Advertisement

High rate of persistent iatrogenic atrial septal defect after single transseptal puncture for cryoballoon pulmonary vein isolation

  • Markus Linhart
  • Jessica T. Werner
  • Florian Stöckigt
  • Annika T. Kohlmann
  • Pia C. Lodde
  • Lutz P. T. Linneborn
  • Thomas Beiert
  • Christoph Hammerstingl
  • Roger Borràs
  • Georg Nickenig
  • René P. Andrié
  • Jan W. Schrickel
Article

Abstract

Purpose

Congenital atrial septal defect (ASD) is associated with increased morbidity, whereas little is known about the rate of spontaneous closure, associated clinical and echocardiographic parameters, or complications of iatrogenic atrial septal defect (iASD) beyond 1 year of follow-up. Persistent iASD after transseptal puncture for PVI has been described in up to 38% of small cohorts of patients in short-term follow-up after transseptal puncture. We sought to investigate the course of iASD after single transseptal puncture for first pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with cryoballoon, along with possible risk factors for persistent iASD.

Methods

After a first PVI with cryoballoon, 102 patients (64 ± 10 years, 64% male) underwent long-term clinical follow-up and comprehensive transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiographic study.

Results

Prevalence of iASD after PVI was 37% after 2.9 (1.6–4.9) years. No clinical complications or deterioration of echocardiographic parameters were associated with iASD. Lower left atrial appendage flow velocity was associated with higher risk of persistence of iASD (3.5% for every 1 cm/s decrease, p = 0.002).

Conclusions

Despite a high rate of iASD after cryoballoon PVI in long-term follow-up, this was not associated with increased clinical complications. Lower LAA velocity was associated with higher risk of persistent iASD. Repeated routine echocardiographic follow-up may not be necessary in these patients.

Keywords

Iatrogenic atrial septal defect Transseptal puncture Cryoballoon ablation 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

The study was approved by the local ethics committee (Ethikkommission an der Medizinischen Fakultät der Rheinischen Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, approval no. 353/13) and was carried out in concordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. All patients gave written informed consent before study inclusion.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Webb G, Gatzoulis MA. Atrial septal defects in the adult: recent progress and overview. Circulation. 2006;114(15):1645–53.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chan NY, Choy CC, Lau CL, Lo YK, Chu PS, Yuen HC, et al. Persistent iatrogenic atrial septal defect after pulmonary vein isolation by cryoballoon: an under-recognized complication. Europace. 2011;13(10):1406–10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hammerstingl C, Lickfett L, Jeong KM, Troatz C, Wedekind JA, Tiemann K, et al. Persistence of iatrogenic atrial septal defect after pulmonary vein isolation—an underestimated risk? Am Heart J. 2006;152(2):362 e1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rillig A, Meyerfeldt U, Kunze M, Birkemeyer R, Miljak T, Jackle S, et al. Persistent iatrogenic atrial septal defect after a single-puncture, double-transseptal approach for pulmonary vein isolation using a remote robotic navigation system: results from a prospective study. Europace. 2010;12(3):331–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Obel O, Mansour M, Picard M, Ruskin J, Keane D. Persistence of septal defects after transseptal puncture for pulmonary vein isolation procedures. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2004;27(10):1411–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cronin EM, Collier P, Wazni OM, Griffin BP, Jaber WA, Saliba WI. Persistence of atrial septal defect after cryoballoon ablation of atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62(16):1491–2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    McGinty PM, Smith TW, Rogers JH. Transseptal left heart catheterization and the incidence of persistent iatrogenic atrial septal defects. J Interv Cardiol. 2011;24(3):254–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Linhart M, Bellmann B, Mittmann-Braun E, Schrickel JW, Bitzen A, Andrie R, et al. Comparison of cryoballoon and radiofrequency ablation of pulmonary veins in 40 patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a case-control study. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2009;20(12):1343–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fuster V, Rydén LE, Cannom DS, Crijns HJ, Curtis AB, Ellenbogen KA, et al. ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48(4):e149–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Camm AJ, Lip GY, de Caterina R, Savelieva I, Atar D, Hohnloser SH, et al. Focused update of the ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation: an update of the 2010 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation. Eur Heart J. 2012;33(21):2719–47.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Agmon Y, Khandheria BK, Meissner I, Schwartz GL, Petterson TM, O'Fallon WM, et al. Left atrial appendage flow velocities in subjects with normal left ventricular function. Am J Cardiol. 2000;86(7):769–73.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rana BS, Thomas MR, Calvert PA, Monaghan MJ, Hildick-Smith D. Echocardiographic evaluation of patent foramen ovale prior to device closure. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010;3(7):749–60.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Meissner I, Whisnant JP, Khanderia BK, Spittell PC, O'Fallon WM, Pascoe RD, et al. Prevalence of potential risk factors for stroke assessed by transesophageal echocardiography and carotid ultrasonography: the SPARC Study. Mayo Clin Proc. 1999;74(74):862–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Silvestry FE, Cohen MS, Armsby LB, Burkule NJ, Fleishman CE, Hijazi ZM, et al. Guidelines for the echocardiographic assessment of atrial septal defect and patent foramen ovale: from the American Society of Echocardiography and Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015;28(8):910–58.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mas J-L, Arquizan C, Lamy C, Zuber M, Cabanes L, Derumeaux G, et al. Recurrent cerebrovascular events associated with patent foramen ovale, atrial septal aneurysm, or both. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(24):1740–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ben-Dor I, Goldstein SA, Pichard AD, Satler LF, Maluenda G, Li Y, et al. Clinical profile, prognostic implication, and response to treatment of pulmonary hypertension in patients with severe aortic stenosis. Am J Cardiol. 2011;107(7):1046–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sieira J, Chierchia GB, Di Giovanni G, Conte G, de AC, Sarkozy A, et al. One year incidence of iatrogenic atrial septal defect after cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2014;25(1):11–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Davies A, Gunaruwan P, Collins N, Barlow M, Jackson N, Leitch J. Persistent iatrogenic atrial septal defects after pulmonary vein isolation: long-term follow-up with contrast transesophageal echocardiography. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2017;48(1):99–103.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mugnai G, Sieira J, Ciconte G, Hervas MS, Irfan G, Saitoh Y, et al. One year incidence of atrial septal defect after PV isolation: a comparison between conventional radiofrequency and cryoballoon ablation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2015;38(9):1049–57.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chun K-RJ, Schmidt B, Metzner A, Tilz R, Zerm T, Koster I, et al. The ‘single big cryoballoon’ technique for acute pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a prospective observational single centre study. Eur Heart J. 2009;30(6):699–709.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kuck K-H, Brugada J, Furnkranz A, Metzner A, Ouyang F, Chun KRJ, et al. Cryoballoon or radiofrequency ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(23):2235–45.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rich ME, Tseng A, Lim HW, Wang PJ, Su WW. Reduction of iatrogenic atrial septal defects with an anterior and inferior transseptal puncture site when operating the cryoballoon ablation catheter. J Vis Exp. 2015;100:e52811.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Agmon Y, Khandheria BK, Gentile F, Seward JB. Echocardiographic assessment of the left atrial appendage. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;34(7):1867–77.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hoffmann A, Chockalingam P, Balint OH, Dadashev A, Dimopoulos K, Engel R, et al. Cerebrovascular accidents in adult patients with congenital heart disease. Heart. 2010;96(15):1223–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lin Y-S, Liu P-H, Wu L-S, Chen Y-M, Chang C-J, Chu P-H. Major adverse cardiovascular events in adult congenital heart disease: a population-based follow-up study from Taiwan. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2014;14:38.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Cheng TO. All atrial septal defects should be closed. Int J Cardiol. 2014;175(2):224–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Chen J-Y, Zhang A-D, Lu H-Y, Guo J, Wang F-F, Li Z-C. CHADS2 versus CHA2DS2-VASc score in assessing the stroke and thromboembolism risk stratification in patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Geriatr Cardiol. 2013;10(3):258–66.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Schueler R, Ozturk C, Wedekind JA, Werner N, Stockigt F, Mellert F, et al. ersistence of iatrogenic atrial septal defect after interventional mitral valve repair with the MitraClip system: a note of caution. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8(3):450–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Deneke T, Jais P, Scaglione M, Schmitt R, Di Biase L, Christopoulos G, et al. Silent cerebral events/lesions related to atrial fibrillation ablation: a clinical review. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2015;26(4):455–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    von Bary C, Deneke T, Arentz T, Schade A, Lehrmann H, Eissnert C, et al. Silent cerebral events as a result of left atrial catheter ablation do not cause neuropsychological sequelae—a MRI-controlled multicenter study. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2015;43(3):217–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Fisher MR, Forfia PR, Chamera E, Housten-Harris T, Champion HC, Girgis RE, et al. Accuracy of Doppler echocardiography in the hemodynamic assessment of pulmonary hypertension. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009;179(7):615–21.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Markus Linhart
    • 1
  • Jessica T. Werner
    • 1
  • Florian Stöckigt
    • 1
  • Annika T. Kohlmann
    • 1
  • Pia C. Lodde
    • 1
  • Lutz P. T. Linneborn
    • 1
  • Thomas Beiert
    • 1
  • Christoph Hammerstingl
    • 1
  • Roger Borràs
    • 2
  • Georg Nickenig
    • 1
  • René P. Andrié
    • 1
  • Jan W. Schrickel
    • 1
  1. 1.Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik IIUniversitätsklinikum BonnBonnGermany
  2. 2.Institut d’Investigacions Biomédiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS)BarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations