Skip to main content
Log in

Preventive substrate ablation in chronic post-myocardial infarction patients with high-risk scar characteristics for ventricular arrhythmias: rationale and design of PREVENT-VT study

  • Published:
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Recent studies showed that an early strategy for ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation resulted in reduction of VT episodes or mortality. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR)-derived border zone channel (BZC) mass has proved to be a strong non-invasive predictor of VT in post-myocardial infarction (MI). CMR-guided VT substrate ablation proved to be safe and effective for reducing sudden cardiac death (SCD) and VA occurrence.

Methods

PREVENT-VT is a prospective, randomized, multicenter, and controlled trial designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of prophylactic CMR-guided VT substrate ablation in chronic post-MI patients with CMR-derived arrhythmogenic scar characteristics. Chronic post-MI patients with late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) CMR will be evaluated. CMR images will be post-processed and the BZC mass measured: patients with a BZC mass > 5.15 g will be eligible. Consecutive patients will be enrolled at 3 centers and randomized on a 1:1 basis to undergo a VT substrate ablation (ABLATE arm) or optimal medical treatment (OMT arm). Primary prevention ICD will be implanted following guideline recommendations, while non-ICD candidates will be implanted with an implantable cardiac monitor (ICM). The primary endpoint is a composite outcome of sudden cardiac death (SCD) or sustained monomorphic VT, either treated by an ICD or documented with ICM. Secondary endpoints are procedural safety and efficiency outcomes of CMR-guided ablation.

Discussion

In some patients, the first VA episode causes SCD or severe neurological damage. The aim of the PREVENT-VT is to evaluate whether primary preventive substrate ablation may be a safe and effective prophylactic therapy for reducing SCD and VA occurrence in patients with previous MI and high-risk scar characteristics based on CMR.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04675073, registered on January 1, 2021.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Not applicable. Enrollment is currently ongoing, and no datasets were generated for analysis yet.

Abbreviations

BZC:

Border zone channel

CL:

Cycle length

EGM:

Electrogram

EPS:

Electrophysiological study

FAM:

Fast anatomical map

ICM:

Implantable Cardiac Monitoring

IHD:

Ischemic heart disease

ICD:

Implantable cardioverter defibrillator

LGE-CMR:

Late gadolinium enhancement-cardiac magnetic resonance

LVEF:

Left ventricular ejection fraction

MDCT:

Multi-detector computed tomography

MI:

Myocardial infarction

PSI:

Pixel signal intensity

PVS:

Programmed ventricular stimulation

SMVT:

Sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia

TOE:

Transoesophageal echocardiogram

TTE:

Transthoracic echocardiogram

VA:

Ventricular arrhythmia

VT:

Ventricular tachycardia

References

  1. de Bakker JM, van Capelle FJ, Janse MJ, et al. Reentry as a cause of ventricular tachycardia in patients with chronic ischemic heart disease: electrophysiologic and anatomic correlation. Circulation. 1988;77:589–606.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Klem I, Weinsaft JW, Bahnson TD, et al. Assessment of myocardial scarring improves risk stratification in patients evaluated for cardiac defibrillator implantation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60:408–20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Perez-David E, Arenal A, Rubio-Guivernau JL, et al. Noninvasive identification of ventricular tachycardia-related conducting channels using contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in patients with chronic myocardial infarction: comparison of signal intensity scar mapping and endocardial voltage mapping. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57:184–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fernandez-Armenta J, Berruezo A, Andreu D, et al. Three-dimensional architecture of scar and conducting channels based on high resolution ce-CMR: insights for ventricular tachycardia ablation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013;6:528–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jauregui B, Soto-Iglesias D, Penela D, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance determinants of ventricular arrhythmic events after myocardial infarction. Europace. 2022;24(6):938–947.

  6. Della Bella P, Baratto F, Vergara P, et al. Does timing of ventricular tachycardia ablation affect prognosis in patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator? Results From the Multicenter Randomized PARTITA Trial. Circulation. 2022;145(25):1829–1838.

  7. Arenal A, Avila P, Jimenez-Candil J, et al. Substrate ablation vs antiarrhythmic drug therapy for symptomatic ventricular tachycardia. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022;79:1441–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Poole JE, Johnson GW, Hellkamp AS, et al. Prognostic importance of defibrillator shocks in patients with heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:1009–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Pannone L, Falasconi G, Cianfanelli L, et al. Sudden cardiac death in patients with heart disease and preserved systolic function: current options for risk stratification. J Clin Med. 2021;10(9):1823.

  10. Gatzoulis KA, Vouliotis AI, Tsiachris D, et al. Primary prevention of sudden cardiac death in a nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy population: reappraisal of the role of programmed ventricular stimulation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013;6:504–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. LaPointe NM, Al-Khatib SM, Piccini JP, et al. Extent of and reasons for nonuse of implantable cardioverter defibrillator devices in clinical practice among eligible patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2011;4:146–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fernandez-Armenta J, Soto-Iglesias D, Silva E, et al. Safety and outcomes of ventricular tachycardia substrate ablation during sinus rhythm: a prospective multicenter registry. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2020;6:1435–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Soto-Iglesias D, Penela D, Jauregui B, et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance-guided ventricular tachycardia substrate ablation. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2020;6:436–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Fernandez-Armenta J, Penela D, Acosta J, et al. Substrate modification or ventricular tachycardia induction, mapping, and ablation as the first step? A randomized study Heart Rhythm. 2016;13:1589–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Priori SG, Blomstrom-Lundqvist C, Mazzanti A, et al. ESC Guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death: The Task Force for the Management of Patients with Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Endorsed by: Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC). Eur Heart J. 2015;36:2793–867.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Knuuti J, Wijns W, Saraste A, et al. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2020;41:407–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Roca-Luque I, Van Breukelen A, Alarcon F, et al. Ventricular scar channel entrances identified by new wideband cardiac magnetic resonance sequence to guide ventricular tachycardia ablation in patients with cardiac defibrillators. Europace. 2020;22:598–606.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Andreu D, Ortiz-Perez JT, Fernandez-Armenta J, et al. 3D delayed-enhanced magnetic resonance sequences improve conducting channel delineation prior to ventricular tachycardia ablation. Europace. 2015;17:938–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Soto-Iglesias D, Acosta J, Penela D, et al. Image-based criteria to identify the presence of epicardial arrhythmogenic substrate in patients with transmural myocardial infarction. Heart Rhythm. 2018;15:814–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Acosta J, Andreu D, Penela D, et al. Elucidation of hidden slow conduction by double ventricular extrastimuli: a method for further arrhythmic substrate identification in ventricular tachycardia ablation procedures. Europace. 2018;20:337–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Acosta J, Fernandez-Armenta J, Borras R, et al. Scar Characterization to predict life-threatening arrhythmic events and sudden cardiac death in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy: the GAUDI-CRT study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018;11:561–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Anderson KP. Sudden cardiac death unresponsive to implantable defibrillator therapy: an urgent target for clinicians, industry and government. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2005;14:71–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Reddy VY, Reynolds MR, Neuzil P, et al. Prophylactic catheter ablation for the prevention of defibrillator therapy. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:2657–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Willems S, Tilz RR, Steven D, et al. Preventive or deferred ablation of ventricular tachycardia in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and implantable defibrillator (BERLIN VT): A Multicenter Randomized Trial. Circulation. 2020;141:1057–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kuck KH, Schaumann A, Eckardt L, et al. Catheter ablation of stable ventricular tachycardia before defibrillator implantation in patients with coronary heart disease (VTACH): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010;375:31–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kuck KH, Tilz RR, Deneke T, et al. Impact of substrate modification by catheter ablation on implantable cardioverter-defibrillator interventions in patients with unstable ventricular arrhythmias and coronary artery disease: results from the multicenter randomized controlled SMS (Substrate Modification Study). Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2017;10(3):e004422.

  27. Schmidt A, Azevedo CF, Cheng A, et al. Infarct tissue heterogeneity by magnetic resonance imaging identifies enhanced cardiac arrhythmia susceptibility in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. Circulation. 2007;115:2006–14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Jauregui B, Soto-Iglesias D, Penela D, et al. Follow-up after myocardial infarction to explore the stability of arrhythmogenic substrate: the footprint study. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2020;6:207–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Acosta J, Fernandez-Armenta J, Penela D, et al. Infarct transmurality as a criterion for first-line endo-epicardial substrate-guided ventricular tachycardia ablation in ischemic cardiomyopathy. Heart Rhythm. 2016;13:85–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The study was partially funded by Biotronik, Germany.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

GF: study concept and design, manuscript drafting, and critical revision. DP: study concept and design, manuscript drafting, and critical revision. DSI: study concept and design, manuscript drafting, and critical revision. AB: study concept and design, manuscript drafting, and critical revision. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonio Berruezo.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was granted by the local Ethics Committee.

Conflict of interest

A. Berruezo is a stockholder of Galgo Medical. D. Soto-Iglesias is an employee of Biosense Webster. A. Berruezo received speaker fees from Biosense and research grants from Biotronik. P. Francia received speaker fees, research, and educational grants from Boston Scientific and Abbott. The other authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Giulio Falasconi M.D. and Diego Penela M.D., Ph.D. equally contributed to the article and should be considered as shared first authors.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Falasconi, G., Penela, D., Soto-Iglesias, D. et al. Preventive substrate ablation in chronic post-myocardial infarction patients with high-risk scar characteristics for ventricular arrhythmias: rationale and design of PREVENT-VT study. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 66, 39–47 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-022-01392-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-022-01392-w

Keywords

Navigation