Skip to main content
Log in

Use of vascular closure device is safe and effective in electrophysiological procedures

  • Published:
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Little is known about the usefulness and safety of vascular closure devices (VCDs) in electrophysiological procedures. We present a retrospective analysis of our experience assessing the utility and outcomes of collagen vascular closure device (Angioseal) in patients that required periprocedural anticoagulation and multiple vascular access sites.

Methods

An retrospective chart review of patients who have undergone the deployment of VCD following electrophysiological procedures.

Results

In 26 patients (16 males, age 57 ± 15 years, weight 96 ± 21 kg), a total of 76 VCD were deployed. Seventy-three VCDs in femoral veins (right or left) and three in femoral artery. The mean number of VCD per patient was 3 (range, 2–4). VCD was successfully deployed in 75 out of 76 access sites. One patient was noted to have ecchymosis in both groins during follow-up visit. No other complications were noted.

Conclusions

We provide evidence that a collagen plug-based VCD designed for arterial closure can be safely and effectively used to close multiple venous accesses even in the same vein. This can be accomplished with a venotomy size up to 2 Fr larger than the size of the closure device.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dangas, G., Mehran, R., Kokolis, S., Feldman, D., Satler, L. F., Pichard, A. D., et al. (2001). Vascular complications after percutaneous coronary interventions following hemostasis with manual compression versus arteriotomy closure devices. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 38(3), 638–641.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Resnic, F. S., Blake, G. J., Ohno-Machado, L., Selwyn, A. P., Popma, J. J., & Rogers, C. (2001). Vascular closure devices and the risk of vascular complications after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients receiving glycoprotein IIb-IIIa inhibitors. American Journal of Cardiology, 88(5), 493–496.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Coto, H. A. (2002). Closure of the femoral vein puncture site after transcatheter procedures using Angio-Seal. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 55(1), 16–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Shaw, J. A., Dewire, E., Nugent, A., & Eisenhauer, A. C. (2004). Use of suture-mediated vascular closure devices for the management of femoral vein access after transcatheter procedures. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 63(4), 439–443.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hamid, T., Rajagopal, R., Pius, C., Clarke, B., & Mahadevan, V. S. (2013). Preclosure of large-sized venous access sites in adults undergoing transcatheter structural interventions. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 81(4), 586–590.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Srivatsa, S. S., Srivatsa, A., & Spangler, T. A. (2015). Mynx vascular closure device achieves reliable closure and hemostasis of percutaneous transfemoral venous access in a porcine vascular model. Journal of Invasive Cardiology, 27(2), 121–127.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bangard, C., Chang, D. H., Libicher, M., Bovenschulte, H., Kochanek, M., Reuter, H., et al. (2013). Misplacement of central venous catheters in the subclavian artery: Safe retrieval with a percutaneous closure device (AngioSeal). Röfo, 185(6), 546–549.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mylonas, I., Sakata, Y., Salinger, M., Sanborn, T. A., & Feldman, T. (2006). The use of percutaneous suture-mediated closure for the management of 14 French femoral venous access. Journal of Invasive Cardiology, 18(7), 299–302.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chu, Y. Q., Cai, L. J., Jiang, D. C., Jia, D., Yan, S. Y., & Wang, Y. Q. (2010). Allergic shock and death associated with protamine administration in a diabetic patient. Clinical Therapeutics, 32(10), 1729–1732.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chilukuri, K., Henrikson, C. A., Dalal, D., Scherr, D., MacPherson, E. C., Cheng, A., et al. (2009). Incidence and outcomes of protamine reactions in patients undergoing catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 25(3), 175–181.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adam S. Budzikowski.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Maraj, I., Budzikowski, A.S., Ali, W. et al. Use of vascular closure device is safe and effective in electrophysiological procedures. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 43, 193–195 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-015-0005-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-015-0005-5

Keywords

Navigation