Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Safety and efficacy of catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia in elderly patients with structural heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Reviews
  • Published:
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Data regarding the age-specific outcomes of VT ablation in patients with structural heart disease (SHD) are scarce. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the outcomes of VT ablation in elderly vs. younger patients with SHD.

Methods

MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar and references comparing VT ablation in elderly vs. younger patients were screened and studies included if matching inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Results

Five retrospective studies enrolling 2778 SHD patients (868 elderly vs. 1910 younger) were included. Compared to younger subjects, the elderly showed similar results in terms of acute ablation success (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.54–1.13, p = 0.189) and minor complications (OR 1.74, 95% CI 0.74–4.09, p = 0.205), a trend toward a higher risk of major complications (OR 2.30, 95% CI 0.83–6.40, p = 0.110) and significantly higher rates of all complications (OR 2.67, 95% CI 1.51–4.71, p = 0.001) and periprocedural mortality (OR 1.93, 95% CI 1.24–3.01, p = 0.004). At a mean follow-up of 18 months, elderly patients showed similar long-term VT recurrence rate (OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.85–1.22, p = 0.861) and higher all-cause mortality (OR 2.00, 95% CI 1.40–2.86, p < 0.001). In elderly patients, urgent VT ablation is associated with higher risk of major complications (beta = 0.06, p < 0.001) and periprocedural mortality (beta = 0.03, p = 0.029), while advanced age is associated with higher risk of major complications (beta = 0.29 with p = 0.009) and all complications + periprocedural mortality (beta = 0.17 with p = 0.037).

Conclusions

Compared to younger patients, VT ablation in elderly showed similar results in terms of acute ablation success and long-term VT recurrence rate with a significantly higher risk of all complications, periprocedural mortality, and long-term mortality, especially when the procedure is performed urgently and in the most aged patients. Large prospective multicenter randomized trials are required to confirm these findings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

VT:

Ventricular tachycardia

SCD:

Sudden cardiac death

SHD:

Structural heart disease

ICD:

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators

HF:

Heart failure

PRISMA:

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses

QUOROM:

Quality of reporting of meta-analyses

MOOSE:

Cochrane Collaboration and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology

PICO:

Population, intervention, comparison, and outcome

IHD:

Ischemic heart disease

NIHS:

Non-ischemic heart disease

DM:

Diabetes mellitus

CKD:

Chronic kidney disease

VT CL:

VT cycle length

RF:

Radiofrequency

TIA:

Transient ischemic attack

NOS:

Newcastle–Ottawa scale

CI:

Confidence interval

OR:

Odds ratio

ES:

Electrical storm

References

  1. Bayés de Luna A, Coumel P, Leclercq JF. Ambulatory sudden cardiac death: mechanisms of production of fatal arrhythmia on the basis of data from 157 cases. Am Heart J. 1989;117:151–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Myerburg RJ, Interian A Jr, Mitrani RM, Kessler KM, Castellanos A. Frequency of sudden cardiac death and profiles of risk. Am J Cardiol. 1997;80:10F-19F.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Priori SG, Blomström-Lundqvist C, Mazzanti A, Blom N, Borggrefe M, Camm J, Elliott PM, Fitzsimons D, Hatala R, Hindricks G, Kirchhof P, Kjeldsen K, Kuck KH, Hernandez-Madrid A, Nikolaou N, Norekvål TM, Spaulding C, Van Veldhuisen DJ, Task force for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). ESC Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death: The Task Force for the Management of Patients With Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)Endorsed By: Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC). Eur Heart J. 2015;36:2793–867.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Connolly SJ, Dorian P, Roberts RS, Gent M, Bailin S, Fain ES, Thorpe K, Champagne J, Talajic M, Coutu B, Gronefeld GC, Hohnloser SH. Comparison of beta-blockers, amiodarone plus beta-blockers, or sotalol for prevention of shocks from implantable cardioverter defibrillators: the OPTIC Study: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2006;295:165–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Moss AJ, Greenberg H, Case RB, Zareba W, Hall WJ, Brown MW, Daubert JP, McNitt S, Andrews ML, Elkin AD. Long-term clinical course of patients after termination of ventricular tachyarrhythmia by an implanted defibrillator. Circulation. 2004;110:3760–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Saxon LA, Hayes DL, Gilliam FR, et al. Long-term outcome after ICD and CRT implantation and influence of remote device follow-up: the ALTITUDE survival study. Circulation. 2010;122:2359–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Schron EB, Exner DV, Yao Q, Jenkins LS, Steinberg JS, Cook JR, Kutalek SP, Friedman PL, Bubien RS, Page RL, Powell J. Quality of life in the antiarrhythmics versus implantable defibrillators trial: impact of therapy and influence of adverse symptoms and defibrillator shocks. Circulation. 2002;105:589–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pedersen CT, Kay GN, Kalman J, Borggrefe M, Della-Bella P, Dickfeld T, Dorian P, Huikuri H, Kim YH, Knight B, Marchlinski F, Ross D, Sacher F, Sapp J, Shivkumar K, Soejima K, Tada H, Alexander ME, Triedman JK, Yamada T, Kirchhof P, Lip GY, Kuck KH, Mont L, Haines D, Indik J, Dimarco J, Exner D, Iesaka Y, Savelieva I. EHRA/HRS/APHRS expert consensus on ventricular arrhythmias. Europace. 2014;16:1257–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Shivkumar K. Catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias. N Engl J Med. 2019;380:1555–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nayyar S, Ganesan AN, Brooks AG, Sullivan T, Roberts-Thomson KC, Sanders P. Venturing into ventricular arrhythmia storm: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Heart J. 2013;34:560–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sapp JL, Wells GA, Parkash R, Stevenson WG, Blier L, Sarrazin JF, Thibault B, Rivard L, Gula L, Leong-Sit P, Essebag V, Nery PB, Tung SK, Raymond JM, Sterns LD, Veenhuyzen GD, Healey JS, Redfearn D, Roux JF, Tang AS. Ventricular tachycardia ablation versus escalation of antiarrhythmic drugs. New Eng J Med. 2016;375:111–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Martinez BK, Baker WL, Konopka A, Giannelli G, Coleman CI, Kluger J, Cronin EM. Systematic review and meta-analysis of catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia in ischemic heart disease. Heart Rhythm. 2020;17:e206–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Santangeli P, Muser D, Maeda S, Filtz A, Zado ES, Frankel DS, Dixit S, Epstein AE, Callans DJ, Marchlinski FE. Comparative effectiveness of antiarrhythmic drugs and catheter ablation for the prevention of recurrent ventricular tachycardia in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Heart Rhythm. 2016;13:1552–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Moser JM, Willems S, Andresen D, Brachmann J, Eckardt L, Hoffmann E, Kuck KH, Lewalter T, Schumacher B, Spitzer SG, Hochadel M, Senges J, Hoffmann BA. Complication rates of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients aged ≥75 years versus <75 years-results from the German ablation registry. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2017;28:258–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Henkel DM, Redfield MM, Weston SA, Gerber Y, Roger VL. Death in heart failure: a community perspective. Circ Heart Fail. 2008;1:91–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. U.S. Census Bureau . U.S. Population Projections: 2010 to 2050. U.S. Department of Commerce; Washington, D.C.: [Accessed April 15, 2009]. 2008. Available at: www.census.gov/population/www/projections/summarytables.html.

  17. Ponikowski P, Voors AA, Anker SD, Bueno H, Cleland JG, Coats AJ, Falk V, González-Juanatey JR, Harjola VP, Jankowska EA, Jessup M, Linde C, Nihoyannopoulos P, Parissis JT, Pieske B, Riley JP, Rosano GM, Ruilope LM, Ruschitzka F, Rutten FH, van der Meer P, TF Authors Members; Document Reviewers. ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: the task force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J. 2016;2016(37):2129–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lakatta EG, Levy D. Arterial and cardiac aging: major shareholders in cardiovascular disease enterprises: part I: aging arteries: a “set up” for vascular disease. Circulation. 2003;107:139–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG; PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ. 2009;339:b2535.

  20. Altman DG, Schulz KF, Moher D, Egger M, Davidoff F, Elbourne D, et al. CONSORT GROUP (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials). The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134:663–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA. 2000;283:2008–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Menzies D. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2011;15(5):582–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wells GA, Shea B, O’Connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, et al. (2011). The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses [webpage on the Internet]. Ottawa, ON: Ottawa Hospital Research Institute; 2011. Available from: http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/nosgen.pdf.

  24. Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). (2011). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org.

  25. Inada K, Roberts-Thomson KC, Seiler J, Steven D, Tedrow UB, Koplan BA, Stevenson WG. Mortality and safety of catheter ablation for antiarrhythmic drug-refractory ventricular tachycardia in elderly patients with coronary artery disease. Heart Rhythm. 2010;7:740–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Barra S, Begley D, Heck P, Turner I, Agarwal S. Ablation of ventricular tachycardia in the very elderly patient with cardiomyopathy: how old is too old? Can J Cardiol. 2015;31:717–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Liang JJ, Khurshid S, Schaller RD, Santangeli P, Marchlinski FE, Frankel DS. Safety and efficacy of catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia in elderly patients with structural heart Disease. J Am Coll Cardiol EP. 2015;1:52–8.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Frontera A, Panniker S, Breitenstein A, Bruno VT, Connolly GM, Wilson D, Rio T, Dhinoja MB, Hussain W, Schilling RJ, Thomas G, Wong T, Hunter RJ, Sacher F, Jaïs P, Duncan E. Safety and mid-term outcome of catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia in octogenarians. Europace. 2017;19:1369–77.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Vakil K, Garcia S, Tung R, Vaseghi M, Tedrow U, Della Bella P, Frankel DS, Vergara P, Di Biase L, Nagashima K, Nakahara S, Tzou WS, Burkhardt JD, Dickfeld T, Weiss JP, Bunch J, Callans D, Lakkireddy D, Natale A, Sauer WH, Stevenson WG, Marchlinski F, Shivkumar K, Tholakanahalli VN. Ventricular tachycardia ablation in the elderly: an international ventricular tachycardia center collaborative group analysis. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2017;10:e005332.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Zado ES, Callans DJ, Gottlieb CD, Kutalek SP, Wilbur SL, Samuels FL, Hessen SE, Movsowitz CM, Fontaine JM, Kimmel SE, Marchlinski FE. Efficacy and safety of catheter ablation in octogenarians. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;35:458–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Sesselberg HW, Moss AJ, McNitt S, Zareba W, Daubert JP, Andrews ML, Hall WJ, McClinitic B, Huang DT, MADIT-II Research Group. Ventricular arrhythmia storms in postinfarction patients with implantable defibrillators for primary prevention indications: a MADIT-II substudy. Heart Rhythm. 2007;4:1395–402.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Exner DV, Pinski SL, Wyse DG, Renfroe EG, Follmann D, Gold M, Beckman KJ, Coromilas J, Lancaster S, Hallstrom AP. AVID Investigators. Electrical storm presages nonsudden death: the antiarrhythmics versus implantable defibrillators (AVID) trial. Circulation. 2001;103:2066–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Vergara P, Tung R, Vaseghi M, Brombin C, Frankel DS, Di Biase L, Nagashima K, Tedrow U, Tzou WS, Sauer WH, Mathuria N, Nakahara S, Vakil K, Tholakanahalli V, Bunch TJ, Weiss JP, Dickfeld T, Vunnam R, Lakireddy D, Burkhardt JD, Correra A, Santangeli P, Callans D, Natale A, Marchlinski F, Stevenson WG, Shivkumar K, Della BP. Successful ventricular tachycardia ablation in patients with electrical storm reduces recurrences and improves survival. Heart Rhythm. 2018;15:48–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alessandro Blandino.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Blandino, A., Bianchi, F., Frankel, D.S. et al. Safety and efficacy of catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia in elderly patients with structural heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 66, 179–192 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-021-01007-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-021-01007-w

Keywords

Navigation