Skip to main content
Log in

Differences in D-dimer blood concentration in atrial fibrillation patients with left atrial thrombus or severe left atrial spontaneous echo contrast

  • Published:
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Severe left atrial spontaneous echo contrast (SLASEC) is considered the prior stage to thrombosis and a high-risk factor for thrombotic events. Studies have suggested an effect of D-dimer blood concentration on exclusion of left atrial thrombus (LAT), but it remains unclear whether D-dimer concentrations differ between atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with SLASEC or LAT.

Methods

Nonvalvular AF patients scheduled to undergo catheter ablation or cardioversion in Shanghai Ruijin Hospital between January 2017 and July 2020 were screened for this prospective study. All patients underwent transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) to detect SLASEC or LAT. D-dimer concentrations were measured at the time of TEE. Clinical data including CHA2DS2-VASc score were evaluated. Major complications with thromboembolism in the SLASEC group were followed up at least 6 months after therapy.

Results

Among 920 consecutively enrolled nonvalvular AF patients, 30 patients with SEC grade 0, 35 patients with SLASEC, and 22 patients with LAT were included. D-dimer concentration and CHA2DS2-VASc score were significantly lower in the SLASEC group compared with the LAT group (D-dimer, 0.26±0.13 vs. 0.86±0.9 mg/L, P<0.05; CHA2DS2-VASc score, 2.3±0.9 vs. 3.1±1.5, P=0.02). The cut-off value for D-dimer concentration (0.285 mg/L) had sensitivity of 77.3% and specificity of 80.0% for prediction of LAT. D-dimer concentration showed a decreasing trend with a significant difference (0.42±0.22 vs. 0.33±0.18 mg/L, P=0.03) for 9 patients in the LAT group after complete thrombus resolution by anticoagulation treatment. No major or fatal bleeding, ischemic stroke, or systemic thromboembolism events occurred in the SLASEC group during the 6-month follow-up.

Conclusions

This study demonstrated a significantly lower D-dimer concentration and CHA2DS2-VASc score in AF patients with SLASEC than in those with LAT. The D-dimer cut-off value (0.285 mg/L) can be used as an effective reference index to distinguish the pre-thrombotic state of LAT from LAT. D-dimer blood concentration may be a predictor of LAT thrombolysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Al-Saady NM, Obel OA, Camm AJ. Left atrial appendage: structure, function, and role in thromboembolism. Heart. 1999;82(5):547–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Jia F, Tian Y, Lei S, Yang Y, Luo S, He Q. Incidence and predictors of left atrial thrombus in patients with atrial fibrillation prior to ablation in the real world of China. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2019;19(4):134–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhou X, Wang Z, Dou S, Chen K, Liu E, Liu T, et al. Biomarkers for predicting left atrial or left atrial appendage thrombus in anticoagulated patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Cardiol Res Pract. 2020;2020 Jun 20:1683142.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Masuda M, Iwakura K, Inoue K, Okamura A, Koyama Y, Toyoshima Y, et al. Estimation of left atrial blood stasis using diastolic late mitral annular velocity. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;14(8):752–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Watanabe T, Shinoda Y, Ikeoka K, Inui H, Fukuoka H, Sunaga A, et al. Dabigatran exhibits low intensity of left atrial spontaneous echo contrast in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation as compared with warfarin. Heart Vessel. 2017;32(3):326–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bernhardt P, Schmidt H, Hammerstingl C, Lüderitz B, Omran H. Patients with atrial fibrillation and dense spontaneous echo contrast at high risk a prospective and serial follow-up over 12 months with transesophageal echocardiography and cerebral magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45(11):1807–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Calkins H, Hindricks G, Cappato R, Kim YH, Saad EB, Aguinaga L, et al. 2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2018;20(1):e1–e160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Unami N, Ise Y, Suzuki H. Anticoagulant activity of apixaban can be estimated by multiple regression analysis. J Arrhythm. 2020;36(6):1032–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kirchhof P, Benussi S, Kotecha D, Ahlsson A, Atar D, Casadei B, et al. ESC Scientific Document Group. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS. Eur Heart J. 2016;37(38):2893–962.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hahn RT, Abraham T, Adams MS, Bruce CJ, Glas KE, Lang RM, et al. Guidelines for performing a comprehensive transesophageal examination: recommendations from the American Society of Echocardiography and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologist. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2013;26(9):921–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Minamisaka T, Watanabe T, Shinoda Y, Ikeoka K, Fukuoka H, Inui H, et al. Transient manifestation of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction following ablation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Clin Cardiol. 2018;41(7):978–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fatkin D, Kelly RP, Feneley MP. Relations between left atrial appendage blood flow velocity, spontaneous echocardiographic contrast and thromboembolic risk in vivo. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;23(4):961–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Watson T, Shantsila E, Lip GY. Mechanisms of thrombogenesis in atrial fibrillation: Virchow’s triad revisited. Lancet. 2009;373(9658):155–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Choudhury A, Lip GY. Atrial fibrillation and the hypercoagulable state: from basic science to clinical practice. Pathophysiol Haemost Thromb. 2005;33(5-6):282–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lippi G, Cervellin G, Franchini M, Favaloro EJ. Biochemical markers for the diagnosis of venous thromboembolism: the past, present and future. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2010;30(4):459–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Milhem A, Ingrand P, Tréguer F, Cesari O, Da Costa A, Pavin D, et al. Exclusion of intra-atrial thrombus diagnosis using D-Dimer assay before catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2019;5(2):223–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Somlói M, Tomcsányi J, Nagy E, Bodó I, Bezzegh A. D-dimer determination as a screening tool to exclude atrial thrombi in atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol. 2003;92(1):85–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Habara S, Dote K, Kato M, Sasaki S, Goto K, Takemoto H, et al. Prediction of left atrial appendage thrombi in non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J. 2007;28(18):2217–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Tarnowski D, Poitz DM, Plichta L, Heidrich FM, Wiedemann S, Ruf T, et al. Comparison of diverse platelet activation markers as indicators for left atrial thrombus in atrial fibrillation. Platelets. 2018;29(1):41–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Wan H, Wu S, Yang Y, Zhu J, Zhang A, Liang Y. Plasma fibrin D-dimer and the risk of left atrial thrombus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2017;12(2):e0172272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Xin D, Wang Y. The diagnostic efficacy of cardiac CTA combined with D-dimer assay for the detection of left atrial thrombus in patients with atrial fibrillation. Am J Emerg Med. 2019;37(10):1922–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Almorad A, Ohanyan A, Pintea Bentea G, Wielandts JY, El Haddad M, Lycke M, et al. D-dimer blood concentrations to exclude left atrial thrombus in patients with atrial fibrillation. Heart. 2021;107(3):195–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hao L, Zhong JQ, Zhang W, Rong B, Xie F, Wang JT, et al. Uninterrupted dabigatran versus warfarin in the treatment of intracardiac thrombus in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Int J Cardiol. 2015;190:63–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Floria M, De Roy L, Xhaet O, Blommaert D, Jamart J, Gerard M, et al. Predictive value of thromboembolic risk scores before an atrial fibrillation ablation procedure. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2013;24(2):139–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Atkinson C, Hinton J, Gaisie EB, Yue AM, Roberts PR, Rakhit DJ, et al. Use of the CHA2DS2-VASc score to reduce utilisation of transoesophageal echocardiography prior to ablation for atrial fibrillation. Echo Res Pract. 2017;4(4):45–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81570234, 81870250, 81900290, 81700394).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yucai Xie or Liqun Wu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lin, C., Bao, Y., Hua, W. et al. Differences in D-dimer blood concentration in atrial fibrillation patients with left atrial thrombus or severe left atrial spontaneous echo contrast. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 64, 341–347 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-021-00991-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-021-00991-3

Keywords

Navigation