Abstract
Recent studies on the threatened clouded apollo butterfly, Parnassius mnemosyne, have identified suitable habitats on a large scale. More detailed knowledge on specific habitat requirements of ovipositing females is still needed. Some earlier observations suggest that females just drop their eggs without discrimination. This study suggests that females can be rather choosy in their oviposition site selection and that they actively search for oviposition sites with suitable vegetation structure. By identifying factors influencing female oviposition, such as distance to shrub, valuable knowledge is generated for restoration plans considered in the study area. This stresses the importance of proper management of extant habitats in order to prevent local extinctions of P. mnemosyne and it also highlights the need for data on specific oviposition requirements in butterfly conservation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
K. Agnew M.C. Singer (2000) ArticleTitleDoes fecundity drive the evolution of insect diet? Oikos 88 533–538
K.-O. Bergman (1999) ArticleTitleHabitat utilization by Lopinga achine (Nymphalidae: Satyrinae) larvae and ovipositing females: implications for conservation Biol. Conserv. 88 69–74
N.A.D. Bourn J.A. Thomas (2002) ArticleTitleThe challenge of conserving grassland insects at the margins of their range in Europe Biol. Conserv. 104 285–292
Blomqvist R. 1996. Parnassius mnemosyne inom Norrtälje kommun 1995. Rapport 1996:1, Norrtälje Naturvårdsfond.
H. Damman (1991) ArticleTitleOviposition behavior and clutch size in a group-feeding pyralid mothOmphalocera munroei J. Anim. Ecol. 60 193–204
R.L.H. Dennis T.G. Shreeve H. Van Dyck (2003) ArticleTitleTowards a functional resource-based concept for habitat: a butterfly biology viewpoint Oikos 102 417–426
H. Descimon M. Napolitano (1993) ArticleTitleEnzyme polymorphism, wing pattern variability, and geographical isolation in an endangered butterfly species Biol. Conserv. 66 117–123
P. Feeny L. Rosenberry M. Carter (1983) Chemical aspects of oviposition behavior in butterflies S. Ahmad (Eds) Herbivorous Insects: Host-seeking Behavior and Mechanisms Academic Press New York 27–76
R. Grundel N.B. Pavlovic C.L. Sulzman (1998) ArticleTitleHabitat use by the endangered Karner blue butterfly in oak oodlands: the influence of canopy cover Biol. Conserv. 85 47–53
U. Gärdenfors (Eds) (2000) Rölistade arter i Sverige -- The 2000 Red List of Swedish Species ArtDatabanken, SLU Uppsala
J.P. Harmon J.A. White D.A. Andow (2003) ArticleTitleOviposition behavior of Ostrinia nubialis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) in response to potential intra- and interspecific interactions Environ. Entomol. 32 334–339
Henriksen H.J. and Kreutzer I.B. 1982. The Butterflies of Scandinavia in Nature. Skandinavisk Bogforlag.
L. Imby (1996) Faktablad: Parnassius mnemosyne -- mnemosynefjäril. Artdatabanken 2000--09--22 SLU Uppsala
L. Imby (1996) Inventering av mnemosynefjäril (Parnassius mnemosyne Linnaeus 1758) i Uppland 1985--86 och 1994 (--1995) Rapport, Världsnaturfonden WWF Sverige
B. Karlsson C. Wiklund (1985) ArticleTitleEgg weight variation in relation to egg mortality and starvation endurance of newly hatched larvae in some satyrid butterflies Ecol. Entomol. 10 205–211
M. Konvicka V. Hula Z. Fric (2003) ArticleTitleHabitat of pre-hibernating larvae of the endangered butterfly Euphydryas aurinia (Lepidotera: Nymphalidae): What can be learned from vegetation composition and architecture Eur. J. Entomol. 100 313–322
M. Konvicka T. Kuras (1999) ArticleTitlePopulation structure, behaviour and selection of oviposition sites of an endangered butterfly, Parnassius mnemosynein Litovelské Pomoraví, Czech Republic J. Insect Conserv. 3 211–223
M. Luoto M. Kuussaari H. Rita J. Salminen T. von Bonsdorff (2001) ArticleTitleDeterminants of distribution and abundance in the clouded apollo butterfly: a landscape ecological approach Ecography 24 601–617
N.K. Michiels A.A. Dhondt (1990) ArticleTitleCosts and benefits associated with oviposition site selection in the dragonfly Sympetrum danae (Odonata: Libellulidae) Anim. Behav. 40 668–678
G. Nève B. Barascud R. Hughes J. Aubert H. Descimon P. Lebrun M. Baguette (1996) ArticleTitleDispersal, colonization power and metapopulation structure in the vulnerable butterfly Proclossiana eunomia (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) J. Appl. Ecol. 33 14–22
T.R. New R.M. Pyle J.A. Thomas C.D. Thomas P.C. Hammond (1995) ArticleTitleButterfly conservation management Ann. Rev. Entomol. 40 57–83
C. Parmesan N. Ryrholm C. Stefanescu J.K. Hill C.D. Thomas H. Descimon B. Huntley L. Kaila J. Kullberg T. Tammaru W.J. Tennent J.A. Thomas M. Warren (1999) ArticleTitlePoleward shifts in geographical ranges of butterfly species associated with regional warming Nature 399 579–583 Occurrence Handle10.1038/21181 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaK1MXjvFegtr4%3D
R.M. Quinn K.J. Gaston D.B. Roy (1998) ArticleTitleCoincidence in the distributions of butterflies and their foodplants Ecography 21 279–288
J.J.A. Renwick F.S. Chew (1994) ArticleTitleOviposition behavior in lepidoptera Annu. Rev. Entomol. 39 377–400
J.A. Thomas (1984) The conservation of butterflies in temperate countries: past efforts and lessons for the future R.I. Vane-Wright P.R. Ackery (Eds) The Biology of Butterflies Academic Press London 333–353
C. Van Swaay M.S. Warren (1999) Red Data Book of European Butterflies (Rhopalocera) Council of Europe Publishing Strasbourg
C. Wiklund (1984) ArticleTitleEgg-laying patterns in butterflies in relation to their phenology and the visual apparency and abundance of their host plants Oecologia 63 23–29
C. Wiklund A. Persson (1983) ArticleTitleFecundity, and the relation of egg weight variation to offspring fitness it the speckled wood butterfly Pararge aegeriaor why don’t butterfly females lay more eggs? Oikos 40 53–63
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bergström, A. Oviposition site preferences of the threatened butterfly Parnassius mnemosyne – implications for conservation. J Insect Conserv 9, 21–27 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-004-3204-4
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-004-3204-4