Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

New technology in electrophysiology: FDA process and perspective

  • Published:
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is a large regulatory agency that monitors everything from food, tobacco, and veterinary medicine to pharmaceutical drugs and medical devices. The Mission statement of the CDRH, one of the Centers of the FDA, in its most succinct form is to protect and promote public health. This is accomplished through timely and continued access to safe, effective, and high quality medical devices. This paper aims to review the overarching principles of the Agency’s review process for cardiac devices as well as highlight some of the newer programs that FDA has engaged in to facilitate innovation, device development, research, and timely market approval.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Information sheet guidance for IRBs, clinical investigators, and sponsors. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/RegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM127067.pdf

  2. Requests for feedback on medical device submissions: the pre-submission program and meetings with Food and Drug Administration staff. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/medicaldevices/deviceregulationandguidance/guidancedocuments/ucm311176.pdf

  3. Code of federal regulations Title 21, Food and drugs, Chapter 9, Subchapter X, section 396. Practice of medicine. 21 CFR 396(9)(x).

  4. FDA decisions for investigational device exemption clinical investigations. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/medicaldevices/deviceregulationandguidance/guidancedocuments/ucm279107.pdf

  5. Code of federal regulations. Title 21. Part 812.2(c).

  6. IDE Basics, Soma Kalb Nov 4, 2014. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Training/CDRHLearn/UCM421763.pdf

  7. Code of federal regulations, Title 21 Food and drugs, Volume 8, Chapter I, Subchapter H, Part 812. Investigational device exemptions.

  8. Code of federal regulations. Title 21. CFR 812.3(m).

  9. Code of federal regulations. Title 21. CFR 812.2(b).

  10. Code of federal regulations. Title 21. Food and drugs, Chapter I, Subchapter H, part 814. Premarket approval of medical devices. Humanitarian use devices.

  11. Guidance for HDE holders, institutional review boards (IRBs), clinical investigators, and Food and Drug Administration staff. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/ucm110203.pdf

  12. CDRH video broadcast January 20, 2010. http://inside.fda.gov:9003/cdrh/officeofthedirector/ucm198536.htm

  13. Medical device innovation initiative white paper February 2011. http://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/CentersOffices/OfficeofMedicalProductsandTobacco/CDRH/CDRHInnovation/ucm242067.htm

  14. 2014–2015 strategic priorities, CDRH, FDA, HHS. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/aboutfda/centersoffices/officeofmedicalproductsandtobacco/cdrh/cdrhvisionandmission/ucm384576.pdf

  15. Investigational device exemptions (IDEs) for early feasibility medical device clinical studies, including certain first in human (FIH) studies. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/medicaldevices/deviceregulationand%20guidance/guidancedocuments/ucm279103.pdf

  16. Expedited access for premarket approval and de novo medical devices intended for unmet medical need for life threatening or irreversibly debilitating diseases or conditions. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/UCM393978.pdf

  17. http://mdic.org/ctir/ [website for Medical Device Innovation Consortium, Clinical Trial Innovation and Reform]

  18. De novo classification process (evaluation of automatic class III designation). http://www.fda.gov/downloads/medicaldevices/deviceregulationandguidance/guidancedocuments/ucm273903.pdf

  19. Factors to consider when making benefit-risk determinations in medical device premarket approval and de novo classifications. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/UCM296379.pdf

  20. Balancing premarket and postmarket data collection for devices subject to premarket approval. http://www.fda.gov/ucm/groups/fdagov-public/@fdagov-meddev-gen/documents/document/ucm393994.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kimberly A. Selzman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Selzman, K.A., Fellman, M., Farb, A. et al. New technology in electrophysiology: FDA process and perspective. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 47, 11–18 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-016-0127-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-016-0127-4

Keywords

Navigation