Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Improved real-time recordings using the fourth-generation cryoballoon technology—detection of dual fascicle electrograms

  • Published:
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

We aimed to analyze the rate of visualization of real-time (RT) recordings and dual fascicle electrograms in our first series of patients treated with the fourth-generation cryoballoon (CB) device.

Methods

All consecutive patients who underwent CB ablation using the fourth-generation technology were included in the analysis. In all procedures, we used a 28-mm CB placed via a single transseptal puncture guided by intracardiac ultrasound. A 20-mm octapolar intraluminal circular catheter was used for intracardiac recordings. A single 180-s freeze strategy was employed.

Results

A total of 129 patients (72.9% male, mean age 60.1 ± 10.9 years) were enrolled in the study. RT recordings were detected in 445 (86.2%) pulmonary veins (PVs). Specifically, RT recordings were visualized in 115 left superior PVs (89.2%), 107 left inferior PVs (82.9%), 118 right superior PVs (91.4%), and 105 right inferior PVs (81.3%). Dual fascicle electrograms could be observed only in patients in sinus rhythm, in 23 of 396 PVs (5.8%). They were most commonly observed in the left superior PV (8.1%), somewhat less in both inferior veins (6.1%), while this phenomenon was least frequent in the right superior PV (3.0%).

Conclusions

By using the fourth-generation CB, we report a specific pattern of isolation represented by a sequential isolation of two apparently distinct PV fascicles during a single CB freeze delivery. This phenomenon occurred in 5.8% of PV ablations. Of note, the rate of visualization of RT isolation with this novel CB was very high and could be documented in 86.2% of PVs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Calkins H, Hindricks G, Cappato R, Kim YH, Saad EB, Aguinaga L, et al. 2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2018;20(1):e1–e160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Velagić V, de Asmundis C, Mugnai G, Hünük B, Hacioğlu E, Ströker E, et al. Learning curve using the second-generation cryoballoon ablation. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2017;18(7):518–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bollmann A, Ueberham L, Schuler E, Wiedemann M, Reithmann C, Sause A, et al. Cardiac tamponade in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: German-wide analysis of 21 141 procedures in the Helios Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Registry (SAFER). Europace. 2018;20(12):1944–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Mugnai G, de Asmundis C, Hünük B, Ströker E, Moran D, Hacioglu E, et al. Improved visualisation of real-time recordings during third generation cryoballoon ablation: a comparison between the novel short-tip and the second generation device. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2016;46(3):307–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ciconte G, Mugnai G, Sieira J, Velagić V, Saitoh Y, Irfan G, et al. On the quest for the best freeze: predictors of late pulmonary vein reconnections after second-generation cryoballoon ablation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2015;8(6):1359–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ghosh J, Singarayar S, Kabunga P, McGuire MA. Subclavian vein pacing and venous pressure waveform measurement for phrenic nerve monitoring during cryoballoon ablation of atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2015;17:884–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Aryana A, Kenigsberg DN, Kowalski M, Koo CH, Lim HW, O'Neill PG, et al. Verification of a novel atrial fibrillation cryoablation dosing algorithm guided by time-to-pulmonary vein isolation: results from the Cryo-DOSING Study (Cryoballoon-ablation DOSING based on the assessment of time-to-effect and pulmonary vein isolation guidance). Heart Rhythm. 2017;14(9):1319–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chun KR, Stich M, Fürnkranz A, Bordignon S, Perrotta L, Dugo D, et al. Individualized cryoballoon energy pulmonary vein isolation guided by real-time pulmonary vein recordings, the randomized ICE-T trial. Heart Rhythm. 2017;14(4):495–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Reissmann B, Wissner E, Deiss S, Heeger C, Schlueter M, Wohlmuth P, et al. First insights into cryoballoon based pulmonary vein isolation taking the individual time-to-isolation into account. Europace. 2017;19:1676–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fürnkranz A, Bologna F, Bordignon S, Perrotta L, Dugo D, Schmidt B. et el. Procedural characteristics of pulmonary vein isolation using the novel third-generation cryoballoon. Europace. 2016;18(12):1795–800.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Moltrasio M, Sicuso R, Fassini GM, Riva SI, Tundo F, dello Russo A, et al. Acute outcome after a single cryoballoon ablation: comparison between Arctic Front Advance and Arctic Front Advance Pro. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2019;42(7):890–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Haïssaguerre M, Shah DC, Jaïs P, Hocini M, Yamane T, Deisenhofer I, et al. Electrophysiological breakthroughs from the left atrium to the pulmonary veins. Circulation. 2000;102(20):2463–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yamane T, Shah DC, Jaïs P, Hocini M, Deisenhofer I, Choi KJ, et al. Electrogram polarity reversal as an additional indicator of breakthroughs from the left atrium to the pulmonary veins. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39(8):1337–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Saito T, Waki K, Becker AE. Left atrial myocardial extension onto pulmonary veins in humans: anatomic observations relevant for atrial arrhythmias. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2000;11:888–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Miyazaki S, Kajiyama T, Watanabe T, Hada M, Nakamura H, Hachiya H, et al. Impact of electrical connections between ipsilateral pulmonary veins on the second-generation cryoballoon ablation procedure. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2019;30(1):27–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mathew S, Rottner L, Warneke L, Maurer T, Lemes C, Hashiguchi N. Initial experience and procedural efficacy of pulmonary vein isolation using the fourth-generation cryoballoon - a step forward? Acta Cardiol. 2019;19:1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rottner L, Mathew S, Reissmann B, Warneke L, Martin I, Lemes C et al. Feasibility, safety, and acute efficacy of the fourth-generation cryoballoon for ablation of atrial fibrillation: another step forward? Clin Cardiol. 2020.

  18. Straube F, Dorwarth U, Pongratz J, Brück B, Wankerl M, Hartl S, et al. The fourth cryoballoon generation with a shorter tip to facilitate real-time pulmonary vein potential recording: feasibility and safety results. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2019;30(6):918–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Vallès E, Benito B, Jiménez J, Cabrera S, Alcalde O, Altaba C, et al. Double factor single shot to diminish complications in cryoballoon ablation procedures for atrial fibrillation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2019;55(1):17–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

VV and GM were responsible for conception of the study and drafting of the manuscript. VP, IP, BPN, and MP were responsible for acquisition and analysis of the data. JS, MC, DP, and DM were responsible for critical revision of the manuscript and important intellectual content.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vedran Velagic.

Ethics declarations

All patients underwent de novo pulmonary vein isolation procedures and provided written informed consent for the ablation. The research was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Conflict of interest

VV received educational grants by St Jude Medical and travel grants and lecture fees from Medtronic and Biosense-Webster. MC received lecture fees from Medtronic. MP and BPN received educational and travel grants from Medtronic and Biosense-Webster.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Velagic, V., Mugnai, G., Pasara, V. et al. Improved real-time recordings using the fourth-generation cryoballoon technology—detection of dual fascicle electrograms. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 61, 261–268 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-020-00809-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-020-00809-8

Keywords

Navigation