Skip to main content
Log in

Pulmonary vein isolation plus adjunctive therapy for the treatment of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Published:
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the primary technique for ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). It is unclear whether adjunctive therapies in addition to PVI can reduce atrial arrhythmia recurrence (AAR) compared to PVI alone in patients with AF.

Methods

A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing PVI plus an adjunctive therapy (autonomic modulation, linear ablation, non-pulmonary vein trigger ablation, epicardial PVI [hybrid ablation], or left atrial substrate modification) to PVI alone was conducted. The primary outcome was AAR. Cumulative odd’s ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for each treatment type.

Results

Forty-six trials were identified that included 8,500 participants. The mean age (± standard deviation) was 60.2 (±4.1) years, and 27.2% of all patients were female. The mean follow-up time was 14.6 months. PVI plus autonomic modulation and PVI plus hybrid ablation were associated with a relative 53.1% (OR 0.47; 95% CI 0.32 to 0.69; p < 0.001) and 59.1% (OR 0.41; 95% CI 0.23 to 0.75; p = 0.003) reduction in AAR, respectively, compared to PVI alone. All categories had at least moderate interstudy heterogeneity except for hybrid ablation.

Conclusion

Adjunctive autonomic modulation and epicardial PVI may improve the effectiveness of PVI. Larger, multi-center randomized controlled trials are needed to evaluate the efficacy of these therapies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Any inquires regarding the data can be submitted to the corresponding author and it will be addressed accordingly.

References

  1. Santangeli P, Marchlinski FE. Pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation: forever young. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64(23):2468–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Haïssaguerre M, Jaïs P, Shah DC, Takahashi A, Hocini M, Quiniou G, et al. Spontaneous initiation of atrial fibrillation by ectopic beats originating in the pulmonary veins. N Engl J Med. 1998;339(10):659–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Berger WR, Neefs J, van den Berg NWE, Krul SPJ, van Praag EM, Piersma FR, et al. Additional ganglion plexus ablation during thoracoscopic surgical ablation of advanced atrial fibrillation: Intermediate follow-up of the AFACT study. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2019;5(3):343–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Katritsis DG, Pokushalov E, Romanov A, Giazitzoglou E, Siontis GCM, Po SS, et al. Autonomic denervation added to pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a randomized clinical trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62(24):2318–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Katritsis DG, Giazitzoglou E, Zografos T, Pokushalov E, Po SS, Camm AJ. Rapid pulmonary vein isolation combined with autonomic ganglia modification: a randomized study. Heart Rhythm. 2011;8(5):672–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Steinberg JS, Shabanov V, Ponomarev D, Losik D, Ivanickiy E, Kropotkin E, et al. Effect of renal denervation and catheter ablation vs catheter ablation alone on atrial fibrillation recurrence among patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and hypertension: The ERADICATE-AF randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2020;323(3):248–55.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Kiuchi MG, Chen S, Hoye NA, Pürerfellner H. Pulmonary vein isolation combined with spironolactone or renal sympathetic denervation in patients with chronic kidney disease, uncontrolled hypertension, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, and a pacemaker. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2018;51(1):51–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pokushalov E, Romanov A, Corbucci G, Artyomenko S, Baranova V, Turov A, et al. A randomized comparison of pulmonary vein isolation with versus without concomitant renal artery denervation in patients with refractory symptomatic atrial fibrillation and resistant hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60(13):1163–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kiuchi MG, Chen S, Silva GR, Paz LMR, Kiuchi T, de Paula Filho AG, et al. Pulmonary vein isolation alone and combined with renal sympathetic denervation in chronic kidney disease patients with refractory atrial fibrillation. Kidney Res Clin Pract. 2016;35(4):237–44.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Valderrábano M, Peterson LE, Swarup V, Schurmann PA, Makkar A, Doshi RN, et al. Effect of catheter ablation with vein of marshall ethanol infusion vs catheter ablation alone on persistent atrial fibrillation: The venus randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2020;324(16):1620–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Verma A, Jiang CY, Betts TR, Chen J, Deisenhofer I, Mantovan R, et al. Approaches to catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(19):1812–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sheikh I, Krum D, Cooley R, Dhala A, Blanck Z, Bhatia A, et al. Pulmonary vein isolation and linear lesions in atrial fibrillation ablation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2006;17(2):103–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sawhney N, Anousheh R, Chen W, Feld GK. Circumferential pulmonary vein ablation with additional linear ablation results in an increased incidence of left atrial flutter compared with segmental pulmonary vein isolation as an initial approach to ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2010;3(3):243–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hocini M, Jaïs P, Sanders P, Takahashi Y, Rotter M, Rostock T, et al. Techniques, evaluation, and consequences of linear block at the left atrial roof in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a prospective randomized study. Circulation. 2005;112(24):3688–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wynn GJ, Panikker S, Morgan M, Hall M, Waktare J, Markides V, et al. Biatrial linear ablation in sustained nonpermanent AF: Results of the substrate modification with ablation and antiarrhythmic drugs in nonpermanent atrial fibrillation (SMAN-PAF) trial. Heart Rhythm. 2016;13(2):399–406.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kang KW, Pak HN, Park J, Park JG, Uhm JS, Joung B, et al. Additional linear ablation from the superior vena cava to right atrial septum after pulmonary vein isolation improves the clinical outcome in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: prospective randomized study. Europace. 2014;16(12):1738–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gaita F, Caponi D, Scaglione M, Montefusco A, Corleto A, Di Monte F, et al. Long-term clinical results of 2 different ablation strategies in patients with paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2008;1(4):269–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Willems S, Klemm H, Rostock T, Brandstrup B, Ventura R, Steven D, et al. Substrate modification combined with pulmonary vein isolation improves outcome of catheter ablation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation: a prospective randomized comparison. Eur Heart J. 2006;27(23):2871–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Arbelo E, Guiu E, Ramos P, Bisbal F, Borras R, Andreu D, et al. Benefit of left atrial roof linear ablation in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a prospective, randomized study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2014;3(5):e000877.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Fassini G, Riva S, Chiodelli R, Trevisi N, Berti M, Carbucicchio C, et al. Left mitral isthmus ablation associated with PV Isolation: long-term results of a prospective randomized study. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2005;16(11):1150–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mun HS, Joung B, Shim J, Hwang HJ, Kim JY, Lee M, et al. Does additional linear ablation after circumferential pulmonary vein isolation improve clinical outcome in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation? Prospective randomised study. Heart. 2012;98(6):480–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gavin AR, Singleton CB, Bowyer J, McGavigan AD. Pulmonary venous isolation versus additional substrate modification as treatment for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2012;33(1):101–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Yu HT, Shim J, Park J, Kim I, Kim T, Uhm J, et al. Pulmonary vein isolation alone versus additional linear ablation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation converted to paroxysmal type with antiarrhythmic drug therapy: a multicenter, prospective, randomized study. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2017;10(6):e004915.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kim TH, Park J, Park JK, Uhm J, Joung B, Hwang C, et al. Linear ablation in addition to circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (Dallas lesion set) does not improve clinical outcome in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a prospective randomized study. Europace. 2015;17(3):388–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Aryana A, Allen SL, Pujara DK, Bowers MR, O’Neill PG, Yamauchi Y, et al. Concomitant pulmonary vein and posterior wall isolation using cryoballoon with adjunct radiofrequency in persistent atrial fibrillation. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2021;7(2):187–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lee JM, Shim J, Park J, Yu HT, Kim T, Park J, et al. The electrical isolation of the left atrial posterior wall in catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2019;5(11):1253–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ahn J, Shin DG, Han SJ, Lim HE. Does isolation of the left atrial posterior wall using cryoballoon ablation improve clinical outcomes in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation? A prospective randomized controlled trial. Europace. 2022;24(7):1093–101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kim JS, Shin SY, Na JO, Choi CU, Kim SH, Kim JW, et al. Does isolation of the left atrial posterior wall improve clinical outcomes after radiofrequency catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation?: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Int J Cardiol. 2015;181:277–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kim D, Yu HT, Kim TH, Uhm J, Joung B, Lee M, et al. Electrical posterior box isolation in repeat ablation for atrial fibrillation: a prospective randomized clinical study. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2022;8(5):582–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Pak HN, Park J, Park JW, Yang S, Yu HT, Kim T, et al. Electrical posterior box isolation in persistent atrial fibrillation changed to paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a multicenter, prospective, randomized study. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2020;13(9):e008531.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kistler PM, Chieng D, Sugumar H, Ling L, Segan L, Azzopardi S, et al. Effect of catheter ablation using pulmonary vein isolation with vs without posterior left atrial wall isolation on atrial arrhythmia recurrence in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation: The CAPLA Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2023;329(2):127–35.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Pappone C, Manguso F, Vicedomini G, Gugliotta F, Santinelli O, Ferro A, et al. Prevention of iatrogenic atrial tachycardia after ablation of atrial fibrillation: a prospective randomized study comparing circumferential pulmonary vein ablation with a modified approach. Circulation. 2004;110(19):3036–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Dixit S, Marchlinski FE, Lin D, Callans DJ, Bala R, Piley MP, et al. Randomized ablation strategies for the treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation: RASTA study. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2012;5(2):287–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Wang XH, Liu X, Sun YM, Shi HF, Zhou L, Gu JN. Pulmonary vein isolation combined with superior vena cava isolation for atrial fibrillation ablation: a prospective randomized study. Europace. 2008;10(5):600–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Corrado A, Bonso A, Madalosso M, Rossillo A, Themistoclakis S, Di Biase L, et al. Impact of systematic isolation of superior vena cava in addition to pulmonary vein antrum isolation on the outcome of paroxysmal, persistent, and permanent atrial fibrillation ablation: results from a randomized study. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2010;21(1):1–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Da Costa A, Levallois M, Romeyer-Bouchard C, Bisch L, Gate-Martinet A, Isaaz K. Remote-controlled magnetic pulmonary vein isolation combined with superior vena cava isolation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a prospective randomized study. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2015;108(3):163–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. DeLurgio DB, Crossen KJ, Gill J, Blauth C, Oza SR, Magnano AR, et al. Hybrid convergent procedure for the treatment of persistent and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation: results of converge clinical trial. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2020;13(12):e009288.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Jan M, Žižek D, Geršak ŽM, Geršak B. Comparison of treatment outcomes between convergent procedure and catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation evaluated with implantable loop recorder monitoring. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2018;29(8):1073–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Hwang J, Park HS, Han S, Lee CH, Kim I, Cho Y, et al. Ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation based on high density voltage mapping and complex fractionated atrial electrograms: A randomized controlled trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021;100(31):e26702.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Oral H, Chugh A, Yoshida K, Sarrazin JF, Kuhne M, Crawford T, et al. A randomized assessment of the incremental role of ablation of complex fractionated atrial electrograms after antral pulmonary vein isolation for long-lasting persistent atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53(9):782–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Di Biase L, Elayi CS, Fahmy TS, Martin DO, Ching CK, Barrett C, et al. Atrial fibrillation ablation strategies for paroxysmal patients: randomized comparison between different techniques. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2009;2(2):113–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Elayi CS, Verma A, Di Biase L, Ching CK, Patel D, Barrett C, et al. Ablation for longstanding permanent atrial fibrillation: results from a randomized study comparing three different strategies. Heart Rhythm. 2008;5(12):1658–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Oral H, Chugh A, Lemola K, Cheung P, Hall B, Good E, et al. Noninducibility of atrial fibrillation as an end point of left atrial circumferential ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a randomized study. Circulation. 2004;110(18):2797–801.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Vogler J, Willems S, Sultan A, Schreiber D, Luker J, Servatius H, et al. Pulmonary vein isolation versus defragmentation: The CHASE-AF clinical trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;66(24):2743–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Yang G, Zheng L, Jiang C, Fan J, Liu X, Zhan X, et al. Circumferential pulmonary vein isolation plus low-voltage area modification in persistent atrial fibrillation: The STABLE-SR-II trial. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2022;8(7):882–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Huo Y, Gaspar T, Schӧnbauer R, Wojcik M, Fiedler L, Roithinger FX, et al. Low-voltage myocardium-guided ablation trial of persistent atrial fibrillation. NEJM Evid. 2022;1(11):1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Masuda M, Asai M, Iida O, Okamoto S, Ishihara T, Nanto K, et al. Low-voltage-area ablation in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation - extended follow-up results of the volcano trial. Circ J. 2022;86(2):245–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Marrouche NF, Wazni O, McGann C, Greene T, Dean JM, Dagher L, et al. Effect of mri-guided fibrosis ablation vs conventional catheter ablation on atrial arrhythmia recurrence in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation: the decaaf ii randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2022;327(23):2296–305.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Waranugraha Y, Rizal A, Setiawan D, Aziz IJ. Additional complex fractionated atrial electrogram ablation does not improve the outcomes of non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Indian Heart J. 2021;73(1):63–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Providência R, Lambiase PD, Srinivasan N, Babu GG, Bronis K, Ahsan S, et al. Is there still a role for complex fractionated atrial electrogram ablation in addition to pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation? meta-analysis of 1415 patients. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2015;8(5):1017–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Wu SH, Jiang WF, Gu J, Zhao L, Wang Y, Liu Y, et al. Benefits and risks of additional ablation of complex fractionated atrial electrograms for patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol. 2013;169(1):35–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Hayward RM, Upadhyay GA, Mela T, Ellinor PT, Barrett CD, Heist EK, et al. Pulmonary vein isolation with complex fractionated atrial electrogram ablation for paroxysmal and nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation: A meta-analysis. Heart Rhythm. 2011;8(7):994–1000.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Li WJ, Bai YY, Zhang HY, Tang RB, Miao CL, Sang CH, et al. Additional ablation of complex fractionated atrial electrograms after pulmonary vein isolation in patients with atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2011;4(2):143–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Kong MH, Piccini JP, Bahnson TD. Efficacy of adjunctive ablation of complex fractionated atrial electrograms and pulmonary vein isolation for the treatment of atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Europace. 2011;13(2):193–204.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Moustafa A, Liu X, Elzanaty A, Meenakshisundaram C, Kancharla K, Kahaly O, et al. Role of adjunctive cryoballoon left atrial posterior wall isolation in non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2022;47(12):101383.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Salih M, Darrat Y, Ibrahim AM, Al-Akchar M, Bhattarai M, Koester C, et al. Clinical outcomes of adjunctive posterior wall isolation in persistent atrial fibrillation: A meta-analysis. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020;31(6):1394–402.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Lupercio F, Lin AY, Aldaas OM, Romero J, Briceno D, Hoffmayer KS, et al. Role of adjunctive posterior wall isolation in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2020;58(1):77–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Kampaktsis PN, Oikonomou EK, Choi DY, Cheung JW. Efficacy of ganglionated plexi ablation in addition to pulmonary vein isolation for paroxysmal versus persistent atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2017;50(3):253–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Rackley J, Nudy M, Gonzalez MD, Naccarelli G, Maheshwari A. Pulmonary vein isolation with adjunctive left atrial ganglionic plexus ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-022-01212-1.

  60. Mujer MT, Al-Abcha A, Saleh Y, Nerusu LA, Boumegouas M, Herzallah K, et al. Effect of combined renal denervation and pulmonary vein isolation in atrial fibrillation recurrence in hypertensive patients: A meta-analysis. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2020;43(8):866–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Kewcharoen J, Vutthikraivit W, Rattanawong P, Prasitlumkum N, Akoum NW, Bunch TJ, et al. Renal sympathetic denervation in addition to pulmonary vein isolation reduces the recurrence rate of atrial fibrillation: an updated meta-analysis of randomized control trials. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2021;60(3):459–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Ukena C, Becker N, Pavlicek V, Millenaar D, Ewen S, Linz D, et al. Catheter-based renal denervation as adjunct to pulmonary vein isolation for treatment of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hypertens. 2020;38(5):783–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Atti V, Turagam MK, Garg J, Lakkireddy D. Renal sympathetic denervation improves clinical outcomes in patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation and history of hypertension: A meta-analysis. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2019;30(5):702–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Chakraborty P, Farhat K, Po SS, Armoundas AA, Stavrakis S. Autonomic nervous system and cardiac metabolism: links between autonomic and metabolic remodeling in atrial fibrillation [published online ahead of print, 2023 Mar 31]. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2023; S2405-500X(23)00117-2

  65. Lange PS, Wenning C, Avramovic N, Leitz P, Larbig R, Frommeyer G, et al. Cardiac sympathetic activity and rhythm control following pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation-a prospective 123i-mibg-spect/ct imaging study. J Pers Med. 2021;11(10):995.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Janes RD, Brandys JC, Hopkins DA, Johnstone DE, Murphy DA, Armour JA. Anatomy of human extrinsic cardiac nerves and ganglia. Am J Cardiol. 1986;57(4):299–309.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Armour JA, Murphy DA, Yuan BX, Macdonald S, Hopkins DA. Gross and microscopic anatomy of the human intrinsic cardiac nervous system. Anat Rec. 1997;247(2):289–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Ashton JL, Burton RAB, Bub G, Smaill BH, Montgomery JM. Synaptic plasticity in cardiac innervation and its potential role in atrial fibrillation. Front Physiol. 2018;9:240.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Kim MY, Coyle C, Tomlinson DR, et al. Ectopy-triggering ganglionated plexuses ablation to prevent atrial fibrillation: GANGLIA-AF study. Heart Rhythm. 2022;19(4):516–24.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Mamchur SE, Mamchur IN, Khomenko EA, Bokhan NS, Scherbinina DA. 'Electrical exclusion' of a critical myocardial mass by extended pulmonary vein antrum isolation for persistent atrial fibrillation treatment. Interv Med Appl Sci. 2014;6(1):31–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Sandler B, Kim MY, Sikkel MB, et al. Targeting the ectopy-triggering ganglionated plexuses without pulmonary vein isolation prevents atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2021;32(2):235–44.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Michaud GF, Kumar S. Surgical ganglionic plexus ablation in atrial fibrillation: is all hope lost for the plexus? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68(11):1166–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Two-stage hybrid ablation or thoracoscopic epicardial ablation for long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation (THAT-LSPAF). ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03708471. Updated February 11, 2020. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03708471.

  74. Hybrid versus catheter ablation in persistent AF (HARTCAP-AF). ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02441738. Updated May 16, 2019. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02441738.

  75. Comparison Between One-stage Hybrid Ablation and Thoracoscopic Surgical Ablation for Intractable Atrial Fibrillation. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03127423. Updated August 18, 2021. https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03127423.

  76. Vlachos K, Derval N, Pambrun T, et al. Ligament of Marshall ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2021;44(5):782–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Stavrakis S, Humphrey MB, Scherlag BJ, et al. Low-level transcutaneous electrical vagus nerve stimulation suppresses atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;65(9):867–75.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. Mircea AA, Rusu M, Liehn EA, Bucur O. Promising therapies for atrial fibrillation and ventricular tachycardia. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(20):12612.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. Qin D, Singh JP. Low-level tragus stimulation for atrial fibrillation: a glimpse of hope for neuromodulation? JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2020;6(3):292–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Stavrakis S, Stoner JA, Humphrey MB, et al. Treat af (transcutaneous electrical vagus nerve stimulation to suppress atrial fibrillation): a randomized clinical trial. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2020;6(3):282–91.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. Andrade JG, Champagne J, Dubuc M, Deyell MW, Verma A, Macle L, et al. Cryoballoon or radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation assessed by continuous monitoring: a ransdomized clinical trial. Circulation. 2019;140(22):1779–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Romero J, Gabr M, Alviz I, et al. Focal impulse and rotor modulation guided ablation versus pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation: A meta-analysis of head-to-head comparative studies. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2021;32(7):1822–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Nakatani Y, Sridi-Cheniti S, Cheniti G, Ramirez FD, Goujeau C, André C, et al. Pulsed field ablation prevents chronic atrial fibrotic changes and restrictive mechanics after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2021;23(11):1767–76.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rahul Bussa.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

No disclosures.

Financial and non-financial interests

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary materials

ESM 1

Table S1 and Figure S1 (DOCX 225 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bussa, R., Nudy, M., Ahmed, M. et al. Pulmonary vein isolation plus adjunctive therapy for the treatment of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 67, 523–537 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-023-01609-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-023-01609-6

Keywords

Navigation