Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of the visualized steerable sheath applied to catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

  • Published:
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

A new type of visualized steerable sheath (Vizigo sheath; Biosense Webster Inc., Irvine, CA, USA) has been employed in clinical treatment. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of the Vizigo sheath to a fixed sheath (Swartz sheath; St. Jude Inc., St. Paul, MN, USA) for catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF).

Methods

We analyzed the procedural time, fluoroscopy time, contact force (CF), and initial pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) rate. After 6 months of follow-up, the success rate of ablation between the two groups was compared.

Results

Compared to the Swartz sheath, using the Vizigo sheath can significantly reduce the total procedural time and fluoroscopy time and increase the overall average CF, especially in the anterior left pulmonary vein (LPV), superior LPV, posterior right pulmonary vein (RPV), and superior RPV. The proportion of CF within a reasonable range in the Vizigo group was significantly higher than that in the Swartz group, especially in the anterior LPV, posterior RPV, and superior RPV. Besides, the left, right, and bilateral initial PVI rates in the Vizigo group were significantly higher.

Conclusions

The visualized steerable sheath for PAF catheter ablation not only reduced radiation exposure but also significantly improved CF and initial PVI rate, all of which indicated an increased rate of successful ablation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jilek C, Ullah W. Pulmonary vein reconnections or substrate in the left atrium: what is the reason for atrial fibrillation recurrences? A dialogue on a pressing clinical situation. Europace. 2019;21(Supplement_1):i12–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Verma A, et al. Response of atrial fibrillation to pulmonary vein antrum isolation is directly related to resumption and delay of pulmonary vein conduction. Circulation. 2005;112(5):627–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wieczorek M, Sassani K, Hoeltgen R. Comparison of pulmonary vein reconnection patterns after multielectrode phased radiofrequency- and cryoballoon ablation of atrial fibrillation. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2020;20(1):197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Masuda M, et al. Steerable versus non-steerable sheaths during pulmonary vein isolation: impact of left atrial enlargement on the catheter-tissue contact force. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2016;47(1):99–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Calkins H, et al. 2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2018;20(1):e1–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hang F, et al. Study on the curative effect and safety of radiofrequency catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation via zero-fluoroscopy transseptal puncture under the dual guidance of electroanatomical mapping and intracardiac echocardiography. Cardiol Res Pract. 2021;2021:5561574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tahin T, et al. Implementation of a zero fluoroscopic workflow using a simplified intracardiac echocardiography guided method for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation, including repeat procedures. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2021;21(1):407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Antolic B, et al. Integrated 3D intracardiac ultrasound imaging with detailed pulmonary vein delineation guided fluoroless ablation of atrial fibrillation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2021;44(9):1487–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Casella M, et al. X-ray exposure in cardiac electrophysiology: a retrospective analysis in 8150 patients over 7 years of activity in a modern, large-volume laboratory. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7(11):e008233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Faroux L, et al. Effect of modern dose-reduction technology on the exposure of interventional cardiologists to radiation in the catheterization laboratory. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;11(2):222–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wartofsky LJH. Increasing world incidence of thyroid cancer: increased detection or higher radiation exposure? Hormones. 2010;9(2):103–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Neuzil P, et al. Electrical reconnection after pulmonary vein isolation is contingent on contact force during initial treatment: results from the EFFICAS I study. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2013;6(2):327–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Park CI, et al. Mechanisms of pulmonary vein reconnection after radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation: the deterministic role of contact force and interlesion distance. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2014;25(7):701–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wakamatsu Y, et al. Impact of the combined use of intracardiac ultrasound and a steerable sheath visualized by a 3D mapping system on pulmonary vein isolation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2021;44(4):693–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Reddy VY, et al. The relationship between contact force and clinical outcome during radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in the TOCCATA study. Heart Rhythm. 2012;9(11):1789–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kuck KH, et al. A novel radiofrequency ablation catheter using contact force sensing: Toccata study. Heart Rhythm. 2012;9(1):18–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Efremidis M, et al. Early pulmonary vein reconnection as a predictor of left atrial ablation outcomes for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2015;17(5):741–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Knowles BR, et al. 3-D visualization of acute RF ablation lesions using MRI for the simultaneous determination of the patterns of necrosis and edema. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2010;57(6):1467–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Anter E, et al. Acute pulmonary vein reconnection is a predictor of atrial fibrillation recurrence following pulmonary vein isolation. J Intervent Card Electrophys. 2014;39(3):225–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ninomiya Y, et al. First-pass isolation is associated with durability of pulmonary vein isolation and has impact on atrial fibrillation ablation outcomes. Circulation. 2019;140:2.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The research leading to these results received funding from 1·3·5 project for disciplines of excellence-Clinical Research Incubation Project, West China Hospital, Sichuan University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Dong Li or Kaijun Cui.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

This study conformed to the principles of the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and was approved by the ethics committee of West China Hospital, Sichuan University. An informed consent form was obtained from all participants after the details of the study were explained.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guo, R., Jia, R., Cen, Z. et al. Effects of the visualized steerable sheath applied to catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 64, 511–518 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-021-01096-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-021-01096-7

Keywords

Navigation