 2003a

    Macrohabitat preferences of European Syrphidae Diptera2002

    Speight, M.C.D.Castella, E.Obrdlik, P.Ball, S. eds. Syrph the Netthe Database of European Syrphidae 33Syrph the Net PublicationsDublin
    Google Scholar
  19. Speight, M.C.D., Castella, E., Obrdlik, P. 2003b

    Microsite features used by European Syrphidae (Diptera), 2002

    Speight, M.C.D.Castella, E.Obrdlik, P.Ball, S. eds. Syrph the Netthe database of European Syrphidae 34Syrph the Net PublicationsDublin
    Google Scholar
  20. Speight M.C.D. and Good J.A. 2003. Development of eco-friendly forestry practices in Europe and the maintenance of saproxylic biodiversity. In: Mason F., Nardi G. and Tisato M. (eds), Proceedings of the International Symposium ‘Dead wood a key to biodiversity’, Mantova, May 29–31st 2003. Sherwood 95 supplement, 2:73–77.Google Scholar
  21. Ssymank A. and Doczkal D. 1998. Rote Liste der Schwebfliegen (Diptera: Syrphidae). In: Binot M., Bless R., Boye P., Gruttke H. and Pretscher P. (eds), Rote Liste gefährdeter Tiere Deutschlands, Schriftenreihe für Landschaftspflege und Naturschutz. 55:65–72. Google Scholar
  22. Versteirt, V., Desender, K., Geudens, G., Grootaert, P. 2000Determinatie en bioindicatie van bosgebonden ongewervelden. 3. Ecologische standplaatskarakterisatie van bossen aan de hand van keverfauna (Coleoptera) 4. Verkennend onderzoek naar de potentiëe waarde van integrale bosreservaten voor het behoud van xylobionte arthropodenKoninklijk Belgisch Instituut voor Natuurwetenschappen departement EntomologieBrusselGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.European Invertebrate Survey – The NetherlandsLeidenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations