Skip to main content
Log in

Safety and feasibility of combined atrial fibrillation ablation and left atrial appendage occlusion after left atrial appendage electrical isolation

  • Published:
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To demonstrate the feasibility of combining left atrial appendage electrical isolation (LAAEI) with left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) to increase efficacy of persistent/longstanding atrial fibrillation (PLAF) catheter ablation (CA) while mitigating risk of left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombus.

Background

CA for atrial fibrillation (AF) plus LAAO is safe and feasible. LAAEI may improve freedom from recurrence in PLAF but may increase LAA thrombus.

Methods

We performed 42 concomitant procedures in patients with PLAF. After standard lesions, LAAEI was performed. LAAO immediately followed ablation. If 3-month transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) was benign, oral anticoagulation (OAC) was transitioned to dual antiplatelet therapy for 3 more months.

Results

Patients were 71.1 ± 8.5 years old, with CHADS2-VASc of 3.3 ± 1.1 and HAS-BLED of 2.5 ± 1.4. Twenty-eight of 42 patients (66.7%) were completely AF free over an average follow-up of 18.6 ± 8.6 months. The AF-free survival estimate was 94.5% at 1 year. There was no thromboembolism (TE) during the follow-up. There were six non-significant leaks acutely and six non-significant leaks at 6 months. There were three device-related thrombi, although 2/3 stopped OAC prematurely.

Conclusion

A combined procedure is feasible and effective in treating arrhythmia and stroke risk associated with PLAF. The risk of TE despite OAC after LAAEI supports simultaneous LAAO.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Colilla S, Crow A, Petkun W, Singer DE, Simon T, Liu X. Estimates of current and future incidence and prevalence of atrial fibrillation in the U.S. adult population. Am J Cardiol. 2013;112:1142–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kannel WB, Wolf PA, Benjamin EJ, Levy D. Prevalence, incidence, prognosis, and predisposing conditions for atrial fibrillation: population-based estimates. Am J Cardiol. 1998;82:2N–9N.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Zoni-Berisso M, Lercari F, Carazza T, Domenicucci S. Epidemiology of atrial fibrillation: European perspective. Clin Epidemiol. 2014;6:213–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hart RG, Pearce LA, Rothbart RM, McAnulty JH, Asinger RW, Halperin JL. Stroke with intermittent atrial fibrillation: incidence and predictors during aspirin therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;35:183–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dorian P, Jung W, Newman D, Paquette M, Wood K, Ayers GM, et al. The impairment of health-related quality of life in patients with intermittent atrial fibrillation: implications for the assessment of investigational therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;36:1303–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Palareti G, Leali N, Coccheri S, Poggi M, Manotti C, D'Angelo A, et al. Bleeding complications of oral anticoagulant treatment: an inception-cohort, prospective collaborative study (ISCOAT). Lancet. 1996;348:423–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Phillips KP, Walker DT, Humphries JA. Combined catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation and Watchman® left atrial appendage occlusion procedures: five-year experience. J Arrhythm. 2016;32:119–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kita K, Doshi R Combined atrial fibrillation ablation and left atrial appendage occlusion device sizing considerations. Heart Rhythm Vol 15. Chicago, IL 2017.

  9. Panikker S, Jarman JW, Virmani R, et al. Left atrial appendage electrical isolation and concomitant device occlusion to treat persistent atrial fibrillation: a first-in-human safety, feasibility, and efficacy study. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2016;9:pii: e004652.

  10. Di Biase L, Burkhardt JD, Mohanty P, et al. Left atrial appendage isolation in patients with longstanding persistent AF undergoing catheter ablation: BELIEF Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68:1929–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rillig A, Tilz RR, Lin T, et al. Unexpectedly high incidence of stroke and left atrial appendage Thrombus formation after electrical isolation of the left atrial appendage for the treatment of atrial tachyarrhythmias. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2016;9:e003461.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim YG, Shim J, Oh SK, Lee KN, Choi JI, Kim YH. Electrical isolation of the left atrial appendage increases the risk of ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack regardless of postisolation flow velocity. Heart Rhythm. 2018;15:1746–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Calkins H, Hindricks G, Cappato R, Kim YH, Saad EB, Aguinaga L, et al. 2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2017;14:e275–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Friedman DJ, Black-Maier EW, Barnett AS, Pokorney SD, al-Khatib SM, Jackson KP, et al. Left atrial appendage electrical isolation for treatment of recurrent atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2018;4:112–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gadiyaram VK, Mohanty S, Gianni C, Trivedi C, al-Ahmad A, Burkhardt DJ, et al. Thromboembolic events and need for anticoagulation therapy following left atrial appendage occlusion in patients with electrical isolation of the appendage. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2019;30:511–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Phillips KP, Pokushalov E, Romanov A, Artemenko S, Folkeringa RJ, Szili-Torok T, et al. Combining Watchman left atrial appendage closure and catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: multicentre registry results of feasibility and safety during implant and 30 days follow-up. Europace. 2018;20:949–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

K Kita: none; S Carlson: none; J Sohn: none; M Huntsinger: none; H Tun: none; and R Doshi: Consultant: Abbott Medical, Boston Scientific, Biosense Webster.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rahul N. Doshi.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kita, K., Carlson, S., Huntsinger, M. et al. Safety and feasibility of combined atrial fibrillation ablation and left atrial appendage occlusion after left atrial appendage electrical isolation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 57, 43–55 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-019-00603-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-019-00603-1

Keywords

Navigation