Skip to main content
Log in

Security millimetre wave body scanner safe for patients with leadless pacemakers or subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators

  • Published:
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This study was designed to evaluate the electromagnetic interference (EMI) effects and safety of the new security screening millimetre wave body scanners (MWBSs) for patients with rare cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs).

Methods

We identified 73 patients with either entirely subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (S-ICD) or leadless pacemakers (LPM) attending routine device follow-up. CIED programming was optimised for the detection of EMI occurrence, and high-voltage therapy was disabled. Patients then underwent millimetre wave body scans under continuous ECG monitoring. Scanning was performed at the recommended distance as well as in close proximity to the scanner emulating accidental exposure. CIED function was observed for EMI effects.

Results

There were no episodes of inhibition of pacing in the leadless pacemaker subgroup, no oversensing in the S-ICD subgroup and no spontaneous device reprogramming in any group. There was no change in pacing or sensing thresholds, and S-ICD vector eligibility remained unchanged after scanning with the MWBS. No CIEDs were identified by the MWBS during the study.

Conclusion

No EMI events were detected during the use of MWBSs by patients with either S-ICDs or LPMs. This data should be reassuring for patients suggesting that they can undergo security body scans without worries or disclosure of their CIED status.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

Not applicable.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Bardy GH, Smith WM, Hood MA, Crozier IG, Melton IC, Jordaens L, et al. An entirely subcutaneous implantable cardioverter–defibrillator. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(1):36–44.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Priori SG, Blomström-Lundqvist C, Mazzanti A, Blom N, Borggrefe M, Camm J, et al. 2015 ESC guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death. Eur Heart J. 2015;36(41):2793–867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. O’Connor M, et al. Long-term single-center comparison of ICD lead survival: evidence for premature Linox lead failure. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2018;29(7):1024–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kleemann T, Becker T, Doenges K, Vater M, Senges J, Schneider S, et al. Annual rate of transvenous defibrillation lead defects in implantable cardioverter-defibrillators over a period of >10 years. Circulation. 2007;115(19):2474–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Borleffs CJW, van Erven L, van Bommel RJ, van der Velde ET, van der Wall EE, Bax JJ, et al. Risk of failure of transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2009;2(4):411–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hauser RG, et al. Long-term structural failure of coaxial polyurethane implantable cardioverter defibrillator leads. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2002;25(6):879–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kitamura S, Satomi K, Kurita T, Shimizu W, Suyama K, Aihara N, et al. Long-term follow-up of transvenous defibrillation leads: high incidence of fracture in coaxial polyurethane lead. Circ J. 2006;70(3):273–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dorwarth U, et al. Transvenous defibrillation leads: high incidence of failure during long-term follow-up. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2003;14(1):38–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Beinart R, Nazarian S. Effects of external electrical and magnetic fields on pacemakers and defibrillators: from engineering principles to clinical practice. Circulation. 2013;128(25):2799–809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dawson TW, Caputa K, Stuchly MA, Shepard RB, Kavet R, Sastre A. Pacemaker interference by magnetic fields at power line frequencies. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2002;49(3):254–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Scholten A, Silny J. The interference threshold of unipolar cardiac pacemakers in extremely low frequency magnetic fields. J Med Eng Technol. 2001;25(5):185–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Misiri J, Kusumoto F, Goldschlager N. Electromagnetic interference and implanted cardiac devices: the nonmedical environment (part I). Clin Cardiol. 2012;35(5):276–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. StJude, “ICD and Pacemaker Interference: Dealing With EMI.” [Online]. Available: https://www.sjm.com/en/patients/arrhythmias/living-with-your-treatment/electromagnetic-interference?alert=DeepLinkSoftAlert&clset=af584191-45c9-4201-8740-5409f4cf8bdd%3Ab20716c1-c2a6-4e4c-844b-d0dd6899eb3a. [Accessed: 05-Sep-2017].

  14. Medtronic, “Answers to Questions about Implantable Cardiac Devices, electromagnetic compatability guide,” 2016. [Online]. Available: http://www.medtronic.com/content/dam/medtronic-com-m/mdt/documents/emc_guide.pdf. [Accessed: 05-Sep-2016].

  15. Rohde and Schwarz, “R+S QPS Quick Personnel Security Scanner.” [Online]. Available: https://cdn.rohde-schwarz.com/pws/dl_downloads/dl_common_library/dl_brochures_and_datasheets/pdf_1/QPS100-200_bro_en_3606-7160-12_v0200.pdf. [Accessed: 14-Aug-2018].

  16. Jilek C, Tzeis S, Vrazic H, Semmler V, Andrikopoulos G, Reents T, et al. Safety of screening procedures with hand-held metal detectors among patients with implanted cardiac rhythm devices: a cross-sectional analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155(9):587–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kolb C, Schmieder S, Lehmann G, Zrenner B, Karch MR, Plewan A, et al. Do airport metal detectors interfere with implantable pacemakers or cardioverter-defibrillators? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;41(11):2054–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Guag J, Addissie B, Witters D. Personal medical electronic devices and walk-through metal detector security systems: assessing electromagnetic interference effects. Biomed Eng Online. 2017;16(1):33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lennerz C, O’Connor MJ, Blažek P, Weigand S, Grebmer C, Reif S, et al. Modern security screening and electromagnetic interference with cardiac implantable electronic devices. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;75(10):1238–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lennerz C, Pavaci H, Grebmer C, Semmler V, Bourier F, Haller B, et al. Electromagnetic interference in cardiac implantable electronic devices. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69(1):108–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wu T, Rappaport TS, and Collins CM (2005) “The human body and millimeter-wave wireless communication systems: interactions and implications,” in 2015 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), pp. 2423–2429.

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Bavarian Ministry of Economic Affairs, Energy and Technology [Nr. 07 03/686 68/ 57 /17/ 30 /18/ 31 /19)]. Rohde & Schwarz provided a millimetre wave body scanner (R&S QPS, Rohde & Schwarz, Germany) for use during the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization: Christof Kolb and Carsten Lennerz.

Methodology: Tilko Reents, Marc Kottmaier, Lena Friedrich and Christof Kolb.

Formal analysis and investigation: Patrick Blažek, Severin Weigand, Christian Grebmer, Sebastian Reif and Stephanie Fichtner.

Writing—original draft preparation: Matthew J O’Connor and Carsten Lennerz.

Writing—review and editing: Felix Bourier, Verena Semmler, Isabel Deisenhofer, Heribert Schunkert and Christof Kolb.

Funding acquisition: Heribert Schunkert and Carsten Lennerz.

Resources: Isabel Deisenhofer, Heribert Schunkert and Christof Kolb.

Supervision: Isabel Deisenhofer, Christof Kolb and Carsten Lennerz.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carsten Lennerz.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethics approval

This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was granted by the ethics committee of Technische Universität München, Munich.

Consent to participate

All participants provided full, written, informed consent to participation.

Consent for publication

All participants provided full, written, informed consent to publication.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Blažek, P., O’Connor, M.J., Weigand, S. et al. Security millimetre wave body scanner safe for patients with leadless pacemakers or subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 61, 603–607 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-020-00830-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-020-00830-x

Keywords

Navigation