Skip to main content
Log in

Guidelines and the growing service burden

  • Persepectives
  • Published:
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Burke, P. T., Ghanbari, H., Alexander, P. B., Shaw, M. K., Daccarett, M., Machado, C. (2010). A protocol for patients with cardiovascular implantable devices undergoing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): should defibrillation threshold testing be performed post-(MRI). Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology 2010 Jan 29.

  2. Levine, G. N., Gomes, A. S., Arai, A. E., Bluemke, D. A., Flamm, S. D., Kanal, E., et al. (2007). Safety of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiovascular devices: an American Heart Association scientific statement from the Committee on Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiac Catheterization, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention: endorsed by the American College of Cardiology Foundation, the North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. Circulation, 116(24), 2878–2891.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gimbel, J. R. (2008). The AHA Scientific Statement of MRI in patients with devices: neat, but incomplete. Unwise and unsupported. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 31(6), 649–651.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sandler, D. A., Coman, J. A., Auerbach, E. G., Martin, E. T. (2006). Magnetic resonance imaging of patients with pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in a 1.5-tesla magnet: a five-year experience. Heart Rhythm Society, 27th Annual Scientific Sessions. Boston, MA, USA (Abstract).

  5. Sandler, D. A., Coman, J. A., Auerbach, E. G., Martin, E. T. (2006). Magnetic resonance imaging of patients with pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in a 1.5-tesla magnet: a five-year experience. Heart Rhythm Society, 27th Annual Scientific Sessions. Boston, MA, USA (Oral Presentation).

  6. Roguin, A., Zivmen, M., Meininger, G., et al. (2004). Modern pacemaker and implantable cardioverter/defibrillator systems can be magnetic resonance imaging safe: in vitro and in vivo assessment of safety and function at 1.5 T. Circulation, 110(5), 475–482.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Medicare National Coverage Determinations Manual; Chapter 1, Part 4 (Sections 200–310.1) Coverage Determinations: Rev 65, 02-23-07 http://www.cms.hhs.gov/manuals/downloads/ncd103c1_Part4.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Rod Gimbel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gimbel, J.R. Guidelines and the growing service burden. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 28, 83–85 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-010-9480-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-010-9480-x

Navigation