Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Role of CHA2DS2-VASc score in predicting atrial fibrillation recurrence in patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation with cryoballoon ablation

Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology volume 66, pages 1193–1200 (2023)Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Pulmonary vein isolation by cryoablation (PVI-C) is a standard therapy for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). The CHA2DS2-VASc score is a well-established predictor of AF-related stroke. Whether the CHA2DS2-VASc score can also be useful in predicting the long-term clinical outcomes following PVI-C is still unsettled. The aim of this analysis was to evaluate the role of the CHA2DS2-VASc score in predicting AF recurrence after PVI-C.

Methods

Patients with symptomatic AF underwent an index PVI-C. Data were collected prospectively in the framework of the 1STOP ClinicalService project. Patients were categorized into two groups: low risk (LR) and high risk (HR) based on CHA2DS2-VASc score (0–1 and ≥ 2, respectively).

Results

Out of 3313 patients, 1910 (57.6%) had a CHA2DS2-VASc score between 0 and 1, while 1403 (42.3%) had CHA2DS2-VASc > = 2. Patient characteristics were significantly different between the two cohorts, including age, sex, BMI, paroxysmal AF, history of stroke, diabetes, and ischemic cardiomyopathy. On the contrary, procedural times and acute complications were comparable. The 36-month freedom from AF after a single procedure was 72.5% (95% CI: 69.8–75.0) in the LR group and 65.9% (95% CI: 62.3–69.2) in the HR score group (HR: 1.26, 95% CI: 1.08–1.47, p = 0.001). After multivariate analysis, higher CHA2DS2-VASc score was still a significant predictor of the risk of AF recurrence (HR: 1.33; 1.10–1.60, p = 0.003).

Conclusions

PVI-C is highly effective in the treatment of AF over the long term. A CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥ 2 is an independent predictor of AF recurrence during the follow-up and should be considered during the clinical management after the index procedure.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Code availability

SAS software, version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA), was used to perform statistical analyses.

References

  1. Calkins H, Hindricks G, Cappato R, et al. 2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2017;14(10):e275–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.05.012.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, ESC Scientific Document Group, et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS): The Task Force for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J. 2021;42(5):373–498. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa612.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kuck KH, Brugada J, Fürnkranz A, FIRE AND ICE Investigators, et al. Cryoballoon or Radiofrequency Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(23):2235–45. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1602014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kuck KH, Albenque JP, Chun KJ, FIRE AND ICE Investigators, et al. Repeat ablation for atrial fibrillation recurrence post cryoballoon or radiofrequency ablation in the FIRE AND ICE trial. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2019;12(6):e007247.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Njoku A, Kannabhiran M, Arora R, et al. Left atrial volume predicts atrial fibrillation recurrence after radiofrequency ablation: a meta-analysis. Europace. 2018;20(1):33–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mohanty S, Della Rocca DG, Gianni C, et al. Predictors of recurrent atrial fibrillation following catheter ablation. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2021;19(3):237–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/14779072.2021.1892490.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Osorio J, Hunter TD, Rajendra A, Zei P, Silverstein J, Morales G. Predictors of clinical success after paroxysmal atrial fibrillation catheter ablation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2021;32(7):1814–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.15028.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lip GY, Nieuwlaat R, Pisters R, Lane DA, Crijns HJ. Refining clinical risk stratification for predicting stroke and thromboembolism in atrial fibrillation using a novel risk factor-based approach: the euro heart survey on atrial fibrillation. Chest. 2010;137(2):263–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Padeletti L, Curnis A, Tondo C, et al. Pulmonary vein isolation with the cryoballoon technique: feasibility, procedural outcomes, and adoption in the real world: data from One Shot Technologies TO Pulmonary vein isolation (1STOP) Project. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2017;40(1):46–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tondo C, Iacopino S, Pieragnoli P, ClinicalService 1STOP Project Investigators, et al. Pulmonary vein isolation cryoablation for patients with persistent and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation: clinical outcomes from the real-world multicenter observational project. Heart Rhythm. 2018;15(3):363–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Letsas KP, Efremidis M, Giannopoulos G, et al. CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc scores as predictors of left atrial ablation outcomes for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2014;16(2):202–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/eut210.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhao J, Zhou D, Chen M, et al. CHA2DS2-VASc and SAMe-TT2R2 scores as predictors of recurrence for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients on vitamin K antagonists after radiofrequency catheter ablation. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2020;21(3):200–8. https://doi.org/10.2459/JCM.0000000000000930.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jacobs V, May HT, Bair TL, et al. The impact of risk score (CHADS2 versus CHA2DS2-VASc) on long-term outcomes after atrial fibrillation ablation. Heart Rhythm. 2015;12(4):681–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.12.034.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tu HT, Campbell BC, Meretoja A, et al. Pre-stroke CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc scores are useful in stratifying three-month outcomes in patients with and without atrial fibrillation. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013;36(4):273–80. https://doi.org/10.1159/000353670.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kornej J, Hindricks G, Kosiuk J, et al. Comparison of CHADS2, R2CHADS2, and CHA2DS2-VASc scores for the prediction of rhythm outcomes after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: the Leipzig Heart Center AF Ablation Registry. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014;7(2):281–7. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.113.001182.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tsai CF, Huang PS, Chen JJ, et al. Correlation between CHA2DS2-VASc score and left atrial size in patients with atrial fibrillation: a more than 15-year prospective follow-up study. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021;28(8): 653405. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.653405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Daccarett M, Badger TJ, Akoum N, et al. Association of left atrial fibrosis detected by delayed-enhancement magnetic resonance imaging and the risk of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57(7):831–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Lohrmann G, Liu A, Ziegler P, Monteiro J, Varberg N, Passman R. CHA2DS2VASc score as a predictor of ablation success defined by continuous long-term monitoring. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2022;. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-022-01326-6. Online ahead of print.

  19. Marrouche NF, Wilber D, Hindricks G, et al. Association of atrial tissue fibrosis identified by delayed enhancement MRI and atrial fibrillation catheter ablation: the DECAAF study. JAMA. 2014;311(5):498–506.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Demarchi A, Neumann L, Rordorf R, et al. Long-term outcome of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in patients with severe left atrial enlargement and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. Europace. 2021;23(11):1751–2175.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Fortuni F, Casula M, Sanzo A, et al. Meta-analysis comparing cryoballoon versus radiofrequency as first ablation procedure for atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol. 2020;125(8):1170–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Rordorf R, Scazzuso F, Chun KRJ, Cryo AF global registry investigators, et al. Cryoballoon ablation for the treatment of atrial fibrillation in patients with concomitant heart failure and either reduced or preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: results from the Cryo AF Global Registry. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021;10(24):e021323.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Hae Lim, an employee of Medtronic Inc, for his help in the preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology Unit, IRCCS Fondazione Policlinico S. Matteo, Pavia, Italy

    Roberto Rordorf

  2. Maria Cecilia Hospital, GVM Care&Research, Cotignola, Italy

    Saverio Iacopino

  3. ULSS, 6 Euganea, Ospedale Di Camposampiero- Cittadella, Italy

    Roberto Verlato

  4. Ospedale Delle Apuane-, Massa Carrara, Italy

    Giuseppe Arena

  5. Heart Rhythm Center at Monzino Cardiac Center, IRCCS Department of Clinical Electrophysiology&Cardiac Pacing Department of Biomedical, Surgical and Dentistry Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy

    Claudio Tondo

  6. IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria, Negrar, Italy

    Giulio Molon

  7. Ospedale San Maurizio, Bolzano, Italy

    Massimiliano Manfrin

  8. ASST San Gerardo Di Monza, Monza, Italy

    Giovanni Rovaris

  9. Ospedale San Luca, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico, Milan, Italy

    Giovanni Battista Perego

  10. Policlinico Casilino, Rome, Italy

    Luigi Sciarra

  11. Istituto Sant’Ambrogio, Milan, Italy

    Massimo Mantica

  12. ASST Vimercate, Vimercate, Italy

    Riccardo Sacchi

  13. Ospedale Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy

    Paolo Pieragnoli

Authors
  1. Roberto Rordorf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Saverio Iacopino
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Roberto Verlato
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Giuseppe Arena
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Claudio Tondo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Giulio Molon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Massimiliano Manfrin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Giovanni Rovaris
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Giovanni Battista Perego
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Luigi Sciarra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Massimo Mantica
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Riccardo Sacchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Paolo Pieragnoli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roberto Rordorf.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

The project was approved by each site’s medical ethics committee or medical director, and it conforms to the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki.

Consent to participate

Each patient provided informed consent for data collection and analyses.

Consent for publication

NA

Conflict of interest

Roberto Rordorf received modest speaking fees from Abbott and Boston Scientific. Roberto Verlato received modest consultancy and speaker’s fees from Medtronic. Giulio Molon received modest consultancy fees from Medtronic and Boston Scientific and speaker’s fees from Medtronic, Boston Scientific, St. Jude, and Boehringer Ingelheim. Claudio Tondo serves as a member of the Medtronic European Advisory Board and Boston Scientific International Advisory Board. He received lecture and proctor fees from Medtronic, Abbott Medical, Biosense Webster, and Boston Scientific. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this manuscript to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 19 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rordorf, R., Iacopino, S., Verlato, R. et al. Role of CHA2DS2-VASc score in predicting atrial fibrillation recurrence in patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation with cryoballoon ablation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 66, 1193–1200 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-022-01430-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-022-01430-7

Keywords

search

Navigation