Skip to main content
Log in

“First-degree AV block—a benign entity?” Insertable cardiac monitor in patients with 1st-degree AV block reveals presence or progression to higher grade block or bradycardia requiring pacemaker implant

  • Published:
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

First-degree AV block has in the past generally been considered a benign condition. A few recent studies have shown that 1st-degree AV block is associated with an increased risk for heart failure, pacemaker (IPG) implantation, and death. We investigated the outcomes of patients who received an insertable cardiac monitor (ICM) (Medtronic Reveal XT®) within the scope of the INSIGHT XT study and had 1st-degree AV block at baseline.

Methods

The observational, international, multi-center INSIGHT (R)XT study prospectively enrolled 1003 patients implanted with an ICM for arrhythmia diagnosis, irrespective of the clinical indication. This analysis includes 37 patients who had documented 1st-degree AV block at enrolment. Patients with known concurrent higher grade block at enrolment were excluded.

Results

The indications for rhythm monitoring and ICM implantation were syncope/pre-syncope in 54.1%, cryptogenic stroke in 18.9%, AF with rhythm control intervention in 21.6%, and unexplained palpitations in 5.4%. Mean age was 68 ± 14 years, 75.7% were male, and concurrent bundle branch block was present in 8.1%. The median follow-up time was 12.2 months (IQR3.9–15.9). Fifteen patients (40.5%) received an IPG during the follow-up, and in 93.3% of the cases, the implant was needed to treat a now detected more severe bradycardia or progression of the conduction disease.

Conclusions

ICM either revealed progression of 1st-degree AV block to a higher grade block (53%) or detected an already existing more severe bradycardia warranting an IPG in 40.5% patients. This finding supports the conclusion that 1st-degree AV block might be a risk marker for more severe intermittent conduction disease and is not benign in all patients. Further studies may reveal patient subgroups which are at risk for demonstrating or developing higher grade AV block and may warrant a future IPG implantation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Packard JM, Graettinger JS, Graybiel A. Analysis of the electrocardiograms obtained from 1000 young healthy aviators: ten year follow-up. Circulation. 1954;10:384–400.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Johnson RL, Averill KH, Lamb LE. Electrocardiographic findings in 67,375 asymptomatic subjects. VII. Atrioventricular block. Am J Cardiol. 1960;6:153–77.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bexton RS, Camm AJ. First degree atrioventricular block. Euro Heart J. 1984;5(Suppl A):107–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Erikssen J, Otterstad JE. Natural course of a prolonged PR interval and the relation between PR and incidence of coronary heart disease. A 7-year follow-up study of 1832 apparently healthy men aged 40–59 years. Clin Cardiol. 1984;7:6–13.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Mymin D, Mathewson FA, Tate RB, Manfreda J. The natural history of primary first-degree atrioventricular heart block. N Engl J Med. 1986;315:1183–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cheng S, Keyes M, Larson M, McCabe E, Newton-Cheh C, Levy D, et al. Long-term outcomes in individuals with prolonged PR interval or first-degree atrioventricular block. JAMA. 2009;301(24):2571–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Uhm JS, Shim J, Mun HS, Park J, Park SH, Joung B, et al. First-degree atrioventricular block is associated with advanced atrioventricular block, atrial fibrillation and left ventricular dysfunction in patients with hypertension. J Hypertens. 2014;32:1115–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Crisel RK, Farzeneh-Far R, Beeya N, Whooley MA. First-degree atrioventricular block is associated with heart failure and death in persons with stable coronary artery disease: data from the heart and soul study. Eur Heart J. 2011;32:1875–80.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Kwok CS, Rashid M, Beynon R, Barker D, Patwala A, Morley-Davies A, et al. Prolonged PR interval, first-degree heart block and adverse cardiovascular outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart. 2016;102(9):672–80.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by Medtronic.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thorsten Lewalter.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Thorsten Lewalter has received speaker honorarium from Medtronic.

Helmut Pürerfellner has received speaker honorarium from Medtronic.

Andrea Ungar has received speaker honorarium from Medtronic.

Guido Rieger is an employee of Medtronic.

Lorenza Mangoni is an employee of Medtronic.

Firat Duru has received speaker honorarium from Medtronic.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lewalter, T., Pürerfellner, H., Ungar, A. et al. “First-degree AV block—a benign entity?” Insertable cardiac monitor in patients with 1st-degree AV block reveals presence or progression to higher grade block or bradycardia requiring pacemaker implant. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 52, 303–306 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-018-0439-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-018-0439-7

Keywords

Navigation