Abstract
Background
Cryoballoon ablation (CBA) is an effective first-line treatment for symptomatic atrial fibrillation (AF), as recently demonstrated by three randomized trials. This sub-analysis of the Cryo Global Registry aims to examine current clinical practices of first-line CBA.
Methods
AF patients treated with first-line CBA were compared to CBA in antiarrhythmic drug (AAD)-refractory patients at 12 months. Efficacy was examined using time-to-first atrial arrhythmia recurrence following a 90-day blanking period. Healthcare utilization was evaluated by repeat ablations and hospitalizations. Disease burden was examined by assessing quality of life (QOL) and patients’ reporting of symptoms.
Results
Of 1394 patients, 433 (31.1%) were treated with first-line CBA, which was more frequent in high-volume centers. Serious procedure-related adverse event rates were similar. Efficacy at 12 months was higher in the first-line group (87.8 vs. 81.6%, HRunadj 0.64 (95% CI 0.47–0.88); p < 0.01) regardless of the centers’ CBA experience; when controlling for baseline characteristics, the difference was not significant (HRadj 0.87 (95% CI 0.56–1.37); p = 0.55). No difference was observed in repeat ablations and hospitalizations between cohorts. First-line patients experienced a larger mean reduction in symptoms and were prescribed AADs at a lower rate at 12-month follow-up (9.7 vs. 29.9%). QOL improved in both cohorts from baseline to 12 months with no significant difference between groups (p = 0.29).
Conclusions
In this global real-world experience, first-line CBA in patients with symptomatic AF is effective, with a larger symptom reduction compared with CBA after AAD failure and without a difference in healthcare utilization at mid-term follow-up.
Clinical trial registration
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02752737
Graphical abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- AAD:
-
Antiarrhythmic drug
- AF:
-
Atrial fibrillation
- AFL:
-
Atrial flutter
- AT:
-
Atrial tachycardia
- CBA:
-
Cryoballoon ablation
- LA:
-
Left atrium
- PAF:
-
Paroxysmal AF
- PsAF:
-
Persistent AF
- PV:
-
Pulmonary vein
- PVI:
-
Pulmonary vein isolation
References
Kirchhof P, Camm AJ, Goette A, et al. Early rhythm-control therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:1305–16. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2019422.
Zhang YY, Qiu C, Davis PJ, et al. Predictors of progression of recently diagnosed atrial fibrillation in REgistry on Cardiac Rhythm DisORDers Assessing the Control of Atrial Fibrillation (RecordAF)-United States cohort. Am J Cardiol. 2013;112:79–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.02.056.
Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2020;42:373–498.
Calkins H, Hindricks G, Cappato R, et al. 2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2018;20(1):e1–160. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/eux274.
Wazni OM, Dandamudi G, Sood N, et al. Cryoballoon ablation as initial therapy for atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2021;384:316–24. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2029554.
Kuniss M, Pavlovic N, Velagic V, et al. Cryoballoon ablation vs. antiarrhythmic drugs: first-line therapy for patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. EP Europace. 2021;23(7):1033–41. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euab029.
Andrade JG, Wells GA, Deyell MW, et al. Cryoablation or drug therapy for initial treatment of atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2020;384:305–15. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2029980.
Cosedis Nielsen J, Johannessen A, Raatikainen P, et al. Radiofrequency ablation as initial therapy in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:1587–95. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1113566.
Morillo CA, Verma A, Connolly SJ, et al. Radiofrequency ablation vs antiarrhythmic drugs as first-line treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (RAAFT-2): a randomized trial. JAMA. 2014;311:692–700. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.467.
Wazni OM, Marrouche NF, Martin DO, et al. Radiofrequency ablation vs antiarrhythmic drugs as first-line treatment of symptomatic atrial fibrillation: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2005;293(21):2634–40. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.293.21.2634.
Chun KRJ, Okumura K, Scazzuso F, et al. Safety and efficacy of cryoballoon ablation for the treatment of paroxysmal and persistent AF in a real-world global setting: results from the Cryo AF Global Registry. J of Arrhythmia. 2021;37(2):356–67. https://doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12504.
Kuck KH, Brugada J, Fürnkranz A, et al. Cryoballoon or radiofrequency ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(23):2235–45. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1602014.
Kuck KH, Fürnkranz A, Chun KR, et al. Cryoballoon or radiofrequency ablation for symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: reintervention, rehospitalization, and quality-of-life outcomes in the FIRE AND ICE trial. Eur Heart J. 2016;37(38):2858–65. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehw285.
Kuck KH, Albenque JP, Chun KJ, et al. Repeat ablation for atrial fibrillation recurrence post cryoballoon or radiofrequency ablation in the FIRE AND ICE Trial. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2019;12(6):e007247. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.119.007247.
Baysal E, Okşul M, Burak C, et al. Decreasing time between first diagnosis of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and cryoballoon ablation positively affects long-term consequences. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-022-01167-3.
Kuck K-H, Lebedev DS, Mikhaylov EN, et al. Catheter ablation or medical therapy to delay progression of atrial fibrillation: the randomized controlled atrial fibrillation progression trial (ATTEST). EP Europace. 2021;23(3):362–369a. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euaa298.
Bavishi AA, Kaplan RM, Peigh G, et al. Patient characteristics as predictors of recurrence of atrial fibrillation following cryoballoon ablation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2019;42(6):694–704. https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.13669.
Aksu T, Baysal E, Guler TE, Golcuk SE, Erden İ, Ozcan KS. Predictors of atrial fibrillation recurrence after cryoballoon ablation. J Blood Med. 2015;29(6):211–7. https://doi.org/10.2147/JBM.S81551.
Chew DS, Black-Maier E, Loring Z, et al. Diagnosis-to-ablation time and recurrence of atrial fibrillation following catheter ablation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2020;13(4):e008128. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.119.008128.
Moltrasio M, Iacopino S, Arena G, et al. First-line therapy: insights from a real-world analysis of cryoablation in patients with atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Med. 2021;22:000–000. https://doi.org/10.2459/JCM.0000000000001176.
Straube F, Dorwarth U, Ammar-Busch S, et al. First-line catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: outcome of radiofrequency vs. cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation. Europace. 2016;18:368–75. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euv271.
Akkaya E, Berkowitsch A, Zaltsberg S, et al. Second-generation cryoballoon ablation as a first-line treatment of symptomatic atrial fibrillation: two-year outcome and predictors of recurrence after a single procedure. Int J Cardiol. 2018;259:76–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.11.011.
Acknowledgements
The authors sincerely thank the Cryo Global Registry global sites and staff for their commitment and contributions to the study. The authors also thank Troy Penz, Jada Selma, Hae Lim, Bob Hokanson, and Valentine Obidigbo from Medtronic for their support of the trial and generation of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Consortia
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
Data collection adhered to the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practices. The study was approved by local institutional review boards and ethics committees at each center.
Informed concent
Patients provided written informed consent prior to participation in the study.
Conflict of interest
FJ Kueffer and KA van Bragt are employees of Medtronic.
Dr. Földesi has received compensation for teaching and proctoring from Medtronic, The Johnson & Johnson Co., Abbott Laboratories, and Biotronik SE & Co. Dr. Okumura has received compensation from Medtronic and compensation from Johnson and Johnson outside the submitted work. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest pertaining to this manuscript to declare.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Zucchelli, G., Chun, K.R.J., Khelae, S.K. et al. Impact of first-line cryoablation for atrial fibrillation on healthcare utilization, arrhythmia disease burden and efficacy outcomes: real-world evidence from the Cryo Global Registry. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 66, 711–722 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-022-01388-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-022-01388-6