Remote robotic catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: how fast is it learned and what benefits can be earned?

  • Andreas Rillig
  • Udo Meyerfeldt
  • Ralf Birkemeyer
  • Fabian Treusch
  • Markus Kunze
  • Tomislav Miljak
  • Vlada Zvereva
  • Werner Jung
Article

Abstract

Introduction

Recently, results describing pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) on patients using a robotic navigation system (RNS) in a high-volume center specialized in pulmonary vein isolation were published. The main purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate the learning curve of new users of RNS in a community hospital and to address the effectivity of RNS in electrophysiological settings with fewer patients. Radiation times, procedural times, feasibility, and safety with the RNS were assessed.

Methods

PVI using the RNS was performed on 100 consecutive patients with symptomatic paroxysmal (n = 56, 56%) or persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). To assess the learning curve of practitioners with first-time use of RNS, patients were divided into four groups of 25 patients each (Q1–Q4). Procedural times as well as radiation times, complications, and outcome after a 6-month follow-up period were assessed for each quartile. All patients were ablated by the same physician.

Results

Comparing the four patient groups, a continuous and significant reduction of procedural and radiation times was seen in the first 75 patients (Q1–Q3), whereas no further improvement was seen in the consecutive patients (Q3–Q4). One pericardial tamponade occurred in the course of 100 patients (1%). Overall success rate after a 6-month follow-up period was 74% in patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF. Comparing the four quartiles there was a higher but non-significant number of patients with freedom of atrial fibrillation after a 6-month follow-up in the subsequent groups (Q2–Q4) when compared to group 1.

Conclusions

This data suggest that RNS is feasible and safe when performed in a community hospital with a significant reduction of radiation times and procedure times within the first 75 patients and with similar success and complication rates as compared to high-volume centers.

Keywords

Remote robotic catheter ablation Atrial fibrillation Pulmonary vein isolation Learning experience Catheter ablation 

References

  1. 1.
    Marrouche, N. F., Dresing, T., Cole, C., Bash, D., Saad, E., Balaban, K., et al. (2002). Circular mapping and ablation of the pulmonary vein for treatment of atrial fibrillation: Impact of different catheter technologies. J Am Coll Cardiol, 40, 464–474. 4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pappone, C., Oreto, G., Rosanio, S., Vicedomini, G., Tocchi, M., Gugliotta, F., et al. (2001). Atrial electroanatomical remodeling after circumferential radiofrequency pulmonary vein ablation: Efficacy of an anatomic approach in a large cohort of patients with atrial fibrillation. Circulation, 104, 2539–2544.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Reddy, V. Y., Neuzil, P., Malchano, Z. J., Vijaykumar, R., Cury, R., Abbara, S., et al. (2007). View-synchronized robotic image-guided therapy for atrial fibrillation ablation: Experimental validation and clinical feasibility. Circulation, 115(21), 2705–2714.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kanagaratnam, P., Koa-Wing, M., Wallace, D. T., Goldenberg, A. S., Peters, N. S., & Davies, D. W. (2008). Experience of robotic catheter ablation in humans using a novel remotely steerable catheter sheath. Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 21(1), 19–26.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schmidt, B., Tilz, R., Kars Neven, K., Chun, K. R., Fuernkranz, A., & Ouyang, F. (2009). Remote robotic navigation and electroanatomical mapping for ablation of atrial fibrillation. Considerations for navigation and impact on procedural outcome. Circ Arrhythmia Electrophysiol, 2, 120–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Saliba, W., Reddy, V. Y., Wazni, O., Cummings, J. E., Burkhardt, J. D., Haissaguerre, M., et al. (2008). Atrial fibrillation ablation using a robotic catheter remote control system: Initial human experience and long-term follow-up results. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 51(25), 2407–2411.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kautzner, J., Peichl, P., Cihák, R., Wichterle, D., & Mlcochová, H. (2009). Early experience with robotic navigation for catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 32(Suppl 1), S163–S166.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    DI Biase, L., Wang, Y., Horton, R., Gallinghouse, G. J., Mohanty, P., Sanchez, J., et al. (2009). Ablation of atrial fibrillation utilizing robotic catheter navigation in comparison to manual navigation and ablation: Single-center experience. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 20(12), 1328–1335.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rillig, A., Meyerfeldt, U., Kunze, M., Birkemeyer, R., Miljak, T., Jäckle, S., et al. (2010). Persistent iatrogenic atrial septal defect after a single-puncture, double-transseptal approach for pulmonary vein isolation using a remote robotic navigation system: Results from a prospective study. Europace, 12(3), 331–336.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    O'Neill, M. D., Jaïs, P., Takahashi, Y., Jönsson, A., Sacher, F., Hocini, M., et al. (2006). The stepwise ablation approach for chronic atrial fibrillation—Evidence for a cumulative effect. Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 16(3), 153–167. Review.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hocini, M., Jaïs, P., Sanders, P., Takahashi, Y., Rotter, M., Rostock, T., et al. (2005). Techniques, evaluation, and consequences of linear block at the left atrial roof in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: A prospective randomized study. Circulation, 112(24), 3688–3696.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jaïs, P., Hocini, M., Hsu, L. F., Sanders, P., Scavee, C., Weerasooriya, R., et al. (2004). Technique and results of linear ablation at the mitral isthmus. Circulation, 110(19), 2996–3002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA); European Cardiac Arrhythmia Scoiety (ECAS); American College of Cardiology (ACC); American Heart Association (AHA); Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS), Calkins, H., Brugada, J., Packer, D.L., Cappato, R., Chen, S.A., Crijns, H.J., Damiano, R.J. Jr., et al. (2007). HRS/EHRA/ECAS expert Consensus Statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: recommendations for personnel, policy, procedures and follow-up. A report of the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) Task Force on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm, 4(6):816–861.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Koa-Wing, M., Willis, B., Bowden, S., Salukhe, T.V., Lim, P.B., Linton, N.W.F., Kojodjojo, P., et al. (2008). Learning Experience for Robotically-Assisted Atrial Fibrillation Ablation from an Early Adopting Site. Europace, 10(supplement 2), abstract.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    DI Biase, L., Natale, A., Barrett, C., Tan, C., Elayi, C. S., Ching, C. K., et al. (2009). Relationship between catheter forces, lesion characteristics, "Popping," and char formation: Experience with robotic navigation system. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 20(4), 436–440.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Okumura, Y., Johnson, S. B., Bunch, T. J., Henz, B. D., O'Brien, C. J., & Packer, D. L. (2008). A systematical analysis of in vivo contact forces on virtual catheter tip/tissue surface contact during cardiac mapping and intervention. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 19, 632–640.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andreas Rillig
    • 1
  • Udo Meyerfeldt
    • 1
  • Ralf Birkemeyer
    • 1
  • Fabian Treusch
    • 1
  • Markus Kunze
    • 1
  • Tomislav Miljak
    • 1
  • Vlada Zvereva
    • 1
  • Werner Jung
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Cardiology, Schwarzwald-Baar-Klinikum Villingen-SchwenningenAcademic Hospital of the University of FreiburgVillingen-SchwenningenGermany

Personalised recommendations