Abstract
Purpose
The WATCHMAN device for Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion (LAAO) has proven to be an effective alternative to oral anticoagulation (OAC) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), and has now been adopted in clinical practice. In the present study, we analyzed the safety and efficacy profile of the LAAO procedure at mid-term follow-up.
Methods
The TRAPS Registry is an observational, multicenter registry involving four Italian centers. Consecutive patients who had undergone LAAO with WATCHMAN device were enrolled. Clinical, demographic, and procedural data were collected at the time of implantation, and follow-up data were collected to assess the clinical outcome.
Results
A total of 151 patients were included in the Registry from May 2012 to October 2015. Implantation of the device was successful in 150/151 patients, with no or minimal (< 5 mm) leakage as assessed by peri-procedural transesophageal echo. In the remaining patient, early device embolization was reported, with no sequelae. Overall, intra-procedural events were reported in 5 (3.3%) patients. During a median follow-up of 16 months (25th and 75th percentile, 10–25), 5 patients died of any cause. The annual rate of all-cause stroke was 2.2% (95% CI, 0.7–5.1), the rate of transient ischemic attack was 1.3% (95% CI, 0.3–3.8), and that of major bleeding 0.4% (95% CI, 0.01–2.4).
Conclusions
LAAO for stroke prevention was safely and effectively achieved by implantation of the WATCHMAN device in patients with non-valvular AF. Moreover, regardless of the risk profile of the population, we observed low rates of death and thromboembolic and bleeding events over a median follow-up of 16 months. These findings were obtained in an unselected group of consecutive patients who were variably eligible for chronic OAC therapy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Friberg L, Hammar N, Rosenqvist M. Stroke in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: report from the Stockholm Cohort of Atrial Fibrillation. Eur Heart J. 2010;31:967–75.
Hart RG, Pearce LA, Aguilar MI. Meta-analysis: antithrombotic therapy to prevent stroke in patients who have nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Ann Intern Med. 2007;146:857–67.
Blackshear JL, Odell JA. Appendage obliteration to reduce stroke in cardiac surgical patients with atrial fibrillation. Ann Thorac Surg. 1996;61:755–9.
Tzikas A, Holmes DR Jr, Gafoor S, Ruiz CE, Blomström-Lundqvist C, Diener HC, et al. Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion: the Munich consensus document on definitions, endpoints and data collection requirements for clinical studies. EuroIntervention. 2016;12:103–11.
Camm AJ, Lip GY, De Caterina R, Savelieva I, Atar D, Hohnloser SH, et al. ESC Committee for Practice Guidelines (CPG). 2012 focused update of the ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation: an update of the 2010 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation. Developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association. Eur Heart J. 2012;33:2719–47.
Holmes DR, Reddy VY, Turi ZG, Doshi SK, Sievert H, Buchbinder M, et al. Percutaneous closure of the left atrial appendage versus warfarin therapy for prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation: a randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2009;374:534–42.
Holmes DR Jr, Kar S, Price MJ, Whisenant B, Sievert H, Doshi SK, et al. Prospective randomized evaluation of the Watchman Left Atrial Appendage Closure device in patients with atrial fibrillation versus long-term warfarin therapy: the PREVAIL trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64:1–12.
Reddy VY, Möbius-Winkler S, Miller MA, Neuzil P, Schuler G, Wiebe J, et al. Left atrial appendage closure with the Watchman device in patients with a contraindication for oral anticoagulation: the ASAP study (ASA Plavix Feasibility Study with Watchman Left Atrial Appendage Closure Technology). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61:2551–6.
Boersma LV, Schmidt B, Betts TR, Sievert H, Tamburino C, Teiger E, et al. Implant success and safety of left atrial appendage closure with the WATCHMAN device: peri-procedural outcomes from the EWOLUTION Registry. Eur Heart J. 2016;37:2465–74.
Mazzone P, Guarracini F, Regazzoli D, Danna P, Molon G, Saccà S, et al. Rationale and design of TRAPS (Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Italian Multicenter Registry) study. Exp Clin Cardiol. 2014;20:3367–74.
Reddy VY, Holmes D, Doshi SK, Neuzil P, Kar S. Safety of percutaneous left atrial appendage closure: results from the Watchman Left Atrial Appendage System for Embolic Protection in Patients with AF (PROTECT AF) clinical trial and the Continued Access Registry. Circulation. 2011;123:417–24.
Tzikas A, Shakir S, Gafoor S, Omran H, Berti S, Santoro G, et al. Left atrial appendage occlusion for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: multicentre experience with the AMPLATZER Cardiac Plug. EuroIntervention. 2016;11:1170–9.
Sharma D, Reddy VY, Sandri M, Schulz P, Majunke N, Hala P, et al. Left Atrial Appendage Closure in patients with contraindications to oral anticoagulation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67:2190–2.
Boersma LV, Ince H, Kische S, Pokushalov E, Schmitz T, Schmidt B, et al. Efficacy and safety of left atrial appendage closure with WATCHMAN in patients with or without contraindication to oral anticoagulation: 1-year follow-up outcome data of the EWOLUTION trial. Heart Rhythm. 2017;14:1302–8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mazzone, P., D’Angelo, G., Regazzoli, D. et al. Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure with WATCHMAN™ device: peri-procedural and mid-term outcomes from the TRAPS Registry. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 52, 47–52 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-018-0351-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-018-0351-1