Skip to main content
Log in

Lesion size indices for cavotricuspid isthmus ablation: superior or superfluous?

  • Commentary
  • Published:
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Pérez FJ, Schubert CM, Parvez B, Pathak V, Ellenbogen KA, Wood MA. Long-term outcomes after catheter ablation of cavo-tricuspid isthmus dependent atrial flutter. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2009;2(4):393–401.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Murayama Y, Kishihara J, Fukaya H, Mitani Y, Saito D, Matsuura G, et al. Lesion size index-guided cavotricuspid isthmus linear ablation. J Interv Cardiac Electrophysiol. 2022.

  3. Bourier F, Ramirez FD, Martin CA, Vlachos K, Frontera A, Takigawa M, et al. Impedance, power, and current in radiofrequency ablation: insights from technical, ex vivo, and clinical studies. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020;31(11):2836–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kashiwagi M, Kuroi A, Katayama Y, Terada K, Fujita S, Hozumi T, et al. Impact of cavotricuspid isthmus depth on the ablation index for successful first-pass typical atrial flutter ablation. Sci Reports. 2021;11(1):22413.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Maclean E, Simon R, Ang R, Dhillon G, Ahsan S, Khan F, et al. A multi-center experience of ablation index for evaluating lesion delivery in typical atrial flutter. Pac Clin Electrophysiol. 2021;44(6):1039–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tofig BJ, Lukac P, Nielsen JM, Hansen ESS, Tougaard RS, Jensen HK, et al. Radiofrequency ablation lesions in low-, intermediate-, and normal-voltage myocardium: an in vivo study in a porcine heart model. EP Europace. 2019;21(12):1919–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Matsuura G, Kishihara J, Fukaya H, Oikawa J, Ishizue N, Saito D, et al. Optimized lesion size index (o-LSI): a novel predictor for sufficient ablation of pulmonary vein isolation. J Arrhythm. 2021;37(3):558–65.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Lozano Granero C, Franco E, Matía Francés R, Hernández-Madrid A, Sánchez-Pérez I, Zamorano Gómez JL, et al. Impact of power and contact force on index-guided radiofrequency lesions in an ex vivo porcine heart model. J Interv Cardiac Electrophysiol. 2022;63(3):687–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Viola G, Stabile G, Bandino S, Rossi L, Marrazzo N, Pecora D, et al. Safety, efficacy, and reproducibility of cavotricuspid isthmus ablation guided by the ablation index: acute results of the FLAI study. EP Europace. 2021;23(2):264–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Giehm-Reese M, Kronborg MB, Lukac P, Kristiansen SB, Jensen HK, Gerdes C, et al. Recurrent atrial arrhythmia in a randomised controlled trial comparing contact force–guided and contact force–blinded ablation for typical atrial flutter. J Interv Cardiac Electrophysiol. 2022;63(3):699–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Giehm-Reese M, Kronborg MB, Lukac P, Kristiansen SB, Jensen HK, Gerdes C, et al. A randomized trial of contact force in atrial flutter ablation. EP Europace. 2020;22(6):947–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Calzolari V, de Mattia L, Indiani S, Crosato M, Furlanetto A, Licciardello C, et al. In vitro validation of the lesion size index to predict lesion width and depth after irrigated radiofrequency ablation in a porcine model. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2017;3(10):1126–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Romero J, Patel K, Briceno D, Lakkireddy D, Gabr M, Diaz JC, et al. Cavotricuspid isthmus line in patients undergoing catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation with or without history of typical atrial flutter: a meta-analysis. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020;31(8):1987–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dhiraj Gupta.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Conflict of interest

DG: Institutional research grants from Biosense Webster, Boston Scientific and Medtronic. Speaker fees from Boston Scientific.

PC: None.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This comment refers to the article available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-022-01360-4.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Calvert, P., Gupta, D. Lesion size indices for cavotricuspid isthmus ablation: superior or superfluous?. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 66, 245–247 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-022-01362-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-022-01362-2

Navigation