Skip to main content
Log in

Activation vs entrainment—do we have a winner?

  • Commentary
  • Published:
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Waldo AL, MacLean WA, Karp RB, Kouchoukos NT, James TN. Entrainment and interruption of atrial flutter with atrial pacing: studies in man following open heart surgery. Circulation. 1977;56(5):737–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Waldo AL. Atrial flutter: entrainment characteristics. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1997;8(3):337–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Coffey JO, d’Avila A, Dukkipati S, Danik SB, Gangireddy SR, Koruth JS, et al. Catheter ablation of scar-related atypical atrial flutter. Europace. 2013;15(3):414–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hernandez-Madrid A, Paul T, Abrams D, Aziz PF, Blom NA, Chen J, et al. Arrhythmias in congenital heart disease: a position paper of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC), and the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Working Group on Grown-up Congenital heart disease, endorsed by HRS, PACES, APHRS, and SOLAECE. Europace. 2018;20(11):1719–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhang X, Li W, Lin A, Zou F, Marazzato J, Varrias D, Nagraj S, Wang YC, Seo J, Della Rocca DG, Levine E, Santangeli P, Lakkireddy D, Natale A, Di Biase L. Outcomes of catheter ablation of atrial tachyarrhythmia guided exclusively by activation mapping. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-022-01435-2.

  6. Pathik B, Lee G, Nalliah C, Joseph S, Morton JB, Sparks PB, et al. Entrainment and high-density three-dimensional mapping in right atrial macroreentry provide critical complementary information: entrainment may unmask “visual reentry” as passive. Heart Rhythm. 2017;14(10):1541–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. De Pooter J, El Haddad M, Wolf M, Phlips T, Van Heuverswyn F, Timmers L, et al. Clinical assessment and comparison of annotation algorithms in high-density mapping of regular atrial tachycardias. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2018;29(1):177–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rodriguez Font E, Alonso-Martin C, Guerra JM, Campos Garcia B, Mendez Zurita F, Alcalde Rodriguez O, et al. From high-density mapping to low-density mapping: outlining the active circuit in complex atrial re-entrant tachycardias. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2020;6(5):523–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Timothy R Larsen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This comment refers to the article available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-022-01435-2

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sanders, D.J., Larsen, T.R. Activation vs entrainment—do we have a winner?. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 66, 1313–1314 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-023-01504-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-023-01504-0

Navigation