Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

New insights into typical atrial flutter ablation: extra-isthmus activation time on the flutter wave is predictive of extra-isthmus conduction time after isthmus block

  • Published:
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Catheter ablation of typical atrial flutter (AFl) is succesful if double electrograms on the ablation line are widely separated. Nevertheless, a small interval may also be compatible with complete isthmus block. Predicting such a situation may avoid useless additionnal radiofrequency (RF) applications. We postulated that measuring the extra-isthmus activation time (EIAT) on the counterclockwise (CCW) flutter wave is correlated with the extra-isthmus conduction time after a proven block.

Methods

Files of 76 patients (71 males, 71 ± 12 years) ablated for typical CCW AFl were reviewed. Ten had 2/1 conduction prohibiting reliable measurement. Three patients with proven crista terminalis shunt were also excluded. In the remaining 63 patients, EIAT was measured on the surface ECG before the first RF pulse from the beginning of the negative deflection of the F wave in lead III to the end of the positive deflection (or beginning of the plateau). After successful ablation and completion of block, right atrial (RA) CCW (during low septal pacing), and clockwise (CW) (during low lateral pacing) activation times were measured.

Results

Flutter cycle length was 247 ± 34 ms and EIAT was 142 ± 25 ms. A bidirectionnal isthmus block was obtained in all patients after an RF delivery time of 623 ± 546 s. At a pacing cycle length of 681 ± 71 ms, RA CCW and CW activation times were 147 ± 23 and 139 ± 26 ms, respectively. There was a good correlation between EIA, RA CCW (r = 0.75, p < 0.0001), and CW (r = 0.69, p = 0.0002) activation times.

Conclusion

EIAT on the flutter wave is an easy and feasible measure. It is correlated with extra-isthmus RA conduction time after block completion. EIAT can be used as a measure to predict the post cavo-tricuspid isthmus block RA activation time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AIRA:

Antero-inferior right atrium

AFl:

Atrial flutter

CCW:

Counterclockwise

CS:

Coronary sinus

CTI:

Cavo-tricuspid isthmus

CW:

Clockwise

EIAT:

Extra-isthmus activation time

RA:

Right atrium

RF:

Radiofrequency

References

  1. Saoudi, N., Cosío, F., Waldo, A., Chen, S. A., Iesaka, Y., Lesh, M., et al. (2001). A classification of atrial flutter and regular atrial tachycardia according to electrophysiological mechanisms and anatomical bases; a statement from a Joint Expert Group from The Working Group of Arrhythmias of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. European Heart Journal, 22, 1162–1182.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Blomström-Lundqvist, C., Scheinman, M. M., Aliot, E. M., Alpert, J. S., Calkins, H., Camm, A. J., et al. (2003). ACC/AHA/ESC guidelines for the management of patients with supraventricular arrhythmias-executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Develop Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Supraventricular Arrhythmias). Circulation, 108, 1871–1909.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Schwartzman, D., Callans, D. J., Gottlieb, C. D., Dillon, S. M., Movsowitz, C., & Marchlinski, F. E. (1996). Conduction block in the inferior vena caval-tricuspid valve isthmus: association with outcome of radiofrequency ablation of type I atrial flutter. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 28, 1519–1531.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Saoudi, N., Ricard, P., Rinaldi, J. P., Yaïci, K., Darmon, J. P., & Anselme, F. (2005). Methods to determine bidirectional block of the cavotricuspid isthmus in radiofrequency ablation of typical atrial flutter. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 16, 801–803.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tada, H., Oral, H., Sticherling, C., Chough, S. P., Baker, R. L., Wasmer, K., et al. (2001). Double potentials along the ablation line as a guide to radiofrequency ablation of typical atrial flutter. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 38, 750–755.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Puech, P., Latour, H., & Grolleau, R. (1997). Le flutter et ses limites. Archives des Maladies du Coeur, 63, 116–144.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Saoudi, N., Nair, M., Abdelazziz, A., Poty, H., Daou, A., Anselme, F., et al. (1996). Electrocardiographic patterns and results of radiofrequency catheter ablation of clockwise type I atrial flutter. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 7, 931–942.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ndrepepa, G., Zrenner, B., Deisenhofer, I., Karch, M., Schneider, M., Schreieck, J., et al. (2000). Relationship between surface electrocardiogram characteristics and endocardial activation sequence in patients with typical atrial flutter. Zeitschrift für Kardiologie, 89, 527–537.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bernstein, N. E., Sandler, D. A., Goh, M., Feigenblum, D. Y., Holmes, D. S., & Chinitz, L. A. (2004). Why a sawtooth? Inferences on the generation of the flutter wave during typical atrial flutter drawn from radiofrequency ablation. Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology, 9, 358–361.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Oral, H., Sticherling, C., Tada, H., Chough, S. P., Baker, R. L., Wasmer, K., et al. (2001). Role of transisthmus conduction intervals in predicting bidirectional block after ablation of typical atrial flutter. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 12, 169–174.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Tai, C. T., Haque, A., Lin, Y. K., Tsao, H. M., Ding, Y. A., Chang, M. S., et al. (2002). Double potential interval and transisthmus conduction time for prediction of cavotricuspid isthmus block after ablation of typical atrial flutter. Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 7, 77–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ren, X., Lu, S., Guo, C., Chen, L., Liu, H., Tian, R., et al. (2003). Evaluation of transisthmus conduction interval in predicting bidirectional block after ablation of typical atrial flutter. Chinese Medical Journal, 116, 1770–1772.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Reis-Santos, K., Adragão, P., Aguiar, C., Cavaco, D., Morgado, F., Raposo, L., et al. (2004). Atrial flutter ablation: correlation between isthmic activation times and flutter cycle. Revista Portuguesa de Cardiologia, 23, 533–544.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Shah, D. C., Takahashi, A., Jaïs, P., Hocini, M., Clémenty, J., & Haïssaguerre, M. (1999). Local electrogram-based criteria of cavotricuspid isthmus block. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 10, 662–669.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bazan, V., Martí-Almor, J., Perez-Rodon, J., Bruguera, J., Gerstenfeld, E. P., Callans, D. J., et al. (2010). Incremental pacing for the diagnosis of complete cavotricuspid isthmus block during radiofrequency ablation of atrial flutter. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 21, 33–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Pastor, A., Núñez, A., Guzzo, G., de Diego, C., & Cosío, F. G. (2010). A simple pacing method to diagnose postero-anterior (clockwise) cavo-tricuspid isthmus block after radiofrequency ablation. Europace, 12, 1290–1295.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Anselme, F., Savoure, A., Cribier, A., & Saoudi, N. (2001). Catheter ablation of typical atrial flutter. A randomized comparison of 2 methods for determining complete bidirectionnal isthmus block. Circulation, 103, 1434–1439.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Heidbüchel, H., Willems, R., van Rensburg, H., Adams, J., Ector, H., & Van de Werf, F. (2000). Right atrial angiographic evaluation of the posterior isthmus: relevance for ablation of typical atrial flutter. Circulation, 101, 2178–2184.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Da Costa, A., Faure, E., Thévenin, J., Messier, M., Bernard, S., Abdel, K., et al. (2004). Effect of isthmus anatomy and ablation catheter on radiofrequency catheter ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus. Circulation, 110, 1030–1035.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Cheng, J., Cabeen, W. R., Jr., & Scheinman, M. M. (1999). Right atrial flutter due to lower loop reentry: mechanism and anatomic substrates. Circulation, 99, 1700–1705.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Maury, P., Duparc, A., Hebrard, A., El, B. M., & Delay, M. (2008). Prevalence of typical atrial flutter with reentry circuit posterior to the superior vena cava: use of entrainment at the atrial roof. Europace, 10, 190–196.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Krishnan, K., Gupta, A., Halleran, S. M., Chawla, D., Avery, E. F., Bienias, J. L., et al. (2009). Isthmus dependent atrial flutter cycle length correlates with right atrial cross-sectional area. Indian Pacing and Electrophysiol Journal, 9, 167–173.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre Hospitalier Princesse Grace, Avenue Pasteur, 98000, Monaco

    Decebal Gabriel Latcu, Sok-Sithikun Bun, Mathieu Arnoult, Philippe Ricard, Jean-Paul Rinaldi & Nadir Saoudi

Authors
  1. Decebal Gabriel Latcu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sok-Sithikun Bun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mathieu Arnoult
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Philippe Ricard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jean-Paul Rinaldi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Nadir Saoudi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Decebal Gabriel Latcu.

Additional information

Editorial Commentary

This study provides a supplemental approach to assessing effectiveness of isthmus block in typical atrial flutter ablation by measuring the extra-isthmus conduction time (EIAT). EIAT during flutter correlates well with EIAT during pacing after RF completion and suggests absence of conduction leak across the isthmus.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Latcu, D.G., Bun, SS., Arnoult, M. et al. New insights into typical atrial flutter ablation: extra-isthmus activation time on the flutter wave is predictive of extra-isthmus conduction time after isthmus block. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 36, 19–25 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-012-9729-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-012-9729-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation