Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Clinical predictors and implications of cardiac inflammation detected on positron emission tomography (PET) in patients referred for premature ventricular complex (PVC) ablation

  • Published:
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Positron emission tomography computed tomography (PET-CT) is not routinely used for premature ventricular complexes (PVCs). Whether specific clinical factors are associated with abnormal PET-CT results is not clear.

Methods

The treatment courses and baseline characteristics of consecutive patients in a single center between 2012 and 2021, age > 18 years old, and who received 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET-CT imaging for evaluation of PVCs were retrospectively analyzed.

Results

A total of 102 patients was included. Of these, 27 patients (26.4%) had abnormal PET-CT and 61 (59.8%) had normal imaging. Abnormal PET-CT findings were associated with non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT) (95.2% vs. 52.6%, p = 0.001), higher number of PVC morphologies (2.29 ± 0.7 vs. 1.31 ± 0.6, p < 0.001), greater PVC coupling interval dispersion (72.47 ± 66.4 ms vs. 13.42 ± 17.9 ms, p < 0.001), and greater likelihood of fast heart rate dependent PVCs (78.5% vs. 38.2%, p = 0.017). Fourteen (51.8%) patients had an abnormal PET-CT and abnormal late gadolinium enhancement (LGE). Patients with abnormal PET-CT were more frequently treated with immunosuppression (81.4% vs. 3.2%, p < .0001) than with catheter ablation (11.1% vs. 45.9%, p = 0.002) compared to the normal PET-CT group. Over a median follow-up of 862 days (IQR 134, 1407), PVC burden decreased in both groups [from 23 ± 16% to 9 ± 10% (p < 0.001) in abnormal PET-CT group and from 21 ± 15% to 7 ± 10% (p < 0.001) in normal PET-CT group].

Conclusions

Abnormal PET-CT findings were more commonly associated with NSVT, multiform PVCs, greater PVC coupling interval dispersion, and fast heart rate dependent PVCs. LGE was not sensitive for detecting inflammation. Immunosuppression was effective in managing PVCs with abnormal PET-CT.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Al-Khatib SM, Stevenson WG, Ackerman MJ, et al. 2017 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death: Executive summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. Heart Rhythm. 2018;15(10):e190–e252.

  2. Lakkireddy D, Turagam MK, Yarlagadda B, et al. Myocarditis causing premature ventricular contractions: insights from the MAVERIC Registry. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2019;12(12): e007520.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tung R, Bauer B, Schelbert H, et al. Incidence of abnormal positron emission tomography in patients with unexplained cardiomyopathy and ventricular arrhythmias: the potential role of occult inflammation in arrhythmogenesis. Heart Rhythm. 2015;12(12):2488–98.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Kaur D, Roukoz H, Shah M, et al. Impact of the inflammation on the outcomes of catheter ablation of drug-refractory ventricular tachycardia in cardiac sarcoidosis. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020;31(3):612–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hamon D, Abehsira G, Gu K, et al. Circadian variability patterns predict and guide premature ventricular contraction ablation procedural inducibility and outcomes. Heart Rhythm. 2018;15(1):99–106.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bradfield JS, Homsi M, Shivkumar K, et al. Coupling interval variability differentiates ventricular ectopic complexes arising in the aortic sinus of valsalva and great cardiac vein from other sources: mechanistic and arrhythmic risk implications. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63(20):2151–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Enriquez A, Baranchuk A, Briceno D, et al. How to use the 12-lead ECG to predict the site of origin of idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias. Heart Rhythm. 2019;16(10):1538–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Berruezo A, Mont L, Nava S, et al. Electrocardiographic recognition of the epicardial origin of ventricular tachycardias. Circulation. 2004;109(15):1842–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Valles E, Bazan V, Marchlinski FE. ECG criteria to identify epicardial ventricular tachycardia in nonischemic cardiomyopathy. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2010;3(1):63–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Das MK, Suradi H, Maskoun W, et al. Fragmented wide QRS on a 12-lead ECG: a sign of myocardial scar and poor prognosis. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2008;1(4):258–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rashid S, Rapacchi S, Vaseghi M, et al. Improved late gadolinium enhancement MR imaging for patients with implanted cardiac devices. Radiology. 2014;270(1):269–74.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Frustaci A, Russo MA, Chimenti C. Randomized study on the efficacy of immunosuppressive therapy in patients with virus-negative inflammatory cardiomyopathy: the TIMIC study. Eur Heart J. 2009;30(16):1995–2002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Peretto G, Sala S, Rizzo S, et al. Ventricular arrhythmias in myocarditis: characterization and relationships with myocardial inflammation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;75(9):1046–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Peretto G, Sala S, Basso C, et al. Programmed ventricular stimulation in patients with active vs previous arrhythmic myocarditis. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020;31(3):692–701.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kawamura M, Badhwar N, Vedantham V, et al. Coupling interval dispersion and body mass index are independent predictors of idiopathic premature ventricular complex-induced cardiomyopathy. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2014;25(7):756–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hamon D, Rajendran PS, Chui RW, et al. Premature ventricular contraction coupling interval variability destabilizes cardiac neuronal and electrophysiological control: insights from simultaneous cardioneural mapping. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2017;10(4):e004937.

  17. Levine RL, Pepe PE, Fromm RE Jr, et al. Prospective evidence of a circadian rhythm for out-of-hospital cardiac arrests. JAMA. 1992;267(21):2935–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Englund A, Behrens S, Wegscheider K, et al. Circadian variation of malignant ventricular arrhythmias in patients with ischemic and nonischemic heart disease after cardioverter defibrillator implantation. European 7219 Jewel Investigators. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;34(5):1560–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hayashi H, Fujiki A, Tani M, et al. Circadian variation of idiopathic ventricular tachycardia originating from right ventricular outflow tract. Am J Cardiol. 1999;84(1):99–101, A8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by NHLBI grant R01HL084261 (to Kalyanam Shivkumar and Jason Bradfield).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wei-Hsin Chung.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

The study was approved by the UCLA Institutional Review Board (IRB#11–002516).

Informed consent

Not applicable.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 39 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chung, WH., Hayase, J., Do, D.H. et al. Clinical predictors and implications of cardiac inflammation detected on positron emission tomography (PET) in patients referred for premature ventricular complex (PVC) ablation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 66, 1253–1263 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-022-01446-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-022-01446-z

Keywords

Navigation