Skip to main content
Log in

Site-specific effects of dobutamine on cardiac conduction and refractoriness

  • Published:
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Isoproterenol, a non-specific beta agonist, is commonly used during electrophysiology studies (EPS). However, with the significant increase in the price of isoproterenol in 2015 and the increasing number of catheter ablations performed, the cost implications cannot be ignored. Dobutamine is a less expensive synthetic compound developed from isoproterenol with a similar mechanism to enhance cardiac conduction and shorten refractoriness, thus making it a feasible substitute with a lower cost. However, the use of dobutamine for EPS has not been well-reported in the literature.

Objective

To determine the site-specific effects of various doses of dobutamine on cardiac conduction and refractoriness and assess its safety during EPS.

Methods

From February 2020 to October 2020, 40 non-consecutive patients scheduled for elective EPS, supraventricular tachycardia, atrial fibrillation, and premature ventricular contraction ablations at a single center were consented and prospectively enrolled to assess the effect of dobutamine on the cardiac conduction system. At the end of each ablation procedure, measures of cardiac conduction and refractoriness were recorded at baseline and with incremental doses of dobutamine at 5, 10, 15, and 20 mcg/kg/min. For the primary analysis, the change per dose of dobutamine from baseline to each dosing level of dobutamine received by the patients, comparing atrioventricular node block cycle length (AVNBCL), ventricular atrial block cycle length (VABCL) and sinus cycle length (SCL), was tested using mixed-effect regression. For the secondary analysis, dobutamine dose level was tested for association with relative changes from baseline of each electrophysiologic parameter (SCL, AVNBCL, VABCL, atrioventricular node effective refractory period (AVNERP), AH, QRS, QT, QTc, atrial effective refractory period (AERP), ventricular effective refractory period (VERP), using mixed-effect regression. Changes in systolic and diastolic blood pressures were also assessed. The Holm-Bonferroni method was used to adjust for multiple testing.

Results

For the primary analysis there was no statistically significant change of AVNBCL and VABCL relative to SCL from baseline to each dose level of dobutamine. The SCL, AVNBCL, VABCL, AVNERP, AERP, VERP and the AH, and QT intervals all demonstrated a statistically significant decrease from baseline to at least one dose level with incremental dobutamine dosing. Two patients (5%) developed hypotension during the study and one patient (2.5%) received a vasopressor. Two patients (5%) had induced arrhythmias but otherwise no major adverse events were noted.

Conclusion

In this study, there was no statistically significant change of AVNBCL and VABCL relative to SCL from baseline to any dose level of dobutamine. As expected, the AH and QT intervals, and the VABCL, VERP, AERP and AVNERP all significantly decreased from baseline to at least one dose level with an escalation in dobutamine dose. Dobutamine was well-tolerated and safe to use during EPS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The participants of this study did not give written consent for their data to be shared publicly, so due to the sensitive nature of the research, supporting data is not available.

References

  1. Zipes DP, DiMarco JP, Jackman WM, et al. ACC/AHA Task Force Report: Guidelines for Clinical Intracardiac Electrophysiological and Catheter Ablation Procedures. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;26(2):555–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. D’Silva A, Wright M. Advances in imaging for atrial fibrillation ablation. Radiol Res Pract. 2011;2011:714864.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Khot UN, Vogan ED, Militello MA. Nitroprusside and Isoproterenol Use after Major Price Increases. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(6):594–5. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc1700244.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Knight BP. The rising costs of isoproterenol. EP Lab Dig. 2013;17(3).

  5. Tuttle RR, Mills J. Dobutamine: development of a new catecholamine to selectively increase cardiac contractility. Circ Res. 1975;36(1):185–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Vanegas DI, Perez CDJ, Montenegro JDJ, et al. Dobutamine use for arrhythmia induction during electrical programmed heart stimulation. Rev Colomb Cardiol. 2006;12(7):479–83.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cossú SF, Rothman SA, Chmielewski IL, Hsia HH, Vogel RL, Miller JM, Buxton AE. The effects of isoproterenol on the cardiac conduction system: site-specific dose dependence. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1997;8(8):847–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8167.1997.tb00845.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cismaru G. Arrhythmia induction in the EP lab. 1st ed. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature Switzerland AG;2019:71-86.

  9. Gianni C, Sanchez JE, Mohanty S, Trivedi C, Della Rocca DG, Al-Ahmad A, Burkhardt JD, Gallinghouse GJ, Hranitzky PM, Horton RP, Di Biase L, Natale A. High-Dose Dobutamine for Inducibility of Atrial Arrhythmias During Atrial Fibrillation Ablation. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2020;6(13):1701–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacep.2020.07.018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Piérard LA, Berthe C, Albert A, Carlier J, Kulbertus HE. Haemodynamic alterations during ischaemia induced by dobutamine stress testing. Eur Heart J. 1989;10(9):783–90. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a059571.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lu D, Greenberg MD, Little R, Malik Q, Fernicola DJ, Weissman NJ. Accelerated dobutamine stress testing: safety and feasibility in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. Clin Cardiol. 2001;24(2):141–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.4960240208.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Mazeika PK, Nadazdin A, Oakley CM. Dobutamine stress echocardiography for detection and assessment of coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;19(6):1203–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/0735-1097(92)90325-h.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Burger AJ, Notarianni MP, Aronson D. Safety and efficacy of an accelerated dobutamine stress echocardiography protocol in the evaluation of coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 2000;86(8):825–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9149(00)01100-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Masoni A, Alboni P, Malacarne C, Codeca L. Effects of dobutamine on electrophysiological properties of the specialized conduction system in man. J Electrocardiol. 1979;12(4):361–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-0736(79)80004-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bianchi C, Diaz R, Gonzales C, Beregovich J. Effecto of dobutamine on atrioventricular conduction. Am Heart J. 1975;90(4):474–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dahlberg P, Diamant U, Gilljam T, Rydberg A, Bergfeldt L. QT correction using Bazett’s formula remains preferable in long QT syndrome type 1 and 2. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2021;26:12804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Northwell Health Pharmacy Department. Contracted Price for Isoproterenol and Dobutamine in 2023.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bruce Goldner.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB #: 19–0934) of Northwell Health and exempted from the investigational new drug (IND) based upon a Food and Drug Administration (FDA) review. This study was performed in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.

Informed consent

this study was obtained from all participants included in the study.

Conflict of interest

There was no outside funding for this study. The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 25 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ismail, H., Gabriels, J.K., Chang, D. et al. Site-specific effects of dobutamine on cardiac conduction and refractoriness. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 67, 71–82 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-023-01573-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-023-01573-1

Keywords

Navigation