Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Remote robotic catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: how fast is it learned and what benefits can be earned?

  • Published:
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Recently, results describing pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) on patients using a robotic navigation system (RNS) in a high-volume center specialized in pulmonary vein isolation were published. The main purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate the learning curve of new users of RNS in a community hospital and to address the effectivity of RNS in electrophysiological settings with fewer patients. Radiation times, procedural times, feasibility, and safety with the RNS were assessed.

Methods

PVI using the RNS was performed on 100 consecutive patients with symptomatic paroxysmal (n = 56, 56%) or persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). To assess the learning curve of practitioners with first-time use of RNS, patients were divided into four groups of 25 patients each (Q1–Q4). Procedural times as well as radiation times, complications, and outcome after a 6-month follow-up period were assessed for each quartile. All patients were ablated by the same physician.

Results

Comparing the four patient groups, a continuous and significant reduction of procedural and radiation times was seen in the first 75 patients (Q1–Q3), whereas no further improvement was seen in the consecutive patients (Q3–Q4). One pericardial tamponade occurred in the course of 100 patients (1%). Overall success rate after a 6-month follow-up period was 74% in patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF. Comparing the four quartiles there was a higher but non-significant number of patients with freedom of atrial fibrillation after a 6-month follow-up in the subsequent groups (Q2–Q4) when compared to group 1.

Conclusions

This data suggest that RNS is feasible and safe when performed in a community hospital with a significant reduction of radiation times and procedure times within the first 75 patients and with similar success and complication rates as compared to high-volume centers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Marrouche, N. F., Dresing, T., Cole, C., Bash, D., Saad, E., Balaban, K., et al. (2002). Circular mapping and ablation of the pulmonary vein for treatment of atrial fibrillation: Impact of different catheter technologies. J Am Coll Cardiol, 40, 464–474. 4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Pappone, C., Oreto, G., Rosanio, S., Vicedomini, G., Tocchi, M., Gugliotta, F., et al. (2001). Atrial electroanatomical remodeling after circumferential radiofrequency pulmonary vein ablation: Efficacy of an anatomic approach in a large cohort of patients with atrial fibrillation. Circulation, 104, 2539–2544.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Reddy, V. Y., Neuzil, P., Malchano, Z. J., Vijaykumar, R., Cury, R., Abbara, S., et al. (2007). View-synchronized robotic image-guided therapy for atrial fibrillation ablation: Experimental validation and clinical feasibility. Circulation, 115(21), 2705–2714.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kanagaratnam, P., Koa-Wing, M., Wallace, D. T., Goldenberg, A. S., Peters, N. S., & Davies, D. W. (2008). Experience of robotic catheter ablation in humans using a novel remotely steerable catheter sheath. Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 21(1), 19–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Schmidt, B., Tilz, R., Kars Neven, K., Chun, K. R., Fuernkranz, A., & Ouyang, F. (2009). Remote robotic navigation and electroanatomical mapping for ablation of atrial fibrillation. Considerations for navigation and impact on procedural outcome. Circ Arrhythmia Electrophysiol, 2, 120–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Saliba, W., Reddy, V. Y., Wazni, O., Cummings, J. E., Burkhardt, J. D., Haissaguerre, M., et al. (2008). Atrial fibrillation ablation using a robotic catheter remote control system: Initial human experience and long-term follow-up results. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 51(25), 2407–2411.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kautzner, J., Peichl, P., Cihák, R., Wichterle, D., & Mlcochová, H. (2009). Early experience with robotic navigation for catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 32(Suppl 1), S163–S166.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. DI Biase, L., Wang, Y., Horton, R., Gallinghouse, G. J., Mohanty, P., Sanchez, J., et al. (2009). Ablation of atrial fibrillation utilizing robotic catheter navigation in comparison to manual navigation and ablation: Single-center experience. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 20(12), 1328–1335.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rillig, A., Meyerfeldt, U., Kunze, M., Birkemeyer, R., Miljak, T., Jäckle, S., et al. (2010). Persistent iatrogenic atrial septal defect after a single-puncture, double-transseptal approach for pulmonary vein isolation using a remote robotic navigation system: Results from a prospective study. Europace, 12(3), 331–336.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. O'Neill, M. D., Jaïs, P., Takahashi, Y., Jönsson, A., Sacher, F., Hocini, M., et al. (2006). The stepwise ablation approach for chronic atrial fibrillation—Evidence for a cumulative effect. Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 16(3), 153–167. Review.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hocini, M., Jaïs, P., Sanders, P., Takahashi, Y., Rotter, M., Rostock, T., et al. (2005). Techniques, evaluation, and consequences of linear block at the left atrial roof in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: A prospective randomized study. Circulation, 112(24), 3688–3696.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Jaïs, P., Hocini, M., Hsu, L. F., Sanders, P., Scavee, C., Weerasooriya, R., et al. (2004). Technique and results of linear ablation at the mitral isthmus. Circulation, 110(19), 2996–3002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA); European Cardiac Arrhythmia Scoiety (ECAS); American College of Cardiology (ACC); American Heart Association (AHA); Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS), Calkins, H., Brugada, J., Packer, D.L., Cappato, R., Chen, S.A., Crijns, H.J., Damiano, R.J. Jr., et al. (2007). HRS/EHRA/ECAS expert Consensus Statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: recommendations for personnel, policy, procedures and follow-up. A report of the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) Task Force on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm, 4(6):816–861.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Koa-Wing, M., Willis, B., Bowden, S., Salukhe, T.V., Lim, P.B., Linton, N.W.F., Kojodjojo, P., et al. (2008). Learning Experience for Robotically-Assisted Atrial Fibrillation Ablation from an Early Adopting Site. Europace, 10(supplement 2), abstract.

  15. DI Biase, L., Natale, A., Barrett, C., Tan, C., Elayi, C. S., Ching, C. K., et al. (2009). Relationship between catheter forces, lesion characteristics, "Popping," and char formation: Experience with robotic navigation system. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 20(4), 436–440.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Okumura, Y., Johnson, S. B., Bunch, T. J., Henz, B. D., O'Brien, C. J., & Packer, D. L. (2008). A systematical analysis of in vivo contact forces on virtual catheter tip/tissue surface contact during cardiac mapping and intervention. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 19, 632–640.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Cardiology, Schwarzwald-Baar-Klinikum Villingen-Schwenningen, Academic Hospital of the University of Freiburg, Vöhrenbacherstr, 23, 78050, Villingen-Schwenningen, Germany

    Andreas Rillig, Udo Meyerfeldt, Ralf Birkemeyer, Fabian Treusch, Markus Kunze, Tomislav Miljak, Vlada Zvereva & Werner Jung

Authors
  1. Andreas Rillig
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Udo Meyerfeldt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ralf Birkemeyer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Fabian Treusch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Markus Kunze
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Tomislav Miljak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Vlada Zvereva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Werner Jung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreas Rillig.

Additional information

Andreas Rillig and Udo Meyerfeldt contributed equally.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rillig, A., Meyerfeldt, U., Birkemeyer, R. et al. Remote robotic catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: how fast is it learned and what benefits can be earned?. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 29, 109–117 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-010-9510-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-010-9510-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation