Skip to main content

Ablation of manifest septal accessory pathways: a single-center experience

Abstract

Background

Ablation of septal accessory pathways (SAPs) is associated with an increased risk of heart block. Data on outcomes of SAP ablation in adults are limited.

Objectives

To describe outcomes of SAP ablation in our center.

Methods

Patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome (WPW) undergoing an EP study at our center between January 2008 and August 2019 were identified from our institutional database. Location of the pathway was noted as anteroseptal (AS), midseptal (MS), or posteroseptal (PS). Outcomes of the ablation including success, complication rates, and recurrences were also recorded.

Results

Thirty-three patients with SAP underwent 35 EP studies: AS (n = 13), MS (n = 5), and PS (n = 15). Thirty pathways were targeted for ablation, two of which required a 2nd procedure resulting in 32 attempts at ablation in 30 patients. In the remaining 3 patients, SAP did not have malignant features and were not targeted for ablation. Single-procedure success rate was 28/30 (93.33%): 9/10 AS, 5/5 MS, and 14/15 PS ablations. One AS pathway was successfully ablated during a 2nd procedure. Two complications were observed: 1 pericardial effusion in a patient who underwent epicardial mapping and ablation of both PS and right free wall APs. Additionally, transient 2:1 AV block occurred during an MS pathway ablation that recovered during follow-up and did not require permanent pacing procedure.

Conclusion

In this single-center experience, ablation of manifest SAP was associated with high success rates and low complication rates. No instances of permanent heart block requiring pacing occurred.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Haghjoo M, Kharazi A, Fazelifar AF, Alizadeh A, Emkanjoo Z, Sadr-Ameli MA. Electrocardiographic and electrophysiologic characteristics of anteroseptal, midseptal, and posteroseptal accessory pathways. Heart Rhythm. 2007;4(11):1411–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lin JL, Huang SK, Lai LP, Cheng TF, Tseng YZ, Lien WP. Radiofrequency catheter ablation of septal accessory pathways within the triangle of Koch: importance of energy titration testing other than the local electrogram characteristics for identifying the successful target site. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1998;21(10):1909–17.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Schaffer MS, Silka MJ, Ross BA, Kugler JD. Inadvertent atrioventricular block during radiofrequency catheter ablation. Results of the pediatric radiofrequency ablation registry. Pediatric electrophysiology society. Circulation. 1996;94(12):3214–3220.

  4. Xie B, Heald SC, Bashir Y, Camm AJ, Ward DE. Radiofrequency catheter ablation of septal accessory atrioventricular pathways. Br Heart J. 1994;72(3):281–4.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Van Hare GF, Javitz H, Carmelli D, et al. Prospective assessment after pediatric cardiac ablation: demographics, medical profiles, and initial outcomes. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2004;15(7):759–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Macedo PG, Patel SM, Bisco SE, Asirvatham SJ. Septal accessory pathway: anatomy, causes for difficulty, and an approach to ablation. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2010;10(7):292–309.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Kuck KH, Schluter M, Geiger M, Siebels J, Duckeck W. Radiofrequency current catheter ablation of accessory atrioventricular pathways. Lancet. 1991;337(8757):1557–61.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bar-Cohen Y, Cecchin F, Alexander ME, Berul CI, Triedman JK, Walsh EP. Cryoablation for accessory pathways located near normal conduction tissues or within the coronary venous system in children and young adults. Heart Rhythm. 2006;3(3):253–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ergul Y, Tola HT, Kiplapinar N, Akdeniz C, Saygi M, Tuzcu V. Cryoablation of anteroseptal accessory pathways in children with limited fluoroscopy exposure. Pediatr Cardiol. 2013;34(4):802–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Karadeniz C, Akdeniz C, Turan O, Tuzcu V. Cryoablation of septal accessory pathways in children: midterm results. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2014;37(9):1095–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bravo L, Atienza F, Eidelman G, Ávila P, Pelliza M, Castellanos E, et al. Safety and efficacy of cryoablation vs. radiofrequency ablation of septal accessory pathways: systematic review of the literature and meta-analyses. Europace. 2018;20(8):1334–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Al-Khatib SM, Arshad A, Balk EM, et al. Risk stratification for arrhythmic events in patients with asymptomatic pre-excitation: a systematic review for the 2015 ACC/AHA/HRS guideline for the management of adult patients with supraventricular tachycardia: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. Heart Rhythm. 2016;13(4):e222–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pappone C, Vicedomini G, Manguso F, Baldi M, Pappone A, Petretta A, et al. Risk of malignant arrhythmias in initially symptomatic patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome: results of a prospective long-term electrophysiological follow-up study. Circulation. 2012;125(5):661–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mandapati R, Berul CI, Triedman JK, Alexander ME, Walsh EP. Radiofrequency catheter ablation of septal accessory pathways in the pediatric age group. Am J Cardiol. 2003;92(8):947–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gaita F, Haissaguerre M, Giustetto C, et al. Safety and efficacy of cryoablation of accessory pathways adjacent to the normal conduction system. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2003;14(8):825–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Vakil KP, Tholakanahalli VN. Freezing at the his bundle. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2014;14(6):281–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mikhael El-Chami.

Ethics declarations

The Emory University Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved the study protocol.

Conflict of interest

Mikhael El-Chami is a consultant for Medtronic, Boston Scientific, and Biotronik. All other authors have no conflict of interest to report.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brown, M.T., Kiani, S., Black, G.B. et al. Ablation of manifest septal accessory pathways: a single-center experience. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 61, 349–355 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-020-00823-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-020-00823-w

Keywords

  • Accessory pathways
  • Parahisian pathways
  • Cryoablation
  • Radiofrequency ablation
  • Wolff-Parkinson-White