Skip to main content
Log in

Peak deflection index as a predictor of a free-wall implantation of contemporary leadless pacemakers

  • MULTIMEDIA REPORT
  • Published:
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Leadless pacemakers are an effective treatment for bradycardia. However, some cases exhibit pericardial effusions, presumably associated with device implantations on the right ventricular free-wall. The present study was carried out to find the ECG features during ventricular pacing with a Micra, which enabled distinguishing free-wall implantations from septal implantations without using imaging modalities.

Methods

Thirty-one consecutive patients who received Micra implantations in our facility were enrolled. The location of the device in the right ventricle was evaluated using echocardiography or computed tomography in order to determine whether the device was implanted on the septum (Sep group), apex (Apex group), or free-wall (FW group). The differences in the 12-lead ECG during ventricular pacing by the Micra were analyzed between the Sep and FW groups.

Results

The body of the Micra was clearly identifiable in 22 patients. The location of the device was classified into Sep in 12 patients, Apex in 4, and FW in 6. The mean age was highest in the FW and lowest in the Sep group (82.7 ± 6.6 vs. 72.8 ± 8.7 years, p = 0.027). The peak deflection index (PDI) was significantly larger in the FW group than Sep/Apex group in lead V1 (Sep: 0.505 ± 0.010, Apex: 0.402 ± 0.052, FW: 0.617 ± 0.043, p = 0.004) and lead V2 (Sep: 0.450 ± 0.066, Apex: 0.409 ± 0.037, FW: 0.521 ± 0.030, p = 0.011), whereas there was no difference in the QRS duration, transitional zone, and QRS notching.

Conclusion

The PDI in V1 could be useful for predicting implantations of Micra devices on the free-wall and may potentially stratify the risk of postprocedural pericardial effusions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baddour LM, Epstein AE, Erickson CC, Knight BP, Levison ME, Lockhart PB, et al. Circulation. 2010;121:458–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Olsen T, Jorgensen OD, Nielsen JC, Thogersen AM, Philbert BT, Johansen JB. Incidence of device-related infection in 97 750 patients: clinical data from the complete Danish device-cohort (1982-2018). Eur Heart J. 2019;40:1862–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Reddy VY, Exner DV, Cantillon DJ, Doshi R, Bunch TJ, Tomassoni GF, et al. Percutaneous implantation of an entirely Intracardiac leadless pacemaker. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:1125–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Reynolds D, Duray GZ, Omar R, Soejima K, Neuzil P, Zhang S, et al. A leadless Intracardiac Transcatheter pacing system. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:533–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Roberts PR, Clementy N, Al Samadi F, Garweg C, Martinez-Sande JL, Iacopino S, et al. A leadless pacemaker in the real-world setting: the Micra Transcatheter pacing system post-approval registry. Heart Rhythm. 2017;14:1375–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hai JJ, Fang J, Tam CC, Wong CK, Un KC, Siu CW, et al. Safety and feasibility of a midseptal implantation technique of a leadless pacemaker. Heart Rhythm. 2019;16:896–902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. McGavigan AD, Roberts-Thomson KC, Hillock RJ, Stevenson IH, Mond HG. Right ventricular outflow tract pacing: radiographic and electrocardiographic correlates of lead position. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2006;29:1063–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pang BJ, Joshi SB, Lui EH, Tacey MA, Ling LH, Alison J, et al. Validation of conventional fluoroscopic and ECG criteria for right ventricular pacemaker lead position using cardiac computed tomography. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2014;37:495–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. van Oosterom A, Oostendorp TF. ECGSIM: an interactive tool for studying the genesis of QRST waveforms. Heart. 2004;90:165–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. R Core Team [2018]. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. URL https://www.R-project.org/

  11. Hachiya H, Hirao K, Sasaki T, Higuchi K, Hayashi T, Tanaka Y, et al. Novel ECG predictor of difficult cases of outflow tract ventricular tachycardia: peak deflection index on an inferior lead. Circ J. 2010;74:256–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Liaw A, Wiener M. Classification and regression by randomForest. R News. 2002;2(3):18–22.

    Google Scholar 

  13. El-Chami MF, Roberts PR, Kypta A, Omdahl P, Bonner MD, Kowal RC, et al. How to implant a leadless pacemaker with a tine-based fixation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2016;27:1495–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ritter P, Duray GZ, Steinwender C, Soejima K, Omar R, Mont L, et al. Early performance of a miniaturized leadless cardiac pacemaker: the Micra Transcatheter Pacing Study. Eur Heart J. 2015;36:2510–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Piccini JP, Stromberg K, Jackson KP, Laager V, Duray GZ, El-Chami M, et al. Long-term outcomes in leadless Micra transcatheter pacemakers with elevated thresholds at implantation: Results from the Micra Transcatheter Pacing System Global Clinical Trial. Heart Rhythm. 2017;14:685–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Mr. John Martin for his linguistic assistance in the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takatsugu Kajiyama.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare no conflict of interest related to this study.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(MPG 495 kb)

ESM 2

(MPG 431 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kajiyama, T., Kondo, Y., Nakano, M. et al. Peak deflection index as a predictor of a free-wall implantation of contemporary leadless pacemakers. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 60, 239–245 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-020-00724-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-020-00724-y

Keywords

Navigation